I am just gonna say I told you so and link to what I am talking about
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4000584
Topic: [ANN][Datacoin] Datacoin blockchain start announcement (Minor code upd + logo) - page 29. (Read 171873 times)
May 04, 2014, 06:41:28 AM
May 03, 2014, 01:47:17 PM
what s the connection to storj?
Strorj is currently running on top of Datacoin, but the dev (super3) has indicated that he will introduce a Storjcoin in the future.
May 03, 2014, 05:23:06 AM
what s the connection to storj?
it uses datacoin as backend storage May 03, 2014, 03:21:31 AM
what s the connection to storj?
May 02, 2014, 08:51:00 AM
Let us get inspired by storj.http://storj.io/assets/paper/storj.pdf
Yes, with Metadisk Storj is doing great things with Datacoin. https://github.com/Storj/Metadisk
May 01, 2014, 07:32:42 AM
Let us get inspired by storj.http://storj.io/assets/paper/storj.pdf
May 01, 2014, 02:47:02 AM
We need new wallet with new ssl and primecoin-hp-14 code ;-)
April 28, 2014, 06:57:10 AM
I think what needs to happen is someone needs to upload sensitive data publicly to the DTC blockchain to stir up talk and start using DTC for what its strength is. Distributed, unkillable data storage.
Basically what it needs is content.
Basically what it needs is content.
I have a really cool idea that could be based on datacoin's structure but needs modifications. Im a developer myself but not C++. If someone or a group is interested we can chat about it but I will need to know you a bit first to tell you the idea. It has to do with sensitive data (partly) unkillable.
[email protected]
aris
April 25, 2014, 04:33:02 PM
Datacoin is being used in Storj development and testing ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-storj-decentralized-storage-555159 ) for now. There can be more plans on DTC - Storj cooperation, when these plans are approved\released, I'll push this info to all DTC threads.
It sounds more like Storj is trying to create a Datacoin competitor/replacement.
DTC has been the first like btc was ever in it's field. This status is unchangeable like stored data in blockchain. :-) It gives unique worth to this coin
April 25, 2014, 11:48:44 AM
Datacoin is being used in Storj development and testing ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-storj-decentralized-storage-555159 ) for now. There can be more plans on DTC - Storj cooperation, when these plans are approved\released, I'll push this info to all DTC threads.
It sounds more like Storj is trying to create a Datacoin competitor/replacement.
DTC has been the first like btc was ever in it's field. This status is unchangeable like stored data in blockchain. :-) It gives unique worth to this coin
April 24, 2014, 06:18:00 PM
Datacoin is being used in Storj development and testing ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-storj-decentralized-storage-555159 ) for now. There can be more plans on DTC - Storj cooperation, when these plans are approved\released, I'll push this info to all DTC threads.
It sounds more like Storj is trying to create a Datacoin competitor/replacement.
April 24, 2014, 12:50:32 PM
Datacoin is being used in Storj development and testing ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-storj-decentralized-storage-555159 ) for now. There can be more plans on DTC - Storj cooperation, when these plans are approved\released, I'll push this info to all DTC threads.
It sounds more like Storj is trying to create a Datacoin competitor/replacement.
April 24, 2014, 06:47:50 AM
I was playing around with datacoin, but I seem to have found a small issue in the tx data size checking code.
According to the website, data can be up to 128*1024 bytes, and it is stored in binary.
From what I can see, the rpc methods send and receive the transaction data in base64, which makes sense, since it's a json based transport layer. Eventually, in wallet.cpp, that base64 payload gets decoded and placed in the transaction in binary format.
Unfortunately, all the payload size checks are made before decoding, applying the 128k restriction to the base64 encoded data, although it will be stored in binary. This means that when using the RPC calls, the limit for the data is smaller than expected (around 128*3/4 = 96k).
Have I stumbled into a bug, or am I missing something?
I also stepped on this and reported it to the original dev, but didnt get any response.According to the website, data can be up to 128*1024 bytes, and it is stored in binary.
From what I can see, the rpc methods send and receive the transaction data in base64, which makes sense, since it's a json based transport layer. Eventually, in wallet.cpp, that base64 payload gets decoded and placed in the transaction in binary format.
Unfortunately, all the payload size checks are made before decoding, applying the 128k restriction to the base64 encoded data, although it will be stored in binary. This means that when using the RPC calls, the limit for the data is smaller than expected (around 128*3/4 = 96k).
Have I stumbled into a bug, or am I missing something?
This also means that the fees required are higher to upload data.
April 22, 2014, 08:11:44 PM
I was playing around with datacoin, but I seem to have found a small issue in the tx data size checking code.
According to the website, data can be up to 128*1024 bytes, and it is stored in binary.
From what I can see, the rpc methods send and receive the transaction data in base64, which makes sense, since it's a json based transport layer. Eventually, in wallet.cpp, that base64 payload gets decoded and placed in the transaction in binary format.
Unfortunately, all the payload size checks are made before decoding, applying the 128k restriction to the base64 encoded data, although it will be stored in binary. This means that when using the RPC calls, the limit for the data is smaller than expected (around 128*3/4 = 96k).
Have I stumbled into a bug, or am I missing something?
According to the website, data can be up to 128*1024 bytes, and it is stored in binary.
From what I can see, the rpc methods send and receive the transaction data in base64, which makes sense, since it's a json based transport layer. Eventually, in wallet.cpp, that base64 payload gets decoded and placed in the transaction in binary format.
Unfortunately, all the payload size checks are made before decoding, applying the 128k restriction to the base64 encoded data, although it will be stored in binary. This means that when using the RPC calls, the limit for the data is smaller than expected (around 128*3/4 = 96k).
Have I stumbled into a bug, or am I missing something?
April 19, 2014, 03:25:25 PM
The miners activity is definitely getting stronger day after day. It is very interesting fenomena.
GPU mining is now working for primecoin/datacoin!
It explained the sudden jumping of the number of gpool dtc miners
April 19, 2014, 02:09:27 PM
The miners activity is definitely getting stronger day after day. It is very interesting fenomena.
GPU mining is now working for primecoin/datacoin!
April 18, 2014, 10:05:39 AM
The miners activity is definitely getting stronger day after day. It is very interesting fenomena.
April 15, 2014, 11:58:56 AM
Is anyone interested in joining a datacoin foundation? Just out of curiosity? If there was a foundation committed to finding a developer, we would need engineers of marketing people (mostly engineers at this time because we need to reestablish datacoin).
I am a bit busy with Riecoin but I can commit a bit of my time to a datacoin foundation.
http://datacoinfoundation.org/
I am a bit busy with Riecoin but I can commit a bit of my time to a datacoin foundation.
http://datacoinfoundation.org/
April 15, 2014, 09:17:22 AM
I see i should have read two posts further up. Are storj buying it up for testing?
April 15, 2014, 08:55:33 AM
So, whats the story with the volume on bter, on the 12th and the 14th of march.. We are heading back up to that area now to test it. Capitulation or accumulation? Does anyone have trade history from that period? Price has not moved much since, if it can get above those trades and use them as support it would become interesting. Is something in the works or was that just a final dump?
Jump to: