thanks for you data,also I found that it's quite unstale with the maximal performance settings,sgminer crashed every day.
In this case, with the exception of scrypt, I took under consideration only stable settings.
Topic: [ANN][DCN] Deepcoin secure hashing (CPU/GPU) New algo/ No premine/ No IPO/ PoW - page 44. (Read 182607 times)
September 02, 2014, 11:14:40 AM
In this case, with the exception of scrypt, I took under consideration only stable settings.
September 02, 2014, 11:13:04 AM
I'd like to discuss some results of my research on energy efficiency of deepcoin mining.
This is the example of my small miner based on three Radeon cards: 7950+7870XT+7750.
The power consumption was measured for the whole system.
There are more than one result for some algos as I wanted to test different settings.
Scrypt is just for a comparison and setting are not really optimal. Sorry, I wouldn't bother much with searching optimal GPU settings for scrypt any more.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/rj5pl1mtg3ei6zw/deep_efficiency.png?dl=0
My general conclusion is that:
1. deepcoin algo can be really efficient and eco friendly
2. however it is also very setting-sensitive algo and can turn in power greedy if you don't care for that.
If you press these settings for maximal performance you may get in result significant electrical waste.
In this case tiny performance improvement of roughly 8,5% is completely not worth of 27% power drown increasement.
This is the example of my small miner based on three Radeon cards: 7950+7870XT+7750.
The power consumption was measured for the whole system.
There are more than one result for some algos as I wanted to test different settings.
Scrypt is just for a comparison and setting are not really optimal. Sorry, I wouldn't bother much with searching optimal GPU settings for scrypt any more.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/rj5pl1mtg3ei6zw/deep_efficiency.png?dl=0
My general conclusion is that:
1. deepcoin algo can be really efficient and eco friendly
2. however it is also very setting-sensitive algo and can turn in power greedy if you don't care for that.
If you press these settings for maximal performance you may get in result significant electrical waste.
In this case tiny performance improvement of roughly 8,5% is completely not worth of 27% power drown increasement.
thanks for you data,also I found that it's quite unstale with the maximal performance settings,sgminer crashed every day.
September 02, 2014, 10:59:31 AM
I'd like to discuss some results of my research on energy efficiency of deepcoin mining.
This is the example of my small miner based on three Radeon cards: 7950+7870XT+7750.
The power consumption was measured for the whole system.
There are more than one result for some algos as I wanted to test different settings.
Scrypt is just for a comparison and settings are not really optimal. Sorry, I wouldn't bother much with searching optimal GPU settings for scrypt any more.
My general conclusion is that:
1. deepcoin algo can be really efficient and eco friendly
2. however it is also very settings-sensitive algo and can turn in power greedy if you don't care for that.
If you press these settings for maximal performance you may get in result significant electrical waste.
In this case tiny performance improvement of roughly 8,5% is completely not worth of 27% power drown increasement.
This is the example of my small miner based on three Radeon cards: 7950+7870XT+7750.
The power consumption was measured for the whole system.
There are more than one result for some algos as I wanted to test different settings.
Scrypt is just for a comparison and settings are not really optimal. Sorry, I wouldn't bother much with searching optimal GPU settings for scrypt any more.
My general conclusion is that:
1. deepcoin algo can be really efficient and eco friendly
2. however it is also very settings-sensitive algo and can turn in power greedy if you don't care for that.
If you press these settings for maximal performance you may get in result significant electrical waste.
In this case tiny performance improvement of roughly 8,5% is completely not worth of 27% power drown increasement.
September 02, 2014, 10:09:24 AM
What's going on here?Is this Deepcoin thread or am I in the wrong place?
Nobody cares about your tac shit here,fuck off!
Nobody cares about your tac shit here,fuck off!
September 02, 2014, 09:37:04 AM
Let's clear some things up, shall we?
In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.
Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.
Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.
In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.
Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.
Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.
+1
I think we should be more tolerant towards these trolls concerning their limited understanding of English. They couldn't read and write well. Ignore them is the best I can think of.
I do not want to look for shit, so I apologize in advance if you take something wrong, but I think having a limited understanding of English does not make you a troll.
I am French and have some trouble with some english words, but I'm far from a troll just bashing one coin or another.
September 02, 2014, 09:15:54 AM
Let's clear some things up, shall we?
In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.
Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.
Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.
In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.
Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.
Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.
+1
I think we should be more tolerant towards these trolls concerning their limited understanding of English. They couldn't read and write well. Ignore them is the best I can think of.
September 02, 2014, 08:54:48 AM
Let's clear some things up, shall we?
In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.
Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.
Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.
In the most technical of terms, TAC was not a scam. It was laid out in the original thread AND the white paper that the dev would be receiving donations. HOWEVER, due to lack of consistency in the relay of information, the vast majority were unaware of what was actually happening and subsequently, unfortunate events ensued.
Now, an entirely new team has taken over and will be managing TAC. If you still think it is a scam, it is due to your own ignorance.
Regarding DCN, if you think it is appropriate to make that correlation, Dilution, well, by all means, please go ahead. Your loss due to your own naivety and quite possibly one of the most ludicrous arguments I've witnessed.
September 02, 2014, 07:37:36 AM
The author of DCN has joined Talkcoin team.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam.
Could you prove me that Talkcoin is a scam with your 2. grade English please?
Well the Chinese trolls are everywhere these days, all with newbie account. Sometimes I become sick just because of reading their comments.
September 02, 2014, 07:27:20 AM
I'll keep mining some DCN and I like the deepcoin algo,pretty low temperature.
September 02, 2014, 07:08:17 AM
can personal attacks change the truth?
never care about those stupid ,meaningless personal attacks here.
never care about those stupid ,meaningless personal attacks here.
What truth you are talking about? I wasn't talking about TalkCoin, I know nothing about TalkCoin, don't care to know anything about TalkCoin and you know I'm talking about DeepCoin, obvious from the thread's name, so quit trying to mix things on purpose. Period.
You on purpose PUSHED Bushstar's name in the middle of your comment thing then saying you are feeling worry about his reputation *so touchy* and then talking about creating a coin, lol YET as I said and as I will say again DCN and TalkCoin are here for months, you created your hide-behind-it nick just one day ago AFTER the DCN rising NOT before it, not at the time you found TalkCoin in your opinion is a scam. What truth you are talking about again??
Personal attacks? Dude for example when a thief has robbed something and I call him a thief, that's not a personal attack, it's about stating some FACTS.
Sounds like either IE himself or one of his slaves. Same style, same type of FUD.
Grow up and get a life kid.
September 02, 2014, 04:30:44 AM
DCN is a clean coin,but tac is proved scam.
Yeah,talkcoin dev has stolen huge amount of tac . September 02, 2014, 02:43:46 AM
can personal attacks change the truth?
never care about those stupid ,meaningless personal attacks here.
never care about those stupid ,meaningless personal attacks here.
September 02, 2014, 02:42:40 AM
Hey, dev. You are silent for more than a week. How's life?
September 02, 2014, 02:21:10 AM
DCN is a clean coin,but tac is proved scam.
September 01, 2014, 10:57:46 PM
criticizing Bushstar as a start then talking about a new coin at another coin's thread 
lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays
lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays
yea exactly basically he is saying "deepcoin is a scam!!!.... can we relaunch?"
@dilution007
DeepCoin is here for months and TalkCoin as well, lol so why were you silent all this time.
You SUDDENLY decided to create a new nickname and hide behind it AFTER not before DeepCoin price rising and fud this thread with your shit about reputation of a dev. That's telling everything.
Dude you and guys like you are retards no more, I blame you not cause it's your nature, I blame the weak hands - the real retards - that they keep falling into traps of guys like you then moaning like b******s when they lose everything.
September 01, 2014, 10:50:56 PM
criticizing Bushstar as a start then talking about a new coin at another coin's thread
lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays
lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays
yea exactly basically he is saying "deepcoin is a scam!!!.... can we relaunch?"
September 01, 2014, 10:46:56 PM
The author of DCN has joined Talkcoin team.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam.
So, according to your logic, DCN is a scam as Feathercoin since is the same dev.
You just want to denigrate Talkcoin. Your stupidity has no limits.
I am very touched by your concern about the reputation of Bushstar.
developping? Go to sleep... you're drunk...
September 01, 2014, 10:36:21 PM
criticizing Bushstar as a start then talking about a new coin at another coin's thread
lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays
lol wtf is wrong with fudders of nowadays
September 01, 2014, 10:25:04 PM
The author of DCN has joined Talkcoin team.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam.
So, according to your logic, DCN is a scam as Feathercoin since is the same dev.
You just want to denigrate Talkcoin. Your stupidity has no limits.
I am very touched by your concern about the reputation of Bushstar.
September 01, 2014, 10:09:36 PM
The author of DCN has joined Talkcoin team.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam.
Talkcoin is proved to a scam.
So, according to your logic, DCN is a scam as Feathercoin since is the same dev.
You just want to denigrate Talkcoin. Your stupidity has no limits.
I am very touched by your concern about the reputation of Bushstar.
Jump to: