[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3961.

badman74

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: splawik21 on September 25, 2014, 07:15:16 PM

Quote from: Salkenex on September 25, 2014, 06:52:41 PM

Quote from: Ignition75 on September 23, 2014, 10:18:44 PM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 23, 2014, 01:36:39 PM

Quote from: innergy on September 23, 2014, 01:33:44 PM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 23, 2014, 01:24:45 PM

I get only 4,1 MH/s for my 280x and 4,6 MH/s for 290 and other ppl has 50% more = 50% more payout. Could someone point me which kernels should I use to mine with that speed ? It cant be so unfair Undecided

Quote

sgminer -k darkcoin-mod -o stratum+tcp://... -u ... -p ... -g 1 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2 --xintensity 512 --thread-concurrency 24500 --gpu-engine 1010 --gpu-memclock 1450 --gpu-powertune 20 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --temp-cutoff 90 --temp-target 78

Over 5MH/s on 290..

and other ppl has 8MH/s for 290x and ~6,5MH/s for 280x..

They are lying...

On the 290x and 290, you can reduce power consumption by 35% and only lose 5% performance, otherwise the power bill is $$$ on those cards.

I only get ~3MH/s with this setting on my Sapphire 280Xs (3 of them). I was getting the same off sph_sgminer_x11mod. I see nothing different in terms of hashing power.

Use 14.6 amd driver files and you get 4.25MHs/280x
I undervolted my and with -10 C get 4.05MHs still cool and quiet.

with the mods i did to sgminer-dev 5.0.0 and a little overclocking (1040/1375 from 1000/1250) on my 290x i get 6.2mh/s
granted there is a guy who claims to get 8mh/s with his mods but he will only sell, not give away (i have no actual way to confirm he is getting that since i dont have his modded version)
see my sig for links to my binaries and https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-sgminer-v5-optimized-x11x13neoscryptlyra2reetc-kernel-switch-miner-632503 for info about the changes to the miner

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: coins101 on September 25, 2014, 06:19:12 PM

Monday.

I kinda doubt it. DRK is over the shitcoiners' heads. No matter what happens with the development, they just have that mouth-open blank stare...

Yeah, open source isn't going to change the price much by itself, nor are we going to see a new rash of clones, because you can't clone a thousand VPS's.

My post about forgetting shitty crypto blogs was serious, preaching to anyone inside the crypto scene is an utter waste of effort - we need to get the word out to the spooks, the political dissidents, the junkies, the tax evaders, cheating spouses, etc.

Coins101 is on the right track with gambling sites.

edit: lol, this is about the fourth 1st post on page 3183 - mods on a deletion spree again?

splawik21

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1005

DASH is the future of crypto payments!

Quote from: Salkenex on September 25, 2014, 06:52:41 PM

Quote from: Ignition75 on September 23, 2014, 10:18:44 PM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 23, 2014, 01:36:39 PM

Quote from: innergy on September 23, 2014, 01:33:44 PM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 23, 2014, 01:24:45 PM

I get only 4,1 MH/s for my 280x and 4,6 MH/s for 290 and other ppl has 50% more = 50% more payout. Could someone point me which kernels should I use to mine with that speed ? It cant be so unfair Undecided

Quote

sgminer -k darkcoin-mod -o stratum+tcp://... -u ... -p ... -g 1 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2 --xintensity 512 --thread-concurrency 24500 --gpu-engine 1010 --gpu-memclock 1450 --gpu-powertune 20 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --temp-cutoff 90 --temp-target 78

Over 5MH/s on 290..

and other ppl has 8MH/s for 290x and ~6,5MH/s for 280x..

They are lying...

On the 290x and 290, you can reduce power consumption by 35% and only lose 5% performance, otherwise the power bill is $$$ on those cards.

I only get ~3MH/s with this setting on my Sapphire 280Xs (3 of them). I was getting the same off sph_sgminer_x11mod. I see nothing different in terms of hashing power.

Use 14.6 amd driver files and you get 4.25MHs/280x
I undervolted my and with -10 C get 4.05MHs still cool and quiet.

camosoul

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

www.OroCoin.co

Quote from: thelonecrouton on September 25, 2014, 06:02:44 PM

Quote from: AizenSou on September 25, 2014, 06:00:15 PM

Quote from: vertoe on September 25, 2014, 04:17:37 PM

Quote from: BrainShutdown on September 25, 2014, 04:08:07 PM

Quote from: camosoul on September 25, 2014, 03:03:27 PM

Quote from: strix on September 25, 2014, 01:32:38 PM

I doubt anyone here is more of a newbie than I am with Arch Linux. I have been playing with it for less than a week. This morning heard about the bash bug, ran the test, and yes I was vulnerable. Hmm... heard how easy Arch is to update so for the first time ran "sudo pacman -Syu"

BOOM--vulnerability gone. Way to go Arch. I'm starting to like this...

I played with Arch, never could get used to it. I'm still do "emerge world -uND" [take a nap]

That sure brings back some good memories! Stage 1 FTW!
Thanks Grin

+1 good to see people still using gentoo. too bad their best times are over. for now I'll stick with arch, too.

My whole clusters and clients are all in gentoo Sad

It's really a nightmare.

Gentoo taught me a lot. Mostly, that the seconds of my life were too precious to waste watching all that crap scroll by.

And that you'll learn a lot more when you don't have to wait 8 hours to "try to see if this works."

Arch is certainly a better way. But now that my desktop runs Xubuntu... Screw it.

Salkenex

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

Quote from: Ignition75 on September 23, 2014, 10:18:44 PM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 23, 2014, 01:36:39 PM

Quote from: innergy on September 23, 2014, 01:33:44 PM

Quote from: hellyeahent on September 23, 2014, 01:24:45 PM

I get only 4,1 MH/s for my 280x and 4,6 MH/s for 290 and other ppl has 50% more = 50% more payout. Could someone point me which kernels should I use to mine with that speed ? It cant be so unfair Undecided

Quote

sgminer -k darkcoin-mod -o stratum+tcp://... -u ... -p ... -g 1 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2 --xintensity 512 --thread-concurrency 24500 --gpu-engine 1010 --gpu-memclock 1450 --gpu-powertune 20 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --temp-cutoff 90 --temp-target 78

Over 5MH/s on 290..

and other ppl has 8MH/s for 290x and ~6,5MH/s for 280x..

They are lying...

On the 290x and 290, you can reduce power consumption by 35% and only lose 5% performance, otherwise the power bill is $$$ on those cards.

I only get ~3MH/s with this setting on my Sapphire 280Xs (3 of them). I was getting the same off sph_sgminer_x11mod. I see nothing different in terms of hashing power.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Monday.

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: AizenSou on September 25, 2014, 06:00:15 PM

Quote from: vertoe on September 25, 2014, 04:17:37 PM

Quote from: BrainShutdown on September 25, 2014, 04:08:07 PM

Quote from: camosoul on September 25, 2014, 03:03:27 PM

Quote from: strix on September 25, 2014, 01:32:38 PM

I doubt anyone here is more of a newbie than I am with Arch Linux. I have been playing with it for less than a week. This morning heard about the bash bug, ran the test, and yes I was vulnerable. Hmm... heard how easy Arch is to update so for the first time ran "sudo pacman -Syu"

BOOM--vulnerability gone. Way to go Arch. I'm starting to like this...

I played with Arch, never could get used to it. I'm still do "emerge world -uND" [take a nap]

That sure brings back some good memories! Stage 1 FTW!
Thanks Grin

+1 good to see people still using gentoo. too bad their best times are over. for now I'll stick with arch, too.

My whole clusters and clients are all in gentoo Sad

It's really a nightmare.

Gentoo taught me a lot. Mostly, that the seconds of my life were too precious to waste watching all that crap scroll by.

TanteStefana2

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1001

Quote from: coins101 on September 25, 2014, 05:46:58 PM

If you silent viewers were wondering....the answers is: yes!

If you buy your DRKs with credit cards or some other tracked service, once you spend your DRKs you won't be tracked to death by Big Brother.

Yes, to legally (and for the most part, safely) purchase cryptos, the exchanger must have your confirmed identification. However, once ya got 'em, you can keep 'em perfectly safe from prying eyes via Darkcoin and DarkSend! Why use anything else?

BTW, I'm just going to wait until things settle down with this bash thing. Knowing my luck, the repositories were pulled just after I updated the first instance or something crazy like that, LOL. I'll just make a new instance if I can't get any love later Cheesy

Thanks for all the help guys!!!

AizenSou

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Quote from: vertoe on September 25, 2014, 04:17:37 PM

Quote from: BrainShutdown on September 25, 2014, 04:08:07 PM

Quote from: camosoul on September 25, 2014, 03:03:27 PM

Quote from: strix on September 25, 2014, 01:32:38 PM

I doubt anyone here is more of a newbie than I am with Arch Linux. I have been playing with it for less than a week. This morning heard about the bash bug, ran the test, and yes I was vulnerable. Hmm... heard how easy Arch is to update so for the first time ran "sudo pacman -Syu"

BOOM--vulnerability gone. Way to go Arch. I'm starting to like this...

I played with Arch, never could get used to it. I'm still do "emerge world -uND" [take a nap]

That sure brings back some good memories! Stage 1 FTW!
Thanks Grin

+1 good to see people still using gentoo. too bad their best times are over. for now I'll stick with arch, too.

My whole clusters and clients are all in gentoo Sad

It's really a nightmare.

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: TanteStefana2 on September 25, 2014, 05:56:04 PM

nope, northern cali and I just upgraded my distro, but still no joy. Why always me? ROFLMAO

The 'fix' doesn't work anyway it seems...

TanteStefana2

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1001

Quote from: thelonecrouton on September 25, 2014, 05:30:44 PM

Quote from: TanteStefana2 on September 25, 2014, 05:24:31 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on September 25, 2014, 05:18:11 PM

Looks like it is. It should look like this:

Code:

:~$ env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c "echo this is a test"

bash: warning: x: ignoring function definition attempt
bash: error importing function definition for `x'
this is a test

:~$

Edit: Easier readability here: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/bash-bug-big-in-the-news.2480/#post-22353

Yah, I don't know why it won't update. I even changed the sources. The problem is probably on my end.... just gotta keep at it I guess? I've rebooted again, still no joy. version number says 4.2.45(1)

crouton, that's all I had to do on my other node. they should be exactly alike, the two nodes.... hummmm

Are your instances in Ireland? Those paddy bog trotters may be a bit slow on the updates.

nope, northern cali and I just upgraded my distro, but still no joy. Why always me? ROFLMAO

ruleland

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

if anyone is having problems updating bash with apt-get update / apt-get install bash, your sources.list might be missing an entry

i think all you need is:
deb http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted

change nl to a repository near you. and "precise" with your version (copy those from another line)

the sources.list is probably in the /etc/apt directory

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: _evolution_ on September 25, 2014, 05:45:15 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

seems like the bash bug is not even solved with newest bash: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141597#c23

Come on... The same shit again Angry

(Nevertheless, thank you for the update.)
What if $SHELL=/bin/ksh (KornShell)?

It's not clear reading that link whether it's just the RH fix that's incomplete.

edit: nope, 4.3.11(1) is still vulnerable to the examples posted.

Code:

ubuntu@ip-172-31-23-218:~$ bash --version
GNU bash, version 4.3.11(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later

This is free software; you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
ubuntu@ip-172-31-23-218:~$ env -i X='() { (a)=>\' bash -c 'date'
bash: X: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `='
bash: X: line 1: `'
bash: error importing function definition for `X'
ubuntu@ip-172-31-23-218:~$ ls -l date
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 0 Sep 25 22:53 date

edit: now, how do I undo whatever I just did? Undecided

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

If you silent viewers were wondering....the answers is: yes!

If you buy your DRKs with credit cards or some other tracked service, once you spend your DRKs you won't be tracked to death by Big Brother.

_evolution_

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

seems like the bash bug is not even solved with newest bash: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141597#c23

Come on... The same shit again Angry

(Nevertheless, thank you for the update.)
What if $SHELL=/bin/ksh (KornShell)?

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: TanteStefana2 on September 25, 2014, 05:24:31 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on September 25, 2014, 05:18:11 PM

Looks like it is. It should look like this:

Code:

:~$ env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c "echo this is a test"

bash: warning: x: ignoring function definition attempt
bash: error importing function definition for `x'
this is a test

:~$

Edit: Easier readability here: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/bash-bug-big-in-the-news.2480/#post-22353

Yah, I don't know why it won't update. I even changed the sources. The problem is probably on my end.... just gotta keep at it I guess? I've rebooted again, still no joy. version number says 4.2.45(1)

crouton, that's all I had to do on my other node. they should be exactly alike, the two nodes.... hummmm

Are your instances in Ireland? Those paddy bog trotters may be a bit slow on the updates.

coins101

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000

Come over to the DarkSide, Litecoin miners.

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Ignition75 on September 25, 2014, 05:22:34 PM

Quote from: coins101 on September 25, 2014, 05:16:43 PM

http://www.coindesk.com/swiss-intelligence-service-investigates-paying-informants-bitcoin/

When the informants figure it out, it will be too late. Dead men walking.

Heh, not much of an intelligence service if they don't know either of the following:

1) Using Bitcoin is like wearing a G-String and sun-baking on a busy beach (thanks GeorgeM - Memory Burn)
2) Secret agents prefer the Dark Wink

We should be sending press releases to Langley, MOSSAD, GCHQ etc. - sod useless crypotoblogs.

TanteStefana2

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Propulsion on September 25, 2014, 05:18:11 PM

Looks like it is. It should look like this:

Code:

:~$ env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c "echo this is a test"

bash: warning: x: ignoring function definition attempt
bash: error importing function definition for `x'
this is a test

:~$

Edit: Easier readability here: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/bash-bug-big-in-the-news.2480/#post-22353

Yah, I don't know why it won't update. I even changed the sources. The problem is probably on my end.... just gotta keep at it I guess? I've rebooted again, still no joy. version number says 4.2.45(1)

crouton, that's all I had to do on my other node. they should be exactly alike, the two nodes.... hummmm

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: TanteStefana2 on September 25, 2014, 05:08:24 PM

Quote from: _evolution_ on September 25, 2014, 04:54:50 PM

No, that's wrong. Finally check:

Quote

env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c "echo this is a test"

It should return

Quote

bash: warning: x: ignoring function definition attempt

if everything is okay.

Bourne parser is fucked up, for how long?! 20 years?!

nope, it's not echoing, LOL

Quote

$ env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c "echo this is a test"
vulnerable
this is a test

All I did on my Amazon MN's was run 'sudo apt-get install bash' - came back with 4.3.11 and passed the echo test.

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3961. (Read 9724017 times)