Hello
We would like to invite Namecoin traders at our exchange livecoin.net
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
Topic: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin - page 53. (Read 597064 times)
October 23, 2015, 11:24:09 AM
October 14, 2015, 07:22:22 PM
namecoin-wallet.com uses the same template including the same typos as ppc-wallet.com and dash-wallet.com.
Both have been identified as scam, see
https://www.reddit.com/r/dashpay/comments/375ywp/dashwallet_scam/
and
https://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=2361.0
Both have been identified as scam, see
https://www.reddit.com/r/dashpay/comments/375ywp/dashwallet_scam/
and
https://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=2361.0
October 14, 2015, 05:21:19 AM
is this site trustworthy?
http://namecoin-wallet.com/
is it run by namecoin people as in namecoin.info etc
not going to try until some of the namecoin hero members say ok
thanks
http://namecoin-wallet.com/
is it run by namecoin people as in namecoin.info etc
not going to try until some of the namecoin hero members say ok
thanks
I didn't know it before. It claims to not have access to the coins on the About page, meaning that the private keys would be handled locally in JavaScript. On the other hand, it writes about "free" and "instant" payments, which sounds more like a hosted wallet (which fits to the fact that they want your email address on registration).
I would say you should take care and not put more money on it than on some random exchange, if any at all - but maybe someone else knows more details and can correct me here.
October 14, 2015, 04:14:50 AM
is this site trustworthy?
http://namecoin-wallet.com/
is it run by namecoin people as in namecoin.info etc
not going to try until some of the namecoin hero members say ok
thanks
http://namecoin-wallet.com/
is it run by namecoin people as in namecoin.info etc
not going to try until some of the namecoin hero members say ok
thanks
October 01, 2015, 08:29:26 AM
Just curious , has the bitcoin core pruning feature -prune been ported to namecoin ? This allow to run nodes with minimal hard disk requirement
We are now stay in sync with Bitcoin. I don't know if anybody has yet tried pruning. With the Namecoin blockchain still being way smaller it is a lower priority and we rather want to go towards SPV.
October 01, 2015, 06:18:34 AM
I like this project . One of the few altcoins that make sense and are useful. Sad to see onename and other projects move away from namecoin.
Here is our answer to that: http://blog.namecoin.org/post/130158040415/onenames-blockstore-is-much-less-secure-thanAnd here the ongoing discussion on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3mwtw8/onenames_blockstore_is_much_less_secure_than/
Quote
Just curious , has the bitcoin core pruning feature -prune been ported to namecoin ? This allow to run nodes with minimal hard disk requirement
We are now stay in sync with Bitcoin. I don't know if anybody has yet tried pruning. With the Namecoin blockchain still being way smaller it is a lower priority and we rather want to go towards SPV. September 28, 2015, 10:05:40 AM
I like this project . One of the few altcoins that make sense and are useful. Sad to see onename and other projects move away from namecoin.
Just curious , has the bitcoin core pruning feature -prune been ported to namecoin ? This allow to run nodes with minimal hard disk requirement
Just curious , has the bitcoin core pruning feature -prune been ported to namecoin ? This allow to run nodes with minimal hard disk requirement
September 28, 2015, 07:40:31 AM
With Onename switching to Bitcoin, will Namecoin be used at all for OpenBazaar?
Not that I know of. Onename and OpenBazaar both belong to the same VC company. Onename never answered my question about their business model so it smells like they will monetize lookups to their server (for "decentralized" data).
September 28, 2015, 03:48:35 AM
With Onename switching to Bitcoin, will Namecoin be used at all for OpenBazaar?
September 28, 2015, 03:08:30 AM
Is there a Namecoin slack channel?
No but there is #namecoin-dev on freenode and http://gitter.im/namecoin/lounge (bridged) September 20, 2015, 03:28:37 PM
Is there a Namecoin slack channel?
September 17, 2015, 02:05:43 PM
ShapeShift has added a buy/sell feature to the real time market data website CoinCap.io! You can now buy or sell Namecoin straight from the market data website. Learn more about this here: http://bit.ly/1UVFZ7m
August 24, 2015, 04:59:33 AM
Namecoin is not dead. It just did what other scamcoins won't, and moved it's conversation to its own forum.
https://forum.namecoin.info/
Exactly.https://forum.namecoin.info/
Everybody thinking Namecoin is inactive please just take a look here: http://zmoazeni.github.io/gitspective/#/timeline/namecoin
August 23, 2015, 07:06:38 AM
Namecoin is not dead. It just did what other scamcoins won't, and moved its conversation to its own forum.
https://forum.namecoin.info/
https://forum.namecoin.info/
August 19, 2015, 09:25:09 AM
It is a pity Namecoin did not kick off at all, or all of us can be using dot bit easily 
August 19, 2015, 06:11:23 AM
August 19, 2015, 05:34:19 AM
RIP Namecoin
August 07, 2015, 11:28:36 AM
I've had 630 namecoins in a wallet for a couple years now. When I try to send some to a exchange or different wallet I get a error that says Error: Transaction creation failed! Can anyone help me with this.
August 06, 2015, 01:40:12 PM
I hope most people who are interested in namecoin are aware that one mining pool has a majority control over the namecoin network... f2pool now controls 75% of the hashrate of namecoin. The significance of this should be readily apparent.
... this outcome maybe the inevitable result of the economic incentives due to merge-mining. And a lesser degree due to poor code-base maintenance.
Also if we could get more users/supporters and the price would rise this would probably be solved quickly.
My point being an unmaintained, merged-mine coin basically costs more than it is worth, to more and more mining pools until there is only one and then ....
I think I was next person after you to build it ... and build/test it regularly, so far, so good. NB: reducing feature set by removing "Manage Names" from namecore-qt whenever the upgrade officially takes place will reduce demand of nmc.
Mostly I was referring to the fragmented nature of the previous versions 0.3.50 and 0.3.80, scattered packaging and unmergeable code forking branches.
btw: I would be happy to further discuss the name_op GUI implementation with you. Or the roadmap...
August 06, 2015, 05:30:23 AM
I hope most people who are interested in namecoin are aware that one mining pool has a majority control over the namecoin network... f2pool now controls 75% of the hashrate of namecoin. The significance of this should be readily apparent.
... this outcome maybe the inevitable result of the economic incentives due to merge-mining. And a lesser degree due to poor code-base maintenance.
Also if we could get more users/supporters and the price would rise this would probably be solved quickly.
My point being an unmaintained, merged-mine coin basically costs more than it is worth, to more and more mining pools until there is only one and then ....
I think I was next person after you to build it ... and build/test it regularly, so far, so good. NB: reducing feature set by removing "Manage Names" from namecore-qt whenever the upgrade officially takes place will reduce demand of nmc.
Mostly I was referring to the fragmented nature of the previous versions 0.3.50 and 0.3.80, scattered packaging and unmergeable code forking branches.
Jump to: