I read much marketing meaningless babble (like "the internet of blockchains"), but not much subtance or technical details...
could you please explain for one use case, from the beginning to the end, how would this work?
e.g. let's say I want to send money using SMS, a feature from XST, while I hold some other thing, let's say APEX. Coins would be automagically exchanged? how? what currency does the service provider receive? can the receiver of the SMS receive other currency than XST? how?
the xbridge api would have a method for each possible service? so it would have to be updated every time a new service is added... otherwise... how would it work?
Is the coding of the exchange and the xbridge api finished? When would this be deployed? right after the ITO?
thanks!
Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 447. (Read 1103311 times)
October 23, 2014, 11:45:47 AM
October 23, 2014, 11:41:00 AM
Coins Source features the Blocknet!
http://www.coinssource.com/the-blocknet-the-internet-blockchains-launches-unite-all-blockchains-together/
October 23, 2014, 11:26:44 AM
No Blackcoin? Fail
October 23, 2014, 11:24:21 AM
synechist, I PM you. Please check
October 23, 2014, 11:22:53 AM
Quote
joebob999, it is deceitful to make out that revelation (or you, for that matter) is speaking "objectively".
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
I was speaking specifically to where the (more) objective audience (those who are willing to tolerate open free speech about a subject) can be found.
Bringing God into the subject as the only one who can be objective, and bringing manners up to try and defend censoring relevant talking points (not pure trolling) is cute. You are good at re-directing into a philosophical debate to take focus off the issue at hand. No doubt you have a collection of Fedoras, roast your own coffee, buy organic & like raw tea so kudos to you smartie pants.
I'm more of a cigar, whiskey & bottom line type of guy with a nose for bullshit who doesn't care for practical discussions being sidetracked by pointless philosophical talking points.
Just wanted to point out, that Claiming someone is re-directing the conversation by singling out a single word that is used as a metaphor to use as a definition for objective, is in itself re-directing the conversation entirely.............
October 23, 2014, 11:11:16 AM
Quote
joebob999, it is deceitful to make out that revelation (or you, for that matter) is speaking "objectively".
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
I was speaking specifically to where the (more) objective audience (those who are willing to tolerate open free speech about a subject) can be found.
Bringing God into the subject as the only one who can be objective, and bringing manners in to try and defend censoring speech is cute. You are good at re-directing speech into a philosophical debate to take focus off the issue at hand. So kudos to you smartie pants. No doubt you have a collection of Fedoras, roast your own coffee beans, buy organic & like raw tea so kudos to you.
I'm more of a cigar, whiskey & bottom line type of guy.
Funny you should suggest all that.
I'm a trilby guy rather than a fedora, I buy single origin coffee beans (already roasted, alas!), and forego organic/raw/whatever for Islay single malts. Bit of a mixture then.
As for re-directing speech to take focus off the issue at hand, the issue at hand is respect for others and constructive discourse.
I'm sure you'd agree that constructive discourse requires being critical. There's no point without critical thought and constructive criticism.
But that's not what I've been getting from either Revelation or you on the XC thread. I can't say your intentions are bad, since I'm not privy to them, but I can say that in contrast to Revelation you're quite capable of critical thought, but you have these a priori opinions - highly negative towards XC - that you import into a discussion and aren't up for negotiation. To do this is to not respect one of the requirements for constructive discourse: speaking in a manner that bears constructively upon the perspective of the other people involved. And to do this, you need to respect others - or more specifically, to be empathetic.
This is the issue at hand. It's the position you take up against the community. You don't come alongside them, you talk at them.
+ 1000
October 23, 2014, 10:56:33 AM
Quote
joebob999, it is deceitful to make out that revelation (or you, for that matter) is speaking "objectively".
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
I was speaking specifically to where the (more) objective audience (those who are willing to tolerate open free speech about a subject) can be found.
Bringing God into the subject as the only one who can be objective, and bringing manners in to try and defend censoring speech is cute. You are good at re-directing speech into a philosophical debate to take focus off the issue at hand. So kudos to you smartie pants. No doubt you have a collection of Fedoras, roast your own coffee beans, buy organic & like raw tea so kudos to you.
I'm more of a cigar, whiskey & bottom line type of guy.
Funny you should suggest all that.
I'm a trilby guy rather than a fedora, I buy single origin coffee beans (already roasted, alas!), and forego organic/raw/whatever for Islay single malts. Bit of a mixture then.
As for re-directing speech to take focus off the issue at hand, the issue at hand is respect for others and constructive discourse.
I'm sure you'd agree that constructive discourse requires being critical. There's no point without critical thought and constructive criticism.
But that's not what I've been getting from either Revelation or you on the XC thread. I can't say your intentions are bad, since I'm not privy to them, but I can say that in contrast to Revelation you're quite capable of critical thought, but you have these a priori opinions - highly negative towards XC - that you import into a discussion and aren't up for negotiation. To do this is to not respect one of the requirements for constructive discourse: speaking in a manner that bears constructively upon the perspective of the other people involved. And to do this, you need to respect others - or more specifically, to be empathetic.
This is the issue at hand. It's the position you take up against the community. You don't come alongside them, you talk at them.
October 23, 2014, 10:43:11 AM
Quote
joebob999, it is deceitful to make out that revelation (or you, for that matter) is speaking "objectively".
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
I was speaking specifically to where the (more) objective audience (those who are willing to tolerate open free speech about a subject) can be found.
Bringing God into the subject as the only one who can be objective, and bringing manners up to try and defend censoring relevant talking points (not pure trolling) is cute. You are good at re-directing into a philosophical debate to take focus off the issue at hand. No doubt you have a collection of Fedoras, roast your own coffee, buy organic & like raw tea so kudos to you smartie pants.
I'm more of a cigar, whiskey & bottom line type of guy with a nose for bullshit who doesn't care for practical discussions being sidetracked by pointless philosophical talking points.
October 23, 2014, 10:38:40 AM
Of all these coins who do you think is the best to invest and why?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
"SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code."
what they each bring to the table, it's upto you to decide which you would invest in
Thanks for the very well documented information, I have only invested in XC, Librex and Bitswitch....well not anynmore in XC as I am unable to withdraw them from mintpal...Any one has the same problem with XC in mintpal and what can I do to get them back?
Ask this on the XC thread. Some people figured out how to do it. :-)
October 23, 2014, 10:37:52 AM
@Revelation, your post history is a stream of abuse and negativity.
You pretty much just don't post constructive, respectful things.
Kindly be civil or leave this thread.
You pretty much just don't post constructive, respectful things.
Kindly be civil or leave this thread.
@Revelation - I would recommend this thread if you want to speak objectively, not be censored & have the audience of the entire altcoin section rather than just those who frequent the XC thread.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcurrency-xc-blocknet-community-thread-830893
joebob999, it is deceitful to make out that revelation (or you, for that matter) is speaking "objectively".
It is not an issue of objectivity, for two reasons:
- revelation is being uncivil, not specifically untruthful. It's not a matter of objectivity but of respect for others.
- people have subjective viewpoints, not objective ones. So revelation couldn't "speak objectively" if he tried. He's not God.
Finally, you've behaved utterly awfully in the XC thread. Take this to heart, because it explains why Teka banned you from it.
You'd be fooling yourself if you think of yourself as a righteous and "objective" protester against "censorship". Get a grip.
October 23, 2014, 10:35:17 AM
Of all these coins who do you think is the best to invest and why?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
"SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code."
what they each bring to the table, it's upto you to decide which you would invest in
Thanks for the very well documented information, I have only invested in XC, Librex and Bitswitch....well not anynmore in XC as I am unable to withdraw them from mintpal...Any one has the same problem with XC in mintpal and what can I do to get them back?
October 23, 2014, 10:32:34 AM
@Revelation, your post history is a stream of abuse and negativity.
You pretty much just don't post constructive, respectful things.
Kindly be civil or leave this thread.
You pretty much just don't post constructive, respectful things.
Kindly be civil or leave this thread.
@Revelation - I would recommend this thread if you want to speak objectively, not be censored & have the audience of the entire altcoin section rather than just those who frequent the XC thread.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xcurrency-xc-blocknet-community-thread-830893
October 23, 2014, 10:26:47 AM
@Revelation, your post history is a stream of abuse and negativity.
You pretty much just don't post constructive, respectful things.
Kindly be civil or leave this thread.
You pretty much just don't post constructive, respectful things.
Kindly be civil or leave this thread.
October 23, 2014, 10:06:12 AM
Of all these coins who do you think is the best to invest and why?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
Bitswift for sure. All the other looks a little crap
So....you are so friendly to call the others crap and suggesting Roscoin?
You must be trolling
October 23, 2014, 09:54:54 AM
Very cool. Just tweeted it out!
October 23, 2014, 09:52:48 AM
Thanks Synechist.
October 23, 2014, 09:48:03 AM
October 23, 2014, 09:32:06 AM
Of all these coins who do you think is the best to invest and why?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
"SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code."
what they each bring to the table, it's upto you to decide which you would invest in
nice.
well, i'm in all of them so zero fucks given!
October 23, 2014, 09:27:37 AM
Of all these coins who do you think is the best to invest and why?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
"SSD – First steganograpic anon transaction over mobile. This means that you can embed a transfer of SSD into an image that you take from your mobile and not have it traced – the image doesn’t suggest that a transaction has occurred. That is pretty freaking stout in my opinion. Development ongoing.
XST – World’s First anonymous SMS transaction. Again, a mobile transaction that is anonymous. Development ongoing (this is a theme with everyone here so I won't repeat it).
APEX – In wallet developments – everything from social networking to casinos. Aggressive dev team with an eye towards enabling web merchant transactions within their wallet.
UTIL – Content filtering to protect exit nodes from malicious and illegal content. A great business feature.
SWIFT – geoSwift, a way to GPS locate and connect sellers/buyers via mobile.
LXC – Working on BlueTooth transactions…meaning mobile transactions without internet connection. Sidechain research and implementation planned.
FIBRE – An Aggressive dev team that has already created their own OS and have integrated FibreLock (an android style password system that renders keyloggers obsolete) into a BTC Modded wallet in addition to their own.
NHZ – Asset Exchange and further expansion of NXT code."
what they each bring to the table, it's upto you to decide which you would invest in
October 23, 2014, 09:24:38 AM
Of all these coins who do you think is the best to invest and why?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
SX, Sonic, Fibre, Next Horizon, bitswitch,apex, utilitycoin, librex, stealthcoin?
Bitswift for sure. All the other looks a little crap
Thats a little harsh! I would go with Stealth or Sonic. I am using Apex to buy the tokens however.
Jump to: