Topic: [ANN][QAU] QUANTUM PROJECT - Connecting markets - page 25. (Read 78813 times)

Yes, incredible advice you just gave everyone here.  Really appreciate the openness and spirit of sharing information you just demonstrated.

I like this project.

There are so many arbitrage opportunity in the crypto-market, just this last week BTS was trading 10-15% higher on the Chinese exchanges for quite a while on heavy volume, given how fast it confirms, you could have bought and sold multiple times. This week I bought both TKN & QRL on Liqui for 10-15% less than it was trading for on Trex & was able to turn a nice profit. However it's something I just dabble in when the discrepancy is obvious and very large, so to invest in a project that is doing it professionally, 24/7, could be very lucrative indeed.

The other great thing is that whether the market is up or down, these opportunities exist, possibly even more so in a down market. So QAU's USD returns may be fairly independent of overall market direction. So when 99% of alts should & do fall in a crypto downturn, I think we will find that QAU could be quite resilient.

Communication is a big aspect of creating confidence, especially with a fairly centralised operation, so the more information you can give and the more frequently you can give it, the better imo. Good luck

Meanwhile, the trading volume on BTC Livecoin 16 (QAU +8,58%), 6 ETH (QAU +90,8%!!!). The website http://www.quantumproject.org showing rapid growth and continues to gain popularity in the United States http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/quantumproject.org

So where did all the ICO/presale money go? Was it just directly traded for the generated tokens? So the dev just profited $4million for generating the tokens?  

Good day, when are you planning to enter Bittrex?

Sorry, my bad. Thanks for the quick support, both on this thread and on mail.

Quantum is an ethereum token. So all ethereum wallets support Quantums, even hardware wallets.

82,454,023 QAU has been sold in the presale, the rest is reserved for later stages of the project, as explained in our whitepaper.

If you are having issues withdrawing your tokens, please contact our support: [email protected] and we will look into your case and resolve it as soon as possible. If you requested a withdrawal 5 days ago you should have received your tokens by now. Maybe you received them and don't have the token added to your wallet properly or you did not confirm your request by email. Contact us and we will figure it out for you.

Hi dev, and any other if you know.

I am just wondering about the project and how it's coming along. I am an ICO investor, and I currently have not received my tokens.

On Coinmarketcap the circulating supply is at 82,454,023 QAU. Does this mean that investors haven't received the rest of the tokens as there should be 247,362,070 QAU in complete circulation?

If this is me misunderstanding, I still see a massive problem in the fact that it is not a fair market currently. I am forced to see others trade, while I cannot.

I was told that I would receive them in the next few days (5 days ago). What is happening - can you shed some light on this?

Meanwhile aсcording to Alexa Rank site http://www.quantumproject.org/ is gaining popularity in the list of countries the second place in the United States. The day before yesterday the United States was not. There is interest so you can expect the successful completion of the second phase of the ICO and token of 0.7-1$. In this case, the investment will bring profit x5 and above. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/quantumproject.org

If the planned second phase of the ICO, the developers needed to redeem a large number (or all) tokens at the offer price to the price of tokens increased significantly. In the second phase of the ICO to sell the tokens at a cost of 0.8-1$. Accordingly, the new and old investors will not sell the cheaper tokens than 1.1$ per share and the price will automatically grow. If they can do that it will be a stroke of genius, and discourage investors money many times over. The question of money, if they have so much money to buy. Need big investors. Sorry for my English

All the chips are very successful, by quantum, thus I got a lot of wealth, some will keep holding, waiting for your application successful landing, but what time does the wallet can be successful on-line？

Gold luck with this

quantum not only ran an advertising here in the forim. I saw their ads while I was jist browsing the net and on different websites so I am sure that is why the word spread so fast and it gained a lot of investors. And also people who are actually supporting the project were tweeting about it without a pay. Investors from Xaurum also may have participated here.

If you checked the early days of QAU or read even the first 5-10 pages of this thread, you will not wonder how they got those number of followers.
Bought followers? I don't think so. As this project ran a sig campaign, I believe that they are pretty serious with their goals.
And to add, the campaign manager & the escrow for this one I can say, are reputable individuals in crypto.
So there's nothing unusual here. The dev team just need to be careful with exchanges. Or maybe they have other plans that we don't know yet.

I applaud your optimism. I'm invested as well, so I hope you're right.

There's something else that seems odd to me - the amount of Facebook (25K) and Twitter (22K) followers. Quite a big number for such a new project that's only being traded on some obscure exchanges. Also, the amount of people actually interacting on those channels is relatively small. Bought followers, maybe?

What I'm understanding is many of these devs/companies focus on the unique aspect of their blockchain currency and they sort of skip some of the key points in the marketing efforts.  It's a blindspot, yes, but I don't see it as much of concern, especially if the code is on github and you can see the block explorer and if they pre-mined it (all the red flags).  So often that actually creates a powerful investment that is under the radar and not quite clear, at least at the beginning.

For instance, look at Minereum.  There are only a few developers on it, and they are heads down focusing on the code, roadmap they've promised and technical aspects.  This one is the first self-mining smart contract, which sounds like a lot to take in but truly brings a lot of value to the market if/when they deliver.  Like QAU, the website leaves a lot out of essential language out of view.  But again, that's why it makes for an advantageous investment because it hasn't quite gotten the attention yet, but we understand it has massive potential and there aren't any REAL alarms yet.

I think early-investors of QAU, whom understand the technology and trust the project, leadership, and roadmap are in for serious gains as it gets on other exchanges and goes through blackhole events (deflationary).

Hmm, I guess I'm not technically well-versed enough to say what it is that's missing in the whitepaper, but to me, it looks really vague. It's only 8 pages and first three pages are the cover page, table of contents and Crypto definition. Also, last page only has 1 small paragraph. There's barely  2-3 pages of text there.

I mean, is the whole idea behind this thing so straight forward that there's nothing to really write about?

Agree somewhat, disagree somewhat.  The website has solid technical detail in the whitepaper, but yes could afford to be more detailed.  I also think QAU needs a re-brand.  The website looks like it was cool back in 2010 and it's just not as clean as something like, MEMSQL.  <-- notice that's not a crypto website.

But what I think is truly attractive about this one is the deflationary aspect of it.  There's nothing really like this on the market yet and I support this coin long-term.  And QAU gets on more exchanges and people start understanding that aspect of it, I think it's only going to soar.

I like the idea, but the lack of information is a bit concerning and makes the whole thing  look unprofessional. You need to put a lot more emphasis on presentation and communication.