[ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY - page 210.

R-J-F

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 310

AKA RJF - Member since '13

Quote from: zahidmoon on June 10, 2017, 05:00:10 PM

it seems an intresting coin after litecoin
emc2 team is growing and its price is also growing
and crowdfunding platform is on its way and soon will be presented on next Friday 6/16/2017 on our web site www.emc2.foundation
its good news after crowdfunding price will rise and i hope after that there is no dump

Been holding EMC2 for years, mined most of them, glad to see it's getting some respect!

zahidmoon

sr. member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 269

it seems an intresting coin after litecoin
emc2 team is growing and its price is also growing
and crowdfunding platform is on its way and soon will be presented on next Friday 6/16/2017 on our web site www.emc2.foundation
its good news after crowdfunding price will rise and i hope after that there is no dump

ARTISTCOLONY

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: CryptoDatabase on June 09, 2017, 08:52:11 PM

Quote from: bluelab on June 09, 2017, 06:28:24 AM

We completed the design for emc2me.io - Einsteinium crowdfunding platform.

It will be presented next Friday 6/16/2017 on our web site www.emc2.foundation

Cheers!

Will this new crowdfunding platform feature those of us who sponsored the last one that didn't make it or will that be forgotten?

FIRST MILLION goes to greenpeace save the whales ~ save the rainforest~ legal weed ... Cool

https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_emc2

CryptoDatabase

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1005

https://cryptodatabase.net

Quote from: bluelab on June 09, 2017, 06:28:24 AM

We completed the design for emc2me.io - Einsteinium crowdfunding platform.

It will be presented next Friday 6/16/2017 on our web site www.emc2.foundation

Cheers!

Will this new crowdfunding platform feature those of us who sponsored the last one that didn't make it or will that be forgotten?

ARTISTCOLONY

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: mrbodz on June 09, 2017, 06:45:38 PM

anyone know why the bittrex market is down?

EMC2 4000 close !!! cryptopia markets legit * Cheesy

weeeeeeee

mrbodz

hero member

Activity: 800

Merit: 1000

anyone know why the bittrex market is down?

ARTISTCOLONY

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: SweetStars on June 09, 2017, 12:19:38 AM

Improvements and development of the coin leads to higher prices in the intermediate and long run. Things begin to snowball.
The team is growing. Progress is being made, the value increases. It is becoming more resilient when those bloodbaths happen. And stays up when it shifts upward.
Focusing on super-short term gains is just pump and dump scammy crap, or pure hype. Both which end in pain, and alienate folks. There is no growth there in the intermediate and long term, both in price and development. Price matters, but without a solid team and growth, real increases do not happen. You end up rotting on the vine. What I have seen over the last three months is a growing team with a great strategy to push this coin forward. The coin has gone up in value as a result.

EMC2 what part of PAID PROMOTION are you confused about? it's just LITECOIN re-mix nothing radically different than other coins lol Cool

==== .O1BTC par value $EMC2* ====

bluelab

full member

Activity: 267

Merit: 150

We completed the design for emc2me.io - Einsteinium crowdfunding platform.

It will be presented next Friday 6/16/2017 on our web site www.emc2.foundation

Cheers!

SweetStars

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Improvements and development of the coin leads to higher prices in the intermediate and long run. Things begin to snowball.
The team is growing. Progress is being made, the value increases. It is becoming more resilient when those bloodbaths happen. And stays up when it shifts upward.
Focusing on super-short term gains is just pump and dump scammy crap, or pure hype. Both which end in pain, and alienate folks. There is no growth there in the intermediate and long term, both in price and development. Price matters, but without a solid team and growth, real increases do not happen. You end up rotting on the vine. What I have seen over the last three months is a growing team with a great strategy to push this coin forward. The coin has gone up in value as a result.

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: ARTISTCOLONY on June 08, 2017, 09:32:49 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 07, 2017, 11:35:30 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 07, 2017, 01:56:25 PM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 11:05:01 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 06, 2017, 10:12:56 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 04:56:58 AM

Quote from: HashUnlimited on June 06, 2017, 04:44:34 AM

PM-Tech Update:

Basic functionality is running fine in production. The only issue users might have encountered on our pool last night was that mined blocks haven't been updated in the frontend for a while. This wasn't a node issue, I have installed backup instances where one of them is actively communicating with a stratum test instance sending block notifications. When this one got synced, it mixed up the shares in the DB a little, causing MPOS to stop the UI updates (cronjobs). All blocks mined were accounted later on, no issues there. My apologies for discovering that a few hours late.

The performance of the new wallet is slightly (really minimal) worse than the old one. This is caused by the additional block verification steps due to the BIPs deployed using Bitcoin's IsSuperMajority rule, e.g. elevating the block version. Once these BIPs are enforced, we will release a minor update almost immediately, where those rule checks will be replaced by a simple starting block check (similar to how BIP34 is handled nowadays). From then it is expected to outperform the current version.

Initial block download was improved significantly, this will be noticed by new users as well. IBD starts with downloading just the headers from one peer, in parallel the block download is initiated receiving the data from up to eight peer simultaneously, decreasing IBD times from a day now on the old version to a few hours in best case.

Currently I'm in the process of testing the updated multisig functionality which is also supposed to be supported by the Electrum servers. A lot of possibilities are given here in terms of smart contracts, micropayment channels and JoinCoin.

To be continued....

good ...

im glad things are starting to make a lot more sense now ... as well as starting to roll along mate ...

pool / stratum / db - are all a pain but part of the process ...

we will start the pool i initially started mentioning - and compare notes ... that way we can have a couple of pools running IF i can get it all setup and modified ...

we unfortunately cant really test the pool - as we have no scrypt miners / asics to test with ... especially when high hash is concerned ...

right now though - finishing all the 'real world' stuff and setup ...

chat to you back on skype soon ...

#crysx

just fucking stop you need to talk to varvarin we have more hash power than you can shake a stick at Cool

hmmm ...

i dunno whether to take what you are saying as a joke - or you are purposely making out to be offensive ...

not to mention that what you have written - really doesnt make sense to me ...

who on earth are you anyway? ...

#crysx

EMC2 ===> if you had any idea how big this coin is... 10K easy maybe 100K by 2018 Cool

~ask varvarin

you think i dont know? ...

being one of the members of the core team - i had better know Wink

...

but here is the thing ... unlike you - who rates the coins 'bigness' on price - i ( and we at CWI ) dont ... we rate it on the coins progress - and most of all - the team behind it ... price is consequential ... no matter who you speak to on the team - varvarin included - they will tell you the same thing ... even though some of the older team members have a nice sum in their wallets - and would like to see the price increase - the main purpose of ANYTHING happening here is the growth of the coin - not the price ...

so 10k 100k 1m - all consequential ...

without the great team and members of the team - the coin is lost ...

so - i think i have a better idea of how 'big' the coin is than most others ... except for the other team members of course - who KNOW what i do about it and how much effort and code are going into it currently ... and believe me - there are LOTS of things that we will bring out soon ...

Wink

...

#crysx

PRICE is everything. if we were still 20 satoshis what really is it worth?
..in my world your grand ideologies mean little if you are broke and jobless

my point exactly ...

which is why WE continue to get stronger and better - and those with the 'price' ideology continue to scramble for the next dollar ... normally due to hunger and poverty - as well as greed ...

price is NOT everything ...

vision and hard ( and smart ) work and the pursuit of a workable system IS everything ...

it is your mentality that keeps the systems where they are - and on a level that cannot grow ... vision ( instead of the blind 'dollar' faith you seem to have ) is the growth factor here - NOT price ... what is the use of a system that goes no where - but on a trade list? ... eventually interest wains and it becomes a deceased entity ... without growth of the project - price is moot ... and that growth can ONLY come from vision ... and that costs nothing ...

but - im not here to convince you otherwise ... only here to grow the coin - the projects surrounding it - and the ideals that come with it ...

btw - to answer your question ... YUP! ... even at 1sat it is worth it if it has a decent vision ... eventually - people will see what comes of this vision - GROWTH ... when that happens - price is a consequence ... oops - i did it again ... said those two words - price and consequential - in the same sentence again Wink

...

#crysx

HashUnlimited

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 10

PM-Tech Update:
All tests are going as planned, soft fork testing will take place this weekend. For the automated testing, we are planning another change in the main code within this release, which will allow us to use the same predefined tests and payloads for future updates rather than completely re-writing the test procedures. Initial tests from Bitcoin are nice, just to make things simple (understandably), they are using the coinbase transactions for any coin shifting. Now EMC2 comes in, the only coin (at least I know) which per specification requires two transactions there, one address hard coded... The decision to adapt the main code rather than the tests was also influenced by the fact, that the mining functionality of the node itself is deprecated (block creation via RPC commands are still going to be possible though). So we need to be more flexible unless we want to create block by block on test net which currently does not allow to mine on stratum protocol due only one hardcoded public key which is of course not valid for test net.

In parallel we are evaluating the possibility to quickly adopt the stratum code as well, at least to provide main net/test net configurability but the target is to use the same codebase as well for any other coin it was initially designed for. This would provide much better maintenance possibilities for pools running multiple coins.

The whole thing isn't going to delay the release too much, we should be out for pools and exchanges within the next week as planned.

To be continued....

ARTISTCOLONY

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 07, 2017, 11:35:30 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 07, 2017, 01:56:25 PM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 11:05:01 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 06, 2017, 10:12:56 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 04:56:58 AM

Quote from: HashUnlimited on June 06, 2017, 04:44:34 AM

PM-Tech Update:

Basic functionality is running fine in production. The only issue users might have encountered on our pool last night was that mined blocks haven't been updated in the frontend for a while. This wasn't a node issue, I have installed backup instances where one of them is actively communicating with a stratum test instance sending block notifications. When this one got synced, it mixed up the shares in the DB a little, causing MPOS to stop the UI updates (cronjobs). All blocks mined were accounted later on, no issues there. My apologies for discovering that a few hours late.

The performance of the new wallet is slightly (really minimal) worse than the old one. This is caused by the additional block verification steps due to the BIPs deployed using Bitcoin's IsSuperMajority rule, e.g. elevating the block version. Once these BIPs are enforced, we will release a minor update almost immediately, where those rule checks will be replaced by a simple starting block check (similar to how BIP34 is handled nowadays). From then it is expected to outperform the current version.

Initial block download was improved significantly, this will be noticed by new users as well. IBD starts with downloading just the headers from one peer, in parallel the block download is initiated receiving the data from up to eight peer simultaneously, decreasing IBD times from a day now on the old version to a few hours in best case.

Currently I'm in the process of testing the updated multisig functionality which is also supposed to be supported by the Electrum servers. A lot of possibilities are given here in terms of smart contracts, micropayment channels and JoinCoin.

To be continued....

good ...

im glad things are starting to make a lot more sense now ... as well as starting to roll along mate ...

pool / stratum / db - are all a pain but part of the process ...

we will start the pool i initially started mentioning - and compare notes ... that way we can have a couple of pools running IF i can get it all setup and modified ...

we unfortunately cant really test the pool - as we have no scrypt miners / asics to test with ... especially when high hash is concerned ...

right now though - finishing all the 'real world' stuff and setup ...

chat to you back on skype soon ...

#crysx

just fucking stop you need to talk to varvarin we have more hash power than you can shake a stick at Cool

hmmm ...

i dunno whether to take what you are saying as a joke - or you are purposely making out to be offensive ...

not to mention that what you have written - really doesnt make sense to me ...

who on earth are you anyway? ...

#crysx

EMC2 ===> if you had any idea how big this coin is... 10K easy maybe 100K by 2018 Cool

~ask varvarin

you think i dont know? ...

being one of the members of the core team - i had better know Wink

...

but here is the thing ... unlike you - who rates the coins 'bigness' on price - i ( and we at CWI ) dont ... we rate it on the coins progress - and most of all - the team behind it ... price is consequential ... no matter who you speak to on the team - varvarin included - they will tell you the same thing ... even though some of the older team members have a nice sum in their wallets - and would like to see the price increase - the main purpose of ANYTHING happening here is the growth of the coin - not the price ...

so 10k 100k 1m - all consequential ...

without the great team and members of the team - the coin is lost ...

so - i think i have a better idea of how 'big' the coin is than most others ... except for the other team members of course - who KNOW what i do about it and how much effort and code are going into it currently ... and believe me - there are LOTS of things that we will bring out soon ...

Wink

...

#crysx

PRICE is everything. if we were still 20 satoshis what really is it worth?
..in my world your grand ideologies mean little if you are broke and jobless

R-J-F

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 310

AKA RJF - Member since '13

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 07, 2017, 11:35:30 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 07, 2017, 01:56:25 PM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 11:05:01 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 06, 2017, 10:12:56 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 04:56:58 AM

Quote from: HashUnlimited on June 06, 2017, 04:44:34 AM

PM-Tech Update:

Basic functionality is running fine in production. The only issue users might have encountered on our pool last night was that mined blocks haven't been updated in the frontend for a while. This wasn't a node issue, I have installed backup instances where one of them is actively communicating with a stratum test instance sending block notifications. When this one got synced, it mixed up the shares in the DB a little, causing MPOS to stop the UI updates (cronjobs). All blocks mined were accounted later on, no issues there. My apologies for discovering that a few hours late.

The performance of the new wallet is slightly (really minimal) worse than the old one. This is caused by the additional block verification steps due to the BIPs deployed using Bitcoin's IsSuperMajority rule, e.g. elevating the block version. Once these BIPs are enforced, we will release a minor update almost immediately, where those rule checks will be replaced by a simple starting block check (similar to how BIP34 is handled nowadays). From then it is expected to outperform the current version.

Initial block download was improved significantly, this will be noticed by new users as well. IBD starts with downloading just the headers from one peer, in parallel the block download is initiated receiving the data from up to eight peer simultaneously, decreasing IBD times from a day now on the old version to a few hours in best case.

Currently I'm in the process of testing the updated multisig functionality which is also supposed to be supported by the Electrum servers. A lot of possibilities are given here in terms of smart contracts, micropayment channels and JoinCoin.

To be continued....

good ...

im glad things are starting to make a lot more sense now ... as well as starting to roll along mate ...

pool / stratum / db - are all a pain but part of the process ...

we will start the pool i initially started mentioning - and compare notes ... that way we can have a couple of pools running IF i can get it all setup and modified ...

we unfortunately cant really test the pool - as we have no scrypt miners / asics to test with ... especially when high hash is concerned ...

right now though - finishing all the 'real world' stuff and setup ...

chat to you back on skype soon ...

#crysx

just fucking stop you need to talk to varvarin we have more hash power than you can shake a stick at Cool

hmmm ...

i dunno whether to take what you are saying as a joke - or you are purposely making out to be offensive ...

not to mention that what you have written - really doesnt make sense to me ...

who on earth are you anyway? ...

#crysx

EMC2 ===> if you had any idea how big this coin is... 10K easy maybe 100K by 2018 Cool

~ask varvarin

you think i dont know? ...

being one of the members of the core team - i had better know Wink

...

but here is the thing ... unlike you - who rates the coins 'bigness' on price - i ( and we at CWI ) dont ... we rate it on the coins progress - and most of all - the team behind it ... price is consequential ... no matter who you speak to on the team - varvarin included - they will tell you the same thing ... even though some of the older team members have a nice sum in their wallets - and would like to see the price increase - the main purpose of ANYTHING happening here is the growth of the coin - not the price ...

so 10k 100k 1m - all consequential ...

without the great team and members of the team - the coin is lost ...

so - i think i have a better idea of how 'big' the coin is than most others ... except for the other team members of course - who KNOW what i do about it and how much effort and code are going into it currently ... and believe me - there are LOTS of things that we will bring out soon ...

Wink

...

#crysx

Very well said. Projects like this with real world implications still suffer from "price fixation" when there is so much more going on. I have mined, and held, EMC2 for years and I commend you and the team for working diligently to make EMC2 a project to look up to, not just a "buy low, sell high" junk coin. Thank you for your dedication, all of you on the team and, all the silent supporters as well.

bluelab

full member

Activity: 267

Merit: 150

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 07, 2017, 11:35:30 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 07, 2017, 01:56:25 PM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 11:05:01 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 06, 2017, 10:12:56 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 04:56:58 AM

Quote from: HashUnlimited on June 06, 2017, 04:44:34 AM

PM-Tech Update:

Basic functionality is running fine in production. The only issue users might have encountered on our pool last night was that mined blocks haven't been updated in the frontend for a while. This wasn't a node issue, I have installed backup instances where one of them is actively communicating with a stratum test instance sending block notifications. When this one got synced, it mixed up the shares in the DB a little, causing MPOS to stop the UI updates (cronjobs). All blocks mined were accounted later on, no issues there. My apologies for discovering that a few hours late.

The performance of the new wallet is slightly (really minimal) worse than the old one. This is caused by the additional block verification steps due to the BIPs deployed using Bitcoin's IsSuperMajority rule, e.g. elevating the block version. Once these BIPs are enforced, we will release a minor update almost immediately, where those rule checks will be replaced by a simple starting block check (similar to how BIP34 is handled nowadays). From then it is expected to outperform the current version.

Initial block download was improved significantly, this will be noticed by new users as well. IBD starts with downloading just the headers from one peer, in parallel the block download is initiated receiving the data from up to eight peer simultaneously, decreasing IBD times from a day now on the old version to a few hours in best case.

Currently I'm in the process of testing the updated multisig functionality which is also supposed to be supported by the Electrum servers. A lot of possibilities are given here in terms of smart contracts, micropayment channels and JoinCoin.

To be continued....

good ...

im glad things are starting to make a lot more sense now ... as well as starting to roll along mate ...

pool / stratum / db - are all a pain but part of the process ...

we will start the pool i initially started mentioning - and compare notes ... that way we can have a couple of pools running IF i can get it all setup and modified ...

we unfortunately cant really test the pool - as we have no scrypt miners / asics to test with ... especially when high hash is concerned ...

right now though - finishing all the 'real world' stuff and setup ...

chat to you back on skype soon ...

#crysx

just fucking stop you need to talk to varvarin we have more hash power than you can shake a stick at Cool

hmmm ...

i dunno whether to take what you are saying as a joke - or you are purposely making out to be offensive ...

not to mention that what you have written - really doesnt make sense to me ...

who on earth are you anyway? ...

#crysx

EMC2 ===> if you had any idea how big this coin is... 10K easy maybe 100K by 2018 Cool

~ask varvarin

you think i dont know? ...

being one of the members of the core team - i had better know Wink

...

but here is the thing ... unlike you - who rates the coins 'bigness' on price - i ( and we at CWI ) dont ... we rate it on the coins progress - and most of all - the team behind it ... price is consequential ... no matter who you speak to on the team - varvarin included - they will tell you the same thing ... even though some of the older team members have a nice sum in their wallets - and would like to see the price increase - the main purpose of ANYTHING happening here is the growth of the coin - not the price ...

so 10k 100k 1m - all consequential ...

without the great team and members of the team - the coin is lost ...

so - i think i have a better idea of how 'big' the coin is than most others ... except for the other team members of course - who KNOW what i do about it and how much effort and code are going into it currently ... and believe me - there are LOTS of things that we will bring out soon ...

Wink

...

#crysx

crysx, bitcoinrevolution , you are guys awesome

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 07, 2017, 01:56:25 PM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 11:05:01 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 06, 2017, 10:12:56 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 04:56:58 AM

Quote from: HashUnlimited on June 06, 2017, 04:44:34 AM

PM-Tech Update:

Basic functionality is running fine in production. The only issue users might have encountered on our pool last night was that mined blocks haven't been updated in the frontend for a while. This wasn't a node issue, I have installed backup instances where one of them is actively communicating with a stratum test instance sending block notifications. When this one got synced, it mixed up the shares in the DB a little, causing MPOS to stop the UI updates (cronjobs). All blocks mined were accounted later on, no issues there. My apologies for discovering that a few hours late.

The performance of the new wallet is slightly (really minimal) worse than the old one. This is caused by the additional block verification steps due to the BIPs deployed using Bitcoin's IsSuperMajority rule, e.g. elevating the block version. Once these BIPs are enforced, we will release a minor update almost immediately, where those rule checks will be replaced by a simple starting block check (similar to how BIP34 is handled nowadays). From then it is expected to outperform the current version.

Initial block download was improved significantly, this will be noticed by new users as well. IBD starts with downloading just the headers from one peer, in parallel the block download is initiated receiving the data from up to eight peer simultaneously, decreasing IBD times from a day now on the old version to a few hours in best case.

Currently I'm in the process of testing the updated multisig functionality which is also supposed to be supported by the Electrum servers. A lot of possibilities are given here in terms of smart contracts, micropayment channels and JoinCoin.

To be continued....

good ...

im glad things are starting to make a lot more sense now ... as well as starting to roll along mate ...

pool / stratum / db - are all a pain but part of the process ...

we will start the pool i initially started mentioning - and compare notes ... that way we can have a couple of pools running IF i can get it all setup and modified ...

we unfortunately cant really test the pool - as we have no scrypt miners / asics to test with ... especially when high hash is concerned ...

right now though - finishing all the 'real world' stuff and setup ...

chat to you back on skype soon ...

#crysx

just fucking stop you need to talk to varvarin we have more hash power than you can shake a stick at Cool

hmmm ...

i dunno whether to take what you are saying as a joke - or you are purposely making out to be offensive ...

not to mention that what you have written - really doesnt make sense to me ...

who on earth are you anyway? ...

#crysx

EMC2 ===> if you had any idea how big this coin is... 10K easy maybe 100K by 2018 Cool

~ask varvarin

you think i dont know? ...

being one of the members of the core team - i had better know Wink

...

but here is the thing ... unlike you - who rates the coins 'bigness' on price - i ( and we at CWI ) dont ... we rate it on the coins progress - and most of all - the team behind it ... price is consequential ... no matter who you speak to on the team - varvarin included - they will tell you the same thing ... even though some of the older team members have a nice sum in their wallets - and would like to see the price increase - the main purpose of ANYTHING happening here is the growth of the coin - not the price ...

so 10k 100k 1m - all consequential ...

without the great team and members of the team - the coin is lost ...

so - i think i have a better idea of how 'big' the coin is than most others ... except for the other team members of course - who KNOW what i do about it and how much effort and code are going into it currently ... and believe me - there are LOTS of things that we will bring out soon ...

Wink

...

#crysx

drumamat

sr. member

Activity: 1193

Merit: 251

Quote from: djnocide on June 07, 2017, 07:05:51 PM

Quote from: drumamat on June 07, 2017, 06:06:23 PM

Quote from: drumamat on June 06, 2017, 10:26:22 AM

Hey guys,

I have weird stuff going on with my wallet:

I sent coins but there is no confirmations from the wallet (last version of wallet fully synched) and no pending transactions on the exchange where I sent the coins.

Now my balance shows as 0 Emc2, I checked on the block explorer and it says I still have the coins in the wallet, the txid of the withdraw doesn't even exist.

Can anyone help please?

Thanks so much in advance

Hey guys!

My problem is still on, and I would really appreciate some help!

I have the latest wallet, fully synced. I sent 3 EMC to the same address to make sure everything was fine, and they arrived and got confirmed on both ends. After that I sent 47000 EMC to the same address, nothing arrived, and the tx has 0 confirmation after 48h. Now my wallet shows 0 balance, and the Txid doesn't "exist" in the block explorer.

Even weirder, my EMC address shows a positive balance in the blockchain and shows the 3EMC tx that I sent as a test as 50 EMC.

What is going on ? I have had like 20 different Qt wallets for different coins, I have never seen that.

Finally, I can't do "-repairwallet" or "-rescan" like this in the debug log, those commands don't work and don't even show up in the help section of the debug log.

Please help if you can! Thanks!

For the -rescan:
   right-click on the wallet
   select properties
   in the target line at the end of if, add -rescan
   click "apply"
   restart your wallet

That's how i've make it work in the past

Thank you for your help! Unfortunately after finding how to "rescan" I didn't get any result out of it. Still 0 coins in the wallet, 0 confirmation on the transaction, and 0 coin on the exchange.

Thanks again

djnocide

legendary

Activity: 1164

Merit: 1000

Einsteinium Foundation Board Member and Treasurer

Quote from: drumamat on June 07, 2017, 06:06:23 PM

Quote from: drumamat on June 06, 2017, 10:26:22 AM

Hey guys,

I have weird stuff going on with my wallet:

I sent coins but there is no confirmations from the wallet (last version of wallet fully synched) and no pending transactions on the exchange where I sent the coins.

Now my balance shows as 0 Emc2, I checked on the block explorer and it says I still have the coins in the wallet, the txid of the withdraw doesn't even exist.

Can anyone help please?

Thanks so much in advance

Hey guys!

My problem is still on, and I would really appreciate some help!

I have the latest wallet, fully synced. I sent 3 EMC to the same address to make sure everything was fine, and they arrived and got confirmed on both ends. After that I sent 47000 EMC to the same address, nothing arrived, and the tx has 0 confirmation after 48h. Now my wallet shows 0 balance, and the Txid doesn't "exist" in the block explorer.

Even weirder, my EMC address shows a positive balance in the blockchain and shows the 3EMC tx that I sent as a test as 50 EMC.

What is going on ? I have had like 20 different Qt wallets for different coins, I have never seen that.

Finally, I can't do "-repairwallet" or "-rescan" like this in the debug log, those commands don't work and don't even show up in the help section of the debug log.

Please help if you can! Thanks!

TXid that went wrong : c0e48893e3532a3556247ca122274eca1ea51ca4bd2bda2b295e7ceb9120013f

Address of my wallet (showing positive balance and the weird 50 EMC sent instead of 3): EM88G2XwaneSRgUyxMXYfL4JuUEfbTH9yU

For the -rescan:
right-click on the wallet
select properties
in the target line at the end of if, add -rescan
click "apply"
restart your wallet

That's how i've make it work in the past

drumamat

sr. member

Activity: 1193

Merit: 251

Quote from: drumamat on June 06, 2017, 10:26:22 AM

Hey guys,

I have weird stuff going on with my wallet:

I sent coins but there is no confirmations from the wallet (last version of wallet fully synched) and no pending transactions on the exchange where I sent the coins.

Now my balance shows as 0 Emc2, I checked on the block explorer and it says I still have the coins in the wallet, the txid of the withdraw doesn't even exist.

Can anyone help please?

Thanks so much in advance

Hey guys!

My problem is still on, and I would really appreciate some help!

I have the latest wallet, fully synced. I sent 3 EMC to the same address to make sure everything was fine, and they arrived and got confirmed on both ends. After that I sent 47000 EMC to the same address, nothing arrived, and the tx has 0 confirmation after 48h. Now my wallet shows 0 balance, and the Txid doesn't "exist" in the block explorer.

Even weirder, my EMC address shows a positive balance in the blockchain and shows the 3EMC tx that I sent as a test as 50 EMC.

What is going on ? I have had like 20 different Qt wallets for different coins, I have never seen that.

Finally, I can't do "-repairwallet" or "-rescan" like this in the debug log, those commands don't work and don't even show up in the help section of the debug log.

Please help if you can! Thanks!

bitcoinrevolution

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 11:05:01 AM

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 06, 2017, 10:12:56 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 04:56:58 AM

Quote from: HashUnlimited on June 06, 2017, 04:44:34 AM

PM-Tech Update:

Basic functionality is running fine in production. The only issue users might have encountered on our pool last night was that mined blocks haven't been updated in the frontend for a while. This wasn't a node issue, I have installed backup instances where one of them is actively communicating with a stratum test instance sending block notifications. When this one got synced, it mixed up the shares in the DB a little, causing MPOS to stop the UI updates (cronjobs). All blocks mined were accounted later on, no issues there. My apologies for discovering that a few hours late.

The performance of the new wallet is slightly (really minimal) worse than the old one. This is caused by the additional block verification steps due to the BIPs deployed using Bitcoin's IsSuperMajority rule, e.g. elevating the block version. Once these BIPs are enforced, we will release a minor update almost immediately, where those rule checks will be replaced by a simple starting block check (similar to how BIP34 is handled nowadays). From then it is expected to outperform the current version.

Initial block download was improved significantly, this will be noticed by new users as well. IBD starts with downloading just the headers from one peer, in parallel the block download is initiated receiving the data from up to eight peer simultaneously, decreasing IBD times from a day now on the old version to a few hours in best case.

Currently I'm in the process of testing the updated multisig functionality which is also supposed to be supported by the Electrum servers. A lot of possibilities are given here in terms of smart contracts, micropayment channels and JoinCoin.

To be continued....

good ...

im glad things are starting to make a lot more sense now ... as well as starting to roll along mate ...

pool / stratum / db - are all a pain but part of the process ...

we will start the pool i initially started mentioning - and compare notes ... that way we can have a couple of pools running IF i can get it all setup and modified ...

we unfortunately cant really test the pool - as we have no scrypt miners / asics to test with ... especially when high hash is concerned ...

right now though - finishing all the 'real world' stuff and setup ...

chat to you back on skype soon ...

#crysx

just fucking stop you need to talk to varvarin we have more hash power than you can shake a stick at Cool

hmmm ...

i dunno whether to take what you are saying as a joke - or you are purposely making out to be offensive ...

not to mention that what you have written - really doesnt make sense to me ...

who on earth are you anyway? ...

#crysx

EMC2 ===> if you had any idea how big this coin is... 10K easy maybe 100K by 2018 Cool

~ask varvarin

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: bitcoinrevolution on June 06, 2017, 10:12:56 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on June 06, 2017, 04:56:58 AM

Quote from: HashUnlimited on June 06, 2017, 04:44:34 AM

PM-Tech Update:

Basic functionality is running fine in production. The only issue users might have encountered on our pool last night was that mined blocks haven't been updated in the frontend for a while. This wasn't a node issue, I have installed backup instances where one of them is actively communicating with a stratum test instance sending block notifications. When this one got synced, it mixed up the shares in the DB a little, causing MPOS to stop the UI updates (cronjobs). All blocks mined were accounted later on, no issues there. My apologies for discovering that a few hours late.

The performance of the new wallet is slightly (really minimal) worse than the old one. This is caused by the additional block verification steps due to the BIPs deployed using Bitcoin's IsSuperMajority rule, e.g. elevating the block version. Once these BIPs are enforced, we will release a minor update almost immediately, where those rule checks will be replaced by a simple starting block check (similar to how BIP34 is handled nowadays). From then it is expected to outperform the current version.

Initial block download was improved significantly, this will be noticed by new users as well. IBD starts with downloading just the headers from one peer, in parallel the block download is initiated receiving the data from up to eight peer simultaneously, decreasing IBD times from a day now on the old version to a few hours in best case.

Currently I'm in the process of testing the updated multisig functionality which is also supposed to be supported by the Electrum servers. A lot of possibilities are given here in terms of smart contracts, micropayment channels and JoinCoin.

To be continued....

good ...

im glad things are starting to make a lot more sense now ... as well as starting to roll along mate ...

pool / stratum / db - are all a pain but part of the process ...

we will start the pool i initially started mentioning - and compare notes ... that way we can have a couple of pools running IF i can get it all setup and modified ...

we unfortunately cant really test the pool - as we have no scrypt miners / asics to test with ... especially when high hash is concerned ...

right now though - finishing all the 'real world' stuff and setup ...

chat to you back on skype soon ...

#crysx

just fucking stop you need to talk to varvarin we have more hash power than you can shake a stick at Cool

hmmm ...

i dunno whether to take what you are saying as a joke - or you are purposely making out to be offensive ...

not to mention that what you have written - really doesnt make sense to me ...

who on earth are you anyway? ...

#crysx

Topic: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY - page 210. (Read 1076407 times)