Topic: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin - page 76. (Read 594476 times)

The bitcoin source is really not architectured to support alts, and given that changes since 0.3 have made this more the case then it was even then I am pretty sure it never will be.     I personally would really like to see the major alts put some effort to bring something like the picocoin codebase into a usable form for this.  As it is built around a library it should prove more easy for the alts to share work and advance some things on their own rather then just somewhat blindly taking random patches from bitcoin on an uncoordinated basis.

It may be easier or at least quicker to add in the RPC calls you want.  That of course does not give you the tracking of the development, but I still think that will only last for a short term once again and a better long term solution is needed.  That said, I think most currently agree with you, as they see it easier to just keep mirroring bitcoin development.


That is simply not going to work, unless you mean a namecoin fork or alternative.  Namecoin needs merge mining to at least validate the blocks already made with it active, even if you turn it off in this new version.   Merged mining is a forking change.


I might be up for that, even if I do disagree with the approach.   I know there is some talk of doing this once leveldb is more stable for some of the other chains, and it would be easier to do both at once.

Hmm... I see that page is from Dec 2011.  I can say that that was not true at that time since I built two of the three clients  available from dot-bit at that time and my two got built from Vince's source at the time.  Of course it was never the head, but when he announced a tagged release.

At that time also, there was no official source.   Guess I will have to ask what is the right one to use then, I thought it would be the official source at this point now that they have one.

It sounds easy ---- but i suspect this could be very complex based on the age differences... or at least very time consuming...

is it JUST the rpc commands that you need? (can you list them in PM)..

no harm in looking into it.

My part of the "unofficial bounty" is completely unrelated to the work you are doing, unfortunately. I'll be glad to spice it up a bit more if someone can commit to do what I need done soon, otherwise I'll end up doing it myself as soon as I can find the time.

Reiterating my needs once more: I need namecoind (command line daemon, don't care for GUI) to be rebased on top of a current bitcoind source code so I have access to the newer RPC calls and to allow easy tracking of bitcoin development to leverage the amazing work being done there constantly. All else is sugar, although said sugar is certainly important to increase adoption that is not my current priority.

Also, I will accept paying the bounty for a working namecoind as described above even if it doesn't have the merged mining stuff in, as that is something well served afaik with the outdated client.

If instead of a bounty there's someone willing to take this task for a set price I'll be happy to chip in with NMC, BTC, XRP, LTC and/or TRC. Just state your price and expected time to delivery and we can try and fund that (but ultimately only paid after delivery, though I'll be glad to put the 'prize' in escrow)

all code will be given, and will submit pull request on github

development is in progress.. namecoin-qt (slight modifications for compatibility due to old code).. nothing major will change..
1st will be without name creation... 2nd will be with name creation (although will only display/edit d/names.. any other prefixes or searches for others will unfortunately need to be done in the console window)..
so basically, will be ok for bit domains..
if i managed to recoup some costs for bounty( ?) and donations.. we can have a look at the old namecoin code.

Encryption of wallet may not be in the first release.....

if patient i can have the old namecoin code looked at, but we will need to create a thread of issues and what needs doing, as i currently have less clue than most.... i actually think namecoin should have it's own section, being the oldest / best altcoin created IMO)... (the dotbit forum needs cleaning up).
We can then work together in making this coin better than every other.. i personally believe that NMC should be as or more valueable than bitcoin...

the possibilities are endless


If someone else is working on this project, let me know asap and I will give up... i wouldn't bother changing or trying to roll out an update namecoin (3.50+) until we find out off the Khal/vinced and/or the community what updates are required... also what i have had done thus far will have been a complete waste of my time.

what has happened to Vinced and Khal?

I'll keep all updated..

I am passionate about NMC, and would love to see this crypto become no1 coin

"the binaries that majority of clients are running are built using khal's source git tree"
https://dot-bit.org/BuildNamecoinFromSource

v350 windows is built from Khal's source.

Maybe I am picking the wrong repository?  Why did you pick to fork from  https://github.com/khalahan/namecoin  and not from https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin ?

Ah, well I checked what I wrote, and I put updated mac port.  Guess maybe I should have just put build.   I figured people would know what I meant by port, especially  since my old port/build is still featured on the official site. A port typically does not have improvements, and minimal code alterations only as needed to get it to build.


https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin/tree/master/doc  has the build instructions already though. 


Seems some people want binaries.   Only way to offer them is to distribute them that I know of.  I was for awhile known as the person who supplied the builds for windows and mac put on dot-bit.org.  Personal life kept me distracted with other things  for most of 2012, and I noticed that while someone had updated the widows builds, no one ever did it for the Mac.   As I did back in 2011,  I also build the gui version as they can be useful to some people as well.   I used to use Multicoin as the gui for awhile, but that is too far out of date now.

I do get your point, and that is why I avoid binaries myself, or usually run them sandboxed in a VM for awhile.  I am just not sure what the alternative is for people that don't want to build it themselves.  People that want binaries are going to have to pick who they trust I guess.   If you have a better idea, I would like to know of it, so I can use it myself.

btw: I just put my old windows makefile and some stolen instructions on git: https://github.com/phelixbtc/namecoin

That's new, being hinted as a troll. Look, I'm sure you mean well and everyone will know that you just meant you compiled the latest from namecoin git but that's not what I read on your post, I read it as "I altered the code, improved it somehow, here's a shiny binary and no reference to the source code".

Now that you explained I know that was not the case, you didn't change anything, just compiled. Fine, but a set of instructions on how to build it would be much better received.

I can quickly cook a namecoin version for windows/mac with a small easter egg added and you have no way of verifying, and you know the type of easter eggs that are common around here, right?

Be cool, and stay safe. Distributing binaries is a major no-no in most cases, and advocating it even if your intentions and code are the best will teach users to trust binaries referenced from threads, and that usually ends in "help, my wallet has been stolen and I don't know why" kind of posts.

I have no idea is nelisky is trolling, but I know for sure zamgo is for whatever reason. 

I know he knows where the heck to find the sources. ( https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin )

The mac build is just an update to the one already featured on http://dot-bit.org/  , and the windows build is similar  as what I used to do.  Just in this case someone at least updated it already.

In any case, I am now that I have built the new baseline, I am starting to  make some changes to the code to aid someone who wanted  me to do something with the namecoin code for them.    People used to say thank you for them.   I won't bother posting those results if the community has become such trolls of stating the obvious and all of the sudden pretending they can't find the damn source code for namecoin, and stating the obvious to not run binaries you don't trust and build from source yourselves if you want.  Anyway, the build are there for those that want them, and are easily ignored by those that don't.  If they don't get downloaded I will know there is not demand for them anymore and not to waste my time uploading them.

Yes.   Binaries from unknown sources are very dangerous.  

It's great there is some new namecoin work being done, but it has to be in the open for all of us to see or else no one will trust it.

Post the source on github or another suitable location and let us all review it.  

Can you share the source code? Pushing binaries around is dangerous (for users) at best.

Updated Mac port, and a gui version for sending coins for windows as well.

https://www.box.com/s/cv35rbugsvvz1lbi1iw4

Looking forward to it ... will you submit pull request to namecoin/namecoin github repo (khal still controls this I think)?

correct... although the namecoin code will need a minor adjustment to work with the gui (will be commented in the code)..


anyone know why my daemon crashes when i use the sendtoname command?

have debug.log if anyone wants to check (in win764).. everything else works spot on from what i can tell

Just clarifying, if I understood our PM exchange properly, you are taking the 0.3.50 NMC client and giving it a QT GUI, right? You are not updating the base client to match the newer bitcoin source?

yes.. in process now..
eta 14 days qt client (should work linux/windows)
2nd part, 2 weeks later, should include name registration, with some fixed fields to change, like ns, IP).. anything really advanced will need to be done in console window

if all goes according to plan

You might have seen this already?

http://sourceforge.net/projects/namecoinj/

It seems to work, is a little buggy but i don't think anybody really trusted because of the big fat binary buried inside the jar ball ...

I've nearly got a port working based on the bitcoinjs-server nodejs library, as well. I've gotten it to connect to the peer network, though it seems there's some difference in how the block difficulty progression is calculated for NMC... Once I get that and add the logic for the NMC-specific Scripts, that will be another option for end users to run locally via Node, and as a web framework for web applications as well!