The project is interesting and promising.
But frankly speaking the idea isn't new. I'we seen similar projects here.
How do you plan to differ from similar projects here and ones on fiat?
We believe that success usually builds on good ideas connected in right time and in right place (market)!
Every brand new idea is well forgotten old one
Let me quote the answer for same question if you don't mind:
What makes your project different between other similar projects?
I'll quote that part from WP... As for our competitors/references:
Successful principle of constant user participation on the platform, as in the social network, used in LinkedIn, allows, including in the EVO platform, to conduct regular work on the development of their professional portrait, as certainly one of the most valuable assets for successful career building. This is different from the recruiting services Indeed, HH and others, the availability of posted CVs in which in most cases confirms the fact of job search, which has a negative effect on the relationship with the current employer, and also fragment the process of working on their competencies for certain time intervals. The transition to a system of objectively confirmed competences and personal and business qualities gives the model of a professional social network new opportunities for mass application as a tool for staff selection.
Compared with Prometric, which performs certification only in the interests of the customer company, as well as with BrainBench, which focuses only on tests of its own design, the logic of combining existing valuation systems is applied. Strictly speaking, these companies are not competitors in the future, but partners of the platform, and their advanced developments will also be used as systems of skills confirmation. The platform is able to rely on existing solutions without building up its own infrastructure network. The transformation of evaluation data into user asset and its security through Blockchain technology creates an order of magnitude higher scalability and growth in the number of users. It is necessary to take into account, among other things, ample opportunities for integration and recording of all previous achievements of the user, as well as motivation for further training and competence development.
Compared with BitDegree, as solutions for employers in terms of increasing the competence of employees and the possibility of targeted training of future employees, the EVO platform will bring together significantly more participants than students whose education is paid by employers. The next advantage, including before another recruiting Blockchain project - Aworker - is to avoid the principles of subjective mutual confirmation skills. The construction of a new "LinkedIn" based on a principle initially discredited by the effect of social approval, or reliance on self-scoring of educational courses, seeking to increase its market value and attractiveness by any means, is seen as a deadlock. The mutual control of the participants in the education and evaluation system, through the emphasis on independent expertise, makes it possible to create incentives for the effective development of both the educational and HR spheres.
Advantages also lie in the speed of appearance on the platform of new systems of assessments and the impact of these systems on educational programs through the scoring of their graduates, as well as its prevalence in the future for the vast majority of professions, skills and directions of education.
We also analized a lot of projects/competitors/references, found their pros and cons and made conclusions.
If you mention any other project which is our competitor/reference, we'll happy to compare it with ours.