Topic: [ANN][XMR] monero.crypto-pool.fr | Large Monero Mining Pool - page 24. (Read 126524 times)
Decided to try a coin. Worked directly on the stock exchange on the Base Address. I understand that all the coins are lost or have the ability to recover? Thank U.
I add mixing 3 in todolist
For information TODO LIST
1.) Solved definitvely timeout miner ( Present , I have find solution need more code and test)
2.) Find solution for user can signed message for defined parameter ( Per ex rles payout , email , other ) ( Fake Auth )
3.) Add graph for many metrics and Publish metric ( I think use sensu for at wit server dedied same for monitoring admin)
4.) Fix Payout definetely with mixing 3
5.) Report bad share
6.) Add many information
..
...
Finished recoded all code pool from scratch
....
..
15.) Sleep and Go playa del carmen for vacancy
For waiting graph on metric efficiency: You can now efficiency pool for 20,50,100,300,1000,5000 Block on page monitoring.
For information TODO LIST
1.) Solved definitvely timeout miner ( Present , I have find solution need more code and test)
2.) Find solution for user can signed message for defined parameter ( Per ex rles payout , email , other ) ( Fake Auth )
3.) Add graph for many metrics and Publish metric ( I think use sensu for at wit server dedied same for monitoring admin)
4.) Fix Payout definetely with mixing 3
5.) Report bad share
6.) Add many information
..
...
Finished recoded all code pool from scratch
....
..
15.) Sleep and Go playa del carmen for vacancy
For waiting graph on metric efficiency: You can now efficiency pool for 20,50,100,300,1000,5000 Block on page monitoring.
Ok I get your point but how can we process so many transactions without tons of dust ?
I don't think we'll be able to pay people at low fees and on time if we change the setting right now.
We need to work on it.
Thank you for acknowledging this.
Please work on it and keep us updated.
Merci!
Hello is kminer safe to use? my miner has very limit memory and CLaymore crashes a lot. kminer seems work but I fear for safety? thank you.
kminer is not safe.
Have you been on the Claymore GPU thread for the crash problem ?
I sent XMR Dev fluffypony a request for explanation.
I realize he is busy, and I don't expect an instant response, and I am capable of finding stuff on my own.
So, I found this from the Monero Missive transcription of Week 2015-02-23:
Riccardo (fluffypony):
"You are spot on…there are two different aspects to privacy in Monero and that is the unlinkability and the untraceability of transactions. Now when we say unlinkability we are talking about the dual-key stealth addressing that addresses that component; but untraceability is another thing entirely. So, the untraceability is dealt with by ring signatures. As MRL 1 pointed out there is a potential compromise, and a cascading compromise, to the ununtraceable nature of CryptoNote transactions.
I realize he is busy, and I don't expect an instant response, and I am capable of finding stuff on my own.
So, I found this from the Monero Missive transcription of Week 2015-02-23:
Riccardo (fluffypony):
"You are spot on…there are two different aspects to privacy in Monero and that is the unlinkability and the untraceability of transactions. Now when we say unlinkability we are talking about the dual-key stealth addressing that addresses that component; but untraceability is another thing entirely. So, the untraceability is dealt with by ring signatures. As MRL 1 pointed out there is a potential compromise, and a cascading compromise, to the ununtraceable nature of CryptoNote transactions.
Payments aren't processed in the coinbase, they're processed as regular transactions sent to a wallet daemon. It's impossible to tell that they're coming from the pool, especially if you do your bit to promote Monero's transactional privacy by flushing coinbase transactions to a payouts wallet and then processing them from there. If you continue to process them as zero-mixin transactions you'll be forced to make the change once we enforce MRL-0004, so you may as well change now.
Ok I get your point but how can we process so many transactions without tons of dust ?
I don't think we'll be able to pay people at low fees and on time if we change the setting right now.
We need to work on it.
Can you guys please change the payout mixin to 3?
Mixin 0 hurts the foundational privacy aspects of Monero. Even if we don't care about privacy of payouts right now, it could matter when the coins are spent in the future.
Being a leading XMR pool, you guys can set the example here by making the mixin 3 or more.
Thanks! Merci!
Mixin 0 hurts the foundational privacy aspects of Monero. Even if we don't care about privacy of payouts right now, it could matter when the coins are spent in the future.
Being a leading XMR pool, you guys can set the example here by making the mixin 3 or more.
Thanks! Merci!
Mixing for payout from pool is useless.
The mixing is for stealh emitor of transaction.
You know all block find with my pool.
->
You kow all TX spend or not spend for my pool
Where is interest make mixing 3 , 20 , 50,100 ?
If you can find block with TX speend and find my pool as forged block?
I print all transaction send per my pool
For mixing is not useless . I have need 2 prerequire .
1.) I stealh block find
2.) I slealh Payout
You can make payout to youself with mixing you want before .
Is good pratice for spend coin generated per open pool .
You are ready for mine on blackbox pool?
The mixing is for stealh emitor of transaction.
You know all block find with my pool.
->
You kow all TX spend or not spend for my pool
Where is interest make mixing 3 , 20 , 50,100 ?
If you can find block with TX speend and find my pool as forged block?
I print all transaction send per my pool
For mixing is not useless . I have need 2 prerequire .
1.) I stealh block find
2.) I slealh Payout
You can make payout to youself with mixing you want before .
Is good pratice for spend coin generated per open pool .
You are ready for mine on blackbox pool?
To put it in a nutshell, mixing from pool is no use because we know for sure that all transactions are coming from the pool.
Mixing is useful once the XMR are on your personal wallet.
Wut. How do we know that?
https://github.com/zone117x/node-cryptonote-pool/blob/master/lib/paymentProcessor.js#L93
Payments aren't processed in the coinbase, they're processed as regular transactions sent to a wallet daemon. It's impossible to tell that they're coming from the pool, especially if you do your bit to promote Monero's transactional privacy by flushing coinbase transactions to a payouts wallet and then processing them from there. If you continue to process them as zero-mixin transactions you'll be forced to make the change once we enforce MRL-0004, so you may as well change now.
I sent XMR Dev fluffypony a request for explanation.
I realize he is busy, and I don't expect an instant response, and I am capable of finding stuff on my own.
So, I found this from the Monero Missive transcription of Week 2015-02-23:
Riccardo (fluffypony):
"You are spot on…there are two different aspects to privacy in Monero and that is the unlinkability and the untraceability of transactions. Now when we say unlinkability we are talking about the dual-key stealth addressing that addresses that component; but untraceability is another thing entirely. So, the untraceability is dealt with by ring signatures. As MRL 1 pointed out there is a potential compromise, and a cascading compromise, to the ununtraceable nature of CryptoNote transactions.
Just to sort-of explain it quite simply: if I create a bunch of transactions, and in each transaction I have my signature along with your signature…so just by chance I happen to mix with your signature, and it's the same denomination I put every single time. And then in 6 months' time you go and spend that output at a mixin 0. Suddenly what you're effectively doing is you are invalidating all of the times that output was used previously. Which means that all of the transactions where you and I, where I used your signature as a ring signature on it, is suddenly like…well, anybody looking can go "hey, this ring signature is part of an output that was spent, and so therefore the other one must be the correct one." So that revelation becomes dangerous especially when owning a certain number of outputs, and the knowing that you control those outputs leads to a cascade or a snowball.
So what we're really trying to move away from his instead of having "unspent" outputs that we mix with, just having outputs that we mixed with and they should always be unspent; it should be impossible to tell if an output has actually been spent on the blockchain or not.
Now the reason that we might need 0 mix transactions, or mixin 0 transactions, is because traditionally in Monero there is dust. And dust, when you are using it as an input, will never have anything, or will most likely, not have anything it can mix with. So it presented an interesting problem for us and for the rest of the members of the Monero Research Lab. Because not only did we have to devise a scheme that just disallowed mixin 0 transactions, but we also needed to figure out a way to get dust out the system, to maybe do this in a way that dust eventually comes of the system instead of having some sort of magical destroyer of dust go through the blockchain, which is impossible.
So MRL 4 is something that people can read in their own time, but basically the long and the short of it is that we're going to be moving quite soon to a minimum mixin of 2, and we are going to programmatically lock in that within the next 3 to 5 years that minimum mixing is going to move to 4."
Source:
https://getmonero.org/2015/02/23/monero-missive-for-the-week-of-2015-02-23.html
Google translation to French:
Vous êtes sur place ... il ya deux aspects différents à la vie privée dans Monero et ce est la intraçabilité et de la non-traçabilité des transactions. Maintenant, quand nous disons intraçabilité nous parlons de la furtivité double clé d'adressage qui traite de cette composante; mais untraceability est tout autre chose. Ainsi, la non-traçabilité est traitée par signatures d'anneau. Comme une LMR a souligné il ya un compromis potentiel, et un compromis en cascade, de la nature des transactions ununtraceable CryptoNote.
Juste pour trier-de l'expliquer tout simplement: si je crée un groupe de transactions, et dans chaque transaction je ai ma signature avec votre signature ... si par hasard il me arrive de mélanger avec votre signature, et ce est la même dénomination je mets à chaque fois. Et puis, dans le temps de 6 mois, vous aller passer cette sortie à un mixin 0. Soudain ce que vous êtes effectivement faire est vous invalider tous les temps que la production a été utilisé précédemment. Ce qui signifie que toutes les transactions où vous et moi, où je ai utilisé votre signature comme une signature de anneau sur elle, est tout à coup comme ... eh bien, ceux qui cherchent peut aller "hey, cette signature de bague fait partie d'une sortie qui a été dépensé, et ainsi donc l'autre doit être la bonne ". Alors que la révélation devient dangereux surtout quand la possession d'un certain nombre de sorties, et sachant que vous contrôlez ces sorties conduit à une cascade ou d'une boule de neige.
Donc, ce que nous essayons vraiment de se éloigner de son lieu d'avoir des sorties «non dépensés» que nous mélanger avec, juste ayant des sorties que nous mélangé avec et ils devraient toujours être dépensés; il devrait être impossible de dire si une sortie a été dépensé sur le blockchain ou non.
Maintenant, la raison pour laquelle nous pourrions avoir besoin 0 opérations de mixage, ou mixins 0 transactions, parce que traditionnellement Monero il ya de la poussière. Et la poussière, lorsque vous l'utilisez comme une entrée, ne aura jamais rien, ou très probablement, ne pas avoir tout ce qu'il peut mélanger avec. Donc, il a présenté un problème intéressant pour nous et pour le reste des membres du Laboratoire de recherche Monero. Parce que non seulement nous ne avons eu à concevoir un système qui vient refusé mixins 0 opérations, mais nous avons aussi besoin de trouver un moyen pour obtenir la poussière du système, à peut-être le faire d'une manière qui la poussière vient finalement du système au lieu d'avoir une sorte de destroyer magique de la poussière passer par le blockchain, ce qui est impossible.
Donc LMR 4 est quelque chose que les gens peuvent lire dans leur propre temps, mais, fondamentalement, le long et le court, ce est que nous allons déplacer assez rapidement à un minimum de deux mixin, et nous allons verrouiller programme dans ce dans les trois à cinq prochaines années que le mélange minimum va passer à 4
I realize he is busy, and I don't expect an instant response, and I am capable of finding stuff on my own.
So, I found this from the Monero Missive transcription of Week 2015-02-23:
Riccardo (fluffypony):
"You are spot on…there are two different aspects to privacy in Monero and that is the unlinkability and the untraceability of transactions. Now when we say unlinkability we are talking about the dual-key stealth addressing that addresses that component; but untraceability is another thing entirely. So, the untraceability is dealt with by ring signatures. As MRL 1 pointed out there is a potential compromise, and a cascading compromise, to the ununtraceable nature of CryptoNote transactions.
Just to sort-of explain it quite simply: if I create a bunch of transactions, and in each transaction I have my signature along with your signature…so just by chance I happen to mix with your signature, and it's the same denomination I put every single time. And then in 6 months' time you go and spend that output at a mixin 0. Suddenly what you're effectively doing is you are invalidating all of the times that output was used previously. Which means that all of the transactions where you and I, where I used your signature as a ring signature on it, is suddenly like…well, anybody looking can go "hey, this ring signature is part of an output that was spent, and so therefore the other one must be the correct one." So that revelation becomes dangerous especially when owning a certain number of outputs, and the knowing that you control those outputs leads to a cascade or a snowball.
So what we're really trying to move away from his instead of having "unspent" outputs that we mix with, just having outputs that we mixed with and they should always be unspent; it should be impossible to tell if an output has actually been spent on the blockchain or not.
Now the reason that we might need 0 mix transactions, or mixin 0 transactions, is because traditionally in Monero there is dust. And dust, when you are using it as an input, will never have anything, or will most likely, not have anything it can mix with. So it presented an interesting problem for us and for the rest of the members of the Monero Research Lab. Because not only did we have to devise a scheme that just disallowed mixin 0 transactions, but we also needed to figure out a way to get dust out the system, to maybe do this in a way that dust eventually comes of the system instead of having some sort of magical destroyer of dust go through the blockchain, which is impossible.
So MRL 4 is something that people can read in their own time, but basically the long and the short of it is that we're going to be moving quite soon to a minimum mixin of 2, and we are going to programmatically lock in that within the next 3 to 5 years that minimum mixing is going to move to 4."
Source:
https://getmonero.org/2015/02/23/monero-missive-for-the-week-of-2015-02-23.html
Google translation to French:
Vous êtes sur place ... il ya deux aspects différents à la vie privée dans Monero et ce est la intraçabilité et de la non-traçabilité des transactions. Maintenant, quand nous disons intraçabilité nous parlons de la furtivité double clé d'adressage qui traite de cette composante; mais untraceability est tout autre chose. Ainsi, la non-traçabilité est traitée par signatures d'anneau. Comme une LMR a souligné il ya un compromis potentiel, et un compromis en cascade, de la nature des transactions ununtraceable CryptoNote.
Juste pour trier-de l'expliquer tout simplement: si je crée un groupe de transactions, et dans chaque transaction je ai ma signature avec votre signature ... si par hasard il me arrive de mélanger avec votre signature, et ce est la même dénomination je mets à chaque fois. Et puis, dans le temps de 6 mois, vous aller passer cette sortie à un mixin 0. Soudain ce que vous êtes effectivement faire est vous invalider tous les temps que la production a été utilisé précédemment. Ce qui signifie que toutes les transactions où vous et moi, où je ai utilisé votre signature comme une signature de anneau sur elle, est tout à coup comme ... eh bien, ceux qui cherchent peut aller "hey, cette signature de bague fait partie d'une sortie qui a été dépensé, et ainsi donc l'autre doit être la bonne ". Alors que la révélation devient dangereux surtout quand la possession d'un certain nombre de sorties, et sachant que vous contrôlez ces sorties conduit à une cascade ou d'une boule de neige.
Donc, ce que nous essayons vraiment de se éloigner de son lieu d'avoir des sorties «non dépensés» que nous mélanger avec, juste ayant des sorties que nous mélangé avec et ils devraient toujours être dépensés; il devrait être impossible de dire si une sortie a été dépensé sur le blockchain ou non.
Maintenant, la raison pour laquelle nous pourrions avoir besoin 0 opérations de mixage, ou mixins 0 transactions, parce que traditionnellement Monero il ya de la poussière. Et la poussière, lorsque vous l'utilisez comme une entrée, ne aura jamais rien, ou très probablement, ne pas avoir tout ce qu'il peut mélanger avec. Donc, il a présenté un problème intéressant pour nous et pour le reste des membres du Laboratoire de recherche Monero. Parce que non seulement nous ne avons eu à concevoir un système qui vient refusé mixins 0 opérations, mais nous avons aussi besoin de trouver un moyen pour obtenir la poussière du système, à peut-être le faire d'une manière qui la poussière vient finalement du système au lieu d'avoir une sorte de destroyer magique de la poussière passer par le blockchain, ce qui est impossible.
Donc LMR 4 est quelque chose que les gens peuvent lire dans leur propre temps, mais, fondamentalement, le long et le court, ce est que nous allons déplacer assez rapidement à un minimum de deux mixin, et nous allons verrouiller programme dans ce dans les trois à cinq prochaines années que le mélange minimum va passer à 4
See that which you say is the fallacy.
IT DOES MATTER FOR FUTURE MIXING.
I will try to summon a XMR Dev here to explain.
I am afraid that if your pool does not switch to a mixin of 3 or more with payouts, I will be forced to move to a different pool. I do not say that as a threat, but rather a notice, as I have believed in and used your pool for many months and I wish to stay with it.
But, proper mixin is important to the foundational tenets of Monero, and for pool ops to ignore this is to do XMR a disservice.
IT DOES MATTER FOR FUTURE MIXING.
I will try to summon a XMR Dev here to explain.
I am afraid that if your pool does not switch to a mixin of 3 or more with payouts, I will be forced to move to a different pool. I do not say that as a threat, but rather a notice, as I have believed in and used your pool for many months and I wish to stay with it.
But, proper mixin is important to the foundational tenets of Monero, and for pool ops to ignore this is to do XMR a disservice.
Hello is kminer safe to use? my miner has very limit memory and CLaymore crashes a lot. kminer seems work but I fear for safety? thank you.
Can you guys please change the payout mixin to 3?
Mixin 0 hurts the foundational privacy aspects of Monero. Even if we don't care about privacy of payouts right now, it could matter when the coins are spent in the future.
Being a leading XMR pool, you guys can set the example here by making the mixin 3 or more.
Thanks! Merci!
Mixin 0 hurts the foundational privacy aspects of Monero. Even if we don't care about privacy of payouts right now, it could matter when the coins are spent in the future.
Being a leading XMR pool, you guys can set the example here by making the mixin 3 or more.
Thanks! Merci!
Mixing for payout from pool is useless.
The mixing is for stealh emitor of transaction.
You know all block find with my pool.
->
You kow all TX spend or not spend for my pool
Where is interest make mixing 3 , 20 , 50,100 ?
If you can find block with TX speend and find my pool as forged block?
I print all transaction send per my pool
For mixing is not useless . I have need 2 prerequire .
1.) I stealh block find
2.) I slealh Payout
You can make payout to youself with mixing you want before .
Is good pratice for spend coin generated per open pool .
You are ready for mine on blackbox pool?
The mixing is for stealh emitor of transaction.
You know all block find with my pool.
->
You kow all TX spend or not spend for my pool
Where is interest make mixing 3 , 20 , 50,100 ?
If you can find block with TX speend and find my pool as forged block?
I print all transaction send per my pool
For mixing is not useless . I have need 2 prerequire .
1.) I stealh block find
2.) I slealh Payout
You can make payout to youself with mixing you want before .
Is good pratice for spend coin generated per open pool .
You are ready for mine on blackbox pool?
To put it in a nutshell, mixing from pool is no use because we know for sure that all transactions are coming from the pool.
Mixing is useful once the XMR are on your personal wallet.
Mixing for payout from pool is useless.
The mixing is for stealh emitor of transaction.
You know all block find with my pool.
->
You kow all TX spend or not spend for my pool
Where is interest make mixing 3 , 20 , 50,100 ?
If you can find block with TX speend and find my pool as forged block?
I print all transaction send per my pool
For mixing is not useless . I have need 2 prerequire .
1.) I stealh block find
2.) I slealh Payout
You can make payout to youself with mixing you want before .
Is good pratice for spend coin generated per open pool .
You are ready for mine on blackbox pool?
The mixing is for stealh emitor of transaction.
You know all block find with my pool.
->
You kow all TX spend or not spend for my pool
Where is interest make mixing 3 , 20 , 50,100 ?
If you can find block with TX speend and find my pool as forged block?
I print all transaction send per my pool
For mixing is not useless . I have need 2 prerequire .
1.) I stealh block find
2.) I slealh Payout
You can make payout to youself with mixing you want before .
Is good pratice for spend coin generated per open pool .
You are ready for mine on blackbox pool?
Can you guys please change the payout mixin to 3?
Mixin 0 hurts the foundational privacy aspects of Monero. Even if we don't care about privacy of payouts right now, it could matter when the coins are spent in the future.
Being a leading XMR pool, you guys can set the example here by making the mixin 3 or more.
Thanks! Merci!
Mixin 0 hurts the foundational privacy aspects of Monero. Even if we don't care about privacy of payouts right now, it could matter when the coins are spent in the future.
Being a leading XMR pool, you guys can set the example here by making the mixin 3 or more.
Thanks! Merci!
Hi,
A new exploit has been patched today. Only few minutes after it has been found.
We have a stable efficiency the last 4 days which is good.
Happy mining.
1 HD7950 470 H/ks is perfect for port 6666.
With 4 r9-270's , you get many more and port 9999 is not to strong .
You can submit share in average on lower 2 minutes .
With 4 r9-270's , you get many more and port 9999 is not to strong .
You can submit share in average on lower 2 minutes .
Thank you.
1 HD7950 470 H/ks is perfect for port 6666.
With 4 r9-270's , you get many more and port 9999 is not to strong .
You can submit share in average on lower 2 minutes .
With 4 r9-270's , you get many more and port 9999 is not to strong .
You can submit share in average on lower 2 minutes .
Port 9999.
I think add new port with super varfiff.
In two week if you miner is compatible .
Never disconnect and timeout .
After at done, i can activate vardiff or other features.
I know your need change on front and monitoring and other users features.
I have worked on priority for stabilité and performance pool.
I think add new port with super varfiff.
In two week if you miner is compatible .
Never disconnect and timeout .
After at done, i can activate vardiff or other features.
I know your need change on front and monitoring and other users features.
I have worked on priority for stabilité and performance pool.
9999 is vardiff?
9999 for 1 HD7950 470 H/ks currently on 6666?
9999 for 4 r9-270's ?
Just to be clear they are different machines.
Port 9999.
I think add new port with super varfiff.
In two week if you miner is compatible .
Never disconnect and timeout .
After at done, i can activate vardiff or other features.
I know your need change on front and monitoring and other users features.
I have worked on priority for stabilité and performance pool.
I think add new port with super varfiff.
In two week if you miner is compatible .
Never disconnect and timeout .
After at done, i can activate vardiff or other features.
I know your need change on front and monitoring and other users features.
I have worked on priority for stabilité and performance pool.
What port for 4 270's
and also for 1 HD7950?
and also for 1 HD7950?
OK, thanks.
Then, you should probably edit the OP and your signatures to reflect xmr.crypto-pool.fr
Keep up the good work.
Google Translated: Continuez votre bon travail.
Then, you should probably edit the OP and your signatures to reflect xmr.crypto-pool.fr
Keep up the good work.
Google Translated: Continuez votre bon travail.
Thanks,
xmr.crypto-pool.fr is only for mining ( in theories )
monero.crypto-pool.fr is only for Website
You can mine monero.crypto-pool.fr at work for all port ( exept port 80 ).
Is bad for me and for you .
Monero.crypto-pool.fr is only one IP.
I can not demuxing trafic ( one ip == one serveur )
And protection Arbor for IP used on monero.crypto-pool.fr is bad for trafic stratum.
If DDOS on pool with monero.crypto-pool.fr you are not 100% protection DDOS
I can not disclosure all protection .
Je comprends.
OK, thanks.
Then, you should probably edit the OP and your signatures to reflect xmr.crypto-pool.fr
Keep up the good work.
Google Translated: Continuez votre bon travail.
Then, you should probably edit the OP and your signatures to reflect xmr.crypto-pool.fr
Keep up the good work.
Google Translated: Continuez votre bon travail.
Thanks,
xmr.crypto-pool.fr is only for mining ( in theories )
monero.crypto-pool.fr is only for Website
You can mine monero.crypto-pool.fr at work for all port ( exept port 80 ).
Is bad for me and for you .
Monero.crypto-pool.fr is only one IP.
I can not demuxing trafic ( one ip == one serveur )
And protection Arbor for IP used on monero.crypto-pool.fr is bad for trafic stratum.
If DDOS on pool with monero.crypto-pool.fr you are not 100% protection DDOS
I can not disclosure all protection .
Does it matter if our miners are pointed to:
monero.crypto-pool.fr
OR
xmr.crypto-pool.fr
?
Probably doesn't matter, but I have to ask.
monero.crypto-pool.fr
OR
xmr.crypto-pool.fr
?
Probably doesn't matter, but I have to ask.
No you are right to ask, please use xmr.crypto-pool.fr
OK, thanks.
Then, you should probably edit the OP and your signatures to reflect xmr.crypto-pool.fr
Keep up the good work.
Google Translated: Continuez votre bon travail.
Jump to: