Strawman argument Holy shit. You must be trolling.
There's no way you
actually believe the shit you're saying.
Since when did documents that refute the central premise of your argument become a straw man?
You started this stupidity parade by saying:
you are a true retard.
compcoin uses scrypt-n for starters.
nicehash has not offered scrypt-n for years now.
when compcoin was listed on novaexchange; novaexchange listed wallet source address (probably since removed) and someone with a bunch of scrypt-n miners (either gpu or KNC titan) started mining blocks; dev spotted this and put block explorer on hold temporarily. unable to stop it, block explorer has since resumed.
god damn.
Then you got presented hard proof that you're wrong via proof I mined CMP on NiceHash.
And I offered real-time verification if you would put your money where your mouth is; but you still talk out your ass saying "it's photo brushed" - yet you "can't be bothered" to put up or shut up.
_______________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
Let's recap:
- You said I was a "true retard" and "lying" because YOU BELIEVED IT WASN'T POSSIBLE TO MINE CMP ON NICEHASH.
- The reason why: you thought you found some inconsistency based on the source code being Scrypt-N and NiceHash not supporting that.
- I provided documentation to refute that.
- Based on the documentation, YOU LEARNED MINING CMP ON NICEHASH IS POSSIBLE.
- You ask what does it prove now that you've learned mining CMP on NiceHash IS possible?
_______________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
Considering
the crux of your argument was that it's NOT possible to mine CMP on NiceHash... AND NOW YOU'VE LEARNED FROM MY PROOF THAT IT IS POSSIBLE
That proves you're wrong. I've proved that everything I said previously holds weight.That I wasn't lying. That the mining attack was scaled through NiceHash. That mining CMP on NiceHash is possible. And that I've done it - with my wallet and screenshots of my order for proof.
***
Now you try to back-peddle and say "oh well at least I posted the code," like it was just a wholesome contribution to the community and not a failed attempt to prove your point.***
LMFAO.
What a complete joker.
Internet warrior log1k attempts ad hominem argument, is immediately proven wrong with facts, claims straw man argument, gets told to put up or shut up with a bet on the facts.
What does he do?
He back-peddles tail between his legs - but not before he expresses his self-satisfaction with having copied and pasted open source files!
log1k - is he a troll, jackass, or both?
Stay tuned for his next post and remember, folks, this is what FUD looks like!