Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][UPDATE][NEOS]Neos v2.1- Blowfish, 2FA, Theft Recovery, Decoy System - page 82. (Read 169273 times)

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Crypto Maniac
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
for anyone who wants to see all the steps twoturtles took in getting to this point go read through https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=744291.1200

hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
Questions about Arbitrush:

1. Will you publish a whitepaper for Airbitrush?
2. Will you have the code audited/vetted by a trusted 3rd party?

3. Most importantly: Will there be a v2 of Arbitrush, perhaps more decentralized with regular nodes on the network acting as Arbitrush servers?

1.  In terms of the inner workings on the nodes?
2.  It would really depend on the 3rd party and we'd need a legally-binding NDA in that event and even so, that doesn't protect everything.
3.  I'm constantly thinking in the direction of improvement.  I have a few concepts I'm going to try to flesh out and if they prove themselves worthy - integrate them.

     Best regards,

syntaks

1. I suppose so. The paper will presumably lay out your original approach/solution.
2. Fair enough. So maybe an audit simply to determine the originality of code without disclosing its secret sauce.

Nevertheless: What about open-sourcing Arbitrush V1 once V2 is released? The code will almost certainly need to be open-sourced if people are gonna trust it .

3. Brilliant! Decentralisation FTW!

thanks syntaks

v1 and v2 aren't literally different software versions, it's more like "v2 - improvements from the previous version".  They're not separate distributions =)  We'll see about the code review and what can't/can be viewed.

     Best regards,

syntaks
sounds good ,just don't give away our secrets!!
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Hashrate climbs steady - hash now or cry later Grin
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
So whats next for neos? What new?

I started working on v2 just about right after the public release of v1.  A few things I can make mention of that are changing:

1.  Our logo's gotten a little makeover
2.  We have a designer now working on the wallet interface for v2 to make things easier to move around in and more intuitive.
3.  I'm coding a new streamlined setup process that's web-based to make it easier for folks to install and configure as well as customize the installation more.  You'll be able to modify a bunch of parameters like where the web wallet is stored, customize the RPC port, rpc user, rpc pass, etc.
4.  We're adding in so far: c-cex and potentially coin-swap into our trading system.  Any other exchanges that you'd like to see Neos on, please voice it to them and we'll include them in the v2 update.
5.  Some function improvements such as the way addresses are retrieved from the wallet to include them all, address labeling, managing both receiving AND sending addresses in the new interface.
6.  We'll be adding in aliasing.   You'll be able to register aliases and send by alias rather than by address.  For example you can send 10 NEOS to Jimmy instead of N2nDj4j09GjplNCJAKj3U3u322
7.  Block and connection information displayed on the dash
8.  Encryption lock/unlock functions
9.  Wallet backup from within the interface
10.  Market cap data on the dash
11.  IRC through tor in the wallet
12.  key import/export functionality

That's a short list, but there's plenty in the works.  v1 was expedited, so we couldn't really cram all of this in there in the time we had to get it out to you guys - but that's what post-launch time is for. =)

     Best regards,

syntaks

Wow this is quite amazing, this is really getting good. Im glad I got a bunch, I see the value of Neoscoin going nowhere but up for here thats for sure
hey just woke up... see chris how twoturtles takes care;) 

as for the update on things to come, lol amazing and thats the short list thats coming very soon, wait and see the features that will blow everyones minds...arbitrush...

thanx for the update as usual keep it up!
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
The dedication is simply amazing.   Smiley

Edit: On a different note, people such as IE and Btcarchitect were talking #@!% about this coin when trading first opened. This is the reason why neoscoin isn't getting that much attention.

Arbitrush <<
not AIRBRUSH  Tongue

What other anonymous-tx sending systems exist in crypto today?

If any do Id like to know about Airbitrush's differences (improvements)
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
The dedication is simply amazing.   Smiley

Edit: On a different note, people such as IE and Btcarchitect were talking #@!% about this coin when trading first opened. This is the reason why neoscoin isn't getting that much attention.

Arbitrush <<
not AIRBRUSH  Tongue
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Questions about Arbitrush:

1. Will you publish a whitepaper for Airbitrush?
2. Will you have the code audited/vetted by a trusted 3rd party?

3. Most importantly: Will there be a v2 of Arbitrush, perhaps more decentralized with regular nodes on the network acting as Arbitrush servers?

1.  In terms of the inner workings on the nodes?
2.  It would really depend on the 3rd party and we'd need a legally-binding NDA in that event and even so, that doesn't protect everything.
3.  I'm constantly thinking in the direction of improvement.  I have a few concepts I'm going to try to flesh out and if they prove themselves worthy - integrate them.

     Best regards,

syntaks

1. I suppose so. The paper will presumably lay out your original approach/solution.
2. Fair enough. So maybe an audit simply to determine the originality of code without disclosing its secret sauce.

Nevertheless: What about open-sourcing Arbitrush V1 once V2 is released? The code will almost certainly need to be open-sourced if people are gonna trust it .

3. Brilliant! Decentralisation FTW!

thanks syntaks

v1 and v2 aren't literally different software versions, it's more like "v2 - improvements from the previous version".  They're not separate distributions =)  We'll see about the code review and what can't/can be viewed.

     Best regards,

syntaks

thanks. looking forward to seeing how far down the rabbit hole this takes us Wink
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Questions about Arbitrush:

1. Will you publish a whitepaper for Airbitrush?
2. Will you have the code audited/vetted by a trusted 3rd party?

3. Most importantly: Will there be a v2 of Arbitrush, perhaps more decentralized with regular nodes on the network acting as Arbitrush servers?

1.  In terms of the inner workings on the nodes?
2.  It would really depend on the 3rd party and we'd need a legally-binding NDA in that event and even so, that doesn't protect everything.
3.  I'm constantly thinking in the direction of improvement.  I have a few concepts I'm going to try to flesh out and if they prove themselves worthy - integrate them.

     Best regards,

syntaks

1. I suppose so. The paper will presumably lay out your original approach/solution.
2. Fair enough. So maybe an audit simply to determine the originality of code without disclosing its secret sauce.

Nevertheless: What about open-sourcing Arbitrush V1 once V2 is released? The code will almost certainly need to be open-sourced if people are gonna trust it .

3. Brilliant! Decentralisation FTW!

thanks syntaks

v1 and v2 aren't literally different software versions, it's more like "v2 - improvements from the previous version".  They're not separate distributions =)  We'll see about the code review and what can't/can be viewed.

     Best regards,

syntaks
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Questions about Arbitrush:

1. Will you publish a whitepaper for Airbitrush?
2. Will you have the code audited/vetted by a trusted 3rd party?

3. Most importantly: Will there be a v2 of Arbitrush, perhaps more decentralized with regular nodes on the network acting as Arbitrush servers?

1.  In terms of the inner workings on the nodes?
2.  It would really depend on the 3rd party and we'd need a legally-binding NDA in that event and even so, that doesn't protect everything.
3.  I'm constantly thinking in the direction of improvement.  I have a few concepts I'm going to try to flesh out and if they prove themselves worthy - integrate them.

     Best regards,

syntaks

1. I suppose so. The paper will presumably lay out your original approach/solution.
2. Fair enough. So maybe an audit simply to determine the originality of code without disclosing its secret sauce.

Nevertheless: What about open-sourcing Arbitrush V1 once V2 is released? The code will almost certainly need to be open-sourced if people are gonna trust it .

3. Brilliant! Decentralisation FTW!

thanks syntaks
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Questions about Arbitrush:

1. Will you publish a whitepaper for Airbitrush?
2. Will you have the code audited/vetted by a trusted 3rd party?

3. Most importantly: Will there be a v2 of Arbitrush, perhaps more decentralized with regular nodes on the network acting as Arbitrush servers?

1.  In terms of the inner workings on the nodes?
2.  It would really depend on the 3rd party and we'd need a legally-binding NDA in that event and even so, that doesn't protect everything.
3.  I'm constantly thinking in the direction of improvement.  I have a few concepts I'm going to try to flesh out and if they prove themselves worthy - integrate them.

     Best regards,

syntaks
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Questions about Arbitrush:

1. Will you publish a whitepaper for Airbitrush?
2. Will you have the code audited/vetted by a trusted 3rd party?

3. Most importantly: Will there be a v2 of Arbitrush, perhaps more decentralized with regular nodes on the network acting as Arbitrush servers?
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
1202    73 left    anonymous    08/27/2014 09:47:18    976.4005    50.00    
1066    Confirmed    Xircom    08/27/2014 03:24:09    1,670.6915    50.00    
1036    Confirmed    anonymous    08/27/2014 01:16:55    1,315.9476    50.00    
1024    Confirmed    Xircom    08/27/2014 00:55:21    740.2206    50.00

This is supernova, and I have mad respect for ocminer and yourself

I'm just asking is this what you expected or is something wrong?

It's pretty much par the course, but we'll be adjusting the diff later on today after we discuss it and let everyone know when there'll be a fork.  Not *too* much of an adjustment though.  It was more or less designed this way so that it wasn't incredibly easy to just mine->dump or at least hold enough value so that people would actually use it and not want to dump it.

     Best regards,

syntaks

So I got some sha256 rigs that are getting me some coins

They are rented for a 24 hours and have like 20 hours left

So when we do the fork, what happens to those?

Sorry if thats a dumb question, Im not a big tech guy lol

Hell no that's not a dumb question.  I wouldn't wanna waste coin either.  We'll be announcing the fork long ahead of time and at which block it'll occur.  The way we'll roll out the fork is so that it's pretty seamless and that every pool, exchange and everyone in general has time to update before it happens.  The fork is just to adjust the amount of change in the diff algo.  It should be 100% smooth, it's not our first rodeo.

      Best regards,

syntaks
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
Yes Chris +1 for sure , im pretty surprised its so stable and not going up yet  Huh
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
electroneum.com
So whats next for neos? What new?

I started working on v2 just about right after the public release of v1.  A few things I can make mention of that are changing:

1.  Our logo's gotten a little makeover
2.  We have a designer now working on the wallet interface for v2 to make things easier to move around in and more intuitive.
3.  I'm coding a new streamlined setup process that's web-based to make it easier for folks to install and configure as well as customize the installation more.  You'll be able to modify a bunch of parameters like where the web wallet is stored, customize the RPC port, rpc user, rpc pass, etc.
4.  We're adding in so far: c-cex and potentially coin-swap into our trading system.  Any other exchanges that you'd like to see Neos on, please voice it to them and we'll include them in the v2 update.
5.  Some function improvements such as the way addresses are retrieved from the wallet to include them all, address labeling, managing both receiving AND sending addresses in the new interface.
6.  We'll be adding in aliasing.   You'll be able to register aliases and send by alias rather than by address.  For example you can send 10 NEOS to Jimmy instead of N2nDj4j09GjplNCJAKj3U3u322
7.  Block and connection information displayed on the dash
8.  Encryption lock/unlock functions
9.  Wallet backup from within the interface
10.  Market cap data on the dash
11.  IRC through tor in the wallet
12.  key import/export functionality

That's a short list, but there's plenty in the works.  v1 was expedited, so we couldn't really cram all of this in there in the time we had to get it out to you guys - but that's what post-launch time is for. =)

     Best regards,

syntaks

Wow this is quite amazing, this is really getting good. Im glad I got a bunch, I see the value of Neoscoin going nowhere but up for here thats for sure
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
So whats next for neos? What new?

I started working on v2 just about right after the public release of v1.  A few things I can make mention of that are changing:

1.  Our logo's gotten a little makeover
2.  We have a designer now working on the wallet interface for v2 to make things easier to move around in and more intuitive.
3.  I'm coding a new streamlined setup process that's web-based to make it easier for folks to install and configure as well as customize the installation more.  You'll be able to modify a bunch of parameters like where the web wallet is stored, customize the RPC port, rpc user, rpc pass, etc.
4.  We're adding in so far: c-cex and potentially coin-swap into our trading system.  Any other exchanges that you'd like to see Neos on, please voice it to them and we'll include them in the v2 update.
5.  Some function improvements such as the way addresses are retrieved from the wallet to include them all, address labeling, managing both receiving AND sending addresses in the new interface.
6.  We'll be adding in aliasing.   You'll be able to register aliases and send by alias rather than by address.  For example you can send 10 NEOS to Jimmy instead of N2nDj4j09GjplNCJAKj3U3u322
7.  Block and connection information displayed on the dash
8.  Encryption lock/unlock functions
9.  Wallet backup from within the interface
10.  Market cap data on the dash
11.  IRC through tor in the wallet
12.  key import/export functionality

That's a short list, but there's plenty in the works.  v1 was expedited, so we couldn't really cram all of this in there in the time we had to get it out to you guys - but that's what post-launch time is for. =)

     Best regards,

syntaks

Wow! The funny part is syntaks slipped in irc last night....This list is almost at 30 things lined up for us. So much development coming it's amazing Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
electroneum.com
1202    73 left    anonymous    08/27/2014 09:47:18    976.4005    50.00    
1066    Confirmed    Xircom    08/27/2014 03:24:09    1,670.6915    50.00    
1036    Confirmed    anonymous    08/27/2014 01:16:55    1,315.9476    50.00    
1024    Confirmed    Xircom    08/27/2014 00:55:21    740.2206    50.00

This is supernova, and I have mad respect for ocminer and yourself

I'm just asking is this what you expected or is something wrong?

It's pretty much par the course, but we'll be adjusting the diff later on today after we discuss it and let everyone know when there'll be a fork.  Not *too* much of an adjustment though.  It was more or less designed this way so that it wasn't incredibly easy to just mine->dump or at least hold enough value so that people would actually use it and not want to dump it.

     Best regards,

syntaks

So I got some sha256 rigs that are getting me some coins

They are rented for a 24 hours and have like 20 hours left

So when we do the fork, what happens to those?

Sorry if thats a dumb question, Im not a big tech guy lol
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
So whats next for neos? What new?

I started working on v2 just about right after the public release of v1.  A few things I can make mention of that are changing:

1.  Our logo's gotten a little makeover
2.  We have a designer now working on the wallet interface for v2 to make things easier to move around in and more intuitive.
3.  I'm coding a new streamlined setup process that's web-based to make it easier for folks to install and configure as well as customize the installation more.  You'll be able to modify a bunch of parameters like where the web wallet is stored, customize the RPC port, rpc user, rpc pass, etc.
4.  We're adding in so far: c-cex and potentially coin-swap into our trading system.  Any other exchanges that you'd like to see Neos on, please voice it to them and we'll include them in the v2 update.
5.  Some function improvements such as the way addresses are retrieved from the wallet to include them all, address labeling, managing both receiving AND sending addresses in the new interface.
6.  We'll be adding in aliasing.   You'll be able to register aliases and send by alias rather than by address.  For example you can send 10 NEOS to Jimmy instead of N2nDj4j09GjplNCJAKj3U3u322
7.  Block and connection information displayed on the dash
8.  Encryption lock/unlock functions
9.  Wallet backup from within the interface
10.  Market cap data on the dash
11.  IRC through tor in the wallet
12.  key import/export functionality

That's a short list, but there's plenty in the works.  v1 was expedited, so we couldn't really cram all of this in there in the time we had to get it out to you guys - but that's what post-launch time is for. =)

     Best regards,

syntaks
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
1202    73 left    anonymous    08/27/2014 09:47:18    976.4005    50.00    
1066    Confirmed    Xircom    08/27/2014 03:24:09    1,670.6915    50.00    
1036    Confirmed    anonymous    08/27/2014 01:16:55    1,315.9476    50.00    
1024    Confirmed    Xircom    08/27/2014 00:55:21    740.2206    50.00

This is supernova, and I have mad respect for ocminer and yourself

I'm just asking is this what you expected or is something wrong?

It's pretty much par the course, but we'll be adjusting the diff later on today after we discuss it and let everyone know when there'll be a fork.  Not *too* much of an adjustment though.  It was more or less designed this way so that it wasn't incredibly easy to just mine->dump or at least hold enough value so that people would actually use it and not want to dump it.

     Best regards,

syntaks
Pages:
Jump to: