I personally do not expect from this dev to vanish.
Because of no premine and fair start this coin have chance to have the future but that is something that depends on dev and only dev in this stage of project.
So lets make no accusation before we see what is the road map and how much dev can give himself to community.
As I see dump are on the road but that is something that is expectable, coin is on 3 exchanges uuuuuu big thing! There are people who want to make profit and just profit and do not get the point of this technology. If the main goal of some coin is to get on BitTrex on other exchange, without any other point of usage than what is meaning of development?
Because of no premine and fair start this coin have chance to have the future but that is something that depends on dev and only dev in this stage of project.
So lets make no accusation before we see what is the road map and how much dev can give himself to community.
As I see dump are on the road but that is something that is expectable, coin is on 3 exchanges uuuuuu big thing! There are people who want to make profit and just profit and do not get the point of this technology. If the main goal of some coin is to get on BitTrex on other exchange, without any other point of usage than what is meaning of development?
We can't agree anymore about your views, lets make effort to make mistcoin have a nice development. And we think your sign is right
As first point what about changing abbreviation from MIC to MIST ?
There are not one but two coins with MIC for abbr, please share you thoughts about that.
Changing the abreviation is pointless. Is there a particular exchange where MIC is taken you are concerned about? It seems to be available on bittrex, cryptsy, poloniex and this coin is already MIC on c-cex, empoex and coinswap. Either make an actual good argument for changing it or get over it.
I have no concerns about any exchange. Sure this is trivial thing from one point, but than from the marketing side I can not agree. Of course this is just my opinion.
I can get over it no problem, but doesn't MIST looks/sounds better?
Yes and in my opinion it does sound better and makes it clear what coin we are trading, so I am actually for the switch. I just think you are repeating yourself a lot and the repetition is not helping your case. It would be polite for the dev to simply say that he saw your request and whatever they think about it, but from their lack of response I am guessing that they are not concerned. They seem to be in their own little world to be honest.
Did you check previous posts before accusing me of repeating myself? Where did you see I wrote about abbr? This was the first time I wrote about abbr suggestion, but the other community members have start that earlier in OP.
I think dev is buying some cheap coin 
most prob lol. 