Topic: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 507. (Read 1201332 times)

This is Decred where consensus is mutilated and deliberately violated, where significant 34% minorities are being pressured and forced into major changes to consensus rules. Like it or lump it... This is a joke!

PoW

No ICO? But how are they going to distribute 21m coins?

There is no ICO i guess.

Just let Decreds concensus process take care of new ideas and changes, it's not Bitcoin where PoW miners can easily block a consensus change.

When the ICO of Decred is planned?

I guess first, they will publish the statistics of the airdrop. If i remember right they said that maybe this week the testnet will be running

dev, any news about approximate start of testnet?

What bothers me,

c0's % of the premine should be priced at $1.00 per decred. The price "at which this project may be able to sustain itself at 10% subsidy"

(Beyondtext said "If we assume the value of 1 decred averages to USD 1.00 over the first year, this means we'll have USD 302K to spend on development work.  This is a small amount of funding and can pay for 3-4 full time developers for 1 year, so if we went below 10% dev subsidy it would mean the project cannot fund itself unless its exchange rate is well over USD 1.00 per decred")

But then c0's guaranteed 400,000 decred PoS awards in year 1 MUST also be considered in the "compensation package".
This 400,000 "free and guaranteed" PoS is more than the dev fund receives in year 1, yet is totally unaccounted for in the c0 "compensation package"

c0 "imply" they are not seeking profit here. They just say they want "compensation for bring up costs" = $420,000. ok fair enough.
But, c0's "compensation package" is structured to produce 3x that figure = "compensation for bring up cost + 200% profit"
(100% profit at launch + 100% profit in yr 1. based on decred price "at which this project may be able to sustain itself at 10% subsidy")

So, a fairer "compensation package for bring up costs" would be something like,
TOTAL received by c0 at end year1 (premine + PoS) = 420,000 decred.
(ALL the premine/distribution/PoS figures would need changing)

Obviously. A friend here.
But what about this bit?


It will determine if you will have my vote or not on the market.


Edit: icebreaker endorsed the other day hashfast/scam and was involved with them from the start.
It has nothing to do with him trolling Dash. He is irrelevant. End of story for me.

I pray that the Cryptocurrencies Community stop acting like its a civil war, and learn to be a family. We should respect each other projects, but I only see trolling and mischief: actions that hurt all cryptocoins. Of course it's revolting to see how these despicable trolls act in a shameless manner: I can easily understand aleix's reaction. But its stupid to keep feeding those disagreements.
Shame to see that the members of this community are fighting each other, instead of uniting. There's a lot to learn from each crypto project, for the benefit of all.

What's the time for air drop to happen,  I thought that the day was today, 25th.

I understand and concur with your words. I will not mention this topic again if not necessary.

Some of us here have some experience with each other in this forums. Sadly, I know some people background very well.

best regards,

People are here on the basis of their own free will. This is not a project where there will be personal attacks against others - not from the project's side. You are free to say anything you want, and please know there will be no attempt to censor you, but personal preferences for who and who should not be allowed to post here or be part of the project will have no effect on their participation - everyone is welcome and contribution will always be empowered. Everyone is judged solely on the basis of the merit they show in their work on the project - and that includes discussing the issues here and elsewhere. Contribution only starts at "why do this?" - it is not up to the project to construct a solution to every query. It is up to everyone with a better solution to step up and detail that proposal properly and show clearly why it is a better option. That is no easy task, but that's a fundamental consideration of in-depth critique.

Please remove this user (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/splatters-233575) from  AIRDROP database. He ammitted that he has exploited the airdrop with multi account.

Also please report him.


They talking in italian on how they exploited the airdrop.Splatters has used BTCTALK multiaccount and decred forum multiaccount.

The other user suggest Splatters to use TOR but he didn't ammit the SCAM, only Splatters does.

Please investigate and BAN before the genesis launch.

Oh brother, bantering with angry Dash bagholders like you two and big-blockers like Frap.doc is just a hobby.  But I'm flattered you think I'm good enough to go pro.   

I'm here in the Decred thread to learn, and maybe be helpful and or actually productive.  How about you guys?

I notice you both have been in Dash a long time and very nearly exclusively post on its thread.  Any plans to sell some masternodes and buy into the Decred airdump?

What's the right balance of XDC/DASH/PPC for the balanced PoS porftfolio?  1/3 each?

I Agree.

Icebreaker is a despicable human being. He is a professional liar and troller.

Be well aware of that.

Don't get me wrong. Wouldn't be better to hire devs? Or pay them for taking the risk later. Decred proudly announce Governance and voting from the start.
Why not use it in proper way? That would be the best and fair way.
And please, don't let icebreaker to endorse Decred.

Sure we do,please set out your proposals

So I guess we don't need this.

Project Governance and Development

In addition to the technical features that make up the technology, Decred as a project introduces several development and governance features and proposals to ensure and steer long-term growth. We encourage participants to discuss these topics earnestly, as we want to ensure the system of development and governance is built on a solid foundation.

A multi-stakeholder development ecosystem that welcomes and empowers participants who want to build new functionality and improve on existing features.
Any party can submit feature proposals and developers are paid for work to fulfill requirements. This is done in full view of the community in a system designed to fight against ingroup-outgroup dynamics.