We're working on a source-tarball and problem diagnoses atm, expect a link to it in the next couple of minutes
//EDIT:
What we found out:
Sync breaks when the DGW blockheight is in the past
TestNet is broken for unknown reason.
What we did:
Re-Implement DGW(v2)
Raise the DGW blockheight to 200.000 (~15k blocks in the future) / Can be changed if OP decides
Test the Sync of the current blockchain to the new code
What we didnt/couldnt do:
Make sure DGW really kicks in at block 200.000
We're working on a test-version that has lower blockheight but for to test either of them we will need some mining-power as TestNet option is broken for unknown reasons
Topic: [ANN][Frycoin][FRY] - Shut up and take my money! Coin halving coming up! - page 35. (Read 195199 times)
April 12, 2014, 07:27:12 AM
April 12, 2014, 07:17:01 AM
Shoot me a link, I'll give it a go!!!
April 12, 2014, 07:16:17 AM
IT SYNCS!!!
I need some lab-bunnies who would like to run a node too so we can test it better.
But for now:
Note: #1 is running a hybrid-wallet, something inbetween 1&2 so it's difficulty is not DGW. #2 & #3 are DGW.
I need some lab-bunnies who would like to run a node too so we can test it better.
But for now:
Code:
#1/
"blocks" : 173946,
"connections" : 4,
"difficulty" : 0.00085350,
"addr" : "127.0.0.2:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.3:55913",
"blocksrequested" : 37501,
"addr" : "127.0.0.4:55914",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:49894",
"blocksrequested" : 3508,
#2/
"blocks" : 36700,
"connections" : 6,
"difficulty" : 0.18033202,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55911",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:56670",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:56674",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:56747",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.3:55913",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.4:55914",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#3/
"blocks" : 37129,
"connections" : 5,
"difficulty" : 0.15726274,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:57011",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.2:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 16965,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:57016",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:57090",
"blocksrequested" : 16555,
"addr" : "127.0.0.4:55914",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"blocks" : 173946,
"connections" : 4,
"difficulty" : 0.00085350,
"addr" : "127.0.0.2:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.3:55913",
"blocksrequested" : 37501,
"addr" : "127.0.0.4:55914",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:49894",
"blocksrequested" : 3508,
#2/
"blocks" : 36700,
"connections" : 6,
"difficulty" : 0.18033202,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55911",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:56670",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:56674",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:56747",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.3:55913",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.4:55914",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#3/
"blocks" : 37129,
"connections" : 5,
"difficulty" : 0.15726274,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:57011",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.2:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 16965,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:57016",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:57090",
"blocksrequested" : 16555,
"addr" : "127.0.0.4:55914",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
Note: #1 is running a hybrid-wallet, something inbetween 1&2 so it's difficulty is not DGW. #2 & #3 are DGW.
April 12, 2014, 06:57:23 AM
Great NEWS !! I love this little coin, fair and great active dev, hope others will join the party now when it will be updated soon
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY !!!
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY !!!
April 12, 2014, 06:22:25 AM
Hi,
we re-implemented DGW(v2) into the old Frycoin source and we're experiencing something that can be called 'progress'...
It's not sync'ing yet but at least the nodes find each-other now and also give right feedback.
We will post again whenever we find something.
PS: Donations are welcome if we manage to truly fix it
we re-implemented DGW(v2) into the old Frycoin source and we're experiencing something that can be called 'progress'...
It's not sync'ing yet but at least the nodes find each-other now and also give right feedback.
We will post again whenever we find something.
Code:
coind:~/frytest# for i in */; do echo "#$i"; (./Frycoind -datadir=$i getinfo; ./Frycoind -datadir=$i getpeerinfo) | grep -e connec -e blocks -e diff -e addr; done
#1/
"blocks" : 173946,
"connections" : 2,
"difficulty" : 0.00085350,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:39556",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#2/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 4,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40960",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40962",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55911",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40978",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#3/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#4/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#1/
"blocks" : 173946,
"connections" : 2,
"difficulty" : 0.00085350,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:39556",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#2/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 4,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40960",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40962",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55911",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40978",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#3/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#4/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
PS: Donations are welcome if we manage to truly fix it
Good news!
April 12, 2014, 06:06:44 AM
Hi,
we re-implemented DGW(v2) into the old Frycoin source and we're experiencing something that can be called 'progress'...
It's not sync'ing yet but at least the nodes find each-other now and also give right feedback.
We will post again whenever we find something.
PS: Donations are welcome if we manage to truly fix it
we re-implemented DGW(v2) into the old Frycoin source and we're experiencing something that can be called 'progress'...
It's not sync'ing yet but at least the nodes find each-other now and also give right feedback.
We will post again whenever we find something.
Code:
coind:~/frytest# for i in */; do echo "#$i"; (./Frycoind -datadir=$i getinfo; ./Frycoind -datadir=$i getpeerinfo) | grep -e connec -e blocks -e diff -e addr; done
#1/
"blocks" : 173946,
"connections" : 2,
"difficulty" : 0.00085350,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:39556",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#2/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 4,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40960",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40962",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55911",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40978",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#3/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#4/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#1/
"blocks" : 173946,
"connections" : 2,
"difficulty" : 0.00085350,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:39556",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#2/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 4,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40960",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40962",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55911",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:40978",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#3/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
#4/
"blocks" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:55912",
"blocksrequested" : 0,
PS: Donations are welcome if we manage to truly fix it
April 11, 2014, 02:49:18 PM
We have update our FRY wallet and it works fine now:
You mean revert/downgrade, right?
The new wallet with DGW is still broken as far as we know...
It's old, just tested.
The old one is the working one at the moment, indeed.
Any news on when we will have the new one up?
Working on it. COntributers have more time in the weekend
So perhaps after a weekend we will catch up some great news from you?
This is great! Can't wait already
April 11, 2014, 11:33:31 AM
We have update our FRY wallet and it works fine now:
You mean revert/downgrade, right?
The new wallet with DGW is still broken as far as we know...
It's old, just tested.
The old one is the working one at the moment, indeed.
Any news on when we will have the new one up?
Working on it. COntributers have more time in the weekend
April 11, 2014, 10:14:51 AM
We have update our FRY wallet and it works fine now:
You mean revert/downgrade, right?
The new wallet with DGW is still broken as far as we know...
It's old, just tested.
The old one is the working one at the moment, indeed.
Any news on when we will have the new one up?
April 10, 2014, 12:13:06 PM
We have update our FRY wallet and it works fine now:
You mean revert/downgrade, right?
The new wallet with DGW is still broken as far as we know...
It's old, just tested.
The old one is the working one at the moment, indeed.
April 10, 2014, 12:12:22 PM
Should the block reward be 150 by now?
Halving on block 166.666, we are on block 176.778
Halving on block 166.666, we are on block 176.778
Good point!
The coin reward halved at 16.666 blocks by accident, so by block 80.000 the reward was only 18,75. We raised the reward to 300 when we found out, but in between a lot of blocks were very low. At the moment we haven't decided yet if we want to halve the coin again, because it could hurt the coin at the moment. We will still go for the 500M coins, though. We will probably introduce a vote to decide this in a while.
April 10, 2014, 06:50:42 AM
Can you do a short note on why you added DGW here please.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6139074http://
I think more people should use it.
Thanks. And sorry for the spam.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6139074http://
I think more people should use it.
Thanks. And sorry for the spam.
April 10, 2014, 05:42:07 AM
We have update our FRY wallet and it works fine now:
You mean revert/downgrade, right?
The new wallet with DGW is still broken as far as we know...
It's old, just tested.
April 10, 2014, 05:27:00 AM
We have update our FRY wallet and it works fine now:
You mean revert/downgrade, right?
The new wallet with DGW is still broken as far as we know...
April 10, 2014, 05:09:23 AM
We have update our FRY wallet and it works fine now:
https://c-cex.com/?p=fry-btc
https://c-cex.com/?p=fry-usd
Welcome!
https://c-cex.com/?p=fry-btc
https://c-cex.com/?p=fry-usd
Welcome!
April 10, 2014, 12:33:32 AM
Should the block reward be 150 by now?
Halving on block 166.666, we are on block 176.778
Halving on block 166.666, we are on block 176.778
April 09, 2014, 02:52:18 PM
I think my new wallet is connecting to a node in the network. Not synching, but it's something.
April 09, 2014, 11:22:42 AM
Is there an IRC server/channel for frycoin-talk?
if not, feel free to use our server:
obfuscode.net:6697 (SSL)
obfuscode.net:6667 (NO SSL)
if not, feel free to use our server:
obfuscode.net:6697 (SSL)
obfuscode.net:6667 (NO SSL)
April 09, 2014, 06:11:23 AM
We're putting one of our developers on the Fry-Wallet.
Maybe he can find something.
Any changes will be sent as Pull-Request via GitHub to both wallets.
Maybe he can find something.
Any changes will be sent as Pull-Request via GitHub to both wallets.
Thanks a lot!
PM me your github username. Then we can add you to the new team. April 09, 2014, 06:05:42 AM
We're putting one of our developers on the Fry-Wallet.
Maybe he can find something.
Any changes will be sent as Pull-Request via GitHub to both wallets.
Maybe he can find something.
Any changes will be sent as Pull-Request via GitHub to both wallets.
Jump to: