[announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin - page 82.

tysat

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1004

Keep it real

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 08, 2013, 02:30:49 PM

Wonder if it would easier at this point to begin with latest bitcoin as code base and try re-implement vinced's and khal namecoin functionality on top of that ... instead of trying to rebase namecoind ... 0.3.51 on to bitcoin 0.8.1?

On this ... I add my still outstanding bounty pledge for usable GUI to nelisky's ... 1000nmc, so total now 2000nmc for namecoin-qt client.

Also .. has anybody heard from doublec ... I can't believe he really disappeared with the bitparking exchange funds? ( I know where he lives)

I would think it would be easier to go from 0.8.1 -> new namecoind, rather than trying to bring 0.3.51 namecoind up to date. Also makes me glad I had pulled my namecoins out of bitparking, even if I did convert and waste them all on satoshidice.

nelisky

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1002

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 08, 2013, 02:30:49 PM

Wonder if it would easier at this point to begin with latest bitcoin as code base and try re-implement vinced's and khal namecoin functionality on top of that ... instead of trying to rebase namecoind ... 0.3.51 on to bitcoin 0.8.1?

On this ... I add my still outstanding bounty pledge for usable GUI to nelisky's ... 1000nmc, so total now 2000nmc for namecoin-qt client.

Also .. has anybody heard from doublec ... I can't believe he really disappeared with the bitparking exchange funds? ( I know where he lives)

I must have worded myself wrong. My pledge is for a working bitcoind, I don't really care for the GUI part at this point. And also rebasing is most simply not possible as the code bases have diverged a lot. Like I have mentioned before I can provide a diff for the namecoin specific changes over the bitcoin source as it was.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Wonder if it would easier at this point to begin with latest bitcoin as code base and try re-implement vinced's and khal namecoin functionality on top of that ... instead of trying to rebase namecoind ... 0.3.51 on to bitcoin 0.8.1?

On this ... I add my still outstanding bounty pledge for usable GUI to nelisky's ... 1000nmc, so total now 2000nmc for namecoin-qt client.

Also .. has anybody heard from doublec ... I can't believe he really disappeared with the bitparking exchange funds? ( I know where he lives)

virtualmaster

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

I am ready to donate for the developer who brings out an improved client with GUI and password protection.
The amount will be between 5-10 BTC if I ever receive back this amount from the former namecoin bitparking exchange.

nelisky

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1002

Quote from: lunarboy on May 08, 2013, 09:59:35 AM

Think Khal is your man.

Quote from: khal on April 12, 2013, 02:14:57 PM

I'm planning on spending some time on namecoin again. The price may fluctuate a bit :p

He's still working on the namecoin project, but appears to be quite busy. i'm willing to donate a few coins, perhaps if there is enough of us we could get some development. Huh

Reiterating my vouch for 1000 NMC to whomever get a working namecoind version (source code, obviously) that matches the functionalities of the current bitcoind and allows for keeping track of the developments of bitcoind going forward. I don't care about the UI, though that would certainly help further adoption, but that's best taken as a separate project or it might become a little daunting to do it all in a short time period.

My bounty can be extended if someone shows interested and provides a timeline.

lunarboy

hero member

Activity: 544

Merit: 500

Think Khal is your man.

Quote from: khal on April 12, 2013, 02:14:57 PM

I'm planning on spending some time on namecoin again. The price may fluctuate a bit :p

He's still working on the namecoin project, but appears to be quite busy. i'm willing to donate a few coins, perhaps if there is enough of us we could get some development. Huh

midnightlightning

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Quote from: nelisky on April 17, 2013, 08:16:56 AM

Is there anyone that can provide me with a quick tl;dr of the differences between bitcoin and namecoin in terms of communication protocol between peers and wallet format?

I'm circling back on my interest in Namecoin and hitting this roadblock as well. I'm on a Mac, and failed to get the v3.50 version to compile, and the latest compiled binary I could find was too old to be accepted into the current P2P network. The wiki does somewhat document the CLI/RPC commands, but looks to be completely silent on the actual P2P/TCP protocol (effectively, what changed between this documentation of Bitcoin's Protocol, and Namecoin's implementation). If that could somehow be documented, this project could be revived in other client implementations, even if the changes can't easily be rebased onto Bitcoin's latest source.

As some of the recent comments on the wiki indicate, because this alt-coin only has a command-line daemon, and no GUI, and no web-based wallet systems, it's one of the harder alt-chains to just pick up and start using.

I've gone through and created some diffs of Namecoin's source compared to Bitcoin's source at various points, and will try and see if I can muddle through them to figure out some decent documentation on the P2P protocol. If anyone else wants to take a peek as well:

Namecoin 0.3.21 changes against Bitcoin 0.1.5: This is from Vinced's repository, and appears to be the first "released" version; the one that is timed about the same time as the announcement that started this thread, compared to the version of Bitcoin it was originally forked from. I use this one as the base since presumably by the time vinced was comfortable to release it, the various protocols and standards were fully fleshed-out. Notably, this is the largest Diff of the set, at 32.1K lines long (some coding efficiencies between 0.3.21 and 0.3.51 cleaned up 10K lines of code?).
Namecoin 0.3.51 changes against Bitcoin 0.1.5: This is the current version of Namecoin, from the main "namecoin" github repo, compared to the version of Bitcoin it was originally forked from. 22.2K lines long.
Namecoin 0.3.51 changes against Bitcoin 0.8.1: This is the current version of Namecoin, compared to the current version of Bitcoin. 25.6K lines long

nelisky

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1002

I am not being able to find time to do this, and I could really use it.

Anybody wants to join in a bounty? I would say that bounty could be collected for an updated namecoin client based on the latest bitcoin code.

I pledge 1000 NMC to that, if it can be done within the next 2 weeks (should be a "simple" job, and I can provide a diff from namecoin to the bitcoin version it is based upon, as per vinced's repository)

nelisky

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1002

I have started doing it, but haven't been able to dedicate enough time. Basically need to debug why I get no responses from the seed nodes at this point. Is there anyone that can provide me with a quick tl;dr of the differences between bitcoin and namecoin in terms of communication protocol between peers and wallet format?

khal

hero member

Activity: 540

Merit: 500

Quote from: virtualmaster on April 16, 2013, 02:26:36 PM

I think that is a good idea. The newest client would have already the wallet password protection and the other features and to register .bit domains could be used the old wallet.
Many people anyway are only trading with namecoins.
Namecoin is great.

I think too, and it is on the todo list since a long time.
But nobody has worked on it yet.
Any coder available ? :p

virtualmaster

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

I think that is a good idea. The newest client would have already the wallet password protection and the other features and to register .bit domains could be used the old wallet.
Many people anyway are only trading with namecoins.
Namecoin is great.

nelisky

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1002

What would rebasing namecoin daemon onto the latest bitcoin encompass? I could really use some of the updated RPC calls, and it feels like it would be very beneficial for everyone to be able to follow bitcoin development closely.

I tried a simple half baked hackish thing with getting the ports changed, the genesis block and the address version to what namecoin has over bitcoin's git head, but I can't get responses from peers (yes, I added namecoin ones using addnode) so I'm assuming there are more changes to the communication protocol.

And would it be possible to do this in two steps? First without dealing with namecoin specific features but only wallet and communications, and adding the NS stuff later on?

Finally... time for a bounty?

khal

hero member

Activity: 540

Merit: 500

http://register.dot-bit.org/ has been fixed, you can now register again :p

BitCoinNutJob

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

i like namecoin

dotbitme

jr. member

Activity: 65

Merit: 2

dotbit.me

Quote from: sv4ol84a6v79a46ilby on April 13, 2013, 07:15:54 AM

Hi, I have a problem. I tried to follow directions at http://dot-bit.org/HowToRegisterAndConfigureBitDomains so i can pre-order my domain name for namecoins. However, here is what happens when i try to preorder a name:

If you do not have any namecoins you can use a webservice I recently created called dotbit.me. The process of registering a domain name is much simplified and you can pay with bitcoins if you wish. One you have a domain name, you can transfer it out to your own namecoin address for free.

Regards,
Tagide

virtualmaster

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

You need to have some namecoins in your wallet otherwise you cannot pay the fees.
It is less then 1 namecoin to reserve a .bit domain for one year.

sv4ol84a6v79a46ilby

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Hi, I have a problem. I tried to follow directions at http://dot-bit.org/HowToRegisterAndConfigureBitDomains so i can pre-order my domain name for namecoins. However, here is what happens when i try to preorder a name:

Code:

C:\namecoind>namecoind name_new d/THENAMEIWANT

Quote

error: {"code":-4,"message":"Error: This transaction requires a transaction fee
of at least 0.00 because of its amount, complexity, or use of recently received
funds "}

And by the way I checked and the domain name that I want is free.

phelix

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1020

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on February 19, 2013, 04:26:18 AM

Quote from: phelix on February 19, 2013, 03:21:07 AM

message encryption using bitcoin/namecoin keys is at reach: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/encryptdecrypt-arbitrary-text-using-bitcoin-keys-145098

Only key export is missing in namecoin.

You might be able to use pywallet for key export/import?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pywallet-22-manage-your-wallet-update-required-34028

I think pywallet can not work on wallets in use. Otherwise it would be enough to hack something together.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: phelix on February 19, 2013, 03:21:07 AM

message encryption using bitcoin/namecoin keys is at reach: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/encryptdecrypt-arbitrary-text-using-bitcoin-keys-145098

Only key export is missing in namecoin.

You might be able to use pywallet for key export/import?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pywallet-22-manage-your-wallet-update-required-34028

phelix

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1020

message encryption using bitcoin/namecoin keys is at reach: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/encryptdecrypt-arbitrary-text-using-bitcoin-keys-145098

Only key export is missing in namecoin.

Topic: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin - page 82. (Read 597092 times)