hello
just 2 x my stake in Ziftr , after mining first with AWS by CPU, and then by GPU, good price (at the moment) great work done on the payment system and merchants reach out
thanks for the opportunity ! (I make key acquisitions every week) if an opportunity so allow
referring here to the latest tweets @ https://twitter.com/ziftr excellent work but I knew this already
great potential and ultra excited for the growth in retail space
Topic: Announcing ZiftrCOIN Release - page 20. (Read 106711 times)
Is this explorer rich list correct? http://zrcbex.lbtcoin.org/richlist
It's saying the top 100 addresses have 99.91% of entire coin supply?
It's saying the top 100 addresses have 99.91% of entire coin supply?
I never got an answer so I'm bumping. Anyone know?
I saw this question and I know I answered it in my head at some point. It apparently never made it to the computer though, so I apologize for that.
That rich list is technically correct, though it's a bit misleading, to say the least. The top 90 addresses hold/held the pre-mined coins. As mentioned, many of these cannot be spent (peers will reject any transaction that spends them and any block that contains such a transaction), so they aren't really available coins yet.
The coins reserved for the big give-away we're doing later this year are also included in that batch. Those aren't locked up technically but require (I believe) 3 company execs to gain access to them.
There are also quite a few coins from the pre-sale that participants have not collected yet. We didn't feel the need to artificially break these up, so any time a user withdraws some of their pre-sale coins it creates a a funny looking transaction with huge amounts of change. Those change addresses will likely make it to the top of the rich list as well.
So the short version (TLDR) is that yes those addresses do have those coins, but they are either multiple people's coins that haven't been distributed yet or they are locked up such that they don't really exist.
I never got an answer so I'm bumping. Anyone know?
Looks to be correct LiteBit. The majority of PoW coins will only be mined in a few years (PoW rewards will be increasing with each block for a very long time). This large percentage should concern the premine, which I understand was created as "unspendable" until reaching a certain date. That's one of the interesting innovations with ZRC btw (the time locked premine).
I'd expect that ZWGuy or someone from their team should step in to clarify decisively.
Thanks @myagui. I read about the timed release of funds for various things here: https://www.ziftrcoin.com/what-is-ziftrcoin/coin-specifications/
So 95.5% of the coins will be mined over the next 30 years, hence the big discrepancy in the distribution thus far.
I never got an answer so I'm bumping. Anyone know?
Looks to be correct LiteBit. The majority of PoW coins will only be mined in a few years (PoW rewards will be increasing with each block for a very long time). This large percentage should concern the premine, which I understand was created as "unspendable" until reaching a certain date. That's one of the interesting innovations with ZRC btw (the time locked premine).
I'd expect that ZWGuy or someone from their team should step in to clarify decisively.
Is this explorer rich list correct? http://zrcbex.lbtcoin.org/richlist
It's saying the top 100 addresses have 99.91% of entire coin supply?
It's saying the top 100 addresses have 99.91% of entire coin supply?
I never got an answer so I'm bumping. Anyone know?
get some HW error after a few day
I have try used many setting with -w -X gpuengne and memclock but still got HW error
I have try used many setting with -w -X gpuengne and memclock but still got HW error
Quote
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer.exe -k zr5 -o stratum+tcp://zrc-stratum.suprnova.cc:2257 -u ziftrcoin.1 -p x -w 256 -g 2 -X 1024 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1500 --lookup-gap 2
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer.exe -k zr5 -o stratum+tcp://zrc-stratum.suprnova.cc:2257 -u ziftrcoin.1 -p x -w 256 -g 2 -X 1024 --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1500 --lookup-gap 2
I've been gone a while - I'm not sure why that would happen only after a while, though... it's literally running the same code over and over.
this happen just on gpu 0 and why auto run as admin
i was used 2 sgminer to tricky gpu 0
Hey guys
Now listing ZRC on Cryptonator https://www.cryptonator.com/rates/ZRC-BTC
It'll help you to monitor the exchange rates to different currencies, make real-time rate calculations via Converter https://www.cryptonator.com/converter or you can customize and place a price ticker on your website https://www.cryptonator.com/widget
Enjoy!
Cheers
Now listing ZRC on Cryptonator https://www.cryptonator.com/rates/ZRC-BTC
It'll help you to monitor the exchange rates to different currencies, make real-time rate calculations via Converter https://www.cryptonator.com/converter or you can customize and place a price ticker on your website https://www.cryptonator.com/widget
Enjoy!
Cheers
how yes no 
ajmo prešaltat na eng, ljutit će se ljudi
Yes please. Cheers!
I get 3.2 Mhash ASUS R9 280X and 2 Mhash on GTX 960 and only 350 Khash on GTX 860
What miner is you using for the GTX 960? I only het 1,7 MH
Loneviking
==> this tell you how significant the quoted average is, as it defines a 67% confidence level interval, meaning that the "true" average has 67% change to be in the interval [average-error;average+error]. (a 95% confidence level interval would be [average-1.96*error;average+1.96*error])
Obviously this numbers takes time (ans statistics) to stabilize...
zmija, where r u from man?
zmija as snake?
eu prijatelju
. znaš li šta je sa ovim zifterom ne ide nikamo?nemam pojma, ne majnam ga, malo bacio oko na thread al ne pratim baš
ajmo prešaltat na eng, ljutit će se ljudi
I get 3.2 Mhash ASUS R9 280X and 2 Mhash on GTX 960 and only 350 Khash on GTX 860
What miner is you using for the GTX 960? I only het 1,7 MH
Loneviking
==> this tell you how significant the quoted average is, as it defines a 67% confidence level interval, meaning that the "true" average has 67% change to be in the interval [average-error;average+error]. (a 95% confidence level interval would be [average-1.96*error;average+1.96*error])
Obviously this numbers takes time (ans statistics) to stabilize...
zmija, where r u from man?
zmija as snake?
eu prijatelju
. znaš li šta je sa ovim zifterom ne ide nikamo? I get 3.2 Mhash ASUS R9 280X and 2 Mhash on GTX 960 and only 350 Khash on GTX 860
What miner is you using for the GTX 960? I only het 1,7 MH
Loneviking
==> this tell you how significant the quoted average is, as it defines a 67% confidence level interval, meaning that the "true" average has 67% change to be in the interval [average-error;average+error]. (a 95% confidence level interval would be [average-1.96*error;average+1.96*error])
Obviously this numbers takes time (ans statistics) to stabilize...
zmija, where r u from man?
zmija as snake?
eu prijatelju
I get 3.2 Mhash ASUS R9 280X and 2 Mhash on GTX 960 and only 350 Khash on GTX 860
What miner is you using for the GTX 960? I only het 1,7 MH
Loneviking
==> this tell you how significant the quoted average is, as it defines a 67% confidence level interval, meaning that the "true" average has 67% change to be in the interval [average-error;average+error]. (a 95% confidence level interval would be [average-1.96*error;average+1.96*error])
Obviously this numbers takes time (ans statistics) to stabilize...
zmija, where r u from man?
zmija as snake?
I get 3.2 Mhash ASUS R9 280X and 2 Mhash on GTX 960 and only 350 Khash on GTX 860
What miner is you using for the GTX 960? I only het 1,7 MH
Loneviking
==> this tell you how significant the quoted average is, as it defines a 67% confidence level interval, meaning that the "true" average has 67% change to be in the interval [average-error;average+error]. (a 95% confidence level interval would be [average-1.96*error;average+1.96*error])
Obviously this numbers takes time (ans statistics) to stabilize...
zmija, where r u from man?
zmija as snake?
I get 3.2 Mhash ASUS R9 280X and 2 Mhash on GTX 960 and only 350 Khash on GTX 860
What miner is you using for the GTX 960? I only het 1,7 MH
Loneviking
==> this tell you how significant the quoted average is, as it defines a 67% confidence level interval, meaning that the "true" average has 67% change to be in the interval [average-error;average+error]. (a 95% confidence level interval would be [average-1.96*error;average+1.96*error])
Obviously this numbers takes time (ans statistics) to stabilize...
zmija, where r u from man?
zmija as snake?
I get 3.2 Mhash ASUS R9 280X and 2 Mhash on GTX 960 and only 350 Khash on GTX 860
What miner is you using for the GTX 960? I only het 1,7 MH
Loneviking
==> this tell you how significant the quoted average is, as it defines a 67% confidence level interval, meaning that the "true" average has 67% change to be in the interval [average-error;average+error]. (a 95% confidence level interval would be [average-1.96*error;average+1.96*error])
Obviously this numbers takes time (ans statistics) to stabilize...
zmija, where r u from man?
zmija as snake?
I get 3.2 Mhash ASUS R9 280X and 2 Mhash on GTX 960 and only 350 Khash on GTX 860
What miner is you using for the GTX 960? I only het 1,7 MH
Loneviking
==> this tell you how significant the quoted average is, as it defines a 67% confidence level interval, meaning that the "true" average has 67% change to be in the interval [average-error;average+error]. (a 95% confidence level interval would be [average-1.96*error;average+1.96*error])
Obviously this numbers takes time (ans statistics) to stabilize...
still no update for windows miners 
I'm home
This are my settings:
.bat file:
sgminer.exe --config sgminer.conf
sgminer.conf file:
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://zrc-stratum.suprnova.cc:2257",
"user" : "minerjoen.gpu",
"pass" : "1"
}
]
,
"intensity" : "18",
"vector" : "2",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "zr5",
"thread-concurrency" : "13578",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "4"
}
"vector" : "2",This are my settings:
.bat file:
sgminer.exe --config sgminer.conf
sgminer.conf file:
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://zrc-stratum.suprnova.cc:2257",
"user" : "minerjoen.gpu",
"pass" : "1"
}
]
,
"intensity" : "18",
"vector" : "2",
"worksize" : "256",
"kernel" : "zr5",
"thread-concurrency" : "13578",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads" : "4"
}
"thread-concurrency" : "13578",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
these are useless for non-scrypt algos.
Jump to: