Author

Topic: [ANN][CRYPT] CryptCoin x11 + PoS | P2P Anonymity | 0% Premine | Commander - page 151. (Read 512674 times)

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.

Nah man just out making some btc to buy back in eventually but i dont see the point in letting money sit idle or going down do you?

Nope idle money doesn't work for you
copper member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1025
I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.

Nah man just out making some btc to buy back in eventually but i dont see the point in letting money sit idle or going down do you?
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
Looks like someone doesn't want the price to go up just yet.
My guess is a bit of accumulation going on here before some news.

I'm doing a little accumulating myself... I feel the news is coming, and the current prices @ under 60K is great

The fact that this coin does have a chance to get on btc-e is huge. 

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
i support

Excellent! What do you support? This coin? competing coin? pumpers and whales? the devs? your wife?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Any new and update with CRYPT? i see lot and lot of people mining CRYPT like crazy but the price is low.

Nothing concrete it seems atm, but people seem to have been accumulating coin all day today.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
Any new and update with CRYPT? i see lot and lot of people mining CRYPT like crazy but the price is low.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
You'll have to ask him pbremen01.
He is probably one of the longest serving FUDders here who was always willing to voice his concern.
A U-turn from him was a surprise out of the blue.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

I don't know what WC is and what technology it uses.

How can you check "addresses vs confirmations"? Confirmation is a number associated with one transaction. Address doesn't have any such number. Exchanges track confirmations.

It is not the job of an exchange to prevent double spends. They can't prevent or resolve any double spends at all. The network itself (protocol and/or blockchain and/or miners) needs to "resolve" double spends.

If CryptoNick's example is valid, then this actually means that CryptCoin network may actually allow double spends (but I seriously doubt this).

First CryptoNick spent 10 CRYPT for donation, but this probably didn't decrease amount of coins on his address (maybe it decreased number of coins on another address, but we don't know that). So that means that these 10 CRYPT coins may be sent second time to another addess. Voila - double spend.






member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.
copper member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1025
I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I'm speechless (almost) with the lack of FUD today, looks like the work Mindfox is doing has stumped them.

All the FUDder are in a group meeting at the moment

Looks like their meeting ended, one has resurfaced
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0


Notice my $10 Crypt donation to the DEV's in the block explorer and Not linked to My Address=EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca... Brilliant! I know how Crypt will become Anonymous now!
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/crypt/

Address   EhYQd8bicde8M9tRmk2RSUUJ5n1E7rPqht      
Balance   10.0 CRYPT   
Rich List   N/A   
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   559.98 CRYPT 3 transactions (3 vins)   in 3 transactions (3 vins)
Sent   549.98 CRYPT   in 2 transactions (2 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
afd08cdb7a...   47758   2014-6-27 02:38:06   + 10.0 CRYPT   10.0 CRYPT
2460eebbc4...   44075   2014-6-24 18:47:55   - 500.0 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
77f3667f1f...   42011   2014-6-23 10:47:35   + 500.0 CRYPT   500.0 CRYPT
bdb2c2934b...   33183   2014-6-17 22:18:00   - 49.98 CRYPT   0.0 CRYPT
65512b88c2...   31599   2014-6-16 22:49:31   + 49.98 CRYPT   49.98 CRYPT

*************

Address   EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca      
Balance   434.17141241 CRYPT   
Rich List   Rank 481   at block 47523 with 434.0 CRYPT
Guesstimated Wallet   none
Received   434.17141241 CRYPT 11 transactions (11 vins)   in 11 transactions (11 vins)
Sent   0.0 CRYPT   in 0 transactions (0 vouts)
Transactions
Hash   Block   Date/Time   Amount   Balance
51eec6d980...   47523   2014-6-26 23:11:57   + 42.15763737 CRYPT   434.17141241 CRYPT
77625b542f...   45961   2014-6-25 22:59:33   + 0.03897232 CRYPT   392.01377504 CRYPT
fb2217477a...   44428   2014-6-25 00:04:11   + 47.80069275 CRYPT   391.97480272 CRYPT
4e6d5713db...   43560   2014-6-24 10:55:20   + 0.04624909 CRYPT   344.17410997 CRYPT
ddbd5e736a...   41299   2014-6-23 00:00:56   + 0.04433414 CRYPT   344.12786088 CRYPT
74233228d0...   40505   2014-6-22 11:49:14   + 30.31338628 CRYPT   344.08352674 CRYPT
38131f6726...   38579   2014-6-21 06:28:24   + 0.04015694 CRYPT   313.77014046 CRYPT
4cf0b93f3a...   38293   2014-6-21 02:12:49   + 50.80288306 CRYPT   313.72998352 CRYPT
0b6197a4bc...   35335   2014-6-19 05:50:02   + 0.03467647 CRYPT   262.92710046 CRYPT
0f02abec25...   33074   2014-6-17 20:44:01   + 51.83617806 CRYPT   262.89242399 CRYPT
99c8643ce8...   32310   2014-6-17 09:39:40   + 211.05624593 CRYPT   211.05624593 CRYPT

Of course 10 CRYPT donation is not linked to your address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca   because nothing was actually sent from that address.

As you you can clearly see, there is no transactions that would actually DECREASE amount of CRYPT coins on address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca. Each transaction only INCREASES number of CRYPT coins.

So you've done something wrong. Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).


hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Smile if you're not wearing any underwear
I'm speechless (almost) with the lack of FUD today, looks like the work Mindfox is doing has stumped them.

All the FUDder are in a group meeting at the moment
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I'm speechless (almost) with the lack of FUD today, looks like the work Mindfox is doing has stumped them.
full member
Activity: 179
Merit: 100
http://CRYPT.nmgpool.com/



Reward System: Full Stratum/Vardiff system with PROP
Server Location: China/America
Pro Hardware: Connections: 10 gigabit network hypervisor/storage. Direct connection to AIMX, MSX
Storage: Fast ZFS based environment with SSD cache and 32 disks.
CPU: Xeon 64bit / 16 powerful CPU cores
Ram: 128 GB RAM.

Security:
Two different geo-locations Hot wallets (primary and instant back-up).
Offline secured cold Wallet.
Automated back-ups and warning system for operators.
Ddos protecion.


Welcome friends to join our team!



Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
So, Mindfox is now going to work on Cinni?

Devs work on many coins, for some of them it is a job.
Looks like he is well on the way to finishing anon for CRYPT, so I wouldn't be surprised if other coins are willing to pay for his services.
When you can get 2BTC for a small wallet fix, what would you do?
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 256
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
The post said they offered him 0.25 and looking for funding to get him on board. FUD FUD FUD love it!
Jump to: