Telegram username: @facebook_VNN
Twitter Username: @cryptoleding
along with the answer to ((2+12)/2): 7
Topic: [ANN][POOL][PROFIT-SHIFT] Coinshift.com, the first profit-shifting multipool (Read 28693 times)
November 16, 2018, 09:14:39 AM
September 03, 2014, 02:49:16 PM
sorry to see my favorite go down.
August 31, 2014, 12:32:53 PM
August 27, 2014, 08:25:27 AM
I've had an unexchanged balance of .002[and change] for over a month. I've emailed them twice with 3 weeks in between.
No response. I really liked this pool. I'm disappointed that they never seem to mine LTC when other coins are less profitable, and the responses for support are falling on deaf ears.
No response. I really liked this pool. I'm disappointed that they never seem to mine LTC when other coins are less profitable, and the responses for support are falling on deaf ears.
August 22, 2014, 03:12:13 PM
Coinshift,
There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
Well I guess that Coinshift no longer supports his stuff since there is no real contact address for his site and no response here...There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
August 21, 2014, 11:23:00 PM
Coinshift,
There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
Well I guess that Coinshift no longer supports his stuff since there is no real contact address for his site and no response here... There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
August 20, 2014, 06:09:21 PM
Coinshift,
There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
There is a problem with coinshift.com changing coins. Currently our profitability is at 80% mining AUR and HIDDEN and according to your FAQ, if LTC is more profitable, it will mine it; how come we are not mining LTC now?
August 15, 2014, 10:46:20 PM
switched to here from westhash as they are just getting less n less for payouts...but after 24hr my exchanged balance was around .032 btc but i only got paid .006btc? i'm sure the answer maybe in this thread somewhere but i'd just rather ask 
looked at the FAQ...just saw something about .001
looked at the FAQ...just saw something about .001 
August 04, 2014, 07:23:38 AM
Has the option to manually set diff been implemented yet?
Good news: you may now set a manually difficulty setting by using d=
For example:
Code:
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.coinshift.com:3333 -u 1L38dYqRtfZUMcKRN3Jfb1b1hvCqKiXE3Q.miner1 -p d=512
What are your recommended diff-settings for variously sized miners (hash-rates)?
I think that's better without writing diff, don't you think so?
What's the main difference of setting up miners with:
Code:
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.coinshift.com:3333 -u *youraddress* -p x
orCode:
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.coinshift.com:3333 -u *youraddress* -p d=512
July 25, 2014, 05:57:44 PM
Has the option to manually set diff been implemented yet?
Good news: you may now set a manually difficulty setting by using d=
For example:
Code:
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.coinshift.com:3333 -u 1L38dYqRtfZUMcKRN3Jfb1b1hvCqKiXE3Q.miner1 -p d=512
What are your recommended diff-settings for variously sized miners (hash-rates)?
July 25, 2014, 04:33:47 PM
I think it's a good idea. I'd like to continue to use coinshift as a service.
Unfortunately, here's the reality:
I have a GPU rig that does ~3000Kh/s (scrypt)
I have GSDs and Zues that do ~10000Kh/s.
I moved my GPUs over to an X11 pool (nicehash)
GPU Payout 24/h: 0.00448848
CoinShift Payout 24/h: 0.00360998
The GPU rig which is 1/3rd of the scrypt hashrate has pulled in more BTC in a 24h period.
It's not always more, but usually it's pretty close.
I think that developing a Coinshift X11 pool is not a good idea.
1st: I don't like the idea of multipool
2nd and most important: Creating a multipool for an algorithm full of FPGA?
Unfortunately, here's the reality:
I have a GPU rig that does ~3000Kh/s (scrypt)
I have GSDs and Zues that do ~10000Kh/s.
I moved my GPUs over to an X11 pool (nicehash)
GPU Payout 24/h: 0.00448848
CoinShift Payout 24/h: 0.00360998
The GPU rig which is 1/3rd of the scrypt hashrate has pulled in more BTC in a 24h period.
It's not always more, but usually it's pretty close.
Haven't seen any updates here in awhile. With Scrypt getting much less profitable and heat becoming an issue in the Northern Hemisphere, are there any plans to make a Coinshift X11 pool?
I think that developing a Coinshift X11 pool is not a good idea.
1st: I don't like the idea of multipool
2nd and most important: Creating a multipool for an algorithm full of FPGA?
July 25, 2014, 04:27:29 PM
65% LTC profitability
0.00039 BTC/MH/Day
Cryptsy is up, the other coins have dropped well below 100%. The hashrate is 1075.634 MH/s.
Should we be mining LTC yet?
We do mine 100% LTC if our hashrate high enough and the other coins drop below 100%. However, even if we're mining another coin that is ~102% vs LTC, due to luck and spacing between blocks we may fluctuate between 97% or 106%, for example.
The more significant drop we saw today was due to Cryptsy's API being down ALL NIGHT. With their API down we have trouble estimating which coins are the most profitable to mine and we ended up not spending our hashrate as efficiently as we would have otherwise.
Honestly I spend about 20% of my time dealing with/working around Cryptsy's problems. Their wallets go down, stop accepting deposits, APIs go in and out and return stale data, etc. Last night I got pretty pissed and called them out publicly on their shit:
https://twitter.com/CoinShift/with_replies
But I doubt that'll help much -- and it's not like we can switch exchanges easily, the other ones just don't have enough volume.
0.00039 BTC/MH/Day
Cryptsy is up, the other coins have dropped well below 100%. The hashrate is 1075.634 MH/s.
Should we be mining LTC yet?
It was a good spike. Now we're at 82% LTC.
I've asked a few times, but not really got a response.. Why aren't we mining LTC 100% like the FAQ says?
18% is a LOT.
I've asked a few times, but not really got a response.. Why aren't we mining LTC 100% like the FAQ says?
18% is a LOT.
We do mine 100% LTC if our hashrate high enough and the other coins drop below 100%. However, even if we're mining another coin that is ~102% vs LTC, due to luck and spacing between blocks we may fluctuate between 97% or 106%, for example.
The more significant drop we saw today was due to Cryptsy's API being down ALL NIGHT. With their API down we have trouble estimating which coins are the most profitable to mine and we ended up not spending our hashrate as efficiently as we would have otherwise.
Honestly I spend about 20% of my time dealing with/working around Cryptsy's problems. Their wallets go down, stop accepting deposits, APIs go in and out and return stale data, etc. Last night I got pretty pissed and called them out publicly on their shit:
https://twitter.com/CoinShift/with_replies
But I doubt that'll help much -- and it's not like we can switch exchanges easily, the other ones just don't have enough volume.
July 23, 2014, 02:52:20 AM
The 2% fee includes everything (exchange fees, etc.), right?
July 06, 2014, 05:06:22 PM
Has the option to manually set diff been implemented yet?
Good news: you may now set a manually difficulty setting by using d=
For example:
Code:
cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://mine.coinshift.com:3333 -u 1L38dYqRtfZUMcKRN3Jfb1b1hvCqKiXE3Q.miner1 -p d=512
July 05, 2014, 07:03:39 PM
I've noticed the VARDIFF is far too high for my gridseed blade, and a lot of work gets missed and rejects are too high. Blades like to run at diff 512, since there are actually two independent modules, rather than just one submitting the shares. Unfortunately, they cannot be split into two independent miners. Since it get's treated as as one, the VARDIFF goes too high and efficiency goes right down/ Has the option to manually set diff been implemented yet? Because this is otherwise a really nice pool. I've been looking for somewhere to switch to instead of nicehash, because I'm sick of spending most of my time getting work restarts, instability and constantly being retasked to different users.
June 28, 2014, 05:38:05 PM
Haven't seen any updates here in awhile. With Scrypt getting much less profitable and heat becoming an issue in the Northern Hemisphere, are there any plans to make a Coinshift X11 pool?
I think that developing a Coinshift X11 pool is not a good idea.
1st: I don't like the idea of multipool
2nd and most important: Creating a multipool for an algorithm full of FPGA?
June 26, 2014, 12:04:07 PM
had over .001 and wasnt paid out today.
Should i post my btc address?
Should i post my btc address?
June 25, 2014, 05:53:18 AM
Good to know! I will correlate Cryptsy and Profit. It sucks everyone is so dependent on them. If they are go go under, that's a big problem!
June 24, 2014, 11:39:22 PM
It was a good spike. Now we're at 82% LTC.
I've asked a few times, but not really got a response.. Why aren't we mining LTC 100% like the FAQ says?
18% is a LOT.
I've asked a few times, but not really got a response.. Why aren't we mining LTC 100% like the FAQ says?
18% is a LOT.
We do mine 100% LTC if our hashrate high enough and the other coins drop below 100%. However, even if we're mining another coin that is ~102% vs LTC, due to luck and spacing between blocks we may fluctuate between 97% or 106%, for example.
The more significant drop we saw today was due to Cryptsy's API being down ALL NIGHT. With their API down we have trouble estimating which coins are the most profitable to mine and we ended up not spending our hashrate as efficiently as we would have otherwise.
Honestly I spend about 20% of my time dealing with/working around Cryptsy's problems. Their wallets go down, stop accepting deposits, APIs go in and out and return stale data, etc. Last night I got pretty pissed and called them out publicly on their shit:
https://twitter.com/CoinShift/with_replies
But I doubt that'll help much -- and it's not like we can switch exchanges easily, the other ones just don't have enough volume.
June 24, 2014, 03:24:44 PM
It was a good spike. Now we're at 82% LTC.
I've asked a few times, but not really got a response.. Why aren't we mining LTC 100% like the FAQ says?
18% is a LOT.
I've asked a few times, but not really got a response.. Why aren't we mining LTC 100% like the FAQ says?
18% is a LOT.
Jump to: