Topic: [ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 50. (Read 57959 times)

luck factor decrease when time frame increase that's just law of large number. That does not mean you can predict but you can nevertheless compare two different pool during the same period

luck factor never changes. probability changes with the amount of hashrate on a pool - you can assume but not predict. btc value changes. you can assume but not predict .. there are just lots of unpredictable factors.

The luck factor is important especially if pool hash rate is low, but as you mine longer the luck factor should decreased.

One way to figure things is to mine simultaneously different pools (sharing your hashrate equally between them indeed).

For instance I'm mining LUX simultaneously with zergpool and  bsod : so far bsod is giving 30% more earning than zergpool but considering BSOD finding blocks more often I have to wait to see if the difference in earning persists.

My mistake,the syntax requires no space after the comma : -p  c=BTC,mc=LUX works

Same here.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32754602

Hello, after recent updates on nemosminer(now its 3.0) i can no longer find an europe server option to connect to zergpool. Why is that? How can i coonect to the europe server now ?

Pool Estimates are made by looking at past results. That will differ, because block finding is luck. So if you found 20 blocks the past 24h, that desn not necessarily mean, you will find 20 blocks in the next 24h - still you made an assumption that it will be so if the hashrate/diff stays the same (which is never the case). At least, that's how I understand it.

Now, AM seems to compare the estimates to actual payouts. So what they actually compare is how "correct" the pool estimate was. Which again - involves luck and time because they have to wait for maturing at least. The only real information you can get out of this is how CONISTENT that percentage is. So if over a period of - say - >1 week, a pool gets measured at 70% you can assume, that it will be wrong always. If a pool gets measured 70% for just a day it may mean nothing at all.

and beside that, in the past years, the estimates were ALWAYS too high. Always. Every Pool, NH as well. Because those estimates are highly volatile and can never reach a 100% accuracy, which is completely fine, as long as they keep comparable and not being manipulated

If you are on pool A mining but pool B has the luck to find a block - it would've been better to be on pool B. But you wasn't. That's the game.

If someone is interested, I do permanent measurements on earnings and zergpool for example has a 10% rate everyday at 18:00-19:00h GMT, those payouts arrive later on, not sure why this is, but all I care is 24h profit and yes, the estimates don't match. But they never do and never did, at no pool, I've measured lots of them. NH (not a pool but still) has the most accurate so far, which is easy, because they don't need to make any assumptions at all, they have realtime data

Even so, ahashpool is also paying 30% less for x17

The issue is not fixed at all. There are 10 Orphan blocks on zergpool for the past 10 hours and each block is found every 45 minutes and this means a loss of 10% caused by orphan blocks and because of the terrible "DARKNET" network you are using.

Because you actually pay 30% less and 10% of the loss is caused by orphans it means you are stealing the rest of 20% from miners. 

Miners should be aware that advertised 0,5% is a scam because you are located in Russia and using DARKNET to hide you is actually hurting mining process but you want to be hidden and untraceable because of the DARK-ACTIVITY you are doing by stealing.

AHashPoll does not have orphan blocks like you and because they are not hackers like you and they are not stealing from miners like you do, because you pay 30% less and this is shown in Awesome Miner.

Looks like something is going wrong with mining  particular coin with auto exchange to wallet address :

 I tried to mine LUX with option -p  c=BTC, mc=LUX on port 8333 but got also some FOLM earnings
I tried to mine ULT with option -p  c=BTC, mc=ULT on port 4933 but got also plenty of other skein coins earnings

Hope you can help

I think wrong estimates were caused by worsen connectivity via darknet, hence orphans, hence lower end result. Now have fixed it, see it is much better already for last blocks in x17 Verge.

Does it mean that orphan rate is not included in profit prediction? This would explain a lot, as suggested before.
Hope clearnet helps, because these orphans are anoying. However, I thought that ist due to relatively low hashrate in comparison to whole network, am I wrong?

UPDATE

1. PGN is now auto tradeable coin

i have mined for 24 hours now, and i only have coin for 4$, but it should be around 10-11 according to the nplusminer.

what is wrong?

it mines alot on x17 algo

UPDATE.

1. VERGE clearnet version was installed to reduce amount of orphans blocks found. It is safe to mine with less orphans now.
Hopefully it will improve accuracy as well!

For the profit calculations... does the software remove orphans from the stats or include them? If they are included... that would pretty well explain the X17 discrepancy for ZERG right off the bat. There are quite a few orphans being found on ZERG on X17 and very few on ZPOOL.

no one is forcing you to mine at zergpool, so it is not right to say it is not fair. Yes the payout for x17 at zergpool is hovering around 70%, but that is comparable to ahashpool's x17 payout. zpool's x17 started at around 88% for me and it has steadily dropped to 83% over the course of a few days.

You have also conveniently not included the fact that x16r on zergpool has an actual pay out of 92.71% and xevan is at 98.53%.

Now Awesome Miner just introduced a feature from Options-> "Statistics" called "Adjust reported revenue for actual payout performance".  After you enable that feature you will notice that for many algos zergpool is at 60%-70% payout compared to advertised. You will find for the same algo much better payout for other pools.

When you compare using Awesome Miner zergpool payout of 70% for the same algo from other pools and you see that other pools pay 90% of the amount they advertise, you will very easy understand that it is somehow better pay 1% pool fee than being scamed and have 30% being stolen from you by zergpool and advertising it as 0% fee when it is actually 30% fee.

Do some tests with real BTC wallets and you will see that is is not fair to have 30% of your revenue stolen from you.

To clarify those "mc=XVG-lyra2v2" with algo name applies only to "mc=" functionality targeting particularly XVG coin in algo(blake2s and lyra2v2).   If you want to get payed in XVG, use "c=XVG" without algo name in the end as before.


c=  payout coin
mc= mine coin

Please refer to details at zergpool.com describing all Options 1,2 & 3.