Author

Topic: [ANN][Main] Bitcore- BTX - Datacarriersize up to 220 bytes - page 981. (Read 730297 times)

newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0

I am not sure how the airdrop system works, I was just having a look but I strongly suggest to give a reward depending on the amount of coins people own, that's the only way of creating a buy pressure at this point.

Try a system similar to Byteball, the most successful distribution we've seen so far.


To allow wake hands just sell to make those precious 20 Cents ?

The reward system is made and it will stay.

We dont need weake hand we need whales, whales is a future, they build crypto great!

Faucet lovers just victims.



Whats the problem, everyone have right and chance to buy coins,

How iam i different if i buy 10.000 Coins and split them ?

You buy to we will rise hell price, 1-2 BTX keepers enjoy the price spike,

Somebody risk big money for a sh.it nub that just crys ?

All way open, go buy coins and Race with us, or just die Virgin.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131
 
I am not sure how the airdrop system works, I was just having a look but I strongly suggest to give a reward depending on the amount of coins people own, that's the only way of creating a buy pressure at this point.

Try a system similar to Byteball, the most successful distribution we've seen so far.
full member
Activity: 401
Merit: 104
I think this discussion about splitting could be halted, since the dev has already said he wants to switch to pay a percentage on what you have in your wallet. This way people don't have any interest in splitting to many addresses. I would add also the condition to pay not more than one address in one wallet, so people are enouraged in un-spliting all their coins so that the first 1000 in rich list are really 1000 people and not a few hudreds or less.
However, my feeling is that 2.5% is not a good motivation for people to get in the top 1000. Byteball was distributing 10% montly and it even rose it to 20%. I'm not suggesting to copy their model, but 2.5% seems quite unattractive.
You realize 2.5%/week is quite more than 10%/month? 2,5%/week is the same as ~10,38%/4weeks

I guess you are right Smiley
What is needed now is a system to motivate people keeping all their coins in one address, so that the first 1000 people are really 1000 people
sr. member
Activity: 1015
Merit: 289
Hi,
Did the latest Airdrop start?

The latest airdrop was yesterday. Next one will be next monday.
sr. member
Activity: 491
Merit: 250
Hi,
Did the latest Airdrop start?
sr. member
Activity: 1015
Merit: 289


Alternative solution:


Let every bitcointalk forum member with a rank higher than "Member" provide one airdrop address, and then "airdrop" 10 BTX to that address. (We will anyway not get more than 1000 user by this forum, so the airdrop should be smaller but fairer) This way you can more or less assure a fair distribution without concentration to whales.

Edit: The criteria could also be, that only an address with atleast 1 BTX coin inside is eligible for the airdrop, thus you can be sure that the person contributed to the coin either by

  • Mining
  • Claiming
  • Marketbuy

I think that is a rather awful solution. You are just excluding newbies for no reason whatsoever, just because they are what not active on a forum? That is so arbitrary. But hey atleast you are trying, thats a postive here. I personally think the 2.5% is a great solution as it dissuades you from wanting to make multiple accounts, and only gives out a little bit of BTX (so only loyal people will play). It may not be perfect but it is certainly better than being able to spilt multiple accounts and get 10 BTX per wallet address. Lets see how this one goes!

The problem with Newbies is that people could create tens of Newbie profiles in minutes just to cash the airdrop. So you need some ranking to be sure they are real people.
hero member
Activity: 814
Merit: 1000
When was the latest snapshot taken? Which block?

12.00 on clock in Germany someone said

I saw that too, but I would like to know the exact block.

@Chris, can you tell the exact block? I thought I was in the top 1000 (at 12 CET) but it seems that I was not (as I did not receive the coins).
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum

there is no need to give bigger addresses more %
because there is no incentive to split coins there will be no competition to enter the top 1000


There is no incentive to stack them either. If a whale has 20 addresses already in Top 1000 why stack them?

Might as well keep them like this and stop other people from getting the airdrop.

A slight increase in percentage for higher balances solves that
Not really, if its a small % increase.  If it was large it may be worth it.

2.5% is already a small bonus, hopefully this will be adjusted soon because it's 8 x times less reward  than the last +10 reward for people with around ~50BTX

sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
Maybe a fed.

there is no need to give bigger addresses more %
because there is no incentive to split coins there will be no competition to enter the top 1000


There is no incentive to stack them either. If a whale has 20 addresses already in Top 1000 why stack them?

Might as well keep them like this and stop other people from getting the airdrop.

A slight increase in percentage for higher balances solves that
Not really, if its a small % increase.  If it was large it may be worth it.
sr. member
Activity: 409
Merit: 250

there is no need to give bigger addresses more %
because there is no incentive to split coins there will be no competition to enter the top 1000


There is no incentive to stack them either. If a whale has 20 addresses already in Top 1000 why stack them?

Might as well keep them like this and stop other people from getting the airdrop.

A slight increase in percentage for higher balances solves that
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 252


Alternative solution:


Let every bitcointalk forum member with a rank higher than "Member" provide one airdrop address, and then "airdrop" 10 BTX to that address. (We will anyway not get more than 1000 user by this forum, so the airdrop should be smaller but fairer) This way you can more or less assure a fair distribution without concentration to whales.

Edit: The criteria could also be, that only an address with atleast 1 BTX coin inside is eligible for the airdrop, thus you can be sure that the person contributed to the coin either by

  • Mining
  • Claiming
  • Marketbuy

I think that is a rather awful solution. You are just excluding newbies for no reason whatsoever, just because they are what not active on a forum? That is so arbitrary. But hey atleast you are trying, thats a postive here. I personally think the 2.5% is a great solution as it dissuades you from wanting to make multiple accounts, and only gives out a little bit of BTX (so only loyal people will play). It may not be perfect but it is certainly better than being able to spilt multiple accounts and get 10 BTX per wallet address. Lets see how this one goes!
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum

In my opinion, the only 'fair' solution (if you really want to stick to that 1000 top holders thing) would be to have some kind of a variable percentage paid to the top 1000.
For example (don't nail me down on the numbers, just an example):

Top 1-100 gets 3%
Top 101-201 gets 2.9%
Top 301-401 gets 2.8%
...

That way you would force ppl to stack their coins in one address to get the highest possible reward, leaving room for other ppl to join the Top 1000. Of course some extremely rich a$$hole could still split his coins, just to pi$$ off ppl, but that would be just idiotic...

there is no need to give bigger addresses more %
because there is no incentive to split coins there will be no competition to enter the top 1000


actually ,you only want 1 rich guy to take up 1 place on the list
if he owns enough coins to split them he will claim for 539 addresses  as we have just saw in last airdrop

the end result will be 4-5 whales dump in november and the coin just  dies like many others because there is no userbase
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
Maybe a fed.

In my opinion, the only 'fair' solution (if you really want to stick to that 1000 top holders thing) would be to have some kind of a variable percentage paid to the top 1000.
For example (don't nail me down on the numbers, just an example):

Top 1-100 gets 3%
Top 101-201 gets 2.9%
Top 301-401 gets 2.8%
...

That way you would force ppl to stack their coins in one address to get the highest possible reward, leaving room for other ppl to join the Top 1000. Of course some extremely rich a$$hole could still split his coins, just to pi$$ off ppl, but that would be just idiotic...

there is no need to give bigger addresses more %
because there is no incentive to split coins there will be no competition to enter the top 1000


well, normally I would agree, but if there is no incentive, ppl tend to act weired. It's not only about getting coins.
But if you can prevent others to get coins as well, your coins might be worth more. At least you get more control.

I would have no problem to give the big holders and investors a little more, as long as it makes it fair for everyone, I'm ok with that.
And yes, I did receive my coins this time. It's just not good a healthy for a coin to have most coins concentrated in the hands of a few.
Especially when an airdrop is meant to spread the coins.

You said the only reason I split my coins, to have more control of the supply.

%age next airdrop says they'll all shift into 1-2 addresses though.
legendary
Activity: 914
Merit: 1001

In my opinion, the only 'fair' solution (if you really want to stick to that 1000 top holders thing) would be to have some kind of a variable percentage paid to the top 1000.
For example (don't nail me down on the numbers, just an example):

Top 1-100 gets 3%
Top 101-201 gets 2.9%
Top 301-401 gets 2.8%
...

That way you would force ppl to stack their coins in one address to get the highest possible reward, leaving room for other ppl to join the Top 1000. Of course some extremely rich a$$hole could still split his coins, just to pi$$ off ppl, but that would be just idiotic...

there is no need to give bigger addresses more %
because there is no incentive to split coins there will be no competition to enter the top 1000


well, normally I would agree, but if there is no incentive, ppl tend to act weired. It's not only about getting coins.
But if you can prevent others to get coins as well, your coins might be worth more. At least you get more control.

I would have no problem to give the big holders and investors a little more, as long as it makes it fair for everyone, I'm ok with that.
And yes, I did receive my coins this time. It's just not good a healthy for a coin to have most coins concentrated in the hands of a few.
Especially when an airdrop is meant to spread the coins.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
No risk, no fun!
For the airdrop, are the BTC address that you sign are they displayed publicly somewhere and just internally for BTX devs?

https://bitcore.cc/pay.php

Greetz
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds

In my opinion, the only 'fair' solution (if you really want to stick to that 1000 top holders thing) would be to have some kind of a variable percentage paid to the top 1000.
For example (don't nail me down on the numbers, just an example):

Top 1-100 gets 3%
Top 101-201 gets 2.9%
Top 301-401 gets 2.8%
...

That way you would force ppl to stack their coins in one address to get the highest possible reward, leaving room for other ppl to join the Top 1000. Of course some extremely rich a$$hole could still split his coins, just to pi$$ off ppl, but that would be just idiotic...

there is no need to give bigger addresses more %
because there is no incentive to split coins there will be no competition to enter the top 1000
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
For the airdrop, are the BTC address that you sign are they displayed publicly somewhere and just internally for BTX devs?
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
No risk, no fun!



Alternative solution:


Let every bitcointalk forum member with a rank higher than "Member" provide one airdrop address, and then "airdrop" 10 BTX to that address. (We will anyway not get more than 1000 user by this forum, so the airdrop should be smaller but fairer) This way you can more or less assure a fair distribution without concentration to whales.


Exact this way is the longest airdrop in crypto ever in our coin Bitsend.

We are here to go new ways. But we wanted to share faster the coins for you. In Bitsend exact this airdrop is running since 2015.

Greetz
Steve
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
hashrate is dropping like a stone. From over 17GH/s to now around 5.6GH/s. Since the diff is over 730 and difficulty recalculation only happens every 2000 blocks or so, block times are very high now.
This also leads to way less coins miners can earn, and most likely more will stop mining, meaning the block times will rise even higher.
I bet big miners will join back in when the difficulty has been adjusted again.

As for the airdrops: Sorry, but this round was a complete joke. Even worse than the first one.
Again, it was highly abused, and seeing at least two wallets with over 100 addresses in the top 1000 clearly shows that the airdrops are gamed by a few.
Most coins in the hands of a few makes the possibility of a dump much higher...

In my opinion, the only 'fair' solution (if you really want to stick to that 1000 top holders thing) would be to have some kind of a variable percentage paid to the top 1000.
For example (don't nail me down on the numbers, just an example):

Top 1-100 gets 3%
Top 101-201 gets 2.9%
Top 301-401 gets 2.8%
...

That way you would force ppl to stack their coins in one address to get the highest possible reward, leaving room for other ppl to join the Top 1000. Of course some extremely rich a$$hole could still split his coins, just to pi$$ off ppl, but that would be just idiotic...

this is the best and only solution i can see working to stop whales claiming for 100's of addresses
just give them an incentive to stack all their coins in 1 address and that leaves the other 999 addreses free for normal users

its better to give them 1% extra  than have them taking up 100-500 spaces from the top 1K per whale so normal people can still get something ...
sr. member
Activity: 1015
Merit: 289


Alternative solution:


Let every bitcointalk forum member with a rank higher than "Member" provide one airdrop address, and then "airdrop" 10 BTX to that address. (We will anyway not get more than 1000 user by this forum, so the airdrop should be smaller but fairer) This way you can more or less assure a fair distribution without concentration to whales.

Edit: The criteria could also be, that only an address with atleast 1 BTX coin inside is eligible for the airdrop, thus you can be sure that the person contributed to the coin either by

  • Mining
  • Claiming
  • Marketbuy

This is a quite interesting idea in fact, perhaps not as an alternative but as an integration to the already established airdrop. The idea is that the more people you take in, the more the coin will grow.
The best way to do it in my opinion is to make a signature bounty program which advertise this ONE TIME possibility to get free coins for bitcointalk members with some rank (I think member should already be high enough, after all you just want to avoid scammers who make new accounts just to get coins). With the signature campaign you should reach enough people. I'm not convinced about the people having to have already 1 BTX - I'd rather avoid putting problems in the way of people you'd like to seduce into this coin.
Jump to: