Topic: [ANN][SHA]SHACoin2 - Dead Revival - Virtual & Physical Coin - Faucet - page 118. (Read 198297 times)

All,

   We are working on the new wallet, will be released soon. There still are some bugs need to fixed.
   
   No worry,we are always here.

Was this person also buying. There seemed to be a lot of buying at around 17 18 and selling large amounts again at 20ish. Someone making a few pennies?

The seller I was referring was involved in around 40% of the SHA trades on CryptoALTeX and has sold, 148500005.99999989 SHA

Not sure if that helps yas or not

I don't think this is actually possible, as the reward would show up in the blockchain.

Has anyone else noticed all the Misbehaving nodes in the debug logs? Could the wallet issues be on purpose?

two of them marked in red are seed nodes in the OP

03/26/14 23:11:25 Misbehaving: 142.54.179.178:25666 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
03/26/14 23:11:25 disconnecting node 142.54.179.178:25666

03/27/14 14:09:12 Misbehaving: 23.88.228.99:25666 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
03/27/14 14:09:12 disconnecting node 23.88.228.99:25666

03/28/14 02:24:54 Misbehaving: 98.126.190.27:25666 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
03/28/14 02:24:54 disconnecting node 98.126.190.27:25666

03/28/14 02:26:59 Misbehaving: 94.21.124.204:25666 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
03/28/14 02:26:59 disconnecting node 94.21.124.204:25666

03/28/14 02:25:01 Misbehaving: 78.218.172.58:25666 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
03/28/14 02:25:01 disconnecting node 78.218.172.58:25666

03/28/14 02:24:54 Misbehaving: 98.126.190.27:25666 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
03/28/14 02:24:54 disconnecting node 98.126.190.27:25666

03/28/14 02:11:27 Misbehaving: 75.174.4.1:25666 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
03/28/14 02:11:27 disconnecting node 75.174.4.1:25666

03/27/14 21:07:39 Misbehaving: 71.187.164.122:25666 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
03/27/14 21:07:39 disconnecting node 71.187.164.122:25666

Also tried to sync with the only non Misbehaving seed node 198.98.120.30 alone in the .conf no help, so none of the seed nodes
look to be working properly for sync.

This was just a quick parse thru the logs, there are many more Misbehaving nodes...

And I heard your momma premined 1000 blocks.

i heard from somewhere you can easily set your blocks from like 1000 premine blocks to the First  block in order to hide the premines.

All this could be fixed by 1 guy posting and saying I'm here. I know some coders that don't like to be bothered and just stare at code all day. Let's hope that's the case.

their was no premine, and if the dev was mining, he would have made more money in that time mining btc. so that makes no sense. the breakeven with btc was around 50-60 satoshi, so ya, i doubt that
but we need this fixed, ive put alot of time mining, and a little bit of my own coin into it aswell. its a bit scary (
the first few days some ppl rented rigs i think, cuz their was someone with 10ths mining it alot of the time, that person has or had millions, and probably sold alot of what he could with all the issues. either way we need someone to step in, as a community, maybe we can pay someone to help us out. idk

There is one user who has an awful lot of sales, probably close to 50% or more if i ran some more queries.

Have ip and email but neither are very telling and I won't disclose either do to privacy policy but you do have me wondering now.

have you notice the everytime when it reach 20+ sat there is a huge sell order in cryptoaltex? i think is the dev that premine the coin n dump to get his btc.... how many millions have been dump at that price.

hopefully he's hard at work on it.  If we dont hear from him soon someone else should pickup the source and fix it

Any news about the new wallet??

I'm relatively new at all this, but it seems that proof of stake has caused a few failed launches now and that the developers aren't up to fixing it. I guess I'm glad I should be glad that I decided to mine the BNS launch. It seems to have gone pretty smooth. It would have been nice to have some proof of stake there, but I guess I can see why they decided against it. I don't really know enough, but maybe it's something that can be added to a coin later?

Is that even possible?

Yep, seeing the problems that Version has had with POS, and that with a fairly active dev, I don't have much faith that this is a quick or simple issue to resolve.

if that's true he's retarded cuz he would have got more just mining something else. The price never got to the point of profitable really.

So he cr8 coin... dump it ....got his bc... then run away....

I didn't think that it would be possible to mine this coin once the initial mining period was over. Why are people still mining this and getting rewarded for it?

You may be right. How the he'll are we supposed to know? The coin is out and the release was decent and fair. The idea is good and so is the timing. There are many people here who can repair code. Maybe he died.

Sounds like another typical "coin dev."

Step 1:  Download coin source code from GitHub
Step 2:  Change some parameters, update qt interface
Step 3:  Post on BCT and distribute coin
Step 4:  Pray nothing breaks and actually requires real programming skill to fix, because you don't know WTF you're doing