Detailed per rig statistic added on DwarfPool.
On the graphs you сan see individual sent shares for each worker that has own worker-id.
http://dwarfpool.com/whrl
Looks like that:
DwarfPool Quality you can trust!
Topic: [ANN][WHRL] WhirlCoin | WhirlPool Algorithm | Sloped Rewards |AMD + CUDA Equal - page 31. (Read 118096 times)
July 23, 2014, 07:32:36 AM
Detailed per rig statistic added on DwarfPool.
On the graphs you сan see individual sent shares for each worker that has own worker-id.
http://dwarfpool.com/whrl
Looks like that:
DwarfPool Quality you can trust!
July 23, 2014, 07:28:11 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
how is it on suprnova ? its fits with what sgminer says for me
hm just did some tests, no problem at all reaching the site.. strange
July 23, 2014, 06:26:31 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
how is it on suprnova ? its fits with what sgminer says for me
hm just did some tests, no problem at all reaching the site.. strange
July 23, 2014, 06:26:18 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
It should display the correct hashrates but it can take a while when the share difficulty is high. The link after the worker address is supposed to go to a block explorer which I forgot to specify.
July 23, 2014, 06:21:48 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
how is it on suprnova ? its fits with what sgminer says for me
Pools pay you based on what you submit, and that's from the miner anyway. Pool hashrates are really just a convinience, you get payed for what the miner is showing
July 23, 2014, 05:52:49 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
how is it on suprnova ? its fits with what sgminer says for me
hm just did some tests, no problem at all reaching the site.. strange
July 23, 2014, 05:38:33 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
how is it on suprnova ? its fits with what sgminer says for me
Pools pay you based on what you submit, and that's from the miner anyway. Pool hashrates are really just a convinience, you get payed for what the miner is showing
July 23, 2014, 05:32:46 AM
Dear WhirlCoin community,
WhirlCoin (WHRL) is now tradable on swisscex.com: https://www.swisscex.com/market/WHRL_BTC
WhirlCoin (WHRL) is now tradable on swisscex.com: https://www.swisscex.com/market/WHRL_BTC
i think imo that coin should go for .00002800 btc
July 23, 2014, 05:30:28 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
how is it on suprnova ? its fits with what sgminer says for me
July 23, 2014, 05:01:01 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
Generally you should only trust what's in the sgminer - pools are not 100% accurate
July 23, 2014, 04:29:21 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
how is it on suprnova ? its fits with what sgminer says for me
July 23, 2014, 04:22:02 AM
Just wondering if altmine's hashrates correct? Dwarf says I am mining with 5mhs but when I try altmine it goes to 2-3. And the individual worker page is also not working on altmine.
July 23, 2014, 03:02:43 AM
Guys and dev you missed this
https://www.swisscex.com/market/WHRL_BTC
LOL Such a stupid buyers, also stupid sellers on swisscex
https://www.swisscex.com/market/WHRL_BTC
LOL Such a stupid buyers, also stupid sellers on swisscex
July 23, 2014, 02:14:19 AM
I want to buy some but i've never heard about this exchange! Anyone tried it before!?
Trying it now, seems like there are no fake orders and my Whirl deposit was credited very fast. So far, so nice, we'll see.
Please look at cryptoine announce: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-under-construction-694710
There is no fake orders and more importantly there is no fake (robot) trades.
0% Trading fee!
July 23, 2014, 12:58:02 AM
Keep Whirling
July 22, 2014, 10:53:06 PM
ok i give up for a moment, max i can get for R9 280x is 10 Mh/s, only tested on 280x and 7970
its about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
nope, I spend more time trying to optimise ccminer actuallyits about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
Got an optimized one for Whirlcoin? Getting a little over 13,000 kh/s with my 780Ti.
Ever tried ccminer? much better on the nvidia cards. Easy to configure. Cryptominingblog has the download
July 22, 2014, 10:28:06 PM
ok i give up for a moment, max i can get for R9 280x is 10 Mh/s, only tested on 280x and 7970
its about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
nope, I spend more time trying to optimise ccminer actuallyits about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
Got an optimized one for Whirlcoin? Getting a little over 13,000 kh/s with my 780Ti.
July 22, 2014, 10:09:10 PM
ok i give up for a moment, max i can get for R9 280x is 10 Mh/s, only tested on 280x and 7970
its about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
nope, I spend more time trying to optimise ccminer actually its about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
July 22, 2014, 09:48:20 PM
ok i give up for a moment, max i can get for R9 280x is 10 Mh/s, only tested on 280x and 7970
its about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
its about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
Thank you . Thanksssssssssssssssss
Quote
i am a stupid coder..
NoFor everything you must get money for devepoler it except sceince .
July 22, 2014, 08:55:44 PM
ok i give up for a moment, max i can get for R9 280x is 10 Mh/s, only tested on 280x and 7970
its about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
its about 9.5 on 7970
i will release the miner tomorrow, too tired after head banging on openCL code, i need too sleep.
i promise i will release it tomorrow, just let me enjoy lead-time on this miner first, its an easy
optimization though, i believe djm (which this miner is based) already made a miner that is
faster than this
i am a stupid coder..
Jump to: