Pages:
Author

Topic: ✅🔥🚀 [ANN][BOUNTY 1.5M$][ICO] ⭐ ETHEARNAL ICO 2.0 - Decentralised Freelancing ⭐ - page 23. (Read 4750 times)

full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 107
Hi guys!
I read the description of the project and I understand the idea. It's cool that there will be a single system. But do not you think that keeping 1% in the project from the wages of a freelancer is a big enough amount?

Everything depends on the total amount
1% of $ 500 = $ 5
1% of $ 1000 = $ 10
This is less than what is withheld, if we work through intermediaries. Many organizations can hold more than 50% of the wages offered by customers.

I don't understand where the withheld amount is being sent?

If the project ends successfully, then 99% of the salary goes to the freelancer. The remaining 1% is divided into 2 and is converted into the rating units. The larger this amount, the more the rating units. Thus, 0.5% of the contract amount is sent to the rating of the customer and freelancer.

It is cost to use a system where freelancer is protected and can be found by employers. And this is a slight incentive for employer for them to use this system.

And what then are the advantages of this system, if through an intermediary or through a system, if still held a percentage with  of profits?

The benefit is that it will be a single system with customers and freelancers, where everyone has their own rating. The rating formed due to the work performed and the percentage of the transaction. This rating will have its value. Thus, receiving,  losing, changing this rating will be important for each project participant.

Also in the platform will be no intermediaries. Freelancers and customers will communicate directly with each other. No one will withhold interest from the wages of a freelancer. All income will be with a freelancer.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
Hi guys!
I read the description of the project and I understand the idea. It's cool that there will be a single system. But do not you think that keeping 1% in the project from the wages of a freelancer is a big enough amount?

Everything depends on the total amount
1% of $ 500 = $ 5
1% of $ 1000 = $ 10
This is less than what is withheld, if we work through intermediaries. Many organizations can hold more than 50% of the wages offered by customers.

I don't understand where the withheld amount is being sent?

If the project ends successfully, then 99% of the salary goes to the freelancer. The remaining 1% is divided into 2 and is converted into the rating units. The larger this amount, the more the rating units. Thus, 0.5% of the contract amount is sent to the rating of the customer and freelancer.

It is cost to use a system where freelancer is protected and can be found by employers. And this is a slight incentive for employer for them to use this system.

And what then are the advantages of this system, if through an intermediary or through a system, if still held a percentage with  of profits?

The benefit is that it will be a single system with customers and freelancers, where everyone has their own rating. The rating formed due to the work performed and the percentage of the transaction. This rating will have its value. Thus, receiving,  losing, changing this rating will be important for each project participant.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 255
Hi guys!
I read the description of the project and I understand the idea. It's cool that there will be a single system. But do not you think that keeping 1% in the project from the wages of a freelancer is a big enough amount?

Everything depends on the total amount
1% of $ 500 = $ 5
1% of $ 1000 = $ 10
This is less than what is withheld, if we work through intermediaries. Many organizations can hold more than 50% of the wages offered by customers.

I don't understand where the withheld amount is being sent?

If the project ends successfully, then 99% of the salary goes to the freelancer. The remaining 1% is divided into 2 and is converted into the rating units. The larger this amount, the more the rating units. Thus, 0.5% of the contract amount is sent to the rating of the customer and freelancer.

It is cost to use a system where freelancer is protected and can be found by employers. And this is a slight incentive for employer for them to use this system.

And what then are the advantages of this system, if through an intermediary or through a system, if still held a percentage with  of profits?
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Where the withheld wages are being sent?
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
Hi guys!
I read the description of the project and I understand the idea. It's cool that there will be a single system. But do not you think that keeping 1% in the project from the wages of a freelancer is a big enough amount?

Everything depends on the total amount
1% of $ 500 = $ 5
1% of $ 1000 = $ 10
This is less than what is withheld, if we work through intermediaries. Many organizations can hold more than 50% of the wages offered by customers.

I don't understand where the withheld amount is being sent?

If the project ends successfully, then 99% of the salary goes to the freelancer. The remaining 1% is divided into 2 and is converted into the rating units. The larger this amount, the more the rating units. Thus, 0.5% of the contract amount is sent to the rating of the customer and freelancer.

It is cost to use a system where freelancer is protected and can be found by employers. And this is a slight incentive for employer for them to use this system.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 107
Hi guys!
I read the description of the project and I understand the idea. It's cool that there will be a single system. But do not you think that keeping 1% in the project from the wages of a freelancer is a big enough amount?

Everything depends on the total amount
1% of $ 500 = $ 5
1% of $ 1000 = $ 10
This is less than what is withheld, if we work through intermediaries. Many organizations can hold more than 50% of the wages offered by customers.

I don't understand where the withheld amount is being sent?

If the project ends successfully, then 99% of the salary goes to the freelancer. The remaining 1% is divided into 2 and is converted into the rating units. The larger this amount, the more the rating units. Thus, 0.5% of the contract amount is sent to the rating of the customer and freelancer.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 255
Hi guys!
I read the description of the project and I understand the idea. It's cool that there will be a single system. But do not you think that keeping 1% in the project from the wages of a freelancer is a big enough amount?

Everything depends on the total amount
1% of $ 500 = $ 5
1% of $ 1000 = $ 10
This is less than what is withheld, if we work through intermediaries. Many organizations can hold more than 50% of the wages offered by customers.

I don't understand where the withheld amount is being sent?
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 107
Hi guys!
I read the description of the project and I understand the idea. It's cool that there will be a single system. But do not you think that keeping 1% in the project from the wages of a freelancer is a big enough amount?

Everything depends on the total amount
1% of $ 500 = $ 5
1% of $ 1000 = $ 10
This is less than what is withheld, if we work through intermediaries. Many organizations can hold more than 50% of the wages offered by customers.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 255
Hi guys!
I read the description of the project and I understand the idea. It's cool that there will be a single system. But do not you think that keeping 1% in the project from the wages of a freelancer is a big enough amount?
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 253
yes, I will participate! I will be happy if you do not join too!
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
in principle, what I wanted, I found out. I think it's time to finish this. Thank you all for your advice!
  and you definitely decided that you will earn? Still, it seems like we have not all figured out about this project.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 250
in principle, what I wanted, I found out. I think it's time to finish this. Thank you all for your advice!
full member
Activity: 532
Merit: 100
agree. The work was really done very responsible and great!
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 253
I'm not quite sure of this project, but I can say in principle that everything is very good here. Creators fellows!
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
yes, indeed, missed the most important information.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 250
I understand that the difference is that usually in loyalty programs a larger percentage of the appropriation of funds.
  I remembered that I wanted to tell you something about programming. Have you studied the road map well? There is something interesting for you.
  I kind of read everything, but maybe I missed something, but what's so interesting about it? I'm even intrigued
  the commentator has in mind that in the third quarter of the year the development of the mobile platform will start. This can be useful for you. Because you can not only get on special offers, but also develop your abilities
  you forgot one more thing: in the last quarter of the year there will be an implementation of applications for phone platforms, such as iOs and Android
full member
Activity: 532
Merit: 100
I understand that the difference is that usually in loyalty programs a larger percentage of the appropriation of funds.
  I remembered that I wanted to tell you something about programming. Have you studied the road map well? There is something interesting for you.
  I kind of read everything, but maybe I missed something, but what's so interesting about it? I'm even intrigued
  the commentator has in mind that in the third quarter of the year the development of the mobile platform will start. This can be useful for you. Because you can not only get on special offers, but also develop your abilities
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I understand that the difference is that usually in loyalty programs a larger percentage of the appropriation of funds.
  I remembered that I wanted to tell you something about programming. Have you studied the road map well? There is something interesting for you.
  I kind of read everything, but maybe I missed something, but what's so interesting about it? I'm even intrigued
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
I understand that the difference is that usually in loyalty programs a larger percentage of the appropriation of funds.
  I remembered that I wanted to tell you something about programming. Have you studied the road map well? There is something interesting for you.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 253
I understand that the difference is that usually in loyalty programs a larger percentage of the appropriation of funds.
  maybe, but I'm sure that the creators know a lot about their business. usually before the introduction of a product, a marketing survey is conducted, so most likely the results of the diagrams are based on them.
Pages:
Jump to: