Mesterlovesz74 , Any word on the source code yet? Maybe not an issue for you, but some people seem concerned about such things lately.
Check it out.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-poloniex-has-rejected-supercoin-652351
Check it out.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-poloniex-has-rejected-supercoin-652351
We went through the code and found out that the POS start phase was left out. It was a mistake I admit, but all the rest of the code is ok, we checked it out. So despite the fact that the POS phase started from block 1, the rest of the code is solid.
Code:
static const unsigned int MAX_INV_SZ = 50000;
static const int64_t MIN_TX_FEE = 1000;
static const int64_t MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE = MIN_TX_FEE;
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 40000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t COIN_YEAR_REWARD = 10 * CENT; // 10% per year
static const int64_t MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE = 0.1 * COIN; // 10% annual interest
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 1;
You can check that out at github where the source code is, at src/main.cpp, src/main.h
A couple of weeks ago I read a topic where someone used a group who check codes of altcoins. I don't remember where that was exactly but if anyone know them please send me the contact info. I am willing to ask for an "audit"!
About the POS phase. It is on now, I think we do more harm if we stop it in any way, so POS is on, a bit early, but I think everyone can live with that. First post already changed. This means, that at the 100000th block we will have less coins as stated in the first post. So at the first year, coin supply will be 6 mill less. Of course eventually we will reach 40mill but that will be around 5-6 years.
If you have faith in the code, ask Poloniex to have a look. If its good they may list it, or at least start voting for it to be listed. The blockexplorer works, unlike a lot of coins out there, which is something they insist on, so you're halfway there.
Request sent to the owner of Poloniex!
