Hello everyone,
Since the DEV is not even considering the security (mining) problem of DIEM network, i'm making a bounty to try and fix it.
500 million DIEM BOUNTY to implement any solution, that increases DIEM security significantly and allows building long term infrastructure and trust for coin holders traders and merchantsMy general ideas, what could be done:
1. Implement POS
2. Add another algo for mining like myriadcoin.
3. Implement rewards and market DIEM to miners who no longer can mine btc, but posses old ASICS.
4. Check block history before creating new blocks
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1052185. from Gavin: check priorities and transactions
http://gavintech.blogspot.no/2012/05/neutralizing-51-attack.html6.
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/1037/what-can-xxxcoin-do-to-stop-the-impending-51-attackAny other proposals are welcome!Explanation:
Basic premise off all POW (proof-of-work) cryptocoins is that miners are producing blocks (blockchain), which are securing the network and making transactions. No miners - no security - no new transactions - coin is dead. If you are in doubt go ahead and read the original satoshi bitcoin whitepaper
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
Here is a list of coins who got attacked by 51% attack:
Terracoin Date: July 24, 2013
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/terracoin-attack-over-12th-attack-confirmd-261986Coiledcoin Date: Jan 5, 2012
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.675166Worldcoin Date: Nov 01, 2013
http://worldcoinforum.org/topic/456-confirmed-51-attack-double-spend-attack-on-worldcoin/Feathercoin
http://imgur.com/a/fTye4#10Situation right now:
1. Total network hashrate less than 0.3 TH/s . Last time i posted this warning network hashrate was 2 TH/s. The trend is obvious.
Block reward will be less than 1 DIEM in 4 days (2014 04 03).2. DEV is refusing to acknowledge the problem:
"DIEM doesn't need a large hashrate. There is no real point to mining since rewards are so low. Attacking is pointless, we just fork it back" No problem, we just fork it back, while all the coins on the exchanges/wallets are stolen using double spend attacks, and the network is unavailable for days.
3. DEV is promoting and supporting misguided solutions to this problem: "multipool mining scrypt coins and pay DIEM". Why would a miner want to get paid in DIEM, and risk his coin value if at any time this coin can be killed for less than 1000$ ? Why would a miner even use such a pool?
4. DIEM wallet has not been updated since launch:
https://github.com/CarpeDiemCoin/CarpeDiemLaunch/commits/master5. Block rewards will be less than 1 DIEM in less than 3 days.
There is no plan or discussion about increasing network fees to support mining/security.DIEM pros:
1. 8 second transactions are AWESOME
2. No premine
3. SHA256
4. Good launch
5. Semi recognizable name
6. Might succeed transitioning to transaction fee powered mining. No block rewards.
7. Active DEV and good community
DIEM cons:
1. Instamining on launch (50% coin mined the first day, 25% second day).
2. Chicken and egg problem, no mining incentives - network is not secure.
3. DEV is avoiding hard problems, wallet development has stopped.
Until situation changes, i don't recommend anyone to buy and/or hold DIEM or using it for any kind of real world purchases.