So you're saying it's like wafflepool except that the payout to the miners is in SolarCoin instead of bitcoin? If that's what we're talking about, that would be all kinds of awesome for transaction volume. But wouldn't it spike the price of SLR with such a small amount in distribution (~30 million)?
If spiking the price brings more attention to the coin and more interest among generators, then it sounds good to me.
I guess the only thing I'd be concerned about is whether the higher prices would be sustainable. We wouldn't want SLR to appear to be a pump-and-dump. Would a multipool generate a steady stream of buying pressure for the coin which, in theory, would eventually even out with selling pressure from minted coins that people staking their wallets might release onto the market, so that the price would stabilize at some level much higher than what we have now? If so, then it sounds great!
It would only increase the price if some of the SLR coins paid out would not be sold. If 100% of the coins paid out were then sent by miners to the exchanges to be sold, then in theory it would do nothing for the price, as the same amount of coins produced/bought by the multipool would also be sold each day. But, it would keep the volume on the exchanges stronger. However, if some of the coins were tucked away, then the price should move-up, as more buying would take place than selling, at least from the multipool coins, which would help the price. Perhaps there's a way a percentage of the coins bought via the multipool could be tucked away, or maybe donated to the cause somehow; examples: distributed back to solar generators and/or solarcoin holders, service providers, donated to promote the cause (advertising, etc.), ?.
but I did it anyway. LOL 