[ANN][CLOAK] Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digital Currency - page 83.

Duderino123

member

Activity: 119

Merit: 10

Quote from: vinnieG on November 21, 2017, 03:54:42 AM

Quote from: tradercouch on November 21, 2017, 12:44:53 AM

to be honest no one like cloakcoin and looks like its failing Sad

i am also in big lost last bought @ 0.003 levels Sad

Price is what you pay. Value is what you get - Warren Buffett. Dont relate the performance of the price to the actual potential of cloak. There a many cryptos out there that don't even have a working product, but are pumped to the max. Why? Because most people have no idea what they buy, they are just focussed on price. Cloak has an actual working product, an active community and a good development team. Focus not on the price today, but on the long term future potential.

Well said, mate.

vinnieG

jr. member

Activity: 124

Merit: 1

Quote from: tradercouch on November 21, 2017, 12:44:53 AM

to be honest no one like cloakcoin and looks like its failing Sad

i am also in big lost last bought @ 0.003 levels Sad

Price is what you pay. Value is what you get - Warren Buffett. Dont relate the performance of the price to the actual potential of cloak. There a many cryptos out there that don't even have a working product, but are pumped to the max. Why? Because most people have no idea what they buy, they are just focussed on price. Cloak has an actual working product, an active community and a good development team. Focus not on the price today, but on the long term future potential.

CaptNemo

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Tradercouch what do you base that analysis on? Every alt coin has suffered big dips and with the update from Deepend that the code should
be completed by the end of the week and the audit about to commence and open source very soon this will be a exciting time for cloak
especially with the current price of BTC!

mycotoxin

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

Quote from: tradercouch on November 21, 2017, 12:44:53 AM

to be honest no one like cloakcoin and looks like its failing Sad

i am also in big lost last bought @ 0.003 levels Sad

Cloak will go up, but it sucks to see BTC and BCH getting all the attention.
How about the ALTS getting a little bit of the action also.

tradercouch

full member

Activity: 295

Merit: 100

to be honest no one like cloakcoin and looks like its failing Sad

i am also in big lost last bought @ 0.003 levels Sad

liquidflames

jr. member

Activity: 34

Merit: 1

This is a screenshot from our testnet RocketChat page from Deepend, the techlead Dev who is finalizing the code.

"i will do my best. hunkering down. the code is complex. I have the test platform running; but raizor did it on windows in a linux virtual machine. First issue is to get Testnet 4 to recognize localhost. My wife is out of town this week. I will put as much time as possible to get her done this week. Will update daily this week. Hoping to be able to reproduce the bugs -- and have an idea what might be causing at least one. There are only 3 as far as i can tell. Raizor has done some very impressive work. Let me assure you.
also, raizor has offered to answer questions i may have

so i believe odds are damn good to be done this week
be well"

Join the chat and get the daily updates this week.

Seems to be the code is finished this week and off the to auditor boys.

FILL YOUR BAGS, shit is about to get real.

R-J-F

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 310

AKA RJF - Member since '13

Quote from: ?? on ??

If someone want to be added in being an addnode= make sure you pm us!

And, who are you?

Nathan047

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 250

Quote from: anneke2001 on November 19, 2017, 03:06:04 PM

This is Lucifer described and the case with NSA turning it down:
http://derekbruff.org/blogs/fywscrypto/tag/lucifer/

It was good, but NSA wanted it weakened so they can get in, if shit hits the fan.

I guess you learn something new every day, thanks for digging that up for me.

R-J-F

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 310

AKA RJF - Member since '13

Quote from: anneke2001 on November 19, 2017, 04:10:35 PM

So now Zimbabwe is buying a coin that can't perform. Good luck to them.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/16/investing/bitcoin-zimbabwe-price/index.html

Well, AcquireCryptContext some more for BTC, we have our own safe coin.

The country with the Trillion dollar pack of Bubble Gum? It will work for them...

R-J-F

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 310

AKA RJF - Member since '13

Quote from: ?? on ??

Bid walls growing on cryptsy and bittrex, good to see this king place.This little dumps had no affect. The eye from investors is growing!We are able to say it once again: InchHide STRONG"ta

cryptsy? Huh? Do you have time machine? If so, I'll invest!

Grin

R-J-F

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 310

AKA RJF - Member since '13

Quote from: lab rat hoax on November 19, 2017, 12:24:09 PM

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bU9PWsbXQuM/maxresdefault.jpg

Good one!

anneke2001

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

So now Zimbabwe is buying a coin that can't perform. Good luck to them.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/16/investing/bitcoin-zimbabwe-price/index.html

Well, AcquireCryptContext some more for BTC, we have our own safe coin.

anneke2001

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

BTC blockchain limit being 1MB for max tranactions in two's complement

transactions possible:>>> 1024d * 1024d = 1 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000‬b
current blockheight: ---> 495130d = 0 0111 1000 1110 0001 1010b

Turn on the leftmost bit, the sign bit in a two's complement representation of computer maths, and you have a negative blockheight.
Someone could code some countdown for until that will happen.

Only a blockheight of 1048575 will fit in the algo like we know it. Add one, and it's '-1'.

Am I dead wrong or what?

Someone, set up a countdown website for that please, linked to the blocks coming in. ehehe.
A new project is born.

anneke2001

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

So now they all want BTC, a coin with a block_size limit coming.

Am I right that block height numbers of BTC transactions use two's complement for counting on and on?

If you see it binary, when the most significant bit (the token bit) is set, the block height numbers become NEGATIVE !

Am I right?

http://www.convertforfree.com/twos-complement-calculator/

anneke2001

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

This is Lucifer described and the case with NSA turning it down:
http://derekbruff.org/blogs/fywscrypto/tag/lucifer/

It was good, but NSA wanted it weakened so they can get in, if shit hits the fan.

lab rat hoax

hero member

Activity: 1030

Merit: 502

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bU9PWsbXQuM/maxresdefault.jpg

Nathan047

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 250

Quote from: GreenRivers on November 17, 2017, 04:30:29 PM

There is no true complete privacy on blockchain, everything is traceable... and that is the beauty of it

It all depends on what you mean by traceable. If you're talking about knowing who sent or received coins than there is no traceability using certain systems.

Quote from: anneke2001 on November 18, 2017, 03:57:24 AM

NSA Would have weakened the Lucifer algorithm before accepting it as a standard, it was too heavy for them

Perhaps I should know this since I consider myself somewhat knowledgeable in cryptocurrencies, but what's the Lucifer algorithm?

CaptNemo

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

CloakCoinScam, please give us more wisdom and tell us what coins to invest in? or can you only cut and paste and keep saying the same thing like "scam"

Cloverfield

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 115

CloakCoin is still one of the better looking projects. Offcourse the open Source code is taking quite a while and people searching for short term returns are dissapointed at this time.
But me, as a long term believer, I am not worried about it. Better come out with a good working code than rushing into coming out with a code full of flaws.
Price was indeed going lower, but as everything did and BTC grew more and more it was an easy prediction.
I won't do any predictions, but it will be earlier higher than lower from this point.

anneke2001

jr. member

Activity: 85

Merit: 1

If you've studied cryptography you'll know you're talking off you neck. Cryptography done well can be highly secure. Yes, you can have built in trapdoors but it all depends on the algorithm you're using, and your cryptosystem in whole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip_rNAASt6I

NSA Would have weakened the Lucifer algorithm before accepting it as a standard, it was too heavy for them

Topic: [ANN][CLOAK] Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digital Currency - page 83. (Read 811072 times)