Topic: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex - page 160. (Read 436215 times)

Well for sure it works as I'm staking right now (and if I don't stake then the staking difficulty on bittrex and cryptoguru goes right down to near zero; conversely when I do stake it raises extremely high).

The other thing is that you do have to unlock the wallet specifically for staking and not just general use (there is a tick box which I believe wasn't present on the previous clients)

The previous wallet did a good job of auto-staking. Not sure the new wallet is working in the same way.

a possibility that those who holds much bigger amount of there coins just keeping it from their own wallet making it sure that when the price will completely arise they can also easily send it to any exchange that they want then sell it from the price that they adore making the price up and the value will multiply.

Possibly. The other interesting part is that there are now ~16-20% of coins listed on Bittrex and about ~1% on RAWX; that is much higher than has ever been on Bittrex if I recall but still shows that most coins aren't even in play.

So whichever way you look at it around ~75-80% of coins aren't listed on any exchange.

The other thing is that barely anyone seems to actually be staking although a decent number are running the wallet.

If it's got a HDMI connection hook it up to your TV.

You could try to start your laptop by connecting it to a monitor. That's a cheap fix - just need a cable.

Next, you could take out the hard drive (easy) and dock it. Then connect the docked hard disk to a working computer and find the wallet.dat file by searching through your windows file manager.

https://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-External-Duplicator-Function-EC-HDD2/dp/B00IKC14OG/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1474808557&sr=8-1&keywords=Hdd+dock

With the dock, your hard drive is treated like a USB stick

The screen is smashed to bits !

Most prob, it's over due a price correction.

pre-pump behavior.

looks like someone keeps dumping their own coins on them selves, trying to keep the price down.

I agree to most of what you tell, Goergem, so what I tell below is not to argue, those mostly just free thoughts on the subject.

The project time-frame anyway looks to be long enough. Two forks in the next 6 months most probably mean first steps of torrent integration into the actual blockchain, aka start of public beta testing of the basic torrent-related functionality. I expect there lots of discussions and probably disagreement (as everyone has his own view on how this should be done). Its interesting whether the Dev intends to take it into account, or he has 100% fixed vision..

"If it's done, it's done." - true, but only to some extent . Most of developers I have worked with (even very good ones) consider things done as soon as the basic "skeleton" functionality is implemented. But in real business world "done" means - "completely thought out, with all the smallest details considered"+"all of the essential parts implemented, including the smallest details"+"all these tested and passed quality control, including stress testing and many other kinds of testing"+"all this reviewed by multiple people with different strengths and areas of expertise, as one single person could/would always miss something".

Its a bit strange the Dev doesn't ask or discuss anything here. To have a proper torrent implementation in blockchain, one has to consider huge amount of details, and there are so many questionable aspects there!! One explanation could be - maybe indeed there is a team, and they discuss it internally to the extend they don't need any input from outside..? I would be happy if that's the case

Truly saying, I see the VTR idea to be much more complex than those two projects you mentioned, both because of many conceptual questions, and also due to the insanely wide user- and 'abuser-' base of torrents, people (or governments) who will try to abuse, break and stress the VTR beyond all measures. That's also the reason why VTR should have much bigger market cap when being ready and working

I suppose that would be the first steps of torrent integration, and probably starting from that point we could have the "skeleton" implementation more or less ready, so the testing could finally involve the community here.

Same shit different day:

https://torrentfreak.com/mexican-police-target-popular-kickasstorrents-clone-seize-domain-160923/

Torrent hound also decided to shut up shop like torrentz:

https://torrentfreak.com/torrenthound-shuts-down-another-big-torrent-site-bites-the-dust-160915/

Your coins will be fine, just load the wallet.dat into the new wallet and your good to go.

What's wrong with your laptop? will it power up?

Hi you may remember i posted this a while back id like some info please !

If the laptop is broken and on the very first VTR wallet will i be fine just leaving it broken for now if the dev is going to fork or should i get the coins onto a new wallet I'm not a geek I'm an investor  

I mined the coins at the start i think its around 200k and have never really touched them so not exactly pocket change now and definitely won't be soon, but don't worry guys I'm not dumping as there is definately something going on here and always has been, this will be a top 10 !

Genuine help appreciated !

Looks like all the sub 1000 sat coins are gone.

People are realising that this project is serious and extremely undervalued, so much so, the marketcap is laughable.

Before you thought it would take 3-4 months, but now you know that quite a lot was done done 6-8 months ago and you still consider it's too early to say for sure etc etc etc.  Just consider that for a while. If quite a lot of work is already done, one person or 10 people working on this project doesn't make that much difference if there is a release plan in progress. It it's done, it's done.

SDC at $10m and DASH at $80m are both built around one dev.

Don't go all Stockholm syndrome with these sons of donkey's who feel compelled to spend 5BTC into a new ICO with vaporware and happily dumps VTR at these stupid low prices with hardfork release plans already confirmed.

Why would the devs be looking at two hard forks within the next six months?  Come on fellas, think it through.

Thanks for you analysis Goergem. I somehow managed to miss the post you refer to. It sounds promising indeed. I mostly agree with what you say, but what refers to this...


..., I am not sure indeed. We know there was at least one developer helping vTorrent with his work (I believe that was pnoch). Apparently he was helping vTorrent with 2FA stuff, allowing him to focus more on torrent features. However he doesn't look like a permanent member of a permanent team, as he doesn't ever tell he is working on VTR currently.
Also the post you referred to, is from February, and there is more than half-a-year passed since that. We have no idea whether the torrent implementation and anti-cheat protection work has progressed ever since, or all efforts were concentrated on 2FA... Actually we have very little info on anything, to be able to make any definitive assumptions. With the little info we have, we can only speculate and guess.

So for me the "Dev" vs "permanent team of Devs" question is still open
As for the rest, you may well be correct.

Of course, it would be great to get one more piece of info from vTorrent (similar to the one he gave in February), to know what part of the BitTorrent implementation he is working on currently.

Nicely done

Check the charts for yourself - 07/03/2015 20:20:36