Author

Topic: [ANN][CRYPT] CryptCoin x11 + PoS | P2P Anonymity | 0% Premine | Commander - page 150. (Read 512674 times)

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0

Notice my $10 Crypt donation to the DEV's in the block explorer and Not linked to My Address=EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca... Brilliant! I know how Crypt will become Anonymous now!
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/crypt/

Address   EhYQd8bicde8M9tRmk2RSUUJ5n1E7rPqht      
Balance   10.0 CRYPT   
Rich List   N/A   
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   559.98 CRYPT 3 transactions (3 vins)   in 3 transactions (3 vins)
Sent   549.98 CRYPT   in 2 transactions (2 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
afd08cdb7a...   47758   2014-6-27 02:38:06   + 10.0 CRYPT   10.0 CRYPT
2460eebbc4...   44075   2014-6-24 18:47:55   - 500.0 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
77f3667f1f...   42011   2014-6-23 10:47:35   + 500.0 CRYPT   500.0 CRYPT
bdb2c2934b...   33183   2014-6-17 22:18:00   - 49.98 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
65512b88c2...   31599   2014-6-16 22:49:31   + 49.98 CRYPT   49.98 CRYPT

*************

Address   EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca      
Balance   434.17141241 CRYPT   
Rich List   Rank 481   at block 47523 with 434.0 CRYPT
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   434.17141241 CRYPT 11 transactions (11 vins)   in 11 transactions (11 vins)
Sent   0.0 CRYPT   in 0 transactions (0 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
51eec6d980...   47523   2014-6-26 23:11:57   + 42.15763737 CRYPT   434.17141241 CRYPT
77625b542f...   45961   2014-6-25 22:59:33   + 0.03897232 CRYPT   392.01377504 CRYPT
fb2217477a...   44428   2014-6-25 00:04:11   + 47.80069275 CRYPT   391.97480272 CRYPT
4e6d5713db...   43560   2014-6-24 10:55:20   + 0.04624909 CRYPT   344.17410997 CRYPT
ddbd5e736a...   41299   2014-6-23 00:00:56   + 0.04433414 CRYPT   344.12786088 CRYPT
74233228d0...   40505   2014-6-22 11:49:14   + 30.31338628 CRYPT   344.08352674 CRYPT
38131f6726...   38579   2014-6-21 06:28:24   + 0.04015694 CRYPT   313.77014046 CRYPT
4cf0b93f3a...   38293   2014-6-21 02:12:49   + 50.80288306 CRYPT   313.72998352 CRYPT
0b6197a4bc...   35335   2014-6-19 05:50:02   + 0.03467647 CRYPT   262.92710046 CRYPT
0f02abec25...   33074   2014-6-17 20:44:01   + 51.83617806 CRYPT   262.89242399 CRYPT
99c8643ce8...   32310   2014-6-17 09:39:40   + 211.05624593 CRYPT   211.05624593 CRYPT

Of course 10 CRYPT donation is not linked to your address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca   because nothing was actually sent from that address.

As you you can clearly see, there is no transactions that would actually DECREASE amount of CRYPT coins on address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca. Each transaction only INCREASES number of CRYPT coins.

So you've done something wrong. Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).


LMAO! That's why its anonymous smart ass! the wallet addresses of the real sender is not being shown. What we're you thinking? Fudders can't hurt this coin anymore, anon feature is almost complete.

The amount of coins in the wallet address of the "real sender" didn't decrease. So he sends 10 CRYPT to donation address, but the amount of the coins that he owns remains the same?

He probably "owns" other addresses also, not just EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca.

Of course assuming that he (and not somebody else) did actually send 10 CRYPT. CryptoNick didn't provide any proof that he really sent 10 CRYPT do the dev donation address. In fact, I know another guy that claims that he sent those 10 CRYPT (but he didn't prove that either).

Being anonymous and being able to prove that you actually sent funds are completely different things.


Dude you're a terrible fudder, at least learn how to read. Where id he say his total amount of coins in his wallet never decreased? He only said that his wallet was untraceable from the transaction and people can't find out how much coins his wallet currently have. Go and cancel your low buy order because your fud attempts are not working.

I'm not claiming that the total amount of coins in his wallet (not specific wallet address) didn't decrease. In fact it probably decreased because "he probably owns other addresses also, not just EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca" (quote from my post). And those 10 CRYPT were sent from another address that he controls and so the amount of coins in EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca didn't decrease.

But CryptoNick is actually saying "I own address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca and I sent 10 CRYPT to dev address and this transaction didn't link my address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca to dev address" as a "hint" on how the anonymity feature will work. And one very simple explanation is that he sent funds from another address in his wallet. You don't need any anonymity feature for this, bitcoin can do this also.

"people can't find out how much coins his wallet currently have" - this is nothing special and it happens all the time. For example, if I import some random private keys in my bitcoin wallet and I don't send any transactions (or I send carefully crafted transactions) then nobody will be able to determine the amount of coins in this wallet. This is nothing new and not anonymous at all.


EDIT: He is implying that he sent 10 CRYPT from EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca. See also his next post. It seems that he thinks that this is the only address in his wallet (he thinks wallet == wallet address).









full member
Activity: 195
Merit: 100
Magic internet moneys ftw

Notice my $10 Crypt donation to the DEV's in the block explorer and Not linked to My Address=EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca... Brilliant! I know how Crypt will become Anonymous now!
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/crypt/

Address   EhYQd8bicde8M9tRmk2RSUUJ5n1E7rPqht      
Balance   10.0 CRYPT   
Rich List   N/A   
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   559.98 CRYPT 3 transactions (3 vins)   in 3 transactions (3 vins)
Sent   549.98 CRYPT   in 2 transactions (2 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
afd08cdb7a...   47758   2014-6-27 02:38:06   + 10.0 CRYPT   10.0 CRYPT
2460eebbc4...   44075   2014-6-24 18:47:55   - 500.0 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
77f3667f1f...   42011   2014-6-23 10:47:35   + 500.0 CRYPT   500.0 CRYPT
bdb2c2934b...   33183   2014-6-17 22:18:00   - 49.98 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
65512b88c2...   31599   2014-6-16 22:49:31   + 49.98 CRYPT   49.98 CRYPT

*************

Address   EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca      
Balance   434.17141241 CRYPT   
Rich List   Rank 481   at block 47523 with 434.0 CRYPT
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   434.17141241 CRYPT 11 transactions (11 vins)   in 11 transactions (11 vins)
Sent   0.0 CRYPT   in 0 transactions (0 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
51eec6d980...   47523   2014-6-26 23:11:57   + 42.15763737 CRYPT   434.17141241 CRYPT
77625b542f...   45961   2014-6-25 22:59:33   + 0.03897232 CRYPT   392.01377504 CRYPT
fb2217477a...   44428   2014-6-25 00:04:11   + 47.80069275 CRYPT   391.97480272 CRYPT
4e6d5713db...   43560   2014-6-24 10:55:20   + 0.04624909 CRYPT   344.17410997 CRYPT
ddbd5e736a...   41299   2014-6-23 00:00:56   + 0.04433414 CRYPT   344.12786088 CRYPT
74233228d0...   40505   2014-6-22 11:49:14   + 30.31338628 CRYPT   344.08352674 CRYPT
38131f6726...   38579   2014-6-21 06:28:24   + 0.04015694 CRYPT   313.77014046 CRYPT
4cf0b93f3a...   38293   2014-6-21 02:12:49   + 50.80288306 CRYPT   313.72998352 CRYPT
0b6197a4bc...   35335   2014-6-19 05:50:02   + 0.03467647 CRYPT   262.92710046 CRYPT
0f02abec25...   33074   2014-6-17 20:44:01   + 51.83617806 CRYPT   262.89242399 CRYPT
99c8643ce8...   32310   2014-6-17 09:39:40   + 211.05624593 CRYPT   211.05624593 CRYPT

Of course 10 CRYPT donation is not linked to your address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca   because nothing was actually sent from that address.

As you you can clearly see, there is no transactions that would actually DECREASE amount of CRYPT coins on address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca. Each transaction only INCREASES number of CRYPT coins.

So you've done something wrong. Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).


LMAO! That's why its anonymous smart ass! the wallet addresses of the real sender is not being shown. What we're you thinking? Fudders can't hurt this coin anymore, anon feature is almost complete.

The amount of coins in the wallet address of the "real sender" didn't decrease. So he sends 10 CRYPT to donation address, but the amount of the coins that he owns remains the same?

He probably "owns" other addresses also, not just EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca.

Of course assuming that he (and not somebody else) did actually send 10 CRYPT. CryptoNick didn't provide any proof that he really sent 10 CRYPT do the dev donation address. In fact, I know another guy that claims that he sent those 10 CRYPT (but he didn't prove that either).

Being anonymous and being able to prove that you actually sent funds are completely different things.


Dude you're a terrible fudder, at least learn how to read. Where id he say his total amount of coins in his wallet never decreased? He only said that his wallet was untraceable from the transaction and people can't find out how much coins his wallet currently have. Go and cancel your low buy order because your fud attempts are not working.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0


Notice my $10 Crypt donation to the DEV's in the block explorer and Not linked to My Address=EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca... Brilliant! I know how Crypt will become Anonymous now!
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/crypt/

Address   EhYQd8bicde8M9tRmk2RSUUJ5n1E7rPqht      
Balance   10.0 CRYPT   
Rich List   N/A   
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   559.98 CRYPT 3 transactions (3 vins)   in 3 transactions (3 vins)
Sent   549.98 CRYPT   in 2 transactions (2 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
afd08cdb7a...   47758   2014-6-27 02:38:06   + 10.0 CRYPT   10.0 CRYPT
2460eebbc4...   44075   2014-6-24 18:47:55   - 500.0 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
77f3667f1f...   42011   2014-6-23 10:47:35   + 500.0 CRYPT   500.0 CRYPT
bdb2c2934b...   33183   2014-6-17 22:18:00   - 49.98 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
65512b88c2...   31599   2014-6-16 22:49:31   + 49.98 CRYPT   49.98 CRYPT

*************

Address   EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca      
Balance   434.17141241 CRYPT   
Rich List   Rank 481   at block 47523 with 434.0 CRYPT
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   434.17141241 CRYPT 11 transactions (11 vins)   in 11 transactions (11 vins)
Sent   0.0 CRYPT   in 0 transactions (0 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
51eec6d980...   47523   2014-6-26 23:11:57   + 42.15763737 CRYPT   434.17141241 CRYPT
77625b542f...   45961   2014-6-25 22:59:33   + 0.03897232 CRYPT   392.01377504 CRYPT
fb2217477a...   44428   2014-6-25 00:04:11   + 47.80069275 CRYPT   391.97480272 CRYPT
4e6d5713db...   43560   2014-6-24 10:55:20   + 0.04624909 CRYPT   344.17410997 CRYPT
ddbd5e736a...   41299   2014-6-23 00:00:56   + 0.04433414 CRYPT   344.12786088 CRYPT
74233228d0...   40505   2014-6-22 11:49:14   + 30.31338628 CRYPT   344.08352674 CRYPT
38131f6726...   38579   2014-6-21 06:28:24   + 0.04015694 CRYPT   313.77014046 CRYPT
4cf0b93f3a...   38293   2014-6-21 02:12:49   + 50.80288306 CRYPT   313.72998352 CRYPT
0b6197a4bc...   35335   2014-6-19 05:50:02   + 0.03467647 CRYPT   262.92710046 CRYPT
0f02abec25...   33074   2014-6-17 20:44:01   + 51.83617806 CRYPT   262.89242399 CRYPT
99c8643ce8...   32310   2014-6-17 09:39:40   + 211.05624593 CRYPT   211.05624593 CRYPT

Of course 10 CRYPT donation is not linked to your address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca   because nothing was actually sent from that address.

As you you can clearly see, there is no transactions that would actually DECREASE amount of CRYPT coins on address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca. Each transaction only INCREASES number of CRYPT coins.

So you've done something wrong. Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).


LMAO! That's why its anonymous smart ass! the wallet addresses of the real sender is not being shown. What we're you thinking? Fudders can't hurt this coin anymore, anon feature is almost complete.

The amount of coins in the wallet address of the "real sender" didn't decrease. So he sends 10 CRYPT to donation address, but the amount of the coins that he owns remains the same?

He probably "owns" other addresses also, not just EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca.

Of course assuming that he (and not somebody else) did actually send 10 CRYPT. CryptoNick didn't provide any proof that he really sent 10 CRYPT do the dev donation address. In fact, I know another guy that claims that he sent those 10 CRYPT (but he didn't prove that either).

Being anonymous and being able to prove that you actually sent funds are completely different things.



full member
Activity: 195
Merit: 100
Magic internet moneys ftw


Notice my $10 Crypt donation to the DEV's in the block explorer and Not linked to My Address=EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca... Brilliant! I know how Crypt will become Anonymous now!
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/crypt/

Address   EhYQd8bicde8M9tRmk2RSUUJ5n1E7rPqht      
Balance   10.0 CRYPT   
Rich List   N/A   
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   559.98 CRYPT 3 transactions (3 vins)   in 3 transactions (3 vins)
Sent   549.98 CRYPT   in 2 transactions (2 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
afd08cdb7a...   47758   2014-6-27 02:38:06   + 10.0 CRYPT   10.0 CRYPT
2460eebbc4...   44075   2014-6-24 18:47:55   - 500.0 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
77f3667f1f...   42011   2014-6-23 10:47:35   + 500.0 CRYPT   500.0 CRYPT
bdb2c2934b...   33183   2014-6-17 22:18:00   - 49.98 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
65512b88c2...   31599   2014-6-16 22:49:31   + 49.98 CRYPT   49.98 CRYPT

*************

Address   EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca      
Balance   434.17141241 CRYPT   
Rich List   Rank 481   at block 47523 with 434.0 CRYPT
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   434.17141241 CRYPT 11 transactions (11 vins)   in 11 transactions (11 vins)
Sent   0.0 CRYPT   in 0 transactions (0 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
51eec6d980...   47523   2014-6-26 23:11:57   + 42.15763737 CRYPT   434.17141241 CRYPT
77625b542f...   45961   2014-6-25 22:59:33   + 0.03897232 CRYPT   392.01377504 CRYPT
fb2217477a...   44428   2014-6-25 00:04:11   + 47.80069275 CRYPT   391.97480272 CRYPT
4e6d5713db...   43560   2014-6-24 10:55:20   + 0.04624909 CRYPT   344.17410997 CRYPT
ddbd5e736a...   41299   2014-6-23 00:00:56   + 0.04433414 CRYPT   344.12786088 CRYPT
74233228d0...   40505   2014-6-22 11:49:14   + 30.31338628 CRYPT   344.08352674 CRYPT
38131f6726...   38579   2014-6-21 06:28:24   + 0.04015694 CRYPT   313.77014046 CRYPT
4cf0b93f3a...   38293   2014-6-21 02:12:49   + 50.80288306 CRYPT   313.72998352 CRYPT
0b6197a4bc...   35335   2014-6-19 05:50:02   + 0.03467647 CRYPT   262.92710046 CRYPT
0f02abec25...   33074   2014-6-17 20:44:01   + 51.83617806 CRYPT   262.89242399 CRYPT
99c8643ce8...   32310   2014-6-17 09:39:40   + 211.05624593 CRYPT   211.05624593 CRYPT

Of course 10 CRYPT donation is not linked to your address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca   because nothing was actually sent from that address.

As you you can clearly see, there is no transactions that would actually DECREASE amount of CRYPT coins on address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca. Each transaction only INCREASES number of CRYPT coins.

So you've done something wrong. Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).


LMAO! That's why its anonymous smart ass! the wallet addresses of the real sender is not being shown. What we're you thinking? Fudders can't hurt this coin anymore, anon feature is almost complete.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
i support

Excellent! What do you support? This coin? competing coin? pumpers and whales? the devs? your wife?

Guys, I wouldn't listen to another word from this one. He created his account on June 17th as Crypt was in a rally. What is your real ID? Why hide behind a facade?

Man, ignore him. He's a XC fanboy.

We don't need him.
hero member
Activity: 845
Merit: 1000
Whale Watchers and Pinnacle Brilliance founder
i support

Excellent! What do you support? This coin? competing coin? pumpers and whales? the devs? your wife?

Guys, I wouldn't listen to another word from this one. He created his account on June 17th as Crypt was in a rally. What is your real ID? Why hide behind a facade?
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 256
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
Hi, bagholders! I just came in here to say Hi!

Will be back in a few days when it will be at 400k. Salute!

Alrighty pal.. in the mean time grab some cheap coins while ya at it. cya

Bye now! Ill also keep buying cheap and when its 400k ill be pretty happy Smiley
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Smile if you're not wearing any underwear
Hi, bagholders! I just came in here to say Hi!

Will be back in a few days when it will be at 400k. Salute!

Alrighty pal.. in the mean time grab some cheap coins while ya at it. cya
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250



http://BBL.HASHLINK.EU
Spread some hash with us! Wink

- 1% Fee on all pools
- PROP Payout system
- Dedicated Servers
- Multicoin Pool
- High performance NODE.js backend
- User friendly MPOS interface
- STRATUM
- VARDIFF
- Skilled admins
- Forum and IRC Support
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
If the anon feature and the BTC-e rumors are true this coin will be the next thing.

Devs are relatively credible but there is alot a lot of FUD, lets say chances are 50/50 that the rumors are true.

It has half the coin cap than DRK and DRK is valued at 10$. Crypt could go between 5$-25$ ea.

Looking at it that way its worth a 5-15% of your portfolio investment.

If you win you win big and if you lose you lose little.

/protip

0.0005 says otherwise

No, it says that is good to invest.

See at your guerillass coin and spainass coin (lol 5000 satoshi to 300 satoshi, u mad?)
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
If the anon feature and the BTC-e rumors are true this coin will be the next thing.

Devs are relatively credible but there is alot a lot of FUD, lets say chances are 50/50 that the rumors are true.

It has half the coin cap than DRK and DRK is valued at 10$. Crypt could go between 5$-25$ ea.

Looking at it that way its worth a 5-15% of your portfolio investment.

If you win you win big and if you lose you lose little.

/protip

0.0005 says otherwise
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1046
Hi, bagholders! I just came in here to say Hi!

Will be back in a few days when it will be at 40k. Salute!
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Smile if you're not wearing any underwear
Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

I don't know what WC is and what technology it uses.

How can you check "addresses vs confirmations"? Confirmation is a number associated with one transaction. Address doesn't have any such number. Exchanges track confirmations.

It is not the job of an exchange to prevent double spends. They can't prevent or resolve any double spends at all. The network itself (protocol and/or blockchain and/or miners) needs to "resolve" double spends.

If CryptoNick's example is valid, then this actually means that CryptCoin network may actually allow double spends (but I seriously doubt this).

First CryptoNick spent 10 CRYPT for donation, but this probably didn't decrease amount of coins on his address (maybe it decreased number of coins on another address, but we don't know that). So that means that these 10 CRYPT coins may be sent second time to another addess. Voila - double spend.








Nope no double spend! I verified that there are ways to do this and you would need to program it which is what is going to happen, I am sure this is what they are working on since it is so simple. I expect there to be a new tab in commander with this functionality embedded into it. Such a simple idea! You only see positives correct but I could make it look like zero if I wanted. The blockchain is fully in tact too all of the transaction info is there on the block. I am amazed it was this easy!

I don't know if Crypt Dev's would want me to divulge their plans. That is my $10 donation which is truly not showing my total amount of coin. Not a joke, not trying to be funny here at all.  They will implement 2FA and all kinds of good stuff since this is why they created Commander. Makes so much sense now and with an SSL Commander is locked down.

So do you think I should invest more on CRYPT than what I already invested ? do you see and your thoughs on the future of CRYPT ?
legendary
Activity: 987
Merit: 1003
Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

I don't know what WC is and what technology it uses.

How can you check "addresses vs confirmations"? Confirmation is a number associated with one transaction. Address doesn't have any such number. Exchanges track confirmations.

It is not the job of an exchange to prevent double spends. They can't prevent or resolve any double spends at all. The network itself (protocol and/or blockchain and/or miners) needs to "resolve" double spends.

If CryptoNick's example is valid, then this actually means that CryptCoin network may actually allow double spends (but I seriously doubt this).

First CryptoNick spent 10 CRYPT for donation, but this probably didn't decrease amount of coins on his address (maybe it decreased number of coins on another address, but we don't know that). So that means that these 10 CRYPT coins may be sent second time to another addess. Voila - double spend.








Nope no double spend! I verified that there are ways to do this and you would need to program it which is what is going to happen, I am sure this is what they are working on since it is so simple. I expect there to be a new tab in commander with this functionality embedded into it. Such a simple idea! You only see positives correct but I could make it look like zero if I wanted. The blockchain is fully in tact too all of the transaction info is there on the block. I am amazed it was this easy!

I don't know if Crypt Dev's would want me to divulge their plans. That is my $10 donation which is truly not showing my total amount of coin. Not a joke, not trying to be funny here at all.  They will implement 2FA and all kinds of good stuff since this is why they created Commander. Makes so much sense now and with an SSL Commander is locked down.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

^^^ 100% true.  Obviously the math genius doesnt know how things work. He only knows how to quote lame reddit posts because he is from VRC.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



Super has anon onw.  Why dont you go fud their thread jackass.  Or wait..is it your goal to only fud crypt, that has nothing yet and its in the works still?  Dont bash work that hasnt been created yet paulsnoker.  We should release your phone# so everyone can call you to ask questions.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Done, i'm out. going to ride super. good luck.

roll on the floor laughing, super is an obvious shit coin, crypt anon feature is already being implemented and soon to be officially released.

daydreamer.

Better play Lotto.

Hitler said the same thing.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 256
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
Even Cinni is trying to take Mindfox onto their team by offering him 0.25 and raising money.... Why would a competing coin offer a developer of another coin money to join their team... Because they know he is on to something big!
legendary
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1000
Crypt have so much potential and this is main reason for massive FUD. But Crypt is strong. There no is bad coins there is only bad people.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 500
If the anon feature and the BTC-e rumors are true this coin will be the next thing.

Devs are relatively credible but there is alot a lot of FUD, lets say chances are 50/50 that the rumors are true.

It has half the coin cap than DRK and DRK is valued at 10$. Crypt could go between 5$-25$ ea.

Looking at it that way its worth a 5-15% of your portfolio investment.

If you win you win big and if you lose you lose little.

/protip
Jump to: