Latest Windows binaries last commit: Mon May 23 18:45:17
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/30252547/namecoin_2011-05-23.zip
SHA-1: 771727A6582FDCEE5278ABD9DC35FC3CC7BE7BD1
commits since last release:
2011-05-23 Merge pull request #4 from ashuiquu/master
2011-05-22 missing return
2011-05-16 use pertxout for name operations
Topic: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin - page 94. (Read 596107 times)
May 24, 2011, 10:49:24 AM
May 23, 2011, 08:09:54 PM
Oh really?? News to me!
I was only ever able to get confirmed blocks to show up, but I was using 0.3.20 I believe.
use the latest binaries. it should show something like this:I was only ever able to get confirmed blocks to show up, but I was using 0.3.20 I believe.
{
"account" : "",
"category" : "immature",
"amount" : 50.00000000,
"confirmations" : 13,
"txid" : "ad4a4d398bfafa8378636d146fda685ce50fbd6710c7d30af2820c5cd93e8864",
"time" : 1306196513
}
May 23, 2011, 06:32:14 AM
Anybody figure out to check on the unconfirmed blocks?
No.
Just increase your hashing power if you want to see confirmations quicker
Code:
$./namecoind listtransactions
... but you need the 'right' build for it get immature blocks.
Oh really?? News to me!
I was only ever able to get confirmed blocks to show up, but I was using 0.3.20 I believe.
May 23, 2011, 05:54:40 AM
Anybody figure out to check on the unconfirmed blocks?
No.
Just increase your hashing power if you want to see confirmations quicker
Code:
$./namecoind listtransactions
... but you need the 'right' build for it get immature blocks.
May 23, 2011, 05:50:18 AM
Anybody figure out to check on the unconfirmed blocks?
No.
Just increase your hashing power if you want to see confirmations quicker
May 23, 2011, 02:23:51 AM
Anybody figure out to check on the unconfirmed blocks?
Code:
namecoind.exe listtransactions
May 23, 2011, 01:04:55 AM
Anybody figure out to check on the unconfirmed blocks?
May 22, 2011, 10:17:56 AM
Nearly impossible to say without trying. If you need a .bit hosting, send me a PM.
There is a discussion about that here.
Quote from: caston
I just thought of another question. Where do your registration fees go?
Registration fees (name_firstupdate) are lost. Their goal is to avoid a rush, but this is not perfect in my opinion.There is a discussion about that here.
May 22, 2011, 09:00:31 AM
I just thought of another question. Where do your registration fees go?
May 22, 2011, 08:53:46 AM
Then, you must add rejuvepedia.bit on the configuration of your webserver (in apache if you have access directly, or on the web interface where you add your domains)
Hi khal,
Is this likely to work on nearly free speech (http://www.nearlyfreespeech.net)
thank you
May 22, 2011, 07:48:11 AM
Hi I went to register rejuvepedia.bit.
So far I have reserved it with ./namecoind name_new d/rejuvepedia.bit
Now the next part confuses me a bit *no pun intended*
./namecoind name_firstupdate d/ ''
What do I enter for json-value?
At the moment I'm using the domain name rejuvepedia.org and if possible I would like rejuvepedia.bit to point to the same page.
best regards,
Chris
So far I have reserved it with ./namecoind name_new d/rejuvepedia.bit
Now the next part confuses me a bit *no pun intended*
./namecoind name_firstupdate d/
What do I enter for json-value?
At the moment I'm using the domain name rejuvepedia.org and if possible I would like rejuvepedia.bit to point to the same page.
best regards,
Chris
rand = short hex number returned by the name_new command. longhex is the long hex returned.
For json-value, you can follow this :
http://dot-bit.org/HowToRegisterAndConfigureBitDomains#How_to_configure_your_domain
Short and simple example (simply put the ip of your server instead) :
'{"map": {"": "10.0.0.1", "www": "10.0.0.1"}}'
Then, you must add rejuvepedia.bit on the configuration of your webserver (in apache if you have access directly, or on the web interface where you add your domains)
May 22, 2011, 07:27:25 AM
Hi I went to register rejuvepedia.bit.
So far I have reserved it with ./namecoind name_new d/rejuvepedia.bit
Now the next part confuses me a bit *no pun intended*
./namecoind name_firstupdate d/ ''
What do I enter for json-value?
At the moment I'm using the domain name rejuvepedia.org and if possible I would like rejuvepedia.bit to point to the same page.
best regards,
Chris
So far I have reserved it with ./namecoind name_new d/rejuvepedia.bit
Now the next part confuses me a bit *no pun intended*
./namecoind name_firstupdate d/
What do I enter for json-value?
At the moment I'm using the domain name rejuvepedia.org and if possible I would like rejuvepedia.bit to point to the same page.
best regards,
Chris
May 22, 2011, 03:28:18 AM
"internet" and "namecoin" don't show up in a name_scan. Why so?
name_scan limits to 500 results by default. Use :
Code:
name_scan "" 10000
May 22, 2011, 01:23:20 AM
"internet" and "namecoin" don't show up in a name_scan. Why so?
May 22, 2011, 01:08:00 AM
thanks I now have the latest Linux version
May 21, 2011, 06:52:55 PM
Latest Windows binaries (2011-05-11) last commit: Wed May 11 02:12:41
http://min.us/mvfHZcE
SHA-1: 720DBFD0DCA254CB621F498A3EDE08E4B6F65E63
http://min.us/mvfHZcE
SHA-1: 720DBFD0DCA254CB621F498A3EDE08E4B6F65E63
May 21, 2011, 01:44:47 PM
You can find latest linux binaries of namecoin here. They include the patch to see generated coins still not mature.
We are still waiting for someone to build a recent windows version
[edit: thanks grue]
We are still waiting for someone to build a recent windows version
[edit: thanks grue]
May 19, 2011, 12:11:30 PM
I do have another suggestion as well although this might be hard to get it to play nice with what's out there already but if we are going to have namecoin we also need to remember that IP addresses have their own ICAN known as IANA. We also need IPcoin.
May 19, 2011, 12:08:56 PM
The 512 value was an arbitrary choice. 290 is now the real difficulty :
http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9
now it'shttp://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9
589.64331461
thanks for that.. I managed to do a couple of blocks at the old value.. has it gone up due to people actually mining it or has it just been changed again by someone?
May 19, 2011, 07:30:57 AM
The 512 value was an arbitrary choice. 290 is now the real difficulty :
http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9
now it'shttp://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9
589.64331461
Jump to: