Author

Topic: [ANN][PRESALE]⭐ REPU ⭐ - Smart reputation managment - Pre-ICO Soon🚀🚀 - page 132. (Read 19289 times)

full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 107
Yes there is a lot of different services who can benefit from REPU. It will perfectly work with all things with a social network part for exemple, where reputation of users is important. And there is a lot of others possibility for reputation management.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 131
There are so many services and a good system how repu can help this and will be very important in the future.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 263
Repu will spend over 40% of the funds for marketing to bring enough users to the plattform. Thats also a good chance we could see a working demo.

I really hope to see a working demo very soon! The devs need to deliver as soon as possible

thats what i am awaiting too. nowadays it is hard to make a decision at all those icos popping out if there is no demo yet ><

I agree with you, if we aren't in an ICO bubble I don't know what this is but there are only two types of ICOs collecting much money nowadays, the ones investing a shitload of money into marketing and the ones showing an alpha/demo at least.

But even an demo isn't sure it will be a success.. but it's definitely more than no demo Wink
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 12
Hi, I'm sorry if the question is already been make but when will the devs deliver a demo? I'm very curious to see how it works...

Closed beta testing of the platform for everyone who invested in their ICO is planned for the 2nd quarter of this year.
newbie
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
Hi, I'm sorry if the question is already been make but when will the devs deliver a demo? I'm very curious to see how it works...
full member
Activity: 938
Merit: 159
Repu will spend over 40% of the funds for marketing to bring enough users to the plattform. Thats also a good chance we could see a working demo.

I really hope to see a working demo very soon! The devs need to deliver as soon as possible

I would also look and test with pleasure.
when can you wait for it?
i am also curious to be able to try a working demo version, 40% of the funds for adevertising it seems to me a lot i hope the publicity brings so many users
member
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
In their YouTube channel so far only presentation, I think it would be not bad if the team participated in some kind of events or gave interviews - live communication with the community gives opportunity better understand concept of project.

More interaction and interviews would also give a greater sense of legitimacy and closeness with the community
In terms of "reputation" if they will not deliver that demo and we will keep only the discussion on the whitepaper will be hard for them to go on social media in the near future.
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
In their YouTube channel so far only presentation, I think it would be not bad if the team participated in some kind of events or gave interviews - live communication with the community gives opportunity better understand concept of project.

More interaction and interviews would also give a greater sense of legitimacy and closeness with the community
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 22
The Future of Sports is Fan Controlled
The basic features have to be like the current solution on the market. Ontop there have to be the blockchain advantages which make the solution unique.
Looking forward to see the first demo. Any statment by the developpers?


The last statement from dev was that public beta testing is planned for Q2-3 2018 as scheduled in their roadmap . A pity that we can't see a prototype or demo of the platform before ICO.
I believe that this is a big minus. This project looks good and the show would improve sales of coins!

If they don't show something this involves a lot more risk than it would if they have a working product. Although I think the devs will build a beta as fast as possible.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 4
The basic features have to be like the current solution on the market. Ontop there have to be the blockchain advantages which make the solution unique.
Looking forward to see the first demo. Any statment by the developpers?


The last statement from dev was that public beta testing is planned for Q2-3 2018 as scheduled in their roadmap . A pity that we can't see a prototype or demo of the platform before ICO.
I believe that this is a big minus. This project looks good and the show would improve sales of coins!
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
In their YouTube channel so far only presentation, I think it would be not bad if the team participated in some kind of events or gave interviews - live communication with the community gives opportunity better understand concept of project.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
Yes, 4.1 is a solid start. It could be higher and im confident it will be with a little bit more time and effort from the devs Smiley

i think they need to show some progress first or explain more in detail how things will work, i think a series of articles made by the devs about what they are tackling right now would be quite nice

true, a few articles on medium.com would fix this right up. 4.1 score isn't bad at all, it's just that they need to show more details.

You guys, a 4.1 score for an ICO is a very good score. I think an average score is around 3 - 3,5 so a 4.1 seems like a good deal to me

In fact, the developers correctly noted that 4.1 points is not enough. It is necessary to score 4.5 or more. Then the project will look more interesting for investors.

Meanwhile, our rating is 4.3 already Smiley

https://icobench.com/ico/repu

It's good. Since the rating is needed to immediately filter out bad projects. If the rating deserves attention, then you can independently analyze the project and evaluate the prospect of investing.
I also ask you to answer the question about the country or city for the initial launch of your platform.

I see that this project is getting good scores what serves to reinforce the arguments of which we are sure of the success of the project.  Wink
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
4.3 is really an achievement for the project, but I still think that Repu will have a reevaluation in the near future and a gradual increase in the view of the critics, there is potential for much more, and this will be noticed gradually. Congratulations to the Team
Is it 4.3 out of 5 or of 10? If of five, they really have what they and all we expected to have.

out of five
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
4.3 is really an achievement for the project, but I still think that Repu will have a reevaluation in the near future and a gradual increase in the view of the critics, there is potential for much more, and this will be noticed gradually. Congratulations to the Team
Is it 4.3 out of 5 or of 10? If of five, they really have what they and all we expected to have.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
4.3 is really an achievement for the project, but I still think that Repu will have a reevaluation in the near future and a gradual increase in the view of the critics, there is potential for much more, and this will be noticed gradually. Congratulations to the Team
hero member
Activity: 1736
Merit: 857
Yes, 4.1 is a solid start. It could be higher and im confident it will be with a little bit more time and effort from the devs Smiley

i think they need to show some progress first or explain more in detail how things will work, i think a series of articles made by the devs about what they are tackling right now would be quite nice

true, a few articles on medium.com would fix this right up. 4.1 score isn't bad at all, it's just that they need to show more details.

You guys, a 4.1 score for an ICO is a very good score. I think an average score is around 3 - 3,5 so a 4.1 seems like a good deal to me

In fact, the developers correctly noted that 4.1 points is not enough. It is necessary to score 4.5 or more. Then the project will look more interesting for investors.

Meanwhile, our rating is 4.3 already Smiley

https://icobench.com/ico/repu

It's good. Since the rating is needed to immediately filter out bad projects. If the rating deserves attention, then you can independently analyze the project and evaluate the prospect of investing.
I also ask you to answer the question about the country or city for the initial launch of your platform.
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 250
CurioInvest [IEO Live]
Repu will spend over 40% of the funds for marketing to bring enough users to the plattform. Thats also a good chance we could see a working demo.

I really hope to see a working demo very soon! The devs need to deliver as soon as possible

I would also look and test with pleasure.
when can you wait for it?

Market is on track again, so ICO's hopefully didn't take so much damage from this downfall. That's good news,
According to roadmap demo can be released at Q2 or Q3 2018. Shame we didn't see any product before ICO but if you like the idea, you can invest it.
full member
Activity: 616
Merit: 145
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
Repu will spend over 40% of the funds for marketing to bring enough users to the plattform. Thats also a good chance we could see a working demo.

I really hope to see a working demo very soon! The devs need to deliver as soon as possible

thats what i am awaiting too. nowadays it is hard to make a decision at all those icos popping out if there is no demo yet ><

I agree with you, if we aren't in an ICO bubble I don't know what this is but there are only two types of ICOs collecting much money nowadays, the ones investing a shitload of money into marketing and the ones showing an alpha/demo at least.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 257
Repu will spend over 40% of the funds for marketing to bring enough users to the plattform. Thats also a good chance we could see a working demo.

I really hope to see a working demo very soon! The devs need to deliver as soon as possible

I would also look and test with pleasure.
when can you wait for it?
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Jump to: