Topic: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 - page 273. (Read 523584 times)

Highly experimental p2pool this is my first attempt at setting one up.  Set fee for 2%

UPDATE - has stayed up and running we're at 18.5 mh/s. Have found a number of blocks

http://107.20.222.119:9500/static/

cgminer --scrypt -o http://107.20.222.119:9500/ -u yourdigitalcoinaddress -p

Lucky you. I have just 2 rejects in 1 hour

If fast block rates are better then why didn't bitcoin use them.  I think geistgeld already tried changing the block rate speed.

Point your other rigs to the IP address of the PC running the digitalcoin-qt client.

cgminer --scrypt -o http://192.168.1.?:xxxx

-tb-

iming.

A timeline to illustrate
1) A new block is published to the network (time starts)
2) Currently all miners are now working on stale (worthless) data
3) Pool server must be notified of block change (latency from average block to pool server, more links = better)
4) Pool server must generate new merkle tree
5) Pool server must issue LP and new work (latency between pool server & miner)
6) Client must receive LP and change data being worked on (time stops)

The amount of time spent doing those 6 steps will vary by pool and thus pools will have differing amount of stales.

Some pools (like slush for example) complete step 5 in order of miner size to ensure largest miners are updated as quickly as possible.  That bring effective hashing power closer to max quicker.

A good pool should:
a) have thousands of connections to bitcoin network to ensure it is quickly notified of all blocks found
b) actively search out IP addresses of other block generators to ensure they are in list of known nodes
c) have sufficient CPU power to quickly (as in fraction of a second) generate new work for all miners after block change
d) have low latency link to all miners (this is partially beyond control of pool)

Stales can never be brought to 0 but they can be significantly reduced.  On Bitminter my reject rate of prior 30 days is 0.04%.  I believe about 0.02% of that is due to hardware failures (one GPU has higher reject rate than all other GPU) so roughly 0.03% of that is pool inefficiency which is pretty damn good.  Anything below 0.1% should be considered good.  Anything above 1% is horribly bad.  Most miners have 0.1% to 1% stale rate.

conclusion   you are in a lousy pool   

The server is back, please check your config, the dead of arrival must be low for efficiency, and for decreasing useless network traffic.

Negative, that is the last place I'd put my money right now.

got 2 1 reject 1 accepted 17 coins in 20 minutes solo

I can't believe to my eyes, oh wait, are you trying to buy wdc?

The launch of this coin was a lot more fair than WDC. In that regard, I like this coin more than I do WDC.

I'm only getting 'DEAD ON ARRIVAL' messages for my shares from Blastbob's p2pool additions.

10 LTC for anyone who can fix this for me please!

Difficulty: 0.981
Reward: $17

Almost at target.

Hydroponica, please shut up.

You are trying to defend WDC, maybe because you already got a few with the hope to become instarich? I am sorry for you poor kid ahahah
WDC train has already passed and it will be gone soon!

WDc is less than .001 on the exchange, and that's because has been already dumped hard by miners and some idiots are pumping the the price now.

Real value is ZERO, it will be dead by the end of the week when profitability reaches 100%.

Nobody will adopt a stupid coin that can be attacked any time, leaded by a dev that doesn't even bother to use his real name
(and no, Satoshi is history, BTC is already LARGELY ADOPTED)

Except noone cares enough to create a pool, so your coin is still just getting raped by big miners, with low latency connections. So, the one thing setting you apart from WDC, failed.

lol, no response...I guess you all actually opned up the exchange, and pulled out your calculators...FYI, unlike the other alt coins, WDC is going up, not down

There was no successful 51% attack or whatever that person is making up. People should not use terms they don't understand. There were plenty of people getting plenty of blocks the whole way through.

All coins have similar starts, this one will be the least affected by the early miners, since block rewards are proportionally small for the first ones. It was done to give people the opportunity to have pools up before normal rewards come into play.

If you are complaining because someone who is hashing at 40 MH/S is making more than you, crypto currency in general is not for you.

This is not the p2pool that has not correct code, the payout is given by the stats, however with a new coin  we have a lot of orphans, and these orphans will be discarded by the daemons. To have a lower orphan rate having a high local bandwidth with megahash power is quite efficient. Farms are there, and grabbing block is not so easy.

Highly experimental p2pool this is my first attempt at setting one up.  Set fee for 2%

http://107.20.222.119:9500/static/

cgminer --scrypt -o http://107.20.222.119:9500/ -u yourdigitalcoinaddress -p

Um, no? WDC is %299 profitable right now. Do a bit of math, before running your mouth, otherwise, you just look stupid