Topic: [ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution | - page 121. (Read 742197 times)

I said for weeks...bittrex was a mistake. The shenanigans have been going on there since day one. I suspect same group of folks who didn't like the mining cap. They do not want to see this coin grow in value. Also just plan algo bots manipulating price as well I suspect.

Don't see it that way... if he was betting 10min.... we could saved 840 Min...

Also I would like to quote this again:

and this is why I have full confidence in min dev's

Hehe actually those 850 WERE used to promote Minerals. Besides I won like 300 of those anyway Also any reasonable suggestions worth consideration. And this one is pretty reasonable. Can`t promise we will immidiatly incorporate but we definetly consider it.

It would be nice to see more volume (+100BTC), with more ppl pushing down and up the Price would be more unpredictable, and some of those who trade of a %2 profit would be burned in the middle...

I think first of all we should not jump to conclusions and stay calm. If we think with clear mind steps we need to take will become pretty obvious:

1. Update wallet and remove all SCII graphics we used in design
2. Remove SCII screenshots

What else we did used in Minersls? Oh... theres nothing else...
Minerals have custom logo and our betting sites does not use anything that is copyright protected.

But to make you all sure I think it will be wise if I compose official letter and actually ask Blizzard if they will oppose Minerals.

LoL shouldn`t abused LoL graphics all that much. We have this flaw as well and we will take actions before, not after things fuck up.

You shouldn't bet that much... it was really nice of them, but they told everyone about betting more than you are willing to lose... those 850 MIN could be used as bounty or something that could help the coin...

+1  minerals has a solid foundation and dev's .just read through this thread  

Hi everyone, I'd just like to thank MineralsPR and the team for living up to their word and reimbursing me the 850 lost minerals after last nights testing of the betting system. Like I said last night, I think the betting system needs to be looked into again. I think the only way it will work is with a matched betting system, so a person can put up as many minerals as they want on a particular outcome, but anything which isn't matched becomes void. I was initially unsure of how the betting system worked last night, whether there was a house or it was matched to other players stakes, but I believe the way you have implimented the betting system with percentages of the pot distributed dependent on the stake made is excellent. It's perfectly fair and noone can complain.

Someone mentioned during the starcraft match, that the players themselves are setting the odds by how much is bet on either outcome. This is a fundamental flaw, as betting doesn't work this way. "Crayon" (the starcraft player) was randomly matched with an unknown opponent prior to betting taking place. This makes the odds 50/50 as noone knows the skill of the person he's playing. So in order to be fair with the way the current betting system works, both outcomes would need to have an equal pot, as bets are not partially matched and voided with the current system. Then both sides would recieve an equal share irrelevant of the outcome. Im not very technical when it comes to coding or anything like that, but I deffinetly think matched betting like an exchange is the way forward.

The idea behind minerals is excellent and very innovative, and the way I look at it, the betting platform is the most important. If matched betting is implimented, many more markets can be available, and players would be able to set their own odds on different outcomes, which after listening last night, seems like the community would like to see.

 

Thanks

someone is playing with the market, while he wait for someone else to buy, same story

Look at this:



!!!!!!!! 

because we dont use law copyrighted content like "Starcraftcoin/LeagueCoin/CounterStrikeCoin/DotaCoin", etc.
same shit was 4-5 months ago with "celebrity" coins like takei-"tak" and some anothers.  

"Minerals" is absouletly neutral, free idea/name.
till we didnt decided to mining(real mining) in south africa, of course )

and pls stop make fud from 1hour ago registred accounts
 

Can anyone explain why wont the same thing happen to MIN? Regarding of what happened to LOL...

Thanks

I feel like the coin is being "penned in" - large buy orders at 3000, large sell orders at 3500 (bittrex) and we are just getting batted inbetween  

I just don't understand the idiot selling thousands of Min for 3k and lowering the price...

You think Blizzard don't care...?   It's just a matter of time.....