For the record - I think open source is the only way to go - however, again, I think it matters how that is done - it's not as simple as saying - "open source it".
I believe the plan - as per the dev - is to open it once DarkSend has been fully debugged - which I think is entirely reasonable. I think others want it to have a little more momentum in the market and with adoption before it goes open source - which I don't think is unreasonable either. However, it's ultimately the developer's choice - I'm sure though that he will take the input of the community seriously.
I know he has said that closed source is NOT an option in this thread - however, is this on any of the sites so its known to new users?
Because, the community knows that closed source was never an option - but I don't think others do.
It gets drowned out by everyone arguing this point over and over again
The developer wants darksend to be fully functional before releasing it into the wild so that anything that might be wrong won't propagate in every other coin. I don't think of it as closed source, I think of it as smart. Alt coins are all just copy > paste and I don't think there is much thought given to it, so it could mess a lot of users up and in the process, give darksend/darkcoin a bad reputation. Evan needs to keep control until it's ready, then it will be released open source, and yes, others will then improve on it. That's what open source is all about. In the mean time, I suspect Evan will be coming up with other great features for our coin and implementing any improvements made to darksend.
that's how I see our future here.