This article contains serious factual errors. The actual events are chronicled in my blog post, https://blog.crypti.me/crypti_status_and_commentary_on_recent_team_changes/.
Max and Olivier never raised any concerns to the group about how the project was being run or levels of participation by Board Members in the open discussion on the Slack board prior to presentation of their plan.
Their proposal was released very close to the holiday season which extends for several weeks when the holiday periods of the different countries of team members are combined.
No vote was ever taken by the Foundation on their plan or the alternate plans forward. No further discussion on the topic ever took place by Max's and Olivier's choice after the initial meeting where it was brought up near the end of, but still in, the holiday season. The statement that their plan was rejected by the foundation is inaccurate.
Dilution of existing investment in Crypti was never on the table since this would involve a hard fork to add more XCR. The decision to be made was whether to have XCR holders convert XCR to the new project or do a sharedrop so they could keep their existing XCR and also have a stake in the spin-off.
Max and Olivier never raised any concerns to the group about how the project was being run or levels of participation by Board Members in the open discussion on the Slack board prior to presentation of their plan.
Their proposal was released very close to the holiday season which extends for several weeks when the holiday periods of the different countries of team members are combined.
No vote was ever taken by the Foundation on their plan or the alternate plans forward. No further discussion on the topic ever took place by Max's and Olivier's choice after the initial meeting where it was brought up near the end of, but still in, the holiday season. The statement that their plan was rejected by the foundation is inaccurate.
Dilution of existing investment in Crypti was never on the table since this would involve a hard fork to add more XCR. The decision to be made was whether to have XCR holders convert XCR to the new project or do a sharedrop so they could keep their existing XCR and also have a stake in the spin-off.
I have done a Interview with Max, CEO of Lisk. Here is the link (in German):
https://altcoinspekulant.wordpress.com/2016/02/03/lisk-interview-mit-ceo-max-kordek/
https://altcoinspekulant.wordpress.com/2016/02/03/lisk-interview-mit-ceo-max-kordek/
I have done a Interview with Max, CEO of Lisk. Here is the link (in German):
https://altcoinspekulant.wordpress.com/2016/02/03/lisk-interview-mit-ceo-max-kordek/
https://altcoinspekulant.wordpress.com/2016/02/03/lisk-interview-mit-ceo-max-kordek/
Thank you WorldCoiner!
English version translated with Google translate: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Faltcoinspekulant.wordpress.com%2F2016%2F02%2F03%2Flisk-interview-mit-ceo-max-kordek%2F
Litoshi Translation into Plain English:
We were key people on the Crypti project, but the funds at Crypti have almost run out. We really need another job, because we have a wife/girlfriend.
We have learned from Etherium's marketing strategy that PR is 10 times more profitable than actual product. We are pumping this coin for all it is worth. While Oliver works on code, Max is posting to every blog, twitter, and social media possible.
We also know that there are lots of greedy people out there that love IPOs. They all want to be in on the IPO, so they can hopefully get a 5X or 10X return on their IPO coins within a week or two.
We hope to get hundreds of BTC, maybe even a thousand BTC. Then we could pay ourselves 50 BTC a month, each.
Please keep matters concerning the Crypti Foundation to your own thread.
We won't be getting drawn into this petty back and forth, as there is no point in inflaming the situation further.
Therefore, we will ignore your completely false comments, and get on with the job of building Lisk.
We suggest you do the same with Crypti, and let it be.
