Topic: 📢【ANN】【ICO】COINWARE -A Friendly CryptoCurrency Exchange--PRIVATE SALE(LIVE)🔥 (Read 1747 times)
November 24, 2019, 02:05:00 PM
December soon so I thik it is time to see all of project, hope it will be as planned boys. Cheers, good luck.
August 21, 2019, 09:42:56 AM
March 18, 2019, 09:13:51 AM
will you have your own tokens similar to BNB? tell me what benefits will the owners of these tokens get?
Yes, I would also like to read more about the benefits for investors who want to invest in the project. February 13, 2019, 08:12:00 PM
Hello Coinware (CWT) team, Welcome to Cryptolaboratory's rating!
Your rate is 76of 100.
On the page of Coinware (CWT) you may see all the information.
Also you may get widget here.
Comment us, look us and follow us.
|Cryptolaboratory team|
Your rate is 76of 100.
On the page of Coinware (CWT) you may see all the information.
Also you may get widget here.
Comment us, look us and follow us.
|Cryptolaboratory team|
February 06, 2019, 03:12:08 AM
You guys never updated your white paper, and now you've employed a bump bot service to bump your thread... hmm... really doesn't look good, guys.
If I were investor I would immediately skip this project in favor of something that doesn't have outstanding scam accusations against it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinware-plagiarized-whitepaper-5103425
There's literally hundreds of other investment opportunities to choose from. Why take a risk on a project that might be fraudulent?
We are working on it. A review will take us some time. If I were investor I would immediately skip this project in favor of something that doesn't have outstanding scam accusations against it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinware-plagiarized-whitepaper-5103425
There's literally hundreds of other investment opportunities to choose from. Why take a risk on a project that might be fraudulent?
Please give us a bit of time. As soon as it is done. We would announce the updates
February 04, 2019, 12:26:33 AM
You guys never updated your white paper, and now you've employed a bump bot service to bump your thread... hmm... really doesn't look good, guys.
If I were investor I would immediately skip this project in favor of something that doesn't have outstanding scam accusations against it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinware-plagiarized-whitepaper-5103425
There's literally hundreds of other investment opportunities to choose from. Why take a risk on a project that might be fraudulent?
If I were investor I would immediately skip this project in favor of something that doesn't have outstanding scam accusations against it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinware-plagiarized-whitepaper-5103425
There's literally hundreds of other investment opportunities to choose from. Why take a risk on a project that might be fraudulent?
January 29, 2019, 02:42:09 AM
WARNING - PLAGIARIZED WHITEPAPER - POSSIBLE SCAM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinware-plagiarized-whitepaper-5103425
Coinware will undergo a review on the whitepaper. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinware-plagiarized-whitepaper-5103425
Thanks for pointing this out
January 29, 2019, 02:41:23 AM
This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters
There were not any kind of mention of forbes as the source, and although there is a guideline for the proper way to cite sources, but as you kept insisting that what you do is not wrong, let's clear this issue by this way, kindly show the legal permit issued by forbes that you're allowed to copy part of their article.
With this said, I'd like to point us out to one of forbes article, a fraction at least.
Quote
All of the information, content, services and software displayed on, transmitted through, or used in connection with the Website or Other Channels, including for example, advertising, directories, guides, articles, opinions, reviews, text, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips, video, html, source and object code, software, data, and all other related matters, including without limitation, the selection and arrangement of the aforementioned and the "look and feel" of this website (collectively, the "Content"), are protected under applicable copyrights and other proprietary (including but not limited to intellectual property) rights and are the intellectual property of Forbes, and its affiliated companies, licensors and suppliers. Forbes actively protects its rights to the Content to the fullest extent of the law. The copying, rearrangement, broadcast, rewriting for broadcast or publication, redistribution, modification, use or publication by you in any medium, directly or indirectly, of any such matters or any part of the Website, including the removal or alteration of advertising, except for limited rights of use granted hereunder, is strictly prohibited. You may not use such material except as provided in these Terms and Conditions.
As most of us have a copy of your WP and the said forbes article is available for public, it'll be safe to say that the evidences (should the need arise) is available and present. You might want to consult to Mr. David Meszaros for this, as he is listed as your legal advisor on the team structure.
January 28, 2019, 04:29:28 PM
WARNING - PLAGIARIZED WHITEPAPER - POSSIBLE SCAM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinware-plagiarized-whitepaper-5103425
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinware-plagiarized-whitepaper-5103425
January 28, 2019, 07:51:18 AM
This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters
There were not any kind of mention of forbes as the source, and although there is a guideline for the proper way to cite sources, but as you kept insisting that what you do is not wrong, let's clear this issue by this way, kindly show the legal permit issued by forbes that you're allowed to copy part of their article.
With this said, I'd like to point us out to one of forbes article, a fraction at least.
Quote
All of the information, content, services and software displayed on, transmitted through, or used in connection with the Website or Other Channels, including for example, advertising, directories, guides, articles, opinions, reviews, text, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips, video, html, source and object code, software, data, and all other related matters, including without limitation, the selection and arrangement of the aforementioned and the "look and feel" of this website (collectively, the "Content"), are protected under applicable copyrights and other proprietary (including but not limited to intellectual property) rights and are the intellectual property of Forbes, and its affiliated companies, licensors and suppliers. Forbes actively protects its rights to the Content to the fullest extent of the law. The copying, rearrangement, broadcast, rewriting for broadcast or publication, redistribution, modification, use or publication by you in any medium, directly or indirectly, of any such matters or any part of the Website, including the removal or alteration of advertising, except for limited rights of use granted hereunder, is strictly prohibited. You may not use such material except as provided in these Terms and Conditions.
As most of us have a copy of your WP and the said forbes article is available for public, it'll be safe to say that the evidences (should the need arise) is available and present. You might want to consult to Mr. David Meszaros for this, as he is listed as your legal advisor on the team structure.
January 28, 2019, 07:38:43 AM
A reference to blockchain definition does not in anyway termed plagiarism.
OK I'll save you the hassle of having to scroll up a few comments and paste for you the evidence again:
Your whitepaper has plagiarized entire paragraphs.
From a Forbes article:
Quote
What businesses benefit?
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer
From your whitepaper:
Quote
How businesses benefit?
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer
That's what plagiarism is. You stole somebody else's content word-for-word and made it your own. What's your explanation for this?
This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters
Dictionary result for term
/tərm/Submit
noun
1.
a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
"the musical term “leitmotiv”"
synonyms: word, expression, phrase, turn of phrase, idiom, locution
Your white paper has copied word-for-word entire sections. This is plagiarism. Its the result of not having your own ideas, or anything original to say, probably because you are putting out a scam and didn't think to go into much detail.
But it's all okay. I will inform the coinware team about your discovery. I am sure they will have a look at it critically and get back to you. Thanks once again.
January 28, 2019, 06:05:58 AM
A reference to blockchain definition does not in anyway termed plagiarism.
OK I'll save you the hassle of having to scroll up a few comments and paste for you the evidence again:
Your whitepaper has plagiarized entire paragraphs.
From a Forbes article:
Quote
What businesses benefit?
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer
From your whitepaper:
Quote
How businesses benefit?
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer
That's what plagiarism is. You stole somebody else's content word-for-word and made it your own. What's your explanation for this?
This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters
Dictionary result for term
/tərm/Submit
noun
1.
a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
"the musical term “leitmotiv”"
synonyms: word, expression, phrase, turn of phrase, idiom, locution
Your white paper has copied word-for-word entire sections. This is plagiarism. Its the result of not having your own ideas, or anything original to say, probably because you are putting out a scam and didn't think to go into much detail.
January 28, 2019, 05:48:35 AM
Hello all! I read some posts below about plagiarism and I have doubts about team of this project. I don't see here any real arguments from Coinware team. From now I am neither an ambassador, not a member of the Coinware team! (27 JAN. 2019)
Good luck. Everyone has their choice. You were not in depth with the coinware project.
January 28, 2019, 05:47:44 AM
A reference to blockchain definition does not in anyway termed plagiarism.
OK I'll save you the hassle of having to scroll up a few comments and paste for you the evidence again:
Your whitepaper has plagiarized entire paragraphs.
From a Forbes article:
Quote
What businesses benefit?
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer
From your whitepaper:
Quote
How businesses benefit?
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer
Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.
Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.
The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.
While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:
• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer
That's what plagiarism is. You stole somebody else's content word-for-word and made it your own. What's your explanation for this?
January 28, 2019, 05:46:49 AM
Well?
Like I mentioned before these are common terms. Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.
Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.
So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam
What about the massive plagiarism in the white paper? Why not spend the time to write your own paper knowing that a plagiarized white paper is one of the top signs of a scam ICO?
Please, kindly reframe from fuddling.
Thanks
January 28, 2019, 05:40:46 AM
Well?
Like I mentioned before these are common terms. Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.
Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.
So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam
What about the massive plagiarism in the white paper? Why not spend the time to write your own paper knowing that a plagiarized white paper is one of the top signs of a scam ICO?
A reference to blockchain definition does not in anyway termed plagiarism.
January 28, 2019, 05:29:24 AM
Well?
Like I mentioned before these are common terms. Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.
Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.
So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam
What about the massive plagiarism in the white paper? Why not spend the time to write your own paper knowing that a plagiarized white paper is one of the top signs of a scam ICO?
January 28, 2019, 05:26:17 AM
Well?
Like I mentioned before these are common terms. Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.
Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.
So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam
January 28, 2019, 04:34:54 AM
Well?
Like I mentioned before these are common terms. Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.
Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.
So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam
Jump to: