[ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 49.

Flash54

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: Flash54 on April 15, 2018, 08:01:57 PM

Quote from: pinpins on April 15, 2018, 12:07:14 PM

Quote from: Flash54 on April 13, 2018, 12:05:02 PM

scrypt on you pool with nicehash don`t work Sad

Hi,

Did you check it on compatibility? Perhaps it is to do with starting difficulty you can specify d=

I send to you message, please read!

Hello! Again problem with payouts on new my adress. Check personal message please.

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

UPDATE.

1. x17 internal load balancing has been implemented. We can reach up top 4000 miners now on x17 single 3737 port. Will roll out change for other stratums if this one proves to be working ok

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Update

1. Did a some tuning for number of stratums to prevent spammish behavior on low start diff (hsr, skein, lyra2z, hmq1725). Hopefully will make connection experience more stable now.

sundownz

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 512

Is SKUNK algo / coins all okay ? Profit has spiked WAY up.

Also... I am getting crazy amounts of Rejected shares.

sandinthebones

sr. member

Activity: 536

Merit: 321

Waiting for Equihash ...

MrPlus

member

Activity: 514

Merit: 11

Quote

Dealing with connection limits on x17, please approach second port(3738) if feasible for you

@Pinpins,
Is it possible to introduce some sound robin in the API?
If so, Auto-Switching Miners will pick the random port provided when calling the API.

I guess this would greatly help you in such case.

MrPlus

sundownz

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 512

Yesterday was a pretty awesome mining result day -- about 50% higher than average for me. Nice Cool

MrPlus

member

Activity: 514

Merit: 11

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: MrPlus on April 14, 2018, 12:35:15 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

hi , how can i monitor on 24h how much gathering mBTC ?
Last 24 Hours Balance line not show tooltip

You could use NPlusMiner with Earnings Tracking logs enabled.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases

How to tracking?

Enable Earnings Tracking checkbox on the config page.

Earning Tracking logs
Added the ability to enable earnings tracking log in Config (Default = disabled)
csv files are place in .\Logs as "EarningTracker-.csv"
Could be easily loaded in Excel for tables and charting
Anyone feels like building and Excel template and share with the community ? Wink

monkeyguy

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

I've had a couple problems which were totally my mistake and pinpin has been extremely helpful on discord helping me sort them out. A+ for support

guytechie

hero member

Activity: 677

Merit: 500

Quote from: pinpins on April 15, 2018, 12:09:08 PM

Hi,

Can you show me command line you have been using?

I'm using Sniffdog miner 4.8.4, so I'm not sure what it used. Since this was a while ago, I don't see the history any more. Right now it's mining Phi.

Sor for Phi, it's something like this:
Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvot2.2.4\ccminer.exe -a phi -o stratum+tcp://phi.mine.zergpool.com:8333 -u xxxxxx -p ID=,c=BTC -i 23 --api-remote --api-allow=0/0

I don't know if there was an intensity setting or not for skein or not.

If I catch it happening again I'll take note to send you the syntax.

Flash54

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: pinpins on April 15, 2018, 12:07:14 PM

Quote from: Flash54 on April 13, 2018, 12:05:02 PM

scrypt on you pool with nicehash don`t work Sad

Hi,

Did you check it on compatibility? Perhaps it is to do with starting difficulty you can specify d=

I send to you message, please read!

sundownz

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 512

HSR is having a tremendous number of Orphans. Any solution to that ?

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Quote from: guytechie on April 15, 2018, 12:31:41 AM

Is something wrong with skunk stratum? It took almost 3 minutes to start mining.

Code:

*** ccminer 2.2.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 9.0 32-bits

Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
Include some kernels from alexis78, djm34, djEzo, tsiv and krnlx.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2018-04-15 00:26:32] Starting on stratum+tcp://skunk.mine.zergpool.com:8433
[2018-04-15 00:26:32] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-04-15 00:26:32] 3 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm.
[2018-04-15 00:26:33] API open in full access mode to 0/0 on port 4068
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] Stratum difficulty set to 0.1
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] skunk block 322315, diff 72.517
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] GPU #2: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] GPU #1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] GPU #0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2018-04-15 00:29:23] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 4147.59 kH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:23] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 3588.89 kH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:23] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 3565.94 kH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:27] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.78 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:27] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 53.79 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:28] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.79 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:28] accepted: 1/1 (diff 0.118), 96.23 MH/s yes!
[2018-04-15 00:29:30] accepted: 2/2 (diff 0.236), 105.12 MH/s yes!
[2018-04-15 00:29:33] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 55.07 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:33] accepted: 3/3 (diff 0.182), 113.65 MH/s yes!
[2018-04-15 00:29:36] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 55.49 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:36] accepted: 4/4 (diff 0.107), 118.00 MH/s yes!

Then after a bit, it starts rejecting

Code:

[2018-04-15 00:29:43] accepted: 7/8 (diff 0.489), 129.29 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:43] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:46] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.48 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:47] accepted: 7/9 (diff 0.129), 133.41 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:47] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:50] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.71 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:50] accepted: 7/10 (diff 0.101), 134.61 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:50] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 55.16 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] accepted: 7/11 (diff 0.738), 136.31 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] accepted: 7/12 (diff 0.215), 137.48 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:56] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.33 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:56] accepted: 7/13 (diff 0.191), 139.92 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:56] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:57] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.90 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:58] accepted: 7/14 (diff 0.233), 140.80 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:58] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] accepted: 7/15 (diff 0.183), 142.42 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.36 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] accepted: 7/16 (diff 1.198), 143.27 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:05] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.30 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:30:05] accepted: 7/17 (diff 0.218), 145.09 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:05] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:06] accepted: 7/18 (diff 0.118), 145.09 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:06] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:07] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.93 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:30:07] accepted: 7/19 (diff 0.148), 145.78 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:07] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:09] accepted: 7/20 (diff 0.139), 146.33 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:09] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:10] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.20 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:30:10] accepted: 7/21 (diff 0.403), 146.98 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:10] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:18] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 53.95 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:30:19] accepted: 7/22 (diff 0.141), 147.64 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:19] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:25] skunk block 322318, diff 89.956

Hi,

Can you show me command line you have been using?

pinpins

member

Activity: 1028

Merit: 19

Quote from: Flash54 on April 13, 2018, 12:05:02 PM

scrypt on you pool with nicehash don`t work Sad

Hi,

Did you check it on compatibility? Perhaps it is to do with starting difficulty you can specify d=

guytechie

hero member

Activity: 677

Merit: 500

Is something wrong with skunk stratum? It took almost 3 minutes to start mining.

Code:

*** ccminer 2.2.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 9.0 32-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some kernels from alexis78, djm34, djEzo, tsiv and krnlx.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2018-04-15 00:26:32] Starting on stratum+tcp://skunk.mine.zergpool.com:8433
[2018-04-15 00:26:32] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-04-15 00:26:32] 3 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm.
[2018-04-15 00:26:33] API open in full access mode to 0/0 on port 4068
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] Stratum difficulty set to 0.1
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] skunk block 322315, diff 72.517
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] GPU #2: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] GPU #1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2018-04-15 00:29:22] GPU #0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2018-04-15 00:29:23] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 4147.59 kH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:23] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 3588.89 kH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:23] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 3565.94 kH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:27] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.78 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:27] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 53.79 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:28] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.79 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:28] accepted: 1/1 (diff 0.118), 96.23 MH/s yes!
[2018-04-15 00:29:30] accepted: 2/2 (diff 0.236), 105.12 MH/s yes!
[2018-04-15 00:29:33] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 55.07 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:33] accepted: 3/3 (diff 0.182), 113.65 MH/s yes!
[2018-04-15 00:29:36] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 55.49 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:36] accepted: 4/4 (diff 0.107), 118.00 MH/s yes!

Then after a bit, it starts rejecting

Code:

[2018-04-15 00:29:43] accepted: 7/8 (diff 0.489), 129.29 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:43] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:46] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.48 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:47] accepted: 7/9 (diff 0.129), 133.41 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:47] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:50] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.71 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:50] accepted: 7/10 (diff 0.101), 134.61 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:50] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 55.16 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] accepted: 7/11 (diff 0.738), 136.31 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] accepted: 7/12 (diff 0.215), 137.48 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:52] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:56] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.33 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:56] accepted: 7/13 (diff 0.191), 139.92 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:56] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:57] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.90 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:58] accepted: 7/14 (diff 0.233), 140.80 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:58] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] accepted: 7/15 (diff 0.183), 142.42 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.36 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] accepted: 7/16 (diff 1.198), 143.27 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:29:59] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:05] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.30 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:30:05] accepted: 7/17 (diff 0.218), 145.09 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:05] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:06] accepted: 7/18 (diff 0.118), 145.09 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:06] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:07] GPU #1: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.93 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:30:07] accepted: 7/19 (diff 0.148), 145.78 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:07] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:09] accepted: 7/20 (diff 0.139), 146.33 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:09] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:10] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 54.20 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:30:10] accepted: 7/21 (diff 0.403), 146.98 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:10] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:18] GPU #2: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti, 53.95 MH/s
[2018-04-15 00:30:19] accepted: 7/22 (diff 0.141), 147.64 MH/s booooo
[2018-04-15 00:30:19] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2018-04-15 00:30:25] skunk block 322318, diff 89.956

rmSX13

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

how come my hashrate in zergpool's UI is always higher than in my AwesomeMiner's? For a 1080ti you should be getting 65mhs right but in zergpool sometimes it shows twice that? Is that accurate that I'm hashing 120mhs for 1 card?

MrPlus

member

Activity: 514

Merit: 11

Quote from: ?? on ??

hi , how can i monitor on 24h how much gathering mBTC ?
Last 24 Hours Balance line not show tooltip

You could use NPlusMiner with Earnings Tracking logs enabled.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases

SouthMining

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

status API (actual_24h) reports and actual payouts do have some serious mismatches .. anyone else experiencing this and is there some issue on the pool? (mainly mining on x16r/s). there are 3x/day almost zero payouts in a period of ~4hrs. Not sure if this is expected on zergpool or there is some issue with auto-exchange?

looks like: 4hrs almost no balance change followed by 4 hrs steady balance rise, then again 4 hrs no balance change. not sure if this matches up with the mismatch between reported vs real earnings ( but looks like )

alnash

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

Quote from: eminer001 on April 12, 2018, 12:25:39 AM

Quote from: pinpins on April 11, 2018, 03:21:10 PM

Quote from: jurajdobias on April 11, 2018, 01:55:44 PM

Quote from: pinpins on April 11, 2018, 08:06:10 AM

UPDATE.

1. VERGE clearnet version was installed to reduce amount of orphans blocks found. It is safe to mine with less orphans now.
Hopefully it will improve accuracy as well!

Does it mean that orphan rate is not included in profit prediction? This would explain a lot, as suggested before.
Hope clearnet helps, because these orphans are anoying. However, I thought that ist due to relatively low hashrate in comparison to whole network, am I wrong?

I think wrong estimates were caused by worsen connectivity via darknet, hence orphans, hence lower end result. Now have fixed it, see it is much better already for last blocks in x17 Verge.

The issue is not fixed at all. There are 10 Orphan blocks on zergpool for the past 10 hours and each block is found every 45 minutes and this means a loss of 10% caused by orphan blocks and because of the terrible "DARKNET" network you are using.

Wtf is this "darknet network"?? Shocked

Flash54

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

scrypt on you pool with nicehash don`t work Sad

Topic: [ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 49. (Read 57959 times)