Topic: [ANN][CrowdSale Ended]🌟🌟🌟🌟 NVO Decentralized Exchange | MultiWallet 🌟🌟🌟🌟 - page 11. (Read 170146 times)

Thanks. I should have clarified that. By "one larger input" I meant exactly this. If you have lots of small inputs be sure to send them to another address and send them back all as one input.

Let me get this right.These guys have made a few million dollars between them off meaningless milestones producing a wallet that is worthless due to the fact there will be no use for it because there will be no DEX anyway all the while I lose half the amount of bitcoins I invested in their project?

Nice scam.

That's a good thing... keep us posted

Police has started investigation and i handed all evidence i got to my lawyer and the police. They are now trying to find out the identity of escrows and nvo team members/ceo/whatever.
Nothing to say much at this point. German police is not the fastest but they search purposefully.

I wouldn't worry about it too much.  The vote is showing a near impossibility to change, everyone will receive a refund.  You will be sent refund BTC to your address holding the NVST at the rate of about .000093 BTC / 1 NVST.

Check both the telegram and discord groups if you have the time.  The telegram group will contain any updates regarding Ton's project he is continuing and the discord group will contain updates on nemgun's project he appears to be continuing.  NVST holders may end up earning an investment in these divergent projects although I am not sure how it will happen.

Additional tip: The counterparty wallet sweeping process may appear to jam intermittently. I had a number of addresses (Electrum) and some worked while others didn't. After trial and error I figured out the common denominator: If an address has received more than one transaction (i.e. has more than one current spendable input) it would jam the xcp sweep. The solution was to send all BTC on an address to itself (collapse multiple inputs into a single). The sweep process then worked fine.

Any news now? i expect they all go to jail

Can't you sweep from Ledger to something like Exodus?  Your NVST are on the Bitcoin Address.

I'm not familiar with hardware wallets so I couldn't say for sure what the issue would be. Is it a legacy bitcoin address? It may be best to join the telegram or discord in case anyone else has had success with a Ledger Nano S.

First, you'll need to download the zip file from https://github.com/Jpja/Sweep-XCP-Paperwallet (https://github.com/Jpja/Sweep-XCP-Paperwallet)

My case is that i am  having issues voting from the ledger nano S and has been impossible  sweep xcp tokens becouse doesnt recongnice the private key of the ledger hardware wallet.

In case anyone is having issues voting from a paper wallet, I wrote up a quick guide.

First, you'll need to download the zip file from https://github.com/Jpja/Sweep-XCP-Paperwallet

Unzip it and open sweep.html in your favourite web browser. You'll need to input the private key of the paper wallet. Fill in all of the other details and send them to an address that you have generated on counterwallet.io or straight to the voting address.

Note: Sweeping counterparty assets can be finicky. You'll need one larger input of at least 0.0005 bitcoins in the address that you're trying to sweep from. I found that sweeping only worked when I swept all of the bitcoins along with the tokens. This is why I would suggest sending to an address generated on counterwallet.io first, then voting from there.

The voting addresses can be found at https://medium.com/@nvoteam/vote-started-b3e37e0c1ecf

To vote for a refund, send to 17vvg1h5B5qwP2d2oz7t2GpXXpztxsmjNn

To vote for the project to continue, send to 1Caux6gNUB55cALFk1EHiRY5Eo613yuGhE

Do not sweep all of your assets to the voting address! Only NVSTVOTING tokens!

If you're not sure what you should vote for, join Discord or Telegram. Many users are having issues with censorship on Slack (which is typically full) and Telegram, so Discord is suggested for uncensored discussion.

Note: The NVO team does not regularly post on Discord, so there wouldn't typically be any first hand information there.

Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/Ff92WUidI54g8rv2NdRr1A
Discord: https://discord.gg/YvB5HXp

To view the voting results thus far, please visit https://nvo.party/vote.php

The voting should be ending some time around August 29th, although no exact deadline has been given. If you haven't voted yet, please attempt to do so ASAP in case there are any technical difficulties that you need to work through. Honestly, I'm not the most technical person so it took me quite a while to figure out how to vote from a paper wallet. I'll try to help with any questions but joining discord or Telegram is highly recommended.

=Story of most ICOs

Create a fancy and colorful roadmap,
make some great promises,
make a buggy but nice looking wallet,
wait a year with multiple delays, and another delays..
you end up become a millionaire...

At least you can eat 500 btc’s from thin air

Very convenient

 

Calm your tits, he/she only said what I suggested is possible. There is no change in the process, the vote is unlikely to reach those thresholds I spoke of because the activity is low, but currently the majority of the votes (weighted) are for a refund. We are talking about 4:1 ratio with more than a week passing, the community isn't on edge at all.

What are you on about?

I was simply referring to a point where the vote has crossed the minimal threshold, then there is no need to wait until the end since it's just impossible for it to turn around, sort of like they announce election winners during the vote counting process if it reaches a threshold. There is no need to count beyond that threshold.

But this probably won't happen cause the activity is just low. Currently it's more than clear where things are going, a turn around is just extremely unlikely. But it has to be waited, principally speaking.

You want them to change the terms of the vote?  You do realize the community is on edge and votes are still coming in?

Why people are voting in a certain way is unclear, especially big holders that split voted.

Yes, that is possible although I don't think we can reach that threshold unless people actively try to seek out holders that have not voted.

I'll look it up. Ok, so time it is. I'll just leave this story for a week. By the way if a certain threshold is crossed, shouldn't you just finalize the vote? Since there is no mathematical chance for it to turn around kind of thing?

I'm curious why people would vote no to a refund when the CEO has said he wants to continue this project in a different fashion.  The magic dex code doesn't exist and the wallet is the only deliverable.  Nothing is being worked on right now.  So why say you don't want a refund?

Bluelogic

DEX with profit sharing via dividends for investors is a great idea. But given the collapse of leadership (that maybe was never there to start with) NVO isn't the project to bet your ponies on anymore. Not to mention when this was started it was one of the very few, if not the only, universal DEX in conception. However, they have failed to capitalize on their head start and looks like they will be superseded by other projects with similar concepts who have better management. I was hoping they'd make it to the finish line but it doesn't appear to be in the cards.

Hello everybody. Why do many say that they were deceived? Was the project interrupted?