Topic: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet - page 195. (Read 268553 times)
May 25, 2014, 03:50:18 PM
Which pool is the most stable?
May 25, 2014, 03:50:00 PM
From the research I've done and people Im speaking this team is solid and will be a force to be recon with
May 25, 2014, 03:42:37 PM
I forgot the other PDF that also reflects some key concepts in our design, take note of the dual-path communications, XC will use multi-path
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf
These are shown as reference material purposes only
suppernodes
sounds tasty
May 25, 2014, 03:39:36 PM
Buy xc now will be even mooning on way up.
Wow great research papers,Dev got it solid.
Wow great research papers,Dev got it solid.
May 25, 2014, 03:25:04 PM
I forgot the other PDF that also reflects some key concepts in our design, take note of the dual-path communications, XC will use multi-path
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf
And the crowd comes to a HUSH. Hope you get to enjoy a bit of the weekend.
May 25, 2014, 03:15:44 PM
I forgot the other PDF that also reflects some key concepts in our design, take note of the dual-path communications, XC will use multi-path
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf
These are shown as reference material purposes only
May 25, 2014, 02:50:53 PM
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final?
However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention.
Quote
then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree.
XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
If you write your own code, you are generally not considered a clone but the distinction can be elusive for non-coders. The key will be to maximize the technology and make it as anonymous as it can get.
DRK didn't "invent" supernodes or the concept, and while some of concepts are similar and/or overlap, we are on a different path than DRK and as we refine the platform, it will be clear why our design, implementation and infrastructure is superior as we will have autonomous supernodes using PKI that can scale up and out to become a distributed anonymous application platform
I think the potential for masternode application is being considered for DRK too (extra services through the masternodes etc) although the scope of services may vary. Altcoins are certainly evolving...
Will you also implement a mining reward schedule or fee-based-payment for x11coin supernodes?
it would be fee-based and it would go the node that processed the transaction
May 25, 2014, 02:50:29 PM
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final?
However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention.
Quote
then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree.
XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
If you write your own code, you are generally not considered a clone but the distinction can be elusive for non-coders. The key will be to maximize the technology and make it as anonymous as it can get.
You are complete moron...did you read this .pdf
What is behind supernodes that is the key ...you illiterate idiot 
May 25, 2014, 02:49:48 PM
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final?
However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention.
Quote
then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree.
XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
If you write your own code, you are generally not considered a clone but the distinction can be elusive for non-coders. The key will be to maximize the technology and make it as anonymous as it can get.
DRK didn't "invent" supernodes or the concept, and while some of concepts are similar and/or overlap, we are on a different path than DRK and as we refine the platform, it will be clear why our design, implementation and infrastructure is superior as we will have autonomous supernodes using PKI that can scale up and out to become a distributed anonymous application platform
I think the potential for masternode application is being considered for DRK too (extra services through the masternodes etc) although the scope of services may vary. Altcoins are certainly evolving...
Will you also implement a mining reward schedule or fee-based-payment for x11coin supernodes?
May 25, 2014, 02:46:55 PM
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final?
However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention.
Quote
then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree.
XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
If you write your own code, you are generally not considered a clone but the distinction can be elusive for non-coders. The key will be to maximize the technology and make it as anonymous as it can get.
DRK didn't "invent" supernodes or the concept, and while some of concepts are similar and/or overlap, we are on a different path than DRK and as we refine the platform, it will be clear why our design, implementation and infrastructure is superior as we will have autonomous supernodes using PKI that can scale up and out to become a distributed anonymous application platform
This is why the multi-path paradigm network I built back in 2005 still functions to do this day and scaled up to meet the demands of 2014... think back to 2005, granted we had the internet, but not the mobile technology - and that is a key part of my background is mobility that will be leveraged in the android anonymous POS wallet
May 25, 2014, 02:43:56 PM
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final?
However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention.
Quote
then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree.
XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
If you write your own code, you are generally not considered a clone but the distinction can be elusive for non-coders. The key will be to maximize the technology and make it as anonymous as it can get.
May 25, 2014, 02:43:19 PM
i bought over 500 XCoin here -> https://www.europex.eu/#!coin/btc/x
Thinking it was XC (X11 Coin)
Now i learned the HARD way that i lost 0.54 BTC !!!
Withdrew it and now "it's gone" destroyed i believe
I withdrew XCoin to my X11 address XWB4AHRwgQnhGToasRbqgfUXGHrw8bBXZR (if someone rich is willing to donate feel free
) (i normally never bribe!)
At least someone on europex is happy that i bought his expensive XCoin then
PS: I never bribe, just feeling bad at the moment and it is the thruth i made this mistake! CRY
The transaction id from XCoin => ded4a451e575a5d15f2bdd634c64d9c494e3a60f23d0b13c57ae5d3ea4ed88f6
Look my post history and see i'm active on several coins, now i dived into X11 Coin and didn't notice XCoin is another coin.
Let people know... plz plz plz
Let this be a warning for others not to get mistaken or confused
I won't go in XC11 now since i will stop trading for a while.. Destroyed 0.54 BTC in total just because the name is almost the same
Thinking it was XC (X11 Coin)
Now i learned the HARD way that i lost 0.54 BTC !!!
Withdrew it and now "it's gone" destroyed i believe
I withdrew XCoin to my X11 address XWB4AHRwgQnhGToasRbqgfUXGHrw8bBXZR (if someone rich is willing to donate feel free
) (i normally never bribe!)At least someone on europex is happy that i bought his expensive XCoin then
PS: I never bribe, just feeling bad at the moment and it is the thruth i made this mistake!
CRYThe transaction id from XCoin => ded4a451e575a5d15f2bdd634c64d9c494e3a60f23d0b13c57ae5d3ea4ed88f6
Look my post history and see i'm active on several coins, now i dived into X11 Coin and didn't notice XCoin is another coin.
Let people know... plz plz plz
Let this be a warning for others not to get mistaken or confused
I won't go in XC11 now since i will stop trading for a while.. Destroyed 0.54 BTC in total just because the name is almost the same
wait XCoin = X11 coin i think
I don't believe that is X11Coin or XC -
did you receive your coins?
If your coins are lost, contact me and I'll see what I can do
Sad news from the ticket i created on europex, he cannot do anything about it because the seller of those XCoin's withdrew the BTC i payed him. Maybe i can get 500 XCoin's back if i'm 'lucky'.. what are 500 XCoins really worth? lol...
Anyway it seems europex is trustfull, maybe a new exchange to trade on (not that i'm going to trade again any time soon, anywhere...)
May 25, 2014, 02:42:47 PM
lol wtg dev
May 25, 2014, 02:40:45 PM
lol i love this dev, leaves everyone in suspense and then uppercuts all the haters
i bet all those dumpers hitting themselves in the balls with a hammer
+1
i bet all those dumpers hitting themselves in the balls with a hammer
+1
May 25, 2014, 02:40:08 PM
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final?
However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention.
Quote
then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree.
XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
If you write your own code, you are generally not considered a clone but the distinction can be elusive for non-coders. The key will be to maximize the technology and make it as anonymous as it can get.
May 25, 2014, 02:38:30 PM
For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity
http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005, the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day
http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005, the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day
Insanely good work Dev. !
+1 Bye bye haters!
May 25, 2014, 02:37:15 PM
For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity
http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005, the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day
http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005, the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day
Insanely good work Dev. !
May 25, 2014, 02:31:40 PM
For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity
http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf
The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day
also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform
one the of the details we are still working out is the autonomous "supernode" function and best methods to prevent bad-actors.. We have implemented PKI and will leverage that as part of entire solution
http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf
The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day
also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform
one the of the details we are still working out is the autonomous "supernode" function and best methods to prevent bad-actors.. We have implemented PKI and will leverage that as part of entire solution
May 25, 2014, 02:30:24 PM
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final?
However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention.
Quote
then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree.
XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
May 25, 2014, 02:24:07 PM
I like Dark but come on, the whole thing is nothing but a slick marketing and product launch.
There is no marketing associated with Darkcoin. No sponsorships, giveaways, promo events, etc. There was a conscious decision to wait, get the job done and then market. How can you market a product which is beta and not final?
However, coinmarketcap caught up, whales caught up and the pressure escalated. Then global media caught up, then LTC and BTC holders started hedging with DRK and the whole thing blew enormously in terms of coin value and attention.
Quote
then spring this whole masternodes concept that encourages hoarding of the coins to keep the network alive which gets everyone in a buying spree, neverminding the fact the system is setup to further more enrich all those early miners who have the lion's share of the loot.
There must be negative incentives to prevent bad actors from mapping the network. No dis-incentive => someone launches 10.000 nodes and has 99.9% chance to map all transactions. If you make it "costly" to own the nodes you prevent the bad actor attack to a sufficient degree.
XC will "suffer" criticism on this regard for a while until it comes up with another or similar solution.
Jump to: