obfuscode.net stuck on finding blocks ?
7799 (done: 466.52%), so I think it's just a hard block to find. We'll see.
no problem at all it was only the frontend that was lagged , gogogo FRY
YOu found the block: flu663r 18/04 09:43:51
I took it DOWN !
Topic: [ANN][Frycoin][FRY] - Shut up and take my money! Coin halving coming up! - page 31. (Read 195199 times)
April 18, 2014, 04:58:04 AM
7799 (done: 466.52%), so I think it's just a hard block to find. We'll see.
no problem at all it was only the frontend that was lagged , gogogo FRY
YOu found the block: flu663r 18/04 09:43:51
I took it DOWN !
April 18, 2014, 04:55:43 AM
obfuscode.net stuck on finding blocks ?
7799 (done: 466.52%), so I think it's just a hard block to find. We'll see.
no problem at all it was only the frontend that was lagged , gogogo FRY
YOu found the block: flu663r 18/04 09:43:51
April 18, 2014, 04:54:42 AM
obfuscode.net stuck on finding blocks ?
7799 (done: 466.52%), so I think it's just a hard block to find. We'll see.
no problem at all it was only the frontend that was lagged , gogogo FRY
April 18, 2014, 04:46:12 AM
obfuscode.net stuck on finding blocks ?
7799 (done: 466.52%), so I think it's just a hard block to find. We'll see.
April 18, 2014, 04:35:27 AM
obfuscode.net stuck on finding blocks ?
April 18, 2014, 04:24:06 AM
Update OP and takeaway the link and addnodes for old wallet ?
The new mac and windows wallets are coming, but the github source is updated. The windows wallet might take a bit longer, because Awais is still working on that.
Oki that means I can't withdraw from pool to my old wallet now ?
April 18, 2014, 04:19:55 AM
Update OP and takeaway the link and addnodes for old wallet ?
The new mac and windows wallets are coming, but the github source is updated. The windows wallet might take a bit longer, because Awais is still working on that.
April 18, 2014, 04:14:04 AM
Update OP and takeaway the link and addnodes for old wallet ?
April 18, 2014, 04:10:11 AM
THe bitember pool seems to have forked now: http://fry.bitember.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool. They are still on the low difficulty. COmpare it to https://fry.obfuscode.net/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool
What does this mean?
What does this mean?
I have notified them, but will notify them again. Bitember seems to have not been active on bitcointalk for a while now.
April 18, 2014, 04:08:27 AM
THe bitember pool seems to have forked now: http://fry.bitember.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool. They are still on the low difficulty. COmpare it to https://fry.obfuscode.net/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool
What does this mean?
What does this mean?
April 18, 2014, 04:04:39 AM
Now only windows wallet missing and then we are good to go !! 
April 18, 2014, 04:04:00 AM
http://fry.obfuscode.net/explorer/height/200000
http://fry.obfuscode.net/explorer/height/200001
http://fry.obfuscode.net/explorer/height/200002
http://fry.obfuscode.net/explorer/height/200003
\o/
http://fry.obfuscode.net/explorer/height/200001
http://fry.obfuscode.net/explorer/height/200002
http://fry.obfuscode.net/explorer/height/200003
\o/
HOUSTON, WE HAVE NO PROBLEM!!!!
All Thumbs up (or fists filled with Frycoin) to our friends of the Obfuscode pool! The coin is saved!
April 18, 2014, 03:57:31 AM
April 18, 2014, 03:53:25 AM
April 18, 2014, 03:44:47 AM
...
Why do you have your own SSL? To save money?
Why do you have your own SSL? To save money?
Yes and No. SSL-certs are overpriced, this is nothing new, and we are willing to pay for decent security.
However, a certificate with no more than 1024 or 2048 bits (this is the max-size for most issuers) is not acceptable for us.
We require at least 4096 Bits or higher. If browser-manufactures would support 8192 or even 16k certs, we would've used those.
We want to keep all your informations from/to the site confidential.
We enforce Forward-Privacy/Secrecy ensuring that no ISP, Hacker or even Government could guess the content of your transmissions by having historical data of the streams.
We take this serious because in the end it's about your money!
We try to handle this topic in the most transparent manner.
Please confront us with any concerns, bug-reports or other security issues right away.
April 18, 2014, 03:42:19 AM
20 blocks to go!
April 18, 2014, 03:23:46 AM
RE: RE: SSL
I forgot to mention, here is a SSL-Testsite as proof of our SSL-security:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=obfuscode.net&hideResults=on
Compared to:
Google, only has 'A'
Microsoft, only has 'B'
BitcoinTalk, only has 'A-'
I forgot to mention, here is a SSL-Testsite as proof of our SSL-security:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=obfuscode.net&hideResults=on
Quote
Assessed on: Fri Apr 18 07:33:30 UTC 2014
If trust issues are ignored: A+
If trust issues are ignored: A+
Compared to:
Google, only has 'A'
Microsoft, only has 'B'
BitcoinTalk, only has 'A-'
Why do you have your own SSL? To save money?
April 18, 2014, 02:38:22 AM
RE: RE: SSL
I forgot to mention, here is a SSL-Testsite as proof of our SSL-security:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=obfuscode.net&hideResults=on
Compared to:
Google, only has 'A'
Microsoft, only has 'B'
BitcoinTalk, only has 'A-'
I forgot to mention, here is a SSL-Testsite as proof of our SSL-security:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=obfuscode.net&hideResults=on
Quote
Assessed on: Fri Apr 18 07:33:30 UTC 2014
If trust issues are ignored: A+
If trust issues are ignored: A+
Compared to:
Google, only has 'A'
Microsoft, only has 'B'
BitcoinTalk, only has 'A-'
April 18, 2014, 01:17:42 AM
Re: SSL
Usually when we link the page, we link the Non-SSL version because there's a banner underneath the 'Quick-News' section that contains the same text like Frycoin pasted.
We're sadly unable to find a SSL provider that supports our desired level of encryption. 1024 Bit SSL has been called obsolete for the last couple of years now.
Yet most websites and registrars still use 1024 Bit SSL Certificates and Root-CAs which we consider as a 'joke' in times of computing clusters/clouds.
But we know that the big browser-warning page is not helpful when it comes to find new users. We have it on our agenda to find a long-term solution without exposing our users to any 'false'-security.
Until then we're stuck with the warning page and a user has to actively 'trust' our certificate.
If there are any concerns about the genuineness of the certificate, here is the link to it: http://www.obfuscode.net/server.crt
--------
Obsolete versions / Possible Blockchain fork
If you find yourself in this list, please update your wallet/node!
Usually when we link the page, we link the Non-SSL version because there's a banner underneath the 'Quick-News' section that contains the same text like Frycoin pasted.
We're sadly unable to find a SSL provider that supports our desired level of encryption. 1024 Bit SSL has been called obsolete for the last couple of years now.
Yet most websites and registrars still use 1024 Bit SSL Certificates and Root-CAs which we consider as a 'joke' in times of computing clusters/clouds.
But we know that the big browser-warning page is not helpful when it comes to find new users. We have it on our agenda to find a long-term solution without exposing our users to any 'false'-security.
Until then we're stuck with the warning page and a user has to actively 'trust' our certificate.
If there are any concerns about the genuineness of the certificate, here is the link to it: http://www.obfuscode.net/server.crt
--------
Obsolete versions / Possible Blockchain fork
Code:
"addr" : "37.187.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 447,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "107.170.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 7599,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "74.91.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 6596,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "188.226.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 6521,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "23.92.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 3303,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "178.162.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 2040,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "24.249.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 1098,
"version" : 70002,
"blocksrequested" : 447,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "107.170.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 7599,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "74.91.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 6596,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "188.226.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 6521,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "23.92.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 3303,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "178.162.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 2040,
"version" : 70002,
"addr" : "24.249.x.x:55901",
"blocksrequested" : 1098,
"version" : 70002,
If you find yourself in this list, please update your wallet/node!
April 18, 2014, 01:07:13 AM
350 blocks to go, so we soon know if we passed the 200k mark!
Jump to: