Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 2259. (Read 3074324 times)

That's in poor taste. Litoshi spent a lot of time helping and talking about XCR to others - he was a HUGE supporter.
Anyway, I'm done wasting energy on this issue. I will take my share in XCR and convert to LISK and won't think about this project again until the team can show itself capable of transitioning into this new reality. It's just hard to hide my disappointment.

How many BTC does it take to buy a 3 year old BMW or MBZ?  

Max needs to know this for his ICO goal setting.

Yes, The ICO to continue to develop the platform is really the better way to go.

As founders who created the original coin with no inflation and did a pre-sale with the condition that there would be no more created, we were under the obligation to adhere to those terms, so could not ethically do another funding round for the same project. The best option for us would be to do a different project based on the Crypti platform and do a sharedrop so investors in Crypti would have a stake in the new project as well.

Since Max and Olivier were investors who also contributed a lot to the project, they joined the foundation at our invitation since we wanted it to include active community members. They did a lot of hard work and were more than deserving of any salary increases they received, and the salaries were still well below market value for the work they were doing.

Given that Max and Olivier were not founders during the pre-sale, they are not bound by the conditions of it, and are free to do the much needed ICO to complete the project and market it properly. They also, of their own volition, recognize that the investors in Crypti paid for the foundation upon which Lisk is being built and are generously offering them a stake in its future.

This allows the resources and effort to be focused on developing the core technology, giving it the exposure it needs and deserves, and avoids splitting the community between different projects.

In closing, the statements that Crypti ran out of funds months ago with only part time work being done on it are untrue. There were three full time developers working on it with full compensation all the way through December, and are now just finishing the testing of Crypti Release 0.5.5. There are also sufficient funds left to operate the foundation owned delegates for the next 6 months and meet other closing expenses.

The Week in Retrospect #1

We just sent out our first weekly retrospect! Here you can view it, if you are not a subscriber of our newsletter.

Sad to see Max and Olivier take this path. This was morally as bad as I've ever seen in the crypto sphere from a "dev" team that was not an outright scam - sad day. Having said that, the writing is on the wall, XCR is done. For those reasons, I will look to convert at the set rate of 1300. Can't say I'm not ashamed of the way this was handled though. It leaves little confidence in the team - I wish you guys luck, I hope you find more support for LISK than you were willing to give the XCR investors.

Question I have is, why would a fund raiser to develop the DAPP store be any more successful than a brand new ICO for the forked coin? I mean, sure it could have been successful, or alternatively thought of as a warning sign that the team was out of money (as apparently it was)... and made things even worse. With a brand new ICO, it seems like there would be a better chance of bringing outside money and getting more marketing exposure out of it.

As for asking for more money.... umm... so what? I have no problem with teams/devs wanting compensation for their work. Now of course if it's something shady, giant hidden premines or outright scams, not so good. But a dev running a ICO, so what?

Oh man, you have fallen through hard times. You are tilted, raged so infuriated that you've stooped so low to threaten an upcoming crypto experiment.

The Crypti foundation decided to support Lisk.

You are the only one posting FuD because, let me guess, your ego is hurt since you weren't included in the foundations decision. Boohoo, grow up. You're a grown ass man, act like one.

What's wrong with him asking for higher salary? Ethereum team also wanted more money and now their project among top coins by market cap. I wish all teams want more money and not just 'deliver a good product'. Delivering good products don't make them successful. You also need to sell them.

A plan and a roadmap was under way for a new fund raiser to develop the DAPP store.  We were close to announcing it, when Max took the roadmap and the software and left the project. 

Max is just in it because he has a great need for money.  He constantly asked for salary increases during his time at Crypti, complaining about the high cost of living in Germany and his needs.  I could post Slack logs to prove it if necessary.

I don't think so. None of them look like little pussy to post such week fud from a newbie acc. Most likely it's someone who wants to invest in Lisk. There are always guys like that, in any IPO

I haven't followed XCR that closely, although I was in on the ICO ages ago. But your posts are beginning to come across as sour grapes/fud rather than intelligent arguments or warnings.

Issue with a coin copying another in cryptoland? From an outside perspective, I understand that fully, and it seems really weird how everything is open-sourced in crypto. But that's just the way it is. If there were no copies, there would basically be no alts at all.

As for 'the thief' emptying the treasury, it's not like XCR was thriving and chugging along fine. If XCR didn't fork now or try some method of obtaining more funds, how much longer could it have even survived?

In a way, a lot of complaining sounds like sour grapes... they did the ICO before XCR attempted another one... rather than valid arguments.

Now if you want to get into real arguments against the ICO here, you could point to the inherent risk. It'll only work if they get enough btc/eth from outside investors. Otherwise too many XCR people will dump, and there won't be enough btc to support the price or development after the ICO. It's possible to do (look at ETH), but also very iffy.

That is one of the Crypti founders who is internally pretending to support LISK, but is in reality very pissed off

you suckpuppet much ?
don't be a little pussy bitch, FUD with your own account like a man.

Well, I am not a founding member or a dev........ I also was not in on the decision to surrender to the thief.

You guys need to understand that Mike is anti-Intellectual Property.  In Mikes world, every software program would be instantly open source and copy-able, every movie could be copied and posted on YouTube (why pay to see Star Wars?); any radio broadcast, artwork, song, or book could be copied and distributed freely.  There would be no such things as patents and copywrites.  When his "BitSeed" logo and name were copied and used by the BitSeeds coin group https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/network-repairedannbits-bitseeds-a-currency-that-grows-1028446 he posted one post in protest, changed his BTT name, and went away.

He also understands that the keys to the kingdom have been copied and the thief is going to empty the treasury.  There is nothing he can do about it.  

I, on the other hand, will continue to point out the traps set by Max to suck funds out of the community, which consists mainly of parasites who only want to turn a quick profit on the ICO and could care less about anything else.

For you parasites:  Welcome to the road kill

For you serious investors:  Place both hands on your wallet

Great, I will note it in the OP. If you want you can add me on Skype and we can talk about the NewsBTC article. There are some special bounties for news articles.

Just ask me for my Skype handle via PM.

Indeed. It's the way you market it anyway.
If someone made a carbon copy of Bitcoin and made the
entire world use it instead of Bitcoin then I'd use that
instead, cuz what's the point of using Bitcoin then?
Bitcoin is an experiment, and so are other cryptos.
Releasing your source to the public was your choice and
if people want to fork it then they should be allowed to
do so.

@LiskHQ

Yes, sure I'd like to translate the OP. I'll work on it tomorrow, and maybe I can post about Lisk on NewsBTC Philippines.

I'd love to help out in the ways I can.

These newbies are mostly second accounts of crypto-opportunists  

And Lisk has the full support of every one of the Founding Members and developers of Crypti.

user with zero activity will tell us all what's what

There's no wrong with launching a new coin by using someone's source. That's one of main advantages of the crypto world. If you think it's easy to create a useful and successful coin by forking other coin - please do it.