yeah, again convinced how such a huge competition among projects, that without large investments in advertising, the investor simply will not be able to find out about a good project...
In connection with the correction of the market, it is likely that the total number of projects will decrease and only high-quality ones will remain.
Topic: [ANN]Torgim-B2B E-commerce SAAS platform on blockchain - page 2. (Read 3120 times)
May I know pls how much tokens were sold at the ICO?
No, you are wrong. There is a simple rule - the one who acts always will do better than the one who thinks 
Think less, do more?
Perhaps you are right, and this is really trueAnd innovators, such as bitcoin is now would not be top1 coin on the market as there is already a lot better coins. So with this project - if it can capture the market, then it will be easier to stay on it.
There is no single better coin. If there was a better coin the market would have already decided and valued that one higher. That's not the case so you are a liar. It's quite simple. Your analysis was a fail.
You say there are a lot better coins than Bitcoin? Tell me a single coin that is better. The market has decided that so far Bitcoin is the best coin, period. There is nothing to be discussed, crystal clear facts only. Saying something is "better" is also quite weird in the cryptocurrency world. You can't compare Bitcoin to Ethereum, or to Ripple, or to Monero, or to, or to, or to... There will be several coins being the best one for some specific use case.
If this decision leads to success, we can congratulate the project team on the right choice.
In the Telegram group, developers appear much more often than here.
Pay4youractivity
To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
It depends on the overall marketing strategy that the team has chosen. How much it is successful we will understand later.To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
yeah, again convinced how such a huge competition among projects, that without large investments in advertising, the investor simply will not be able to find out about a good project...
In connection with the correction of the market, it is likely that the total number of projects will decrease and only high-quality ones will remain.
Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish real project representatives from fake ones.
This is a big telegram problem, here I agree with you.Pay4youractivity
To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
It depends on the overall marketing strategy that the team has chosen. How much it is successful we will understand later.To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
Pay4youractivity
To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
It depends on the overall marketing strategy that the team has chosen. How much it is successful we will understand later.To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish real project representatives from fake ones.
This is a big telegram problem, here I agree with you.In fact, it turns out that again the capital of the capital steers the whole process. Given that investing a large amount you can get a large discount it turns out that you are in a privileged position.
It is quite logical that the one who has more money has more influence.Pay4youractivity
To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
It depends on the overall marketing strategy that the team has chosen. How much it is successful we will understand later. To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
yeah, again convinced how such a huge competition among projects, that without large investments in advertising, the investor simply will not be able to find out about a good project...
In connection with the correction of the market, it is likely that the total number of projects will decrease and only high-quality ones will remain. I liked the project. It has a team of confidence, in recent months I have seen 3 similar project. They did not have a clear purpose like yours. I wish you luck in the financing.
Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish real project representatives from fake ones.
This is a big telegram problem, here I agree with you.Everything depends on the vigilance of the participants themselves. You can always compare the account of the administration of the group and the scammer. There can not be identical logins, and each administrator has an appropriate mark in the chat, in front of his message.
It seems that it can be found more quickly in the telegram of the project.
Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish real project representatives from fake ones.But more than 50% of the collected funds come from large investors. Their meaning is very important. And their actions are monitored by many smaller investors.
In fact, it turns out that again the capital of the capital steers the whole process. Given that investing a large amount you can get a large discount it turns out that you are in a privileged position.
Pay4youractivity
To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
To get these investors into the project, it is necessary to conduct very laborious and expensive work to attract them offline. Not always the costs pay off in this case.
The month is already coming to an end, it is more likely that the launch is delayed for some time.
But more than 50% of the collected funds come from large investors. Their meaning is very important. And their actions are monitored by many smaller investors.
In fact, it turns out that again the capital of the capital steers the whole process. Given that investing a large amount you can get a large discount it turns out that you are in a privileged position. Jump to: