working correctly on my side are earning estimate correct ?
I believe they are correct as they can be.
Topic: [ANN][FTC][STRATUM] [0% Fee] feathercoin.is-a-geek.com Pool - page 19. (Read 33917 times)
I believe they are correct as they can be.
working correctly on my side are earning estimate correct ?
Greatly reduced stalerates! Good work 
1000/40
1000/40My stales were very high, about 5-6%. I thought that I will try other pools, it turned out that best pool is: https://featherpool.com/ (0% fee) only 0.5% stales!
Greatly reduced stalerates! Good work 1000/40
1000/40My stales were very high, about 5-6%. I thought that I will try other pools, it turned out that best pool is: https://featherpool.com/ (0% fee) only 0.5% stales!
Greatly reduced stalerates! Good work 1000/40
1000/40
does lowering aggression level help that at all? Or is it still stale?
Are the stales next to each other or spread out?
Can you log your reaper output and post the log?
*edit* upped the diff to 31. see if that helps.
Are the stales next to each other or spread out?
Can you log your reaper output and post the log?
*edit* upped the diff to 31. see if that helps.
let me know how it is doing now. I just increased filehandles, and increased difficulty. I haven't got a single reject in the past 5 mins.
It should increase in performance as well as the unconfined blocks confirms as well. That outta remove a half million SQL entries or so.
It should increase in performance as well as the unconfined blocks confirms as well. That outta remove a half million SQL entries or so.
I have 87% stale on reaper.. going to restart and let you know the result.
Edit: Seems to be about 3+ and rising.. Was hoping to keep it below 2% like give-me-ltc
let me know how it is doing now. I just increased filehandles, and increased difficulty. I haven't got a single reject in the past 5 mins.
It should increase in performance as well as the unconfined blocks confirms as well. That outta remove a half million SQL entries or so.
It should increase in performance as well as the unconfined blocks confirms as well. That outta remove a half million SQL entries or so.
Your pool is showing 1Mh/s slower then what I'm sending after a few hours.. reaper is showing 35% stale.
Hope you can fix it as too much power is being wasted on basically nothing.
Hope you can fix it as too much power is being wasted on basically nothing.
I am going to end up increasing the difficulty of the pool. mysql/pushpool are being hammered at this rate. I will need to think for a little bit on how to alter the previous shares in order to keep the system working.
Later tonight I will reset the pool difficulty to either 15 or higher. All that means is less shares per round will be found, but payouts, etc will stay the same. We should see much less rejects and stales with this.
(also, try --queue 0 for those with cgminer, it helps some atm)
Later tonight I will reset the pool difficulty to either 15 or higher. All that means is less shares per round will be found, but payouts, etc will stay the same. We should see much less rejects and stales with this.
(also, try --queue 0 for those with cgminer, it helps some atm)
Currently im standing at over 2000 stales and 108 shares.
Running a 6950 with reaper. Using exact same config as I do with ltc. All I do is change host and port in conf file. I only have 1 card pointing at ftc I have my other 6 on ltc. When I switch that card back to ltc it runs with less than 1% stales
EDit: restarted reaper got about a solid 150 shares and then all the rest turned to stales.
Running a 6950 with reaper. Using exact same config as I do with ltc. All I do is change host and port in conf file. I only have 1 card pointing at ftc I have my other 6 on ltc. When I switch that card back to ltc it runs with less than 1% stales
EDit: restarted reaper got about a solid 150 shares and then all the rest turned to stales.
i get loads of prevhash-stale and prevhash-wrong, then it works perfectly for a while, then those again for a long time
I have to many stales shares.
now i'm getting a few shares but still getting "weird response" or "server down" in between.
EDIT: Now i'm back to stales too
EDIT: Now i'm back to stales too
Mind sending your specs, mining program, and command you are mining with? you are at 4.5% stales. That seems rather high.
now i'm getting a few shares but still getting "weird response" or "server down" in between.
EDIT: Now i'm back to stales too
EDIT: Now i'm back to stales too
What errors are you getting? Were they all within the last 15 mins of your post?
How many rejects/stales/valid are you getting?
i've been getting bad connection ever since i started mining here. I moved everything back to LTC for time being.How many rejects/stales/valid are you getting?
I get good streaks and it'll mine awesome then it'll go non stop stales and then i'll get weird response from server, etc. When i posted this is when i just couldn't connect at all and when it did for a second or 2 it would be stales.
I'm running reaper and my configs are good as i use them for LTC.
Average time to find a block @330kh/s: 2 day(s), 3 hour(s), 35 min, 50 sec
Mining in a pool allows for you to spread that payment out over many, smaller transactions to 'more guarentee' a steady payment. If you mine for a few minutes at a tiem, a PPLNS pool is not good for you. If you mine 12 on/12 off, you should be good. 24/7 would be best
Mining in a pool allows for you to spread that payment out over many, smaller transactions to 'more guarentee' a steady payment. If you mine for a few minutes at a tiem, a PPLNS pool is not good for you. If you mine 12 on/12 off, you should be good. 24/7 would be best
It is based on today from 8am ish UK time to 6pm ish UK/GMT time.
Edit:
OK I've read a bit about PPLNS and I get a bit more of the long haul piece now, basically I need to keep up the mining for a longer period to see better pay outs and the more rounds then the better the pay outs.
So based on the 12 diff if I left things mining for 24 hours would I actually see the 98 (or approx and allowing for diff increases) that I'd get soloing...or I think it'd be 2 days to find a block on Solo on my current set up.
Edit:
OK I've read a bit about PPLNS and I get a bit more of the long haul piece now, basically I need to keep up the mining for a longer period to see better pay outs and the more rounds then the better the pay outs.
So based on the 12 diff if I left things mining for 24 hours would I actually see the 98 (or approx and allowing for diff increases) that I'd get soloing...or I think it'd be 2 days to find a block on Solo on my current set up.
http://feathercoin.is-a-geek.com/about
I imagine what you are seeing is a result of the PPLNS system. Is your amount based on a single day, or multiple days? Because the difficulty did just go up.
I imagine what you are seeing is a result of the PPLNS system. Is your amount based on a single day, or multiple days? Because the difficulty did just go up.
Hi,
I think potentially I need some understanding help here. I set my rig to mining for 8-10 hours today at around 330kh/s, I've come back to around 20 FC.
Based on the pool stats I should earn 90 in 24 hours. And as an estimate 35-40 in 8-10 hours, I am confused to of come home to around 20.
My stats board reads:
Paid Shares
Your Valid: 17251
Invalid: 2802
At the time of posting the estimate per payout is:
Estimated Per Payout
0.058793 FC
How can I equivocate the 17251 valid shares to the coins I should be earning as the earnings atm are not making sense to me and if there is something I am missing or doing wrong I need to understand this.
Kind regards,
Lewis
I think potentially I need some understanding help here. I set my rig to mining for 8-10 hours today at around 330kh/s, I've come back to around 20 FC.
Based on the pool stats I should earn 90 in 24 hours. And as an estimate 35-40 in 8-10 hours, I am confused to of come home to around 20.
My stats board reads:
Paid Shares
Your Valid: 17251
Invalid: 2802
At the time of posting the estimate per payout is:
Estimated Per Payout
0.058793 FC
How can I equivocate the 17251 valid shares to the coins I should be earning as the earnings atm are not making sense to me and if there is something I am missing or doing wrong I need to understand this.
Kind regards,
Lewis
Jump to: