Does anyone know who the chip manufacturer is?
It seems they will work with ASIC companies to develop ASICs using our SoC IP. This way they can enable a low cost, mass production of blockchain IoT devices. I thinks so.
Topic: [ANN][ICO] ⚡️⚡️ SKYNET 🚀 Infinity Chain Blockchain + First Blockchain Chip ⚡️⚡️ - page 37. (Read 24734 times)
July 21, 2018, 11:33:30 AM
July 21, 2018, 07:28:26 AM
Does anyone know who the chip manufacturer is?
It seems they will work with ASIC companies to develop ASICs using our SoC IP. This way they can enable a low cost, mass production of blockchain IoT devices. I thinks so. July 21, 2018, 07:14:21 AM
Does anyone know who the chip manufacturer is?
It seems they will work with ASIC companies to develop ASICs using our SoC IP. This way they can enable a low cost, mass production of blockchain IoT devices. I thinks so. July 21, 2018, 04:12:48 AM
Does anyone know who the chip manufacturer is?
It seems they will work with ASIC companies to develop ASICs using our SoC IP. This way they can enable a low cost, mass production of blockchain IoT devices. I thinks so. July 21, 2018, 04:07:14 AM
Does anyone know who the chip manufacturer is?
July 21, 2018, 03:26:53 AM
How much does Skynet Core's core chip cost if I want to embed an RFID tag? RFID / NFC will certainly play a big role to the IoT world.
It's very technical, but I'll try to answer from what I've read that Skynet can integrate an RFID that costs around 10 cents. July 21, 2018, 03:07:17 AM
How much does Skynet Core's core chip cost if I want to embed an RFID tag? RFID / NFC will certainly play a big role to the IoT world.
It's very technical, but I'll try to answer from what I've read that Skynet can integrate an RFID that costs around 10 cents. July 21, 2018, 03:01:34 AM
How much does Skynet Core's core chip cost if I want to embed an RFID tag? RFID / NFC will certainly play a big role to the IoT world.
It's very technical, but I'll try to answer from what I've read that Skynet can integrate an RFID that costs around 10 cents. July 21, 2018, 02:56:01 AM
Any word on ICO whitelist procedure?
Regarding the ICO whitelist procedure, still waiting for the latest news and it seems that they will soon provide updates with the announcement of a formal token distribution event. July 21, 2018, 02:47:42 AM
Why are you having people on the team that is studing medicine?
I guess it's because of Skynet are bringing the latest blockchain technology into IoT space, of which healthcare is an important part of. Think of the private and sensitive patient information in the hospital or clinics, they can be secured and only accessed by those with proper permission using Skynet blockchain technology. July 21, 2018, 02:34:58 AM
They offer optimized SoC with built-in security, embedded wallet and the firmware at the device level. As such it makes sense for these IoT systems use native tokens to carry out the blockchain based smart contracts. Skynet smart contract contains the detail program contents of the transactions.
July 21, 2018, 02:34:01 AM
Could the SkyNet solution exist without tokens / coins? Why is token / coin inseparable from solution? I get that blockchain technology has a goal here but I am challenged to see why the market for this token / coin will grow and why consumers will pay for it. Also, will commercial / industrial users buy and use the same token / coins offered to ICO participants or will Skynet license their blockchain technology to some people while finding issues for token / coin solutions for consumers / retail markets?
As far as I know Skynet will provide an end-to-end blockchain platform for IoT. They offer optimized SoC with built-in security, embedded wallet and the firmware at the device level. As such it makes sense for these IoT systems use native tokens to carry out the blockchain based smart contracts. Skynet smart contract contains the detail program contents of the transactions, which consists of exchanging of data and value based on specific conditions of the involved devices. IoT is a vast area and Skynet welcome partnerships at various levels as long as the system keeps the major benefits of the Skynet architectute. Hopefully my answer is correct.. July 21, 2018, 02:23:42 AM
Why are you having people on the team that is studing medicine?
July 21, 2018, 02:15:49 AM
Any word on ICO whitelist procedure?
July 21, 2018, 02:11:34 AM
Could the SkyNet solution exist without tokens / coins? Why is token / coin inseparable from solution? I get that blockchain technology has a goal here but I am challenged to see why the market for this token / coin will grow and why consumers will pay for it. Also, will commercial / industrial users buy and use the same token / coins offered to ICO participants or will Skynet license their blockchain technology to some people while finding issues for token / coin solutions for consumers / retail markets?
July 21, 2018, 01:58:27 AM
How much does Skynet Core's core chip cost if I want to embed an RFID tag? RFID / NFC will certainly play a big role to the IoT world.
July 20, 2018, 10:14:24 PM
For the name and logo of this project is very familiar. How does the team respond to it?
As in the discussion I've read on https://t.me/SkynetOpenNetwork that the team explains why to use the name and logo. You can check there. July 20, 2018, 10:03:51 PM
For the name and logo of this project is very familiar. How does the team respond to it?
July 20, 2018, 08:55:26 PM
I see that DPoS and PoS seems to be the consensus method of choice. As far as I know there's no PoS nor DPoS implementation to date that has proven to be as decentralized & secure as PoW. Ethereum's team itself struggles to implement PoS. EOS is a complete failure and is DPoS. What would make your DPoS implementation more decentralized & secure than others?
In my opinion it maybe that this is somewhat contrary to the SON concept, because of the SON itself not exactly sure if that PoW algorithms are ideally decentralized because of all control from the hashing power coming from Chinese companies at the moment but currently as you might know, DAG and PoW don’t work function well in the real world at the moment. There’s tradeoffs in each consensus but they believe a BFT DPoS consensus will function the best for IoT environments. July 20, 2018, 08:48:14 PM
I see that DPoS and PoS seems to be the consensus method of choice. As far as I know there's no PoS nor DPoS implementation to date that has proven to be as decentralized & secure as PoW. Ethereum's team itself struggles to implement PoS. EOS is a complete failure and is DPoS. What would make your DPoS implementation more decentralized & secure than others?
In my opinion it maybe that this is somewhat contrary to the SON concept, because of the SON itself not exactly sure if that PoW algorithms are ideally decentralized because of all control from the hashing power coming from Chinese companies at the moment but currently as you might know, DAG and PoW don’t work function well in the real world at the moment. There’s tradeoffs in each consensus but they believe a BFT DPoS consensus will function the best for IoT environments.Jump to: