Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ENRG]Energycoin - Android Released - Bittrex - - page 5. (Read 334702 times)

hero member
Activity: 605
Merit: 500
wow,live again
legendary
Activity: 2453
Merit: 1026
Energy coin master

... the innovation is the blockchain, not the coins themselves Smiley ....


Concerning the blockchain, I feel something great is going to happen with Energycoin in the near future :-)

I'm aware of the great potential of the blockchain and I hope I can convience people outsite the cryptocurrency world to make use of that for deliver proof of green energy and reward smart usage of the greengrid. Wednesday (in two days) I have a very important meeting with a company working for smartgrid/smartmeters and rewarding Energiemunt (yes a Dutch version of EnergyCoin!), not crypto-version but a cridit token like airmails, used for reward smart usage of the greengrid. If we can come to an agreement then that is the start of a great future for EnergyCoin and we have a green snowball effect! The 1Kwh garantee value for ENRG is in reach then and many applications can be build.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
No one can argue though that blockchain tech is not highly innovative and disruptive, because it is both.

Smiley  might not be a plain'n'simple believer, but I sure am a supporter Wink No argues on that one Smiley

My point is that the Blockchain will be used for so much more than money - it might be another version/interaction of it, though, because the power lies in the concept, not any particular implementation.
And there are, most certainly, more than a few shortcomings in the current ones, specially towards the methods necessary to keep the chain going and secure, aka, POW/POS and the distributed network needed to keep it all solid.

We - those in and around crypto - might be the frontrunners for now, but that will change for sure.

Everyday now, more and more people realize the advantages of having a trustless open public ledger - and that can be used for any payload, anything we want, as long as it can be represented in a binary form.

Once this concept stops being associated with only cryptocurrencies, then the fun begins Wink

As for the coins themselves, be it BTC or any other coin for that matter, maybe they'll be around, as money, or as a simple means of transactional-based value or something else we don't foresee right now Smiley
But I don't see this particular generation of coins as the ones that will make the push into mainstream, that's all.

But i'll keep pushing anyway, 'cause whatever we may be doing right now, it will be the basis of what's to come, one way or another.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
 "If you think it through you can see it: Euros, dollars and all the other legal tender around the world are only worth because we all agree they are ... and as such, we accept them as trading tokens and carry out hour lives using it.
In that sense, *any* cryptocurrency can become useful. Hell, *anything* can become useful as a trading token - just go through history and check everything that has been used as money throughout humanity's journey Smiley
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Yeah, you should see me explain to people that money has no real value and watch their face contort in all kinds of strange ways. There is actually a need for Crypto as currency and that need is being seen by more people now then in the recent past. So, the idea that the blockchain is the only part of Bitcoin ( or any coin ) that has value is hard to foresee. I think both the token aspect and Technological aspect of Crypto will live on into the future.

 Also, as much as some people would scratch their heads at this idea, there is a good possibility that the US government ( for various reasons ) was initially the creator of Crytocurrency/Blockchain Tech. Think about it, the US knows it's own currency may be in trouble one day and they decide to create a currency online that they can appear to be distant from ( so as not to cause panic on the Dollar )  something they can grow a user base around without undue worry about the dollar and then, if the worst happens and all has gone well, there is already an established base of users and businesses accepting the currency.

 I grant you that the above is my own personal "maybe" and only one possibility out of many, but I do not see the government going to war on Bitcoin or even cash. I see a diversification of something that used to be strictly central and that is giving many people who are established in the old system lots of trouble in understanding.

 The take away is really that what we are eventually going to see is something hybrid between central and decentralized monetary systems and in getting there, there will likely be room for even more "Altcoins" then there are right now.   No one can argue though that blockchain tech is not highly innovative and disruptive, because it is both.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Nice said Haron, there is a place for EergyCoin and also other special curancy like XMR, NXT, Ripple.
Only trust on Bitcoin is danger becouse also bitcoin can maybe crash.

Jan, they're all special, none is any less than the other - you may either trust them all or none at all.

The fact that you're more fond of some than others doesn't give them any added value except for you.

The problem with personal valuations is that unless they converge in big numbers into one set, the valued assets aren't Smiley

If you think it through you can see it: Euros, dollars and all the other legal tender around the world are only worth because we all agree they are ... and as such, we accept them as trading tokens and carry out hour lives using it.
In that sense, *any* cryptocurrency can become useful. Hell, *anything* can become useful as a trading token - just go through history and check everything that has been used as money throughout humanity's journey Smiley

But that won't happen without a good reason for it. Believing it, I'm afraid, is not enough.

I know you try hard to achieve that goal - and that's why I advise you to restart the coin from scratch Smiley this coin is already tarnished with the same as all the others: someone is waiting it to become valuable enough to cash/trade in ... and be done with it. Even holding 25% of the coin won't give you the empowerment to face that - it's human nature.

To conclude, I emphasize my recommendation once again:  start over fresh and anew. I know that you're "enchantment" is with the name Smiley and know you "own" it Wink
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250

 I do not agree that Bitcoin will be the only coin of any value in the future. Even in the event of implementation of side chains. In fact that tecnical failure that Energycoin has suffered points to a need for a diverse crypto space that can serve specialized markets.  Though most people in the Bitcoin space like to think that Bitcoin is now beyond certain modes of technical failure that would be hard to correct, most of those thoughts are dead wrong. Every technological thing can break and in times of a broken Bitcoin, other coins would be useful, even if only temporarily.

 I think you'll find a use case for using a separate coin for energy and energy conservation, things that Bitcoin was not explicitly deigned to do.

You misunderstood me: I said BTC is still the only one with *some* practical, real life use today. That's all.

I know as much about the future as the next guy, i.e., I know *nothing*  Tongue

There's a war against money going on (it has been for some time now) and it looks like coins and bills are going the way of the dodo ... but there's also a war on anything decentralized and non-government controllable, so crypto is in for the same fate, I'm afraid.
I said this more than once in several places: the innovation is the blockchain, not the coins themselves Smiley

So, these technologies will probably be the foundation and core of the future "money" ... but it will be very difficult, without a  major shift or disruption to current affairs, for *any* current cryptocurrency to be useful in that future.
legendary
Activity: 2453
Merit: 1026
Energy coin master
Nice said Haron, there is a place for EergyCoin and also other special curancy like XMR, NXT, Ripple.
Only trust on Bitcoin is danger becouse also bitcoin can maybe crash.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
Hi community,

I officially announce I take over the development of EnergyCoin.
Have send several messages to EnergyCR and now I changed the password of EnergyCoin.pw



And it's finally yours Smiley  Good luck Jan, your perseverance led you here, may it take you ahead too.
And the same goes to all those that have been with you - If I'm not mistaken, you are the very last of the original holders of the coin ... and certainly the only one left from the initial team.

Word of advise though: unless you're about to become a programmer with skills to match a crypto endeavor and rescue ENRG, you better get a new dev to pick up and continue the work.

My two cents on ENRG: since you now "own" the name and can make a claim about it, perhaps a complete reboot of the coin would be the best way forward. It would allow for a fresh start on all fronts, including developing the coin with code anew

Whatever way you all go, good luck


(PS - yes, I never stopped reading the thread. But I'm not in to believing anymore ... this coin or any other. So, there's only one that as some real world use, the original BTC. Take care)

 I do not agree that Bitcoin will be the only coin of any value in the future. Even in the event of implementation of side chains. In fact that tecnical failure that Energycoin has suffered points to a need for a diverse crypto space that can serve specialized markets.  Though most people in the Bitcoin space like to think that Bitcoin is now beyond certain modes of technical failure that would be hard to correct, most of those thoughts are dead wrong. Every technological thing can break and in times of a broken Bitcoin, other coins would be useful, even if only temporarily.

 I think you'll find a use case for using a separate coin for energy and energy conservation, things that Bitcoin was not explicitly deigned to do.
legendary
Activity: 2453
Merit: 1026
Energy coin master
Jan, I agree with SlientBit that first of all you need a reliable and outstanding dev to get EnergyCoin back on track. I know the perfect person for that and will ask him if he is willing to help out. Will let you know by PM if he is willing to jump in. It would mean getting the development of ENRG from zero to maximum overdrive :-) A fresh start would be outstanding! Cheers to that.
Thx SlientBit  and Digithusiast for you kind words.
All help is welcome of course and I consider my options to comming days.
A developer I can meet personally I prefer and take my time to make the right choices.
The meeting today would have been moved to April 8 and that is no problem.
I have some good help of community members for doing forking myself but it is a precarious process that must be done very carefully.
I still really belive we can be the green cryptocurrency of the future and I don't give up!

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Hi community,

I officially announce I take over the development of EnergyCoin.
Have send several messages to EnergyCR and now I changed the password of EnergyCoin.pw



And it's finally yours Smiley  Good luck Jan, your perseverance led you here, may it take you ahead too.
And the same goes to all those that have been with you - If I'm not mistaken, you are the very last of the original holders of the coin ... and certainly the only one left from the initial team.

Word of advise though: unless you're about to become a programmer with skills to match a crypto endeavor and rescue ENRG, you better get a new dev to pick up and continue the work.

My two cents on ENRG: since you now "own" the name and can make a claim about it, perhaps a complete reboot of the coin would be the best way forward. It would allow for a fresh start on all fronts, including developing the coin with code anew

Whatever way you all go, good luck


(PS - yes, I never stopped reading the thread. But I'm not in to believing anymore ... this coin or any other. So, there's only one that as some real world use, the original BTC. Take care)
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Hi community,

I officially announce I take over the development of EnergyCoin.
Have send several messages to EnergyCR and now I changed the password of EnergyCoin.pw
Behind the scenes I work on fork the block chain but it takes me some time to find out how that works.
Check all of you are on the right block:


This Friday I have a meeting for application of EnergyCoin and if that works out positive it can give development a boost.
Trading on Bittrex is still possible and I appreciate if people trade and put some extra buy orders.
Most of my ENRG is off the market and stays of he market!

If there is some development I inform you.



Awesome Jan... I am behind ya! With a market cap under $10,000usd my coins also stay off the market!!
legendary
Activity: 2453
Merit: 1026
Energy coin master
Hi community,

I officially announce I take over the development of EnergyCoin.
Have send several messages to EnergyCR and now I changed the password of EnergyCoin.pw
Behind the scenes I work on fork the block chain but it takes me some time to find out how that works.
Check all of you are on the right block:


This Friday I have a meeting for application of EnergyCoin and if that works out positive it can give development a boost.
Trading on Bittrex is still possible and I appreciate if people trade and put some extra buy orders.
Most of my ENRG is off the market and stays of he market!

If there is some development I inform you.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
I have same block as has been listed here.
member
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
Altcom : AZwV4Zh2MdYhvyni4QbR5c2CfsAWkcCXAC
Ok, we are on forks now.

I finally sync to block height 1051199. The block info matches with the blockchain explorer:

{
"hash" : "0875fb57859d36ce5b9d9744f843b96d1e7af91f2e5d39fc5f77dac26e10980e",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 456,
"height" : 1051199,
"version" : 4,
"merkleroot" : "7c9654256dfcf5df770792291d4c046ec7437259afdb10c947d15ac481027646",
"mint" : 0.44082100,
"time" : 1427468644,
"nonce" : 0,
"bits" : "1d2061fc",
"difficulty" : 0.03088017,
"previousblockhash" : "3ff511bee5c904af9efe85dc468c1bbd93034714f0afd8316af684e913ccf777",
"flags" : "proof-of-stake",
"proofhash" : "00003097b04a19889b8b7f8b877182c7377a060cac47d191abb27e66f4af4e1f",
"entropybit" : 0,
"modifier" : "08c3f63cea5ac37a",
"modifierchecksum" : "f81eee14",
"tx" : [
"81bb88e2761b7c29e4e8d9d25dedafe6ac422f3468e203de0f5dc46426c7695a",
"2285803fc773fb19a9203b81d25d436d2c29bca040c000c19d85941931d3b401"
],
"signature" : "3046022100a43a1a1cd87875c991e6dcaa11bae24ecdd5ae6a20db4902645753e31f217b3c02210 0e9d3e58f1c910ea03378b93830fd3f689e674dad36e4bc50409b18aaa0f60c67"
}


And according to the blockchain explorer, we have at least 7 forks at block height 1051200. Each one has different block hash and different time stamp.

That is why my wallet cannot go further beyond block height 1051199. Bittrex’s wallet should have the same issue.

https://bittrex.com/Status


Since someone raised a concern about potential attack, I’d suggest to have Jan sync to block height 1051199 first (if he has not done so) and have him to mine 1051200 onwards until he feels comfortable he should be the largest chain. This will kill all other forks currently mining from 1051200 along with attacks (if any) on these forks. And more importantly, all funds on Bittrex will be safe. We need to protect investors currently buying this coin too.

Why Jan? Just because everyone here trusts him and I suppose there is no motivation for him to attack the network. Smiley

Everyone agrees with it?

 Agreed Thank you sir.

Agreed. do i need to stop my Raspberry which are stuck at block 1051199?



Check if your block hash for 1051199 matches with the blockchain explorer or not first (just to play safe).

If it does match, just keep your Raspberry running unless Jan asks you to stop.

If it doesn’t match or it already syncs beyond 1051200, stop your Raspberry immediately.


P.S.: Everyone please check block hash now. Don’t just check block height. Block heights are meaningless under the current fork situation. For example we already have at least 7 different block hashes for the same block height 1051200.

Block hash:
Code:
getblockhash 1051199 

0875fb57859d36ce5b9d9744f843b96d1e7af91f2e5d39fc5f77dac26e10980e

Confirm it is the same block as in the blockexplorer.


Same block here.
legendary
Activity: 2453
Merit: 1026
Energy coin master
Ok, we are on forks now.

I finally sync to block height 1051199. The block info matches with the blockchain explorer:

{
"hash" : "0875fb57859d36ce5b9d9744f843b96d1e7af91f2e5d39fc5f77dac26e10980e",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 456,
"height" : 1051199,
"version" : 4,
"merkleroot" : "7c9654256dfcf5df770792291d4c046ec7437259afdb10c947d15ac481027646",
"mint" : 0.44082100,
"time" : 1427468644,
"nonce" : 0,
"bits" : "1d2061fc",
"difficulty" : 0.03088017,
"previousblockhash" : "3ff511bee5c904af9efe85dc468c1bbd93034714f0afd8316af684e913ccf777",
"flags" : "proof-of-stake",
"proofhash" : "00003097b04a19889b8b7f8b877182c7377a060cac47d191abb27e66f4af4e1f",
"entropybit" : 0,
"modifier" : "08c3f63cea5ac37a",
"modifierchecksum" : "f81eee14",
"tx" : [
"81bb88e2761b7c29e4e8d9d25dedafe6ac422f3468e203de0f5dc46426c7695a",
"2285803fc773fb19a9203b81d25d436d2c29bca040c000c19d85941931d3b401"
],
"signature" : "3046022100a43a1a1cd87875c991e6dcaa11bae24ecdd5ae6a20db4902645753e31f217b3c02210 0e9d3e58f1c910ea03378b93830fd3f689e674dad36e4bc50409b18aaa0f60c67"
}


And according to the blockchain explorer, we have at least 7 forks at block height 1051200. Each one has different block hash and different time stamp.

That is why my wallet cannot go further beyond block height 1051199. Bittrex’s wallet should have the same issue.

https://bittrex.com/Status


Since someone raised a concern about potential attack, I’d suggest to have Jan sync to block height 1051199 first (if he has not done so) and have him to mine 1051200 onwards until he feels comfortable he should be the largest chain. This will kill all other forks currently mining from 1051200 along with attacks (if any) on these forks. And more importantly, all funds on Bittrex will be safe. We need to protect investors currently buying this coin too.

Why Jan? Just because everyone here trusts him and I suppose there is no motivation for him to attack the network. Smiley

Everyone agrees with it?

 Agreed Thank you sir.

Agreed. do i need to stop my Raspberry which are stuck at block 1051199?



Check if your block hash for 1051199 matches with the blockchain explorer or not first (just to play safe).

If it does match, just keep your Raspberry running unless Jan asks you to stop.

If it doesn’t match or it already syncs beyond 1051200, stop your Raspberry immediately.


P.S.: Everyone please check block hash now. Don’t just check block height. Block heights are meaningless under the current fork situation. For example we already have at least 7 different block hashes for the same block height 1051200.

Block hash:
Code:
getblockhash 1051199 

0875fb57859d36ce5b9d9744f843b96d1e7af91f2e5d39fc5f77dac26e10980e

Confirm it is the same block as in the blockexplorer.
legendary
Activity: 2453
Merit: 1026
Energy coin master
We work on the solution.
No panic.
full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 100
Part-time Altcoin Developer
I'm not sure

I think it.s possible that a DDOS cause a synch issue and as we use slow raspberry, have little number of nodes, and have fast block generation, the pi is not fast enough to agree on the biggest proof chain. (But I don't clearly understand how is the most difficult chain weighted in POS (think it have to do with coinage, but it's not clear for me) so maybe, what I say is crap.

I understand way much better POW than POS.

in any case, our wallet should go for the most "difficult chain" and it seem not to be happening. Is it a bug in the wallet? Or performance issue with pi?

Because even if we were attacked for a double spend, the network should reach agreement, and it's not the case, so I think we have a bug.

We have so little nodes running that it should be easy to ddos them and cause a synch issue.

If a DDOS is the root cause, forging a new chain won't solve our issue.

But I agree that Jan have enough trust and coins to forge a private chain, I just don't know how to do this, and if this will solve the issue.

If it can help, I have light speed connection and a firewall with some basic DDOS protection somewhere in my basement.


Also, I find strange that I have plugged again my hold PI, and he don't synch anymore, he is stuck 20 days in the past, don't download blocks, and still see last block of the chain as the one where you are stuck 1051199



Very nice and thanks for your analysis.  Smiley

Now Jan has sent you his updated blockchain file. Please continue your analysis with the updated file. At least we'd like to know if there was really any DDOS (if any) on/before block height 1051199. At my end I don’t see any other fork up to block height 1051199.

Would appreciate if you or anyone else can come up with a better solution under the current situation. If the community agrees with that solution we can all go for it.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Looking such an Energycoin...have get this wallet..... Wink Smiley Wink
full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 100
Part-time Altcoin Developer
Ok, we are on forks now.

I finally sync to block height 1051199. The block info matches with the blockchain explorer:

{
"hash" : "0875fb57859d36ce5b9d9744f843b96d1e7af91f2e5d39fc5f77dac26e10980e",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 456,
"height" : 1051199,
"version" : 4,
"merkleroot" : "7c9654256dfcf5df770792291d4c046ec7437259afdb10c947d15ac481027646",
"mint" : 0.44082100,
"time" : 1427468644,
"nonce" : 0,
"bits" : "1d2061fc",
"difficulty" : 0.03088017,
"previousblockhash" : "3ff511bee5c904af9efe85dc468c1bbd93034714f0afd8316af684e913ccf777",
"flags" : "proof-of-stake",
"proofhash" : "00003097b04a19889b8b7f8b877182c7377a060cac47d191abb27e66f4af4e1f",
"entropybit" : 0,
"modifier" : "08c3f63cea5ac37a",
"modifierchecksum" : "f81eee14",
"tx" : [
"81bb88e2761b7c29e4e8d9d25dedafe6ac422f3468e203de0f5dc46426c7695a",
"2285803fc773fb19a9203b81d25d436d2c29bca040c000c19d85941931d3b401"
],
"signature" : "3046022100a43a1a1cd87875c991e6dcaa11bae24ecdd5ae6a20db4902645753e31f217b3c02210 0e9d3e58f1c910ea03378b93830fd3f689e674dad36e4bc50409b18aaa0f60c67"
}


And according to the blockchain explorer, we have at least 7 forks at block height 1051200. Each one has different block hash and different time stamp.

That is why my wallet cannot go further beyond block height 1051199. Bittrex’s wallet should have the same issue.

https://bittrex.com/Status


Since someone raised a concern about potential attack, I’d suggest to have Jan sync to block height 1051199 first (if he has not done so) and have him to mine 1051200 onwards until he feels comfortable he should be the largest chain. This will kill all other forks currently mining from 1051200 along with attacks (if any) on these forks. And more importantly, all funds on Bittrex will be safe. We need to protect investors currently buying this coin too.

Why Jan? Just because everyone here trusts him and I suppose there is no motivation for him to attack the network. Smiley

Everyone agrees with it?

 Agreed Thank you sir.

Agreed. do i need to stop my Raspberry which are stuck at block 1051199?



Check if your block hash for 1051199 matches with the blockchain explorer or not first (just to play safe).

If it does match, just keep your Raspberry running unless Jan asks you to stop.

If it doesn’t match or it already syncs beyond 1051200, stop your Raspberry immediately.


P.S.: Everyone please check block hash now. Don’t just check block height. Block heights are meaningless under the current fork situation. For example we already have at least 7 different block hashes for the same block height 1051200.
full member
Activity: 217
Merit: 100
Part-time Altcoin Developer
Ok, I double post

I have bootstraped blockchain sent by Jan, installed it on my Mac to have speed  Grin

Trying to synch, it moves a little bit, but is very slow

Installed and launched Wireshark and seen bunch of this

Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 213.46.197.237 (213.46.197.237), Dst: 192.168.0.34 (192.168.0.34)
Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 22706 (22706), Dst Port: 52813 (52813), Seq: 378568, Ack: 23167, Len: 0

So I send and receive some SYN from this IP, and receive a lot of Ack(nowledgment)

For me look like a DOS attack, I can be wrong.
It's coming from NL, maybe Jan's wallet have bugged or have been corrupted?

This attack if it is one (and nto a simple bug) could also have left an attacker room to forge is chain with little number of coins

I need to go to sleep, big day tomorow but if you could give a look at this, it would be nice  Wink

Thx all for the hard work.
(I was a bad night, thinkig what to do)

The block chain I uploaded is not the correct one!
Before I went to sleep I had deleted again all the block chain files and started again the wallet so my location is downloading again the block chain. Maybe the trafic you mesure is my download.

What block chain do we have:
- there is an Boodstrap file I used before
- I have my original Block Chain I shall ZIP and upload
- I have the Block Chain @home (in case the other one is infected)

I wait for puting online my 21M wallet, I know a have staked 26 th of March and build waight is mayby better.
Can somone post the protocol for restart?

What about the blockexprorer? that says last block 1052000?

The command getblock gives error:
Code:
getblock 1051199


06:08:51

Block not found (code -5)

Olso this message with olther blocks.
But the help window says 1051199 las block.

Have to go.

Edit1:
My wallet block chain info:


I have send a ZIP with all the block chain ifo to Sardokan and liie888coins.
I somwone else want the downloadlink just PM me.
I provide it only to people I trust.

I just exit the wallet and now only my PI is running but I can close that one later.

Edit2:
I see now on Bittrex:

I hope we can fix this quick!



Type getblockhash 1051199 in the console. It should return you 0875fb57859d36ce5b9d9744f843b96d1e7af91f2e5d39fc5f77dac26e10980e

Then to check if it fully conforms to the blockchain explorer, type:

getblock 0875fb57859d36ce5b9d9744f843b96d1e7af91f2e5d39fc5f77dac26e10980e

The blockchain explorer has last block 1052000 coz it is connecting to other peers which are on forks.

Check PM.
Pages:
Jump to: