if it gets a price (with deposits supported on exchanges)
As long as these requirements are not completed by the developers, it won't be supported."
That's for the people and exchanges to decide, there is nothing the developers can "complete" about it. Not the smartest answer from Ledger.
The devs need to be transparent and maintain the true spirit of BTC fork to ensure confidence in investors. Investors, bloggers, and reporters are all waiting for the SBTC announcement since the fork. They should do better to make sure those entitled to free coins do receive them, otherwise, SBTC will get many haters that will not buy the coin just like BitcoinDiamond. The traded volume is not a good sign for SBTC.
Well, nobody is perfect and we can see with each and every fork that the execution is never great. No matter who, all of those people (teams) always seem to be late, to rush things that are still unfinished, to forget thousands of important things, and the communication, presentation and advertisement lack as well. They feel they need to focus more on some parts of the projects since they don't have enough (human) resources to focus fully on everything at the same time, you think their priorities are weird and they should do this and that instead. Nothing you can do, and maybe nothing they can do, it's what it is This is a more general problem of a rapid development/release/whatever, not specific to only the SBTC team.
Are there any wallets and block explorers available already?
SBTC wallet is of course available, otherwise the network couldn't run.
I thing that exchanges finally found the way how to stop all that scammy forks of real bitcoin. Only [Futures] and that's it. Go and fuck yourself now. Just check the website of "so called " new fork under the name of bitcoinX
https://bcx.org/ https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoinx/ It looks like made by a Nigerian scammer in internet cafe. Fucking scammers.
$77 for a "scammy" coin is actually not bad at all.
