Where can I find sources of modified minerd?
And what's wrong with the pool? Mined over hour at ~10Khs but...
TBX Estimate: 0.14274062 TBX Unconfirmed: 0.00000000 TBX Balance: 0.00000000 TBX
Wrong stats?
Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Tenebrix, a CPU-friendly, GPU-hostile cryptocurrency - page 25. (Read 127234 times)
October 01, 2011, 09:42:40 PM
October 01, 2011, 09:38:32 PM
Thanks to ArtForz, who helped finding the problem and jtobey, who has fixed the bug causing the problem in is software, the block explorer at
http://blockexplorer.sytes.net/
is now up to the current block for TBX!
Sorry for the inconveniences caused by this for the last 36 hours or so.
And if you find the explorer useful, please consider donating to the http://blockexplorer.sytes.net/ donation addresses and/or to the author of the Abe software (links to his donation addresses at the bottom of my site).
http://blockexplorer.sytes.net/
is now up to the current block for TBX!
Sorry for the inconveniences caused by this for the last 36 hours or so.
And if you find the explorer useful, please consider donating to the http://blockexplorer.sytes.net/ donation addresses and/or to the author of the Abe software (links to his donation addresses at the bottom of my site).
October 01, 2011, 08:45:15 PM
Finally got the (*@&%* minerd to compile in linux.
It was worth the effort, close to double the hashes of running the windows one in linux.
Too bad I didn't get it fixed during super low difficulty
Anyway, in case y'all have the same issue:
Edit ./configure to not check the libcurl version.
Edit the makefile and specify the path to libcurl in place of the @LIBCURL@ that is in there stock.
Presto!
(/usr/local/lib/libcurl.so is the path)
EDIT:
Do I get development funds for finding and finding a workaround for an issue that caused problems for multiple people?
It was worth the effort, close to double the hashes of running the windows one in linux.
Too bad I didn't get it fixed during super low difficulty
Anyway, in case y'all have the same issue:
Edit ./configure to not check the libcurl version.
Edit the makefile and specify the path to libcurl in place of the @LIBCURL@ that is in there stock.
Presto!
(/usr/local/lib/libcurl.so is the path)
EDIT:
Do I get development funds for finding and finding a workaround for an issue that caused problems for multiple people?
October 01, 2011, 03:20:22 PM
The Simplecoin pool seems to send new work units every minute instead of every five seconds. Since the pool has longpolling it reduces the chance of stale shares (shares that became invalid because they were sent after a new block was generated)
And no, you don't have to do anything of that manually.
And no, you don't have to do anything of that manually.
October 01, 2011, 03:16:01 PM
so how many seconds once i have to ask work unit for pool?
October 01, 2011, 03:11:13 PM
October 01, 2011, 03:08:52 PM
@ Matoking
Well, he can - if he asks Art he might give him the optimized GPU miner for tenebrix. A good radeon will be slightly slower than 2-3 cores of a recent-ish Phenom though
@racerguy
a share
Well, he can - if he asks Art he might give him the optimized GPU miner for tenebrix. A good radeon will be slightly slower than 2-3 cores of a recent-ish Phenom though
@racerguy
a share
Well then this still is a bit of a fail for me. The CPU advantage is not that big really so then 2 Radeons = Phenom 1100T is not that big advantage for CPU people. So on a rig with 1x 1100T and 4x 6990 will be just like 5x 1100T which is still advantageous. Need to make GPU like equal to less than 1 core etc.
October 01, 2011, 03:05:09 PM
so only " PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)" is a share accepted by simplecoin.us?
what about all the hashes showing like this
what about all the hashes showing like this
Code:
[2011-10-02 00:53:46] thread 0: 38059 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:53:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
[2011-10-02 00:54:32] thread 1: 66285 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:54:48] thread 0: 67162 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:55:32] thread 1: 65198 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:55:48] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:56:32] thread 1: 66303 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:56:49] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:57:31] thread 1: 65216 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:57:49] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:58:32] thread 1: 66321 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:58:50] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:59:34] thread 1: 66321 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:59:50] thread 0: 64977 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:00:01] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from ser
[2011-10-02 01:00:35] longpoll failed, sleeping for 30s
[2011-10-02 01:00:38] thread 1: 65233 hashes, 1.03 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:00:40] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:00:40] thread 0: 50813 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:10
0] thread 1: 1280 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:00:43] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2[2011-10-02 01:00:43] thread 0: 3882 hashes, 1.17 khash/sec
011-10-02 01:00:43] thread 1: 3519 hashes, 1.16 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:01:48] thread 1: 70380 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:01:54] thread 0: 77640 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:02:48] thread 1: 65981 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:02:53] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:02:53] thread 0: [64926 hashes, 2011-10-02 01:02
85 hashes, 1.110 khash/sec
.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:03:14] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10[2011-10-0-02 02 01:03:14] thread 0: 22568 hashes, 11:.
03:14] thread 1: 22010 hashes, 1.06 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:04:14] thread 1: 62885 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:04:15] thread 0: 64480 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:05:12] thread 1: 63950 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:05:14] thread 0: 64480 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:06:13] thread 1: 66155 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:06:14] thread 0: 65572 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:07:14] thread 1: 65070 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:07:15] thread 0: 65572 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:08:13] thread 1: 65070 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:08:14] thread 0: 64497 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:08:36] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:08:36] thread 1: 25654 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:08
480 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:09:39] thread 0: 66763 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:09:41] thread 1: 66923 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:10:07] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:10:07] thread 0: 29683 hashes, 1.06 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:10:07] thread 1: 28469 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:11:05] thread 0: 63606 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:11:05] thread 1: 63264 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:12:05] thread 0: 66953 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:12:07] thread 1: 66593 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:12:09] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:12:09] thread 0: 3532 hash[2011-10-02 01:12:09]
shes, es, 1.07 khash/sec
1.00 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:13:01] thread 1: 56400 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:13:13] thread 0: 70640 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:14:01] thread 1: 66352 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:14:14] thread 0: 67276 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:15:03] thread 1: 66352 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:15:15] thread 0: 66173 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:16:02] thread 1: 64211 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:16:14] thread 0: 64038 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:16:41] thread 1: 43738 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:16:41] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
[2011-10-02 01:17:13] thread 0: 66246 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:17:28] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 [2011-10-02 01:17:28] thre01:17:28] thread 0: 16319
361.09 khash/se5 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
c
[2011-10-02 01:17:38] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:17:38] thread 1: 11150 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:17
860 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
1.15 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:18:40] thread 1: 66900 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:18:45] thread 0: 72400 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:19:40] thread 1: 65803 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:19:45] thread 0: 65818 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:20:38] thread 1: 65803 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:20:43] thread 0: 65818 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:21:38] thread 1: 68072 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:21:43] thread 0: 68087 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:22:40] thread 1: 68072 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:22:45] thread 0: 68087 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:22:52] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:22:52] thread 1: 13555 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:22
98 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
1.15 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:23:53] thread 0: 65982 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:23:55] thread 1: 67775 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:24:12] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01[2011-10-02 01:24:12] thread 1: 18286 hashes, 1.0
:24:12] thread 0: 20109 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:25:11] thread 1: 64538 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:25:13] thread 0: 67030 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:26:10] thread 1: 65631 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:26:13] thread 0: 65931 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:26:27] thread 1: 18202 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:26:27] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
[2011-10-02 01:27:12] thread 0: 67048 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:27:28] thread 1: 68257 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:28:04] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:28:04] thread 0: 57784 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:28:04] thread 1: 40762 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:29:06] thread 0: 67981 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:29:07] thread 1: 67936 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:29:59] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:29:59] thread 1: 59018 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:29
351 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:31:01] thread 0: 67189 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:31:02] thread 1: 68097 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:31:10] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:31:10] thread 0: 9738 hashes, [2011-10-02 101:31
82 hashes, .12 khash/sec
1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:32:09] thread 0: 64920 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:32:12] thread 1: 68417 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:33:07] thread 0: 66020 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:33:10] thread 1: 66210 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:34:07] thread 0: 68296 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:34:10] thread 1: 68493 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
October 01, 2011, 02:53:57 PM
@ Matoking
Well, he can - if he asks Art he might give him the optimized GPU miner for tenebrix. A good radeon will be slightly slower than 2-3 cores of a recent-ish Phenom though
@racerguy
a share
Well, he can - if he asks Art he might give him the optimized GPU miner for tenebrix. A good radeon will be slightly slower than 2-3 cores of a recent-ish Phenom though
@racerguy
a share
October 01, 2011, 02:52:32 PM
[2011-10-02 03:47:10] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
mining on simplecoin, did I find a 'share' like you do bitcoin mining or did i find a block?
mining on simplecoin, did I find a 'share' like you do bitcoin mining or did i find a block?
Just a share. The miner readouts will be success for anything that is not a reject.
True found blocks are only seen on the website under TBX Proportional Stats.
October 01, 2011, 02:51:17 PM
[2011-10-02 03:47:10] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
mining on simplecoin, did I find a 'share' like you do bitcoin mining or did i find a block?
mining on simplecoin, did I find a 'share' like you do bitcoin mining or did i find a block?
October 01, 2011, 02:50:12 PM
A miner that supports scrypt. The only one that supports scrypt at the moment is minerd which comes with the Tenebrix pack. And no, you can't use anything like CUDA, it would be against the Tenebrix's point of being a GPU-hostile cryptocurrency. 
October 01, 2011, 02:49:33 PM
Can you use guiminer? Which miner should we be using? Ufasoft? CUDA?
October 01, 2011, 02:43:18 PM
Stats readout is wrong, but the pool is running quite happily.
October 01, 2011, 02:41:13 PM
No, just set your worker to TBX Proportional and it will be fine.
October 01, 2011, 02:40:34 PM
The port is 8337 like with some Bitcoin mining pools.
Wouldn't you be mining BTC if you use that port?
October 01, 2011, 02:37:58 PM
The port is 8337 like with some Bitcoin mining pools.
thanks that did it.
October 01, 2011, 02:35:04 PM
Pool is working.
But mining is poor due to khash.
But mining is poor due to khash.
October 01, 2011, 02:29:09 PM
The port is 8337 like with some Bitcoin mining pools.
October 01, 2011, 02:28:15 PM
Just got a TBX pool up and running on http://simplecoin.us
It is experimental so please give it a run. If it holds up well I'll be moving it to the production pool server.
It is experimental so please give it a run. If it holds up well I'll be moving it to the production pool server.
I can't see how to connect to this pool? http://pool.simplecoin.us:xxxx is that correct? I don't know which port to use.
Jump to: