Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][SEED] SeedCoin | New Road Map - page 42. (Read 184103 times)

member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
October 14, 2014, 02:33:53 AM
Why are there several staking wallets that haven't received staking coins in over 1 day. Actually one in over 1 day and 10 hours?

The former includes our top dog which is at 1 day and 10 minutes at the time of this posting...

It was my understanding that once your coin matures it will be at least 24 hours until stake payout. Once you hit a payout it will be at least another 24 hours until you get another payout. As the network gains weight stake payout can take longer.
hero member
Activity: 582
Merit: 500
October 14, 2014, 02:19:09 AM
Luck plays a small part in staking also. im assuming that causes the semi randomness
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
October 14, 2014, 01:54:51 AM
i have 4 chunks that haven;t stake till now ,
confirmation : 2720 , 2720 , 2011 , 1491
 Huh Huh Huh

the other chunks (more than 15) stake with no problem after 1410 confirmation.



Yep, i have a load the same some over 3000 now about 15 over 2400
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1038
October 14, 2014, 01:50:52 AM
i have 4 chunks that haven;t stake till now ,
confirmation : 2720 , 2720 , 2011 , 1491
 Huh Huh Huh

the other chunks (more than 15) stake with no problem after 1410 confirmation.

legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
October 14, 2014, 01:41:16 AM
Why are there several staking wallets that haven't received staking coins in over 1 day. Actually one in over 1 day and 10 hours?

The former includes our top dog which is at 1 day and 10 minutes at the time of this posting...
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
October 14, 2014, 01:36:00 AM
Guys,
you can keep on fighting and it is OK. but maybe do it somewhere else Smiley

bottom line as i see it is the following:
1. If the Dev was aware (or some people approached him) of some info then he should have told it to the entire community.
2. If it is an algo then all seeds eventually should produce the same amount (not different of 100's of %).

To be honest it does seem to be a bit of a scam and i must admit i did fall into it by renting hash to mine and trying my luck in cryptsy. Seems as the 269% isnt working that well. and in any case if it did by the time the growth period will be other this coin will be worth nothing.

i have invested above 1 BTC and i believe that by the time the growth is over my coin will not be worth even half. (and like everyone else) i expected to do make some profit or at least returned my investment.


so SCAM or NOT?

what do you think?




1. If the Dev was aware (or some people approached him) of some info then he should have told it to the entire community. (scam and insider trading)
2. If it is an algo then all seeds eventually should produce the same amount (not different of 100's of %). (scam for the few friends?)
I call scam on a few points and i would say that we will be lucky to get back 1/4 of the money you put it, the few friends will get the rest.

Its just not right to have  the DEV beening told days before this was up and running that some people knew the scam, its fine to have a strategy but so far i dont think its that simple, the changes that I read here seem to imply that once the dude with 900 seeds in one day from 10 coins would have to wait days as a change was being made to slow that down and not let a few people rig the game but that wasn't to be.

This makes me more worried about why so many changes were made but only a few got all the reward.  Hay its capitalism as it best with alt coins but just because the rules are lose almost like the wild west doesn't mean people should do things they know are wrong and also play dumb about info they had.

People should know that crimes done here can in the future be punished for depending on what country you live in and what seems small now can grow to bite you on the ass later, things like your reputation is it worth is really??





What reputation? He's anonymous, remember? His next coin will be under a different handle and that is that. Same that is the case with half -or more- of current devs in Alternative coins...

Now those who stoke their reputation, considerable ones, along the way supporting this incompetent, those are the ones that should worry not only about their reputations but, above all, about the reputation and image of the coin (PINK) that they represent. The damage to that once pristine image (that was long ago, though, but still quite reputable if not pristine), is quite irreparable. And, of course, no one in his sane mind will ever trust the devs of Pink when they recommend, sponsor or promote anything, including PINK. That's why I firmly believe there wasn't hanky panky going on here, just pure and simple incompetence.

But, of course, I could be wrong.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
October 14, 2014, 01:20:35 AM
What do you guys mean? It's totally working! Before the staking started I had 0.52 SEED, which after updating to 1.05 wallet saturday I soon after received a payment of 2.8 SEED, also noticed a price drop on Bittrex so I bought 2 more SEED and added to wallet. Now I currently have... 21.0384 with still a few days to go. Its working great, and the finish line is within sight! Forget the Moon.. We're going to Mars with SEED! The only planet inhabited solely by robots (ヅ


Hi,
in my opinion you are looking it on the wrong side. it is true that the seeds are growing.
i bet your 0.52 SEED was worth much much more than your current 21.
in short math: 0.52 seed at that time was worth approximatly 0.04 your current 21 SEED now worth 0.015
that is lets say... about 300% ..

i hope you are happy....
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
October 14, 2014, 01:11:31 AM
Guys,
you can keep on fighting and it is OK. but maybe do it somewhere else Smiley

bottom line as i see it is the following:
1. If the Dev was aware (or some people approached him) of some info then he should have told it to the entire community.
2. If it is an algo then all seeds eventually should produce the same amount (not different of 100's of %).

To be honest it does seem to be a bit of a scam and i must admit i did fall into it by renting hash to mine and trying my luck in cryptsy. Seems as the 269% isnt working that well. and in any case if it did by the time the growth period will be other this coin will be worth nothing.

i have invested above 1 BTC and i believe that by the time the growth is over my coin will not be worth even half. (and like everyone else) i expected to do make some profit or at least returned my investment.


so SCAM or NOT?

what do you think?




1. If the Dev was aware (or some people approached him) of some info then he should have told it to the entire community. (scam and insider trading)
2. If it is an algo then all seeds eventually should produce the same amount (not different of 100's of %). (scam for the few friends?)
I call scam on a few points and i would say that we will be lucky to get back 1/4 of the money you put it, the few friends will get the rest.

Its just not right to have  the DEV beening told days before this was up and running that some people knew the scam, its fine to have a strategy but so far i dont think its that simple, the changes that I read here seem to imply that once the dude with 900 seeds in one day from 10 coins would have to wait days as a change was being made to slow that down and not let a few people rig the game but that wasn't to be.

This makes me more worried about why so many changes were made but only a few got all the reward.  Hay its capitalism as it best with alt coins but just because the rules are lose almost like the wild west doesn't mean people should do things they know are wrong and also play dumb about info they had.

People should know that crimes done here can in the future be punished for depending on what country you live in and what seems small now can grow to bite you on the ass later, things like your reputation is it worth is really??



member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
Canadian Miner, eh! (ヅ
October 14, 2014, 01:11:17 AM
What do you guys mean? It's totally working! Before the staking started I had 0.52 SEED, which after updating to 1.05 wallet saturday I soon after received a payment of 2.8 SEED, also noticed a price drop on Bittrex so I bought 2 more SEED and added to wallet. Now I currently have... 21.0384 with still a few days to go. Its working great, and the finish line is within sight! Forget the Moon.. We're going to Mars with SEED! The only planet inhabited solely by robots (ヅ
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
October 14, 2014, 01:09:59 AM
Guys,
you can keep on fighting and it is OK. but maybe do it somewhere else Smiley

bottom line as i see it is the following:
1. If the Dev was aware (or some people approached him) of some info then he should have told it to the entire community.
2. If it is an algo then all seeds eventually should produce the same amount (not different of 100's of %).

To be honest it does seem to be a bit of a scam and i must admit i did fall into it by renting hash to mine and trying my luck in cryptsy. Seems as the 269% isnt working that well. and in any case if it did by the time the growth period will be other this coin will be worth nothing.

i have invested above 1 BTC and i believe that by the time the growth is over my coin will not be worth even half. (and like everyone else) i expected to do make some profit or at least returned my investment.


so SCAM or NOT?

what do you think?




Thank you for keeping it on topic.

It is quite funny to me that after having posted here dozens of times that there was no way on earth for this to ever be anything valuable, people is now beginning to feel uncomfortable about it... funny indeed.

In response to your question, I will give you my opinion: While the launching of this coin showed appalling incompetence, on the part of the developer AND on  his sponsors (the PINK team), I don't believe there's any shady going ons. That's just my personal opinion, mind you.

In any event, it is all quite irrelevant at this stage for the "value" of the coins is nominal. Now, if this were to gain some decent valuation, the predicament would be quite interesting.

The only shady thing that I can see here was the attempt by the dev to keep hiding the fact that the coin was a hack job/copy/paste from Shadow coin. He admitted it ONLY after being caught instead of disclosing it in advance as he should have. Other than that and the obvious incompetence and lack of foresight -to levels of first year of High School and lower-, I don't believe it is a scam, no.
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
October 14, 2014, 12:39:07 AM
Guys,
you can keep on fighting and it is OK. but maybe do it somewhere else Smiley

bottom line as i see it is the following:
1. If the Dev was aware (or some people approached him) of some info then he should have told it to the entire community.
2. If it is an algo then all seeds eventually should produce the same amount (not different of 100's of %).

To be honest it does seem to be a bit of a scam and i must admit i did fall into it by renting hash to mine and trying my luck in cryptsy. Seems as the 269% isnt working that well. and in any case if it did by the time the growth period will be other this coin will be worth nothing.

i have invested above 1 BTC and i believe that by the time the growth is over my coin will not be worth even half. (and like everyone else) i expected to do make some profit or at least returned my investment.


so SCAM or NOT?

what do you think?


legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
October 14, 2014, 12:11:06 AM
Barabbas I think you should respect the Devs request to leave the thread. He created it for hid coin and I think he has a right to run it how he wants.

That is your opinion. Mine is different. When you choose to have an uncensored thread rather than a self-moderated one, it means SOMETHING. You cannot pretend you offer freedom of speech and then do it only when convenient to you. It has a MEANING, ok? You want to censor? do what others have done before you: Close the thread and open a new self-moderated one. Everyone knows what that means so people who tell the truth in their posts, simply will avoid censored threads for they are there for one reason only: To hide the truth.

When you choose the obvious benefits of offering freedom of speech, you have to be ready to read the truth -or what others consider to be the truth-. You cannot swim and pretend to keep your clothes dry, ok? This is not even a matter open for any kind of discussion, alright? The dev, like so many other things before this one, got it all wrong.

From mprep himself on September 22: "Also if the dev has a self moderated thread, he can "ban" (ask him to leave) users from posting in it." (quote/unquote and underline by me)

And, as far as the subject is concerned, that's all I have to say about that.

 

You do have a point I must say. Typical moderated thread that deletes posts and such is the whistlecoin thread. sketchy crap going on there.

I have no interest in a self moderated thread. However, a thread that is not self moderated does not therefore become fully unmoderated.

The difference is that I am not the mod. But I did post the op, I am the sole Dev, and you have made it clear to me that you are out of control. Please stop posting here in this thread.

You may choose to continue acting out of your mind and in a totally arbitrary mode, it's up to you. I will continue posting as long as you keep the thread open which is your ONLY power.

To further signal your hideous bias and partiality, just another poster has graced the thread with direct and unwarranted insults (read the post above), but you have no problem at all with that, have you?

You are a despicable individual, Cryptzo. Everyone is watching show your colors, which is good.

And please, stop posting your personal crappy obsessions and either post ON TOPIC matters or don't post at all, ok?
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
October 14, 2014, 12:05:38 AM
Barabbas I think you should respect the Devs request to leave the thread. He created it for hid coin and I think he has a right to run it how he wants.

That is your opinion. Mine is different. When you choose to have an uncensored thread rather than a self-moderated one, it means SOMETHING. You cannot pretend you offer freedom of speech and then do it only when convenient to you. It has a MEANING, ok? You want to censor? do what others have done before you: Close the thread and open a new self-moderated one. Everyone knows what that means so people who tell the truth in their posts, simply will avoid censored threads for they are there for one reason only: To hide the truth.

When you choose the obvious benefits of offering freedom of speech, you have to be ready to read the truth -or what others consider to be the truth-. You cannot swim and pretend to keep your clothes dry, ok? This is not even a matter open for any kind of discussion, alright? The dev, like so many other things before this one, got it all wrong.

From mprep himself on September 22: "Also if the dev has a self moderated thread, he can "ban" (ask him to leave) users from posting in it." (quote/unquote and underline by me)

And, as far as the subject is concerned, that's all I have to say about that.

 

You do have a point I must say. Typical moderated thread that deletes posts and such is the whistlecoin thread. sketchy crap going on there.

I have no interest in a self moderated thread. However, a thread that is not self moderated does not therefore become fully unmoderated.

The difference is that I am not the mod. But I did post the op, I am the sole Dev, and you have made it clear to me that you are out of control. Please stop posting here in this thread.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
October 14, 2014, 12:00:57 AM
Barabbas I think you should respect the Devs request to leave the thread. He created it for hid coin and I think he has a right to run it how he wants.

That is your opinion. Mine is different. When you choose to have an uncensored thread rather than a self-moderated one, it means SOMETHING. You cannot pretend you offer freedom of speech and then do it only when convenient to you. It has a MEANING, ok? You want to censor? do what others have done before you: Close the thread and open a new self-moderated one. Everyone knows what that means so people who tell the truth in their posts, simply will avoid censored threads for they are there for one reason only: To hide the truth.

When you choose the obvious benefits of offering freedom of speech, you have to be ready to read the truth -or what others consider to be the truth-. You cannot swim and pretend to keep your clothes dry, ok? This is not even a matter open for any kind of discussion, alright? The dev, like so many other things before this one, got it all wrong.

From mprep himself on September 22: "Also if the dev has a self moderated thread, he can "ban" (ask him to leave) users from posting in it." (quote/unquote and underline by me)

And, as far as the subject is concerned, that's all I have to say about that.

 

You do have a point I must say. Typical moderated thread that deletes posts and such is the whistlecoin thread. sketchy crap going on there.

At the same time, its because idiots like him that you dont instantly know it is a scam when you see "self moderated thread" since they post in every thread fud'ing

Idiots like who?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
October 13, 2014, 11:57:20 PM
Barabbas I think you should respect the Devs request to leave the thread. He created it for hid coin and I think he has a right to run it how he wants.

That is your opinion. Mine is different. When you choose to have an uncensored thread rather than a self-moderated one, it means SOMETHING. You cannot pretend you offer freedom of speech and then do it only when convenient to you. It has a MEANING, ok? You want to censor? do what others have done before you: Close the thread and open a new self-moderated one. Everyone knows what that means so people who tell the truth in their posts, simply will avoid censored threads for they are there for one reason only: To hide the truth.

When you choose the obvious benefits of offering freedom of speech, you have to be ready to read the truth -or what others consider to be the truth-. You cannot swim and pretend to keep your clothes dry, ok? This is not even a matter open for any kind of discussion, alright? The dev, like so many other things before this one, got it all wrong.

From mprep himself on September 22: "Also if the dev has a self moderated thread, he can "ban" (ask him to leave) users from posting in it." (quote/unquote and underline by me)

And, as far as the subject is concerned, that's all I have to say about that.

 

You do have a point I must say. Typical moderated thread that deletes posts and such is the whistlecoin thread. sketchy crap going on there.

At the same time, its because idiots like him that you dont instantly know it is a scam when you see "self moderated thread" since they post in every thread fud'ing
hero member
Activity: 582
Merit: 500
October 13, 2014, 11:51:10 PM
Barabbas I think you should respect the Devs request to leave the thread. He created it for hid coin and I think he has a right to run it how he wants.

That is your opinion. Mine is different. When you choose to have an uncensored thread rather than a self-moderated one, it means SOMETHING. You cannot pretend you offer freedom of speech and then do it only when convenient to you. It has a MEANING, ok? You want to censor? do what others have done before you: Close the thread and open a new self-moderated one. Everyone knows what that means so people who tell the truth in their posts, simply will avoid censored threads for they are there for one reason only: To hide the truth.

When you choose the obvious benefits of offering freedom of speech, you have to be ready to read the truth -or what others consider to be the truth-. You cannot swim and pretend to keep your clothes dry, ok? This is not even a matter open for any kind of discussion, alright? The dev, like so many other things before this one, got it all wrong.

From mprep himself on September 22: "Also if the dev has a self moderated thread, he can "ban" (ask him to leave) users from posting in it." (quote/unquote and underline by me)

And, as far as the subject is concerned, that's all I have to say about that.

 

You do have a point I must say. Typical moderated thread that deletes posts and such is the whistlecoin thread. sketchy crap going on there.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
October 13, 2014, 11:50:27 PM
Oh well cant say i am happy, not just the price falling to near nothing already but being i put in the same amount as the PINK guy

He apparently got 10 seeds at 0.1 = he now has 3600+
                   I got 10 seeds at 0.1 i have about 250+

Seems like a total scam now, it looked good till the dev let the pink guys own the coin and get AMAZING staking advantage, as day ago one of the fixes was to make sure his first day 900 held down so we caught up wasn't it?

In the real world this would be insider trading and possible fines or jail time where i live

Shame i think we all just wasted time and money now with the new race to the bottom well on its way.

The DEV even admitted that 5 or so people had told him what they would do to manipulate the staking days before it was out, and he forgot to tell all the mugs? (mugs = all of us that will lose)

I can BS on all levels now, from scam to insider trading and no TESTING!! or maybe testing in the PINK guys advantage, i just cant see how i brought the same amount and guys have 10 times+ what i do, its call BS, BS on all the different wallets and do this do that, BS for people that didnt stake at all yet as they brought in and still have no idea what a load of shit has been going on.

Good lessen but, stay the fuck away from PINK and SEED both seem to be scammers, but one day they get whats coming, karma is a bitch







I understand your frustration, I had 15 seed that is now "only" 350 seed- I was the # 6 wallet b4 the growth period, I'm now the #22 wallet. here is my address sb8nTWouADNjBHQpViGH8gpZ7rPcDrgTiu -- I know that barrabas says this isn't "proof" that I may have more wallets, but I do not. I have just this 1 wallet, just this 1 address. you can check it  on the block explorer under largest wallets tab here https://chainz.cryptoid.info/seed/#!wallets

I take it that you, like me staked a bit during PoW to try to cut down the overall supply of the coins
all I can say is some people did their research and played the game better then I did, I can't be mad all I can say is that Fayoled played the game very well and kept the info from his research to himself to better his position, which was the best thing he could've done imo.
we are all here competing against eachother to gain the biggest market share of the coin. had he shared his info he wouldn't have had the advantage he does now, there would be MANY more coins in the supply thus dilluting his share.

I am definitely not in on any inside info and I started with under 4 seed before growth, and now have over 250.  There are/were tactics to be had if you did some reading on how PoS works.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
October 13, 2014, 11:30:29 PM
Barabbas I think you should respect the Devs request to leave the thread. He created it for hid coin and I think he has a right to run it how he wants.

That is your opinion. Mine is different. When you choose to have an uncensored thread rather than a self-moderated one, it means SOMETHING. You cannot pretend you offer freedom of speech and then do it only when convenient to you. It has a MEANING, ok? You want to censor? do what others have done before you: Close the thread and open a new self-moderated one. Everyone knows what that means so people who tell the truth in their posts, simply will avoid censored threads for they are there for one reason only: To hide the truth.

When you choose the obvious benefits of offering freedom of speech, you have to be ready to read the truth -or what others consider to be the truth-. You cannot swim and pretend to keep your clothes dry, ok? This is not even a matter open for any kind of discussion, alright? The dev, like so many other things before this one, got it all wrong.

From mprep himself on September 22: "Also if the dev has a self moderated thread, he can "ban" (ask him to leave) users from posting in it." (quote/unquote and underline by me)

And, as far as the subject is concerned, that's all I have to say about that.

 
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
October 13, 2014, 11:19:43 PM
Barabbas I think you should respect the Devs request to leave the thread. He created it for hid coin and I think he has a right to run it how he wants.
sr. member
Activity: 342
Merit: 250
October 13, 2014, 11:18:11 PM
What does unredeemed mean?  When I look up my transaction from Bittrex to my wallet:

77362fe0fe5fee991be2a6e7c8c74f94d14442df75115978d963e439f0fafee1

It says my 4.93 SEED is unredeemed.

Anyone know what the deal is?

make sure you are using wallet 1.0.5.0
and do a clean synch
the 4.93 should then appear on your wallet when fully synched

do it asap, your SEED can be due for staking
Pages:
Jump to: