By the way, I do have something positive to say.
It's a good thing the ICO now has more decent rules and a more fair minimum amount of Bitcoins that the dev wants to collect.
It's a good thing the ICO now has more decent rules and a more fair minimum amount of Bitcoins that the dev wants to collect.
Even then, not a significant amount of funds have been collected. I believe, that before the launch, will we know the amount that people would be willing to invest.
Why do you say any decent amount when a few post above you mention a minimum of 10.000 shares?
What would be decent for you? If only 4 BTC would be invested on the 11th, would then all coins be distributed to those investors?
Let's say I invest 1 BTC and only 4 BTC will be raised on the 11th. Will I then receive 1/4th of the 55 ICO XDE coins? And also 1/4th of the EAGS shares that are meant for the XDE investors?
The problem is, you're not clear about what investors will get so they can't decide if it makes sense to invest. Hell, even I would invest if above is correct. Not because I believe in the coin but because it would make sense to invest, because profit is likely.
But you've changed your ICO rules so many times, how can anybody trust you? If the amount that is raised isn't 'decent' in your eyes, you would just extend the ICO again to raise money... Just set rules and stand by them.
